Post on 16-Jan-2016
description
transcript
Relationship Between Cloud Droplet Effective Radius and Cloud Top Height for
Deep Convective Clouds in CloudSat Data Product
Satoshi Suzuki, Shinta Seto, and Taikan OkiInstitute of Industrial Science, the University
of Tokyo
Background: Aerosol Convection Invigoration Effect Hypothesis
Rosenfeld et al. (2008)
2
Background: Aerosol Convection Invigoration Effect Hypothesis
Aerosol concentration
Cloud droplet radius
Cloud top height
Ex) Nakajima et al. (2001)
Purpose: Examine Cloud droplet radius - Cloud top height relationship
Ex) Koren et al. (2010)
Data: CloudSat 2B-CWC-RVOD (Dec. 2006-Feb. 2007)
Cloud Top Height >5000m
Cloud Base<1500m
50km (Independent data)
Cloud top height: highest bin with value
Cloud droplet effective radius (liquid only)
Cloud droplet effective radius↓
Convection↑ Cloud top height↑ 4
Conditions of the clouds to be analyzed
Geographical Distribution of Clouds Matching the Condition
5Cloud top height [m]
Average profile for each cloud top height
6
Average profile for each cloud top height
7
Cloud droplet effective radius - Cloud top height relationship
Cloud droplet effective radius↓
Cloud top height↑ 8
Radar Reflectivity Factor and Cloud Top Height
Radar reflectivity is lower for lower clouds => correct attenuation calculation is needed for the negative relationship to appear 9
Droplet Radius – Cloud Top Height Relationship for clouds without precipitation flag (dBZe<-15)
10Significant negative correlation still appears
Variation of the relationship by surface temperature
Rosenfeld et al. (2008) suggested freezing causes clouds to become invigorated.
Freezing Level
Invigoration No Invigoration Low Invigoration
High Temperature Low Temperature
Variation of the relationship by surface temperature
Cloud top >5000m ⇓>1600mCloud base < 1500m ⇓<1000m
50km (Independent data)
Cloud top height
Cloud droplet effective radius
To see the effect of freezing, lower clouds are also included in the analysis.
12
Freezing Level
Lower clouds do not show negative correlation
13
Cloud droplet effective radius - Cloud top height relationship
Surface temperature 30 – 40 deg C
No negative correlation
14
Surface Temperature 10 – 20 deg C
15
Negative correlation appears in clouds with lower cloud top heights
Freezing Level
Surface Temperature 0 – 10 deg C
By moist adiabatic lapse rate, in most cases, altitude of 2000m should be below 0 deg C
A mechanism other than freezing? 16
Freezing Level
Another Hypothesis by Lee et al. (2010)
Higher aerosol concentration
Smaller Cloud droplet effective radius (Larger surface area)
Larger Evaporation rate
Stronger downdraft, gust front
Stronger Convection17
In clouds with cloud top heights lower than 3000 m, gust fronts do not form?
Conclusions• By analyzing CloudSat 2B-CWC-RVOD product,
negative correlation is found between cloud droplet effective radius and cloud top height for deep clouds
• The negative correlation supports the hypothesis that aerosols are invigorating deep clouds
• Negative correlation do not appear for clouds with low cloud top heights
• When surface temperature is high, the threshold altitudes for negative correlation becomes higher
• Attenuation calculation has a large role in determining the sign of the relationship
• Analysis of clouds with low reflectivity only also shows the relationship is significantly negative
19
Thank you for your kind attention!
The authors would like to acknowledge the CloudSat Data Processing Center at CIRA/Colorado State University for providing data products, Environment Research and Technology Development Fund (S-8) of the Ministry of the Environment, Japan, KAKENHI(22760365), JSPS, Japan, and IGARSS 2011 for their support to this work and presentation.