Post on 31-Dec-2015
description
transcript
This was created over the last 5 years through important legislation
2009: SB678 AB1 Pass
2010: AB1 Seed
Money
2011: SB678 Funds
2011: AB109 and
AB118 Realignment
Prison population change over time
19911993
19951997
19992001
20032005
20072009
2011 -
20,000
40,000
60,000
80,000
100,000
120,000
140,000
160,000
180,000
# of
Peo
ple
in S
tate
Pri
son
Decline in Probation Revocations to State Prison
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
# of
Pri
son
Revo
catio
ns
23% Decline
$220 million over the first 2 years was reinvested in strategies proven to lower recidivism
• Risk/Need Tools• Smaller Caseloads• Targeted intervention for High Risk Offenders
These tools and funding allowed Probation to deal with the new Realignment population successfully
In 2012, money may not be available if SB678 is reduced
2010 2011 20120
20,000,000
40,000,000
60,000,000
80,000,000
100,000,000
120,000,000
140,000,000
160,000,000
$34,792,000
$88,929,225
$136,889,280
$102,494,700
SB678 Funding Scenarios Based on Marginal Funding Rates
Enacted Marginal Funding Level ($9,000) Orginal Marginal Funding Level ($29,000)
Amou
nt F
unde
d by
SB6
78
Jan Budget
Adult probation supervises 350,000 convicted felons
310,000
35,0005,500
Felony Probation PRCSMandatory Supervision
There are 40,000 offenders being supervised under realignment
Oct-11
Nov-11
Dec-11
Jan-12
Feb-12
Mar-12
Apr-12
May-12
Jun-12Jul-1
2
Aug-12
Sep-12
Oct-12
Nov-12
Dec-12
05,000
10,00015,00020,00025,00030,00035,00040,00045,000
Active Realigned Supervision Population
Active PRCS Active Mandatory Supervision
Underuse of split sentences mean 75% of Local Prison terms will leave incarceration
with no re-entry plan
Oct-11 Nov-11Dec-11 Jan-12 Feb-12Mar-12 Apr-12May-12Jun-12 Jul-12 Aug-12 Sep-120
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
Local Prison Offenders Sentenced
Split Sentence Jail Only
Diversity in sentencing practices has result in varying levels of policy implementation
Darker Green Counties have higher levels of split sentencing
Actual Local prison terms were above original estimates by 20%
Oct-11 Nov-11Dec-11 Jan-12 Feb-12Mar-12Apr-12May-12Jun-12 Jul-12 Aug-12 Sep-120%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
140%
160%
Early Outcome Measurement
Warrants and Failures to Appear– 7% of PRCS failed to Appear– 8% are on active warrants
Recidivism Definition:– At the closure of the supervision term, was there a
new felony conviction while under supervision• Too early to tell in terms of recidivism
Supervision and Collaboration
Chief Linda Penner, FresnoChief Michelle Scray Brown, San Bernardino
Chief Robert Ochs, Sonoma
Fresno County
• Felony Probation: • 8,711
• Active PRCS: • 1,304
• Local Prison Terms:• 902
• Split Sentence %: • 33%
San Bernardino County
• Felony Probation: – 19,540
• Active PRCS: – 3,380
• Local Prison Terms:– 3,471
• Split Sentence %: – 18%
Sonoma County
• Felony Probation: – 2,270
• Active PRCS: – 229
• Local Prison Terms:– 186
• Split Sentence %: – 56%
Evidence Based Practices and Treatment
Chief Steve Bordin, ButteChief Michael Daly, Marin
Chief Mack Jenkins, San Diego
Butte County
• Felony Probation: – 1,442
• Active PRCS: – 277
• Local Prison Terms:– 310
• Split Sentence %: – 7%
Marin County
• Felony Probation: – 1,304
• Active PRCS: – 43
• Local Prison Terms:– 25
• Split Sentence %: – 52%
San Diego County
• Felony Probation: – 16,531
• Active PRCS: – 2,082
• Local Prison Terms:– 1,399
• Split Sentence %: – 24%
Stanislaus County
• Felony Probation: – 5,826
• Active PRCS: – 620
• Local Prison Terms:– 506
• Split Sentence %: – 86%
Contra Costa County
• Felony Probation: – 3,451
• Active PRCS: – 239
• Local Prison Terms:– 199
• Split Sentence %: – 86%