Post on 21-Jan-2016
description
transcript
Competition Policy, Growth and Poverty Reduction
CUTS’ 7Up4 Launch ConferenceCompetition Regimes in West Africa
19th June 2008, Accra
Roger Nellist and Tom AllanGrowth and Investment GroupDepartment for International Development, London
r-nellist@dfid.gov.uk
t-allan@dfid.gov.uk
Page 2
Themes
• Reflections and Overview of linkages• Competition links with Growth (inc
Investment Climate)• Competition links with Poverty Reduction• Competition abuses in Africa and
elsewhere• Challenges• Competition Assessment Framework• Conclusions
Page 3
Reflections on Competition
• Competition is the process of rivalry between firms striving to gain sales and make profits
• Major concept, but cannot be measured directly
• Competition is a process and not an ‘equilibrium event’; it is not automatic; markets can fail (forces at work against); needs to be promoted, nurtured and protected
• Competition, vs. fair competition
• Culture of competition
Page 4
Overview of Linkages
CP -> Competition -> PSD -> Growth -> Poverty reduction
and/or
CP (via business behavioural changes) -> Poverty reduction (consumer welfare)
[Efficiency and Equity]
Page 5
Competitive Markets Essential for Growth – Basic Premises
• Fair and effective competition - and competition policy - is fundamental to the functioning of a modern market economy
• Efficient, fair markets essential to catalyse private sector development and growth
• Competition drives innovation and productivity improvements; these drive economic growth
Page 6
Commission on Growth Development
• Growth Report, launched May 2008: High level Commission chaired by Professor Michael Spence, a Nobel Laureate in Economics
• ‘Dynamic productivity gains from entry and exit can overwhelm the static efficiency gains from scale’
• ‘Structural change under competitive pressure is what propels productivity growth’
• Policy recommendation: ‘Governments need to increase competition and flexibility in product and labour markets’
Page 7
Some Economics: Production Function and Growth
• Cobb-Douglas:
• Endogenous growth theory: long run economic growth depends on rate of technical change
• Production Possibility Frontier moves out with enhancements in innovation and productivity
LAKY
Page 8
Production Possibility Frontier
Output increases with innovation and productivity enhancements, for any given
level of K, L inputs
PPF¹
PPF²
K
L
Page 9
More Competitive Pressure, More Innovation - Evidence• Firm-level surveys confirm the importance of competitive
pressure for incentives to innovative and increase productivity
Source: WDR, 2005
Page 10
Competition – what it means in practice
• Fair, effective competition creates level playing field for domestic SMEs (livelihoods, firms and jobs, globalisation)
• Free entry and exit - innovation, technology, productivity
• Intermediate inputs• Links with international competitiveness• More effective competition also limits
corruption
Page 11
Private Investment Has Grown Faster in Countries with Better Investment Climates
Source: WDR, 2005
Average 1984-2000 based on International Country Risk Guide’s index of “Investment Profile”
Page 12
Links with Poverty Reduction
• Direct benefits - fair competition enhances consumer welfare (prices, choice, standards?); essential private goods and services consumed by poor.
• Competition introduced in sanitation services in Tanzania – lower charges and increased access
• Competition introduced in generic drugs in South Africa – prices for antiretroviral drugs fell by up to 88% since 2003 and access increased from 20,000 to 155,000
Page 13
Links with Poverty Reduction
• Indirect benefits through: - general growth enhancements; - access to sustainable livelihoods in formal sector (shared growth, MMW4P);
• Publicly provided infrastructure and services (Govt procurement arrangements, and bid rigging)
• Study of IDA countries: the world’s poorest countries tend to have low levels of competition in domestic markets and a high degree of market dominance (FIAS, 2007)
Page 14
Competition abuses hurt consumers
“People of the same trade seldom meet together, even for merriment or diversion, but the conversation ends in a conspiracy against the public, or in some contrivance to raise prices”
Adam Smith, The Wealth of Nations, 1776
“The ‘really big’ distortions to competition are in poor countries”
W. Lewis (2004) The Power of Productivity
Page 15
Competition Abuses in Africa
• A study of media reports in sub-Saharan Africa identified allegations of 617 anti-competitive practices between 1995 and 2004, in 41 business sectors and in 34 countries.
• Harm to consumers and businesses
• The food and beverage sector received the most allegations (148) – high prices in this sector have a direct impact on the welfare of the poor, who spend a higher proportion of their income on necessities like food.
[Evenett, Jenny, and Meir, 2006]
Page 16
Competition Abuses in Africa – other examples
• Commission for Africa Report 2005 - Role of competition policy in investment climate - Examples of low competition’s impact: transport costs
• Distortions include: (1) Private sector misconduct e.g. insurance, alcoholic
beverages in Kenya, transport cartels (2) Privatization can create private monopolies e.g. Uganda (3) ‘Subsidies’ for SOEs e.g. Telecoms in Zambia (4) Alleged vested interests e.g. competition law in Egypt
Page 17
Legislative Barriers often a Major Impediment to Competition:
Many kinds, but entry barriers particularly serious
Starting a Business Africa E.Asia S.Asia
Number ofProcedures 11 8 8
Time in days 64 53 35
Cost (% Nat. Inc.) 215 43 40
Minimum Capital(% Nat. Inc.) 297 110 1
* Adapted from Broadman (2007), figures rounded
Page 18
Competition policy is important everywhere
• ‘Strong competition policy is not just a luxury to be enjoyed by rich countries, but a real necessity for those striving to create democratic market economies’, Joseph Stiglitz, Nobel Prize Winner
Page 19
Challenges for developing competition policy
• Difficulties in assessing the evidence: relationships, data, and measurement
• Lack of community awareness of the effects of limited competition
• Small/vulnerable DC markets• Capacity constraints
Page 20
Challenges of implementation
• Lack of coordination between competition authorities and other government agencies
• Potential conflict with other policy objectives• Persistence of natural monopolies and tension
with sector-specific regulators• Resistance from vested interests• Lower priority and lack of political will
Page 21
DFID’s Competition Assessment Framework (2008)
• Flexible diagnostic tool for policy makers
• Holistic approach, reflecting multiple causes of limited competition
• Sequential set of questions
• Annexes highlighting key competition issues in particular sectors
Page 22
The CAF approach: a brief summary
• Poses sets of questions grouped by theme• Select sectors important to economy or consumers,
where some indication of possible problems (e.g. high concentration, high entry barriers)
• Identify relevant markets and market structures• Do Government policies hinder competition? (all
levels of government, regulated sectors, trade and industrial policy, unequal enforcement of laws)
• Identify vested interests • Look for signs of anti-competitive conduct by firms
Page 23
CAF: Draw Conclusions
Is competition in relevant markets weak?• If so, what are the effects?• Who profits?• Who loses?• What corrective action is possible?
(Depends on local laws and institutions.)• What are the likely effects of corrective
action on the economy? (e.g. on investment, productivity,
employment, exports?)
Page 24
Uses of the CAF
• Developed as side product of continuing DFID-WBG (FIAS) competition programme in India with CCI
• Africa Regional Workshops – Tanzania (Jan08), Botswana (Feb 08)
• India, Bangladesh (March 08)• Vietnam, ++ (2008)• ODI Competition Research Programme into
state of competition in Africa and Asia (2008 – 2009)
• Growth analytics and MMW4P
Page 25
Competition Assessment Framework (2008)
• Downloadable at:http://www.dfid.gov.uk/pubs/files/caf-2008.pdf
Roger Nellist, HeadTom Allan, EconomistGrowth and Investment GroupDepartment for International DevelopmentLondon
r-nellist@dfid.gov.ukt-allan@dfid.gov.uk
Page 26
Conclusions
• Fair competition matters for: - stimulating growth (innovation and productivity) - entrepreneurs (SMEs) to enter/expand market - wealth creation, poverty reduction
• It matters in Africa!!
• Successful CP needs: - pro-market commitment from top - bottom-up advocacy, and culture of competition - appropriate policies, laws, institutions - technical capability, financial resources - operational independence
• Beware of vested interests, that block reforms
• Assess and address the real impediments to competition