Post on 22-Mar-2020
transcript
Seizing the smart grid opportunity: An industry wide view on how to overcome the
barriers to smart grid development
Tuesday 16 April 2013
Welcome and Opening Remarks
Julian David, Director General,
Intellect
Setting the scene: Smart Grid today and Smart Grid tomorrow
David Smith, Chief Executive,
Energy Networks Association (Chair)
Hannah Nixon, Senior Partner – Distribution, Ofgem
Valerié Lorgé, Programme Manager,
EU Commission – Smart Grid Task Force
Smart Grid development in Britain
Hannah Nixon, Senior Partner
Ofgem
6
The industry is facing unprecedented change
De-carbonisation
Security of Supply
Ageing Assets
Affordability
ELECTRICITY NETWORKS
GAS
NETWORKS
• Renewables / new generation
• Smart Grids
• Electricity storage
• Electric vehicles
• Different network patterns
• Electrification of heat
• Energy efficiency
• Local generation
• Demand Side Management
• Carbon Capture and Storage
• Biomethane
• HVDC
• Skills shortages
7
RIIO-ED1 key challenge
standard asset life
2020 targets
ED1 ED2
Driving factors •Feed-in tariffs •RHI •Other incentive mechanisms •Local planning rules •Technological developments & reductions in cost
Facilitating factors
• Investment to expand and reinforce the distribution network
•Greater use of smart grid technology & DSR to maximise network flexibility at minimum cost
uncertainty around the characteristics, rate and
location of take-up of these technologies
Issues to consider for ED1
• DNO approach to developing business plans – scenarios and investment justification
•Outputs DNOs are required to deliver – longer term?
•Barriers to DNOs adopting commercial arrangements to manage demand and generation output
•Incentives and uncertainty mechanisms
Ensure low carbon technologies can connect in appropriate time at appropriate cost
8
9
10
Development of Smart Grids encouraged through:
= + +
Core price control
incentives
Giving third parties a greater
role in delivery
Innovation
stimulus package
Taking Smart Grids forward: RIIO framework
Revenue Incentives Innovation Outputs
• RIIO - A new way of setting revenue earnings for network companies paid for by charges levied on network users over 8 year period
• Networks will need to be smarter, integrate intermittent sources and encourage customers to manage their demand
• The shape of the low carbon future is unclear and companies will need to innovate and consider smart grid solutions
11
High level framework - Outputs & Incentives
• The efficiency incentive (sharing factor) will make DNOs consider the most efficient response
• DNOs incentivised to use Smart Grids where it can maintain reliability or connect new
customers more quickly and at lower cost • LCNF today (NIA/NIC in the future) will allow development of new Smart Grid
solutions
12
Timing
RIIO-ED1
Key Parameters:
• CoE: 6.0–7.2%
• CoD: Indexed
• Gearing: will be based on assessment of cash flow volatility, business plans, CoE, and RoRE
• Asset lives: 20 to 45 years, transition as required
• RoRE: upside to provide potential for double-digit returns on notional equity; downside at or below CoD
Key Issues:
• Timely & cost-effective connection of new low-carbon technologies
• New types of generation
• New and unusual demand
• Uncertainty of take up of new technologies (e.g. local generation, heat pumps, electric vehicles)
• Consider tools like smart grids
13
Currently over £165m of customers’ money invested in LCN Fund trials exploring Smart Grid solutions
Companies must engage with partners, collaborators and service providers
Learning being produced and feeding into RIIO-ED1:
• Knowledge dissemination • Annual LCN Fund Conference • Smart Grids ENA Portal • Closedown reports • IPR arrangements
Expect DNOs to utilise learning in ED1 business plans. Smart Grids likely to be useful to DNOs in 2 ways:
1. Act as lower cost alternative to accommodate new load or generation 2. Can delay the need to take investment decision until there is greater
certainty
Smart Grids and the Low Carbon Networks Fund
14
Smart Grid Forum
• Established by DECC & Ofgem in May 2011
• Brings together DNOs, NG, suppliers, technology providers, consumer groups, academics, Government and Regulator
• 2nd year work programme consisted of 5 work streams
Work stream Details
WS1 Developed DECC low carbon scenarios
WS2 - closed High level Smart Grids evaluation framework
WS3 DNOs model building on evaluation framework
WS4 Identifying closing doors
WS5 Ways of working – learning dissemination
WS6 Regulatory & commercial issues
Year 3 work programme and potential new work steams to be considered by the forum at its next meeting on 25 April
15
Incentives on customers to actively engage
Costs of accommodating additional load and generation at existing domestic premises continue to be socialised until sufficient smart metering data is available
Recognise that this may reduce incentive for engaging with DNOs as means of reducing costs
Number of separate issues being progressed
1. Achieving upfront notification of where new low carbon technologies are connecting
2. Ensure that there is an incentive on customers to engage with Smart Grids and to manage electricity usage
There are a number of options to address (2) including DUOS charges, load limiters, automated response, other market solutions
16
Work stream 6 – further programme
Develop a number of options for the development of and consumer engagement with Smart Grids Stage 1
A B C D
Roles and relationships for relevant parties under different options & trigger points for these roles
Stage 2
Commercial /regulatory arrangements for each option to effectively discharge roles & identify barriers to and enablers for these arrangements
Stage 3
Output
Defined roles and relationships with supporting commercial/regulatory arrangements across a range of options & trigger points
17
Energy
Energy
EU Support and
Actions towards
Smart Grid
Development
Seizing the Smart Grid opportunity:
Industry view on how to overcome
barriers to development
Valérie Lorgé
European Commission, DG ENER
London, 16 April 2013
Energy
Significant change of energy systems
Decarbonisation objectives
Single Market by 2014
Technological progress
Energy Roadmap 2050: + 35-40% electricity
Energy
20
Smart Grids: a complex but effective solution !
Energy
21
6 Ways Smart Meters Benefit Consumers
1. Energy Savings more accurate and frequent consumption data demonstrably
help consumers reduce their consumption and save money
2. Energy Efficiency more detailed consumption measurements help consumers
identify opportunities for energy efficiency improvements
3. Innovative
Services
smart meters are indispensable for smart home
solutions/home automation, reducing energy costs
4. Empowerment switching suppliers, modifying contractual terms, etc.
becomes easier, faster and cheaper
5. Sustainability use of local renewable sources and storage potential (micro-
grids), electromobility become easier
6. Distribution
System Efficiency
management of the distribution systems becomes cheaper
and more effective, leading to lower distribution costs
Energy
Smart Grids: multi-piece puzzles for many players
22
System Complexity?
Investment
Needs?
Industry
Incentives?
Consumer
Involvement?
Energy
We tackle key Smart Grid challenges
23
System
Complexity
•Standardization
•Seeking & promoting Energy/ICT/Telecom synergies
Industry
Incentives
• Priority to Smart Grids within regulatory framework, including in
Connecting Europe Facility
Consumer
involvement
• Consumer oriented retail market models promoted
• Smart meters: functionalities to benefit consumers
• Data Protection and Security
• Retail price regulation to be assessed by full impact on demand
response, energy efficiency, consumer benefit, sector impact
Energy
Driving forces for Smart Grids
Third Energy Package
Energy Efficiency Directive
Communication on Smart Grids
Regulation on guidelines for trans-European
energy infrastructure
Standardisation Mandates
M/441 Smart Meters M/468 Electric Vehicles M/490 Smart Grids
Recommendation on preparations for the roll out:
- Cost Benefit Analyses
- Common minimum functionalities
- Data protection, privacy, security
Energy
25
Cost Benefit Analysis and planning of roll-out
Energy
Roll-out plans for smart electricity metering systems
Sweden 2003 2009 Completed
Italy 2001 2011 Completed (ENEL: 2001-2006)
Finland Mandated 2009 2013
Malta Mandated 2009 2013
Spain Mandated 2011 2018
Austria Mandated 2012 2019
Poland Under Discussion 2012 2020
Estonia Mandated 2013 2017
Romania Under Discussion 2013 2020
Greece Mandated 2014 2020
UK Mandated 2014 2020
France Mandated (timetable TBC) 2014 2020
Netherlands Mandated (timetable TBC) 2014 2020
Denmark Mandated (1.5mn SM already installed) ? 2020
Luxembourg Mandated 2015 2018
Ireland Mandated 2016 2019
Electricity Smart Meters Roll-Out Timelines in MS (at least 80% coverage)
Energy
Smart Grids Task Force
European Commission
Technology
Supply
Consumers DSOs TSOs Regulators
•Ad-hoc expert working groups
Florence
Forum London
Forum
High Level Steering Committee
Energy
Smart Grids Task Force 2012-2013 http://ec.europa.eu/energy/gas_electricity/smartgrids/taskforce_en.htm
EG1: Standards Validation of M/490 work programme
1st and 2nd set of standards
Interoperability and Conformance testing map
Coordination with other mandates
EG2: Data Protection and Security
DPIA template
Cyber security assessment framework
Consultation minimum security requirements
EG3: Regulation Identification of data handling options
Implications for regulatory framework
EG4: Infrastructure PCI identification process
Organisation of structures and procedures
EG5: Industrial Policy Identification of conditions for investment and
speeding up technology deployment
Energy
Calls for a collaborative approach of policy-makers, industry and
regulators for consumers' benefit.
Opens doors to win-win situation:
Security of supply through better local balancing
Involvement of consumers in the market (micro-generation, etc.)
Empowerment of consumers through demand response => savings
Cost-efficiencies for DSOs & suppliers, new business opportunities for 3rd parties
Success depends on criteria decided largely by Member States:
Smart Meters functionalities (include those also benefiting consumers)
Retail market competition to breed innovative solutions and lower costs
Commission presently assessing CBAs prepared by MS
Assessment and benchmarking under way > Benchmarking report planned for 2013
Successful roll-out of smart metering is key
Energy
Thank you for your attention!
valerie.lorge@ec.europa.eu 30
Setting the scene: Smart Grid today and Smart Grid tomorrow
David Smith, Chief Executive,
Energy Networks Association (Chair)
Hannah Nixon, Senior Partner – Distribution, Ofgem
Valerié Lorgé, Programme Manager,
EU Commission – Smart Grid Task Force
Coffee and Networking Break
Setting standards for the future
Dr Howard Porter, Chief Executive, BEAMA (Chair)
David Johnson, Steering Group Member,
CEN/CENELEC and ETSI – Smart Grid Coordination
David Spillett, Engineering Policy & Standards
Manager, Energy Networks Association
Richard Schomberg, VP Smart Energy Standards,
EDF Group and Chairman of IEC’s Strategic Group
on Smart Grid
Smart Grid Coordination Group
European Standards for the Smart Grid
Where are we today?
Smart Grid Coordination Group
David JOHNSON
CEN-CENELEC-ETSI Smart Grid Coordination Group
2013-04-16© CEN-CENELEC-ETSI
Smart Grid Coordination Group
Mandate M/490
Mandate parallels M/441 (smart metering)
Mandate calls for:
- Reference architecture A technical reference architecture, which will represent the functional information data flows between the main domains and integrate
many systems and subsystems architectures.
- Sustainable processes Sustainable standardisation processes and collaborative tools to enable stakeholder interactions, to improve the two above and adapt them to new requirements based on gap analysis, while ensuring the fit to high level system constraints such as interoperability, security, and privacy, etc.
- Set of consistent standards A set of consistent standards, which will support the information exchange (communication protocols and data models) and the integration of all users into the electric system operation.
David JOHNSON , 2013-04-16 - © CEN-CENELEC-ETSI 36
Smart Grid Coordination Group
SG-CG – Who are we?
David JOHNSON , 2013-04-16- © CEN-CENELEC-ETSI 37
SMART GRID Coordination Group
(established June 2011)
JTC 1 SC 27
CO
JTC 1 SC 27
CO
TC ITS TC ERM
TC M2M TC BRAN
TC TISPAN Board
TC SCP
TC PLT
TC 287
TC 57 SM - CG
SM - CG TC ATTM
TC 8X
TC 247
TC 13 TC 205
TC ITS TC ERM
TC M2M TC BRAN
TC TISPAN Board
TC SCP
TC PLT
TC 287
TC 57 SM - CG
SM - CG TC ATTM
TC 8X
TC 247
TC 13 TC 205
Smart Grid Coordination Group
Organisation during 2011-12
David JOHNSON , 2013-04-16- © CEN-CENELEC-ETSI 38
Mandate Scope
Smart Grid
Coordination
Group(former JWG)
EC
Reference
Group
Process
Team
Security
Team
First Set of
Standards
Team
Architecture
Team
Steering
Committee
Further
Tasks
• Report 2.0
• Liaisons
• Promotion
New joint WGs
Existing WGs
• NIST
• JISC
• China
• Etc.
TC LevelTC Level
SGSG--CG LevelCG Level
EC LevelEC Level
New joint WGs
Existing WGs
New joint WGs
Existing WGs
New joint WGs
Existing WGs
M/441
M/468
coordination
Setup
• Successor of Joint Working Group (JWG) on standards for Smart Grids (May 2010-June 2011)
• 4 Working Groups with more than 300 experts (First Set of Standards, Reference Architecture, Sustainable Processes and SG Information Security)
Main tasks
• To coordinate and manage the whole work process concerning the smart grid mandate M/490
• To keep and drive contact with other regional and international activities
23.10.12
Plenary
Smart Grid Coordination Group
Expectations
David JOHNSON , 2013-04-16 - © CEN-CENELEC-ETSI 39
Easy to use
Give guidance - Support implementation
Inclusive
Include all stakeholders
Comprehensive
Show available and coming standards
Future proof
Open to include new developments
International outreach
Promote European Approach
Distribution System
Operators, Energy suppliers,
Consumer organisations
European Commission,
Regulators
Standardisation
Organisations
Technology suppliers,
manufacturers,
system integrators
Transmission System
Operators,
ICT / Telcos
Smart Grid Coordination Group
Systematic approach
SG-CG process for First set of standards
1. Start with typical industry arrangements
• Entry point: “Systems” = typical industry arrangements
2. Identify related functions
• List of use cases supported and implemented by “system”
3. Map to architecture model
• Identification of interfaces on component, communication and information layer
4. Identify standards
• Identification of list of standards ready for implementation
David JOHNSON , 2013-04-16- © CEN-CENELEC-ETSI 40
Smart Grid Coordination Group
Entry Point
David JOHNSON , 2013-04-16 - © CEN-CENELEC-ETSI 41
First set of standards systems…
• cover all domains of the Smart Grid plane
• cover all actors of the Smart Grid
• support the high level services and functions as defined by the EC
List of systems covered
Smart Grid Coordination Group
Smart Grid Architecture Model
David JOHNSON , 2013-04-16- © CEN-CENELEC-ETSI 42
Mapping to interoperability layers
Mapping to SGAM (Smart Grid Architecture Model)
• SGAM provides common base for all stakeholders
• Description of interoperability layers business, function, information, communication and component
• Typical representation of the system on SGAM
• Identification of interfaces on component, communication and information layer
Smart Grid Coordination Group
First Set of Standards
List of standards
• Description of ‘available’ and ‘coming’ standards for each specific system
• Available standards: published by July 2012
• Coming standards: currently in progress in European standards organisations
• Average of 10-20 standards per system
David JOHNSON , 2013-04-16- © CEN-CENELEC-ETSI 43
Layer S tan dard Comments
Informat ion EN 61970-1
EN 61970-2
EN 61970-301
EN 61970-401
EN 61970-453
EN 61970-501
Energy ma nagem ent system Applicati on
Program Interface
Comm unication IEC/TR 62325 Framework market com muni cat ion
Comm unication EN 60870-5-101
EN 60870-5-104
EN 60870-6
Telecontrol protocols
Informat ion IEC/EN 61850 (al l parts) See substat ion autom at ion system in 8.3.1
Informat ion IEC 62351 Security - all pa rts
Informat ion (guidel ines) IEC 62357 Reference architecture power system
inform ation exchange
Informat ion IEC 62361 Harm oniza tion of qu ality codes
Standards per system
Example list of standards
Smart Grid Coordination Group
First Set of Standards – cont’d
Focus on existing industry arrangements
• 24 systems described in detail with functions, use cases, architectures and relevant standards
• More than 80 tables and figures
Selection guide for all market players
• Guidance for use of standards in implementation
plus
• 5 horizontal issues, including security etc.
• Preview of coming standards
• Work programme for new standards
David JOHNSON , 2013-04-16 - © CEN-CENELEC-ETSI 44
Work programme for 17 topics
Smart Grid Coordination Group
Overview of SG-CG output in 2012
Overall Process
• Framework document (SGCG/M490/A_Framework for Smart Grid Standardization)
Set of Standards – Selection Guide
• First Set of Standards (SGCG/M490/B_Smart Grid Set of Standards)
Conceptual Model, SGAM, Functional & Comm. Arch.
• Reference Architecture (SGCG/M490/C_Smart Grid Reference Architecture)
Use Case Management e.g. Flexibility
• Use Case Management (SGCG/M490/E_Smart Grid Use Cases Management Process)
Information Security, Privacy, Toolbox
• SGIS (SGCG/M490/D_Smart Grid Information Security)
Weblink
• http://www.cencenelec.eu/STANDARDS/HOTTOPICS/SMARTGRIDS/Pages/default.aspx
David JOHNSON , 2013-04-16- © CEN-CENELEC-ETSI 45
Smart Grid Coordination Group
Current work
Mandate iteration
• Extension for 2013-14
Four workstreams
• Smart Grid Consistent Set of Standards
– updating FSS, gaps
• New Applications & Methodology
– refinement of SGAM, use cases
• Interoperability
– interoperability testing methodology, conformance testing map
• Information Security (SGIS)
– smart grid security standards, information security, privacy, updating of smart grid toolbox
David JOHNSON , 2013-04-16 - © CEN-CENELEC-ETSI 46
Smart Grid Coordination Group
Mandate Scope
Updated working group structure
Smart Grid
Coordination
Group (former JWG)
EC
Reference
Group
New Appl.
and
Methodology
Information
Security
Consistent
Set of
Standards
Inter-
operability
Steering
Committee
Further
Tasks
• Report 2.0
• Liaisons
• Promotion
New joint WGs
Existing WGs
• NIST
• JISC
• China
• Etc.
TC Level
SG-CG Level
EC Level
New joint WGs
Existing WGs
New joint WGs
Existing WGs
New joint WGs
Existing WGs
M/441
M/468
coordination
Structure of SG-CG: 2013-14
Smart Grid Coordination Group
Conclusions
Achievements in 2011-12
• Consensus approach
• Deliverables on time
• International acknowledgement
• Systematic standardisation process in place
• Overview of available and coming standards
• Selection guide available - easy entry for all stakeholders
• Current industry applications are supported by standards
• Work programme provides timetable for new standards
• Future requirements can be easily included in systematic framework
David JOHNSON , 2013-04-16- © CEN-CENELEC-ETSI 48
Smart Grid Coordination Group
d
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION
David JOHNSON , 2013-04-16 - © CEN-CENELEC-ETSI 49
www.cen.eu www.cenelec.eu
www.etsi.org
Energy
Networks
Association
Insert presentation
title here Name Position Date
Energy
Networks
Association Smart Grid Standards
‘An ENA Perspective’
David Spillett Engineering Policy & Standards Manager 16 April 2013
The Voice of the Networks
51 Energy Networks Association
ENA
Global Standards – Smart Grids
First Set of Standards - Work Programme
European DSO Response
Main areas of progress on smart grid standards in
Europe
Implications for smart grid development in GB
EU Network Codes
Next steps
Agenda
Energy
Networks
Association
Insert presentation
title here Name Position Date
ENA
5
2 Energy Networks Association
Energy Networks Association (ENA)
is the voice of the networks,
representing the ‘wires and pipes’
transmission and distribution
network operators for gas and
electricity in the UK and Ireland
ENA aim to influence…
•Regulation and the wider representation in UK, Ireland and the rest of Europe.
•Cost-efficient engineering services and standards.
•Safety, health and environment across the gas and electricity industries.
53 Energy Networks Association
Key International Organisations – IEC ISO CEN CENELEC
National Organisations – ANSI, NIST, JIST, CNIS, KATS, ANSI, BSI
IEC & CENELEC 1996 Dresden Agreement
BSI - L/13 Committee - Smart Grid Policy
ENA – member of 64 BSI Electro-technical committees
ESO Smart Grid Co-ordination Group
Global Standards – Smart Grids
54 Energy Networks Association
First Set of Standards Work Programme
8 Domains or Functions
24 types of Smart Grid systems
>400 standards referenced
(Available/Coming)
Average of 10-20 standards per system
50 Technical Committees (IEC/CENELEC)
Work Programme
http://www.cen.eu/cen/Sectors/Sectors/Utili
tiesAndEnergy/SmartGrids/Pages/default.a
spx
55 Energy Networks Association
Timetable
56 Energy Networks Association
Dashboard Example – Gaps 11-12
Gap ID
Gap nb 11-12 SDO leader1 Update date 27-Feb-12
Gap ref Gen-4 and Gen 5 TF leader
CENELEC TC8X WG3
CENELEC TC8X WG5
IEC TC95
IEC TC38
IEC TC64
IEC TC82
IEC TC57
IEC TC88
IEC TC13
Standard status
Standard title SDO
Technical
body Standard reference
Target std
type
Expected
work
Impact on
Standard
starting
status
(mandate
start)
requirements for connection of micro-generators to
the LV gridCENELEC TC8X WG3 EN 50438 Ed 2 EN Boost Revision
DC with
received
requirements for connection of DER to the LV grid CENELEC TC8X WG3 TS 50549-1 TS Boost RevisionCD with
received
requirements for connection of DER to the MV grid CENELEC TC8X WG3 TS 50549-2 TS Boost RevisionCD with
received
Smart Grid User Interface, Part 2: Domain Side
Energy Source Interconnection with the GridIEC TC8 IS Launch Creation not started
Low-voltage generating sets and other
requirements if neededCENELEC TC64 HD 60364-5-551 and another parts if neededHD Boost Revision not started
IEC 61850 object models for photovoltaic, storage,
and other DER invertersIEC TC57 IEC 61850-90-7 TR Launch Creation initiated
Key information from main EU smart grid projects
for standardization purposesCENELEC TC8X WG5 TR Launch Creation TR
Use case collection ( process under resp of
SGCG/SG sustainable processes)CENELEC TC8X WG5 contribution to use case collection
Action plan and follow-up
Main steps Steps content who (Body) who (people) Status When
1
To provide with key information from EU smart grid
projects TC 8X/WG5 John Sinclair Dec-11
2
To provide with one or two Use cases (e.g. extract
one related to VPPs functioning) TC8X WG5 Mar-12
TR in
circulation
3
Define generic material (functions, glossary,
actors, …)
TC8XWG5
and (aligned with SGCG-SP team work)
4
To specify requirements for micro-generators
connected to the LV grid EN 50438 TC8X WG3 Dec-12 Sep-12
To specify requirements for connection of DER to
the LV grid TS 50549-1 TC8X WG3 Sep-11 Jun-12
prTS voted
negatively 15-Feb
To specify requirements for connection of DER to
the MV grid TS 50549-2 TC8X WG3 Sep-11 Jun-12
prTS voted
negatively
7
Liaison with IEC TC8 for connection to the (smart)
grid TC8X S Botton continous work 15-Feb
8 To adapt installation rules TC64 E. Tison ref to Gap 25 - Ind 5 15-Feb
Open investigation on product standards to
specify the protective functions which may be
needed, when considering DER connection to the TC95 Serge Volut Nov-11 Nov-11 Open
10
Establish a liaison between TC57 and TC95 for
data modelling of the communicating interface,
related the connection of DER-related function TC95 Serge Volut Mar-12
IEC TC95 is going to propose to set a
Chairman Advisory Group. The purpose
of this CAG is to consider the smart grid
Serge VOLUT
draft TR
use and update IEC TC8 Template
Waiting for comments on TR
step status update
Information
Gap title
Gap details
Involved
bodies
Current
targetted
Involved
standards
Harmonize/adapt electrical connection to the grid
and installation rules
Provide with use cases addressing the operation
of the grid in presence of high ratio of DER.
Provide with requirements and product standards
for specific protective devices, if nece
Standard for electrical connection and installation
rules to ensure energy availability and security, in
presence of high ratio of DER and allowing
connected generators to participate to new ways
of operating grid (e.g. associated in VPPs or micro
grids)
Initial targetted date
62786-2 work (Smart Grid User Interface -
demand side enegery source
cooperation with Entsoe re-established -
MoU between ENTSOE and Cenelec
under discussion - 1st raw draft
(principles) circulating
idem
liaison with TC82 probably needed -
proposal is made - a TC82 NP is under
preparation on specifying interconnection
of PV inverters with the Grid
In progress but not yet established
57 Energy Networks Association
• http://www.eurelectric.org/publications/?page=2
European DSO Response
Smart Grid Functionality & Service
List of Standards
Smart Network Management
•Electronic compatibility & power quality •Advanced network operation and control (eg faster fault identification and self healing capabilities advanced network automation volt var/watt control. •Smart metering and power line communication
IEC 61000 series IEC 61968/61970/62325 (CIM) IEC 61850 series, IEC 60870 series IEC 62689 series IEC 62351 series IEC 60255 series
Smart Integration of DG & e-mobility
•Integration of DG •Integration of Evs •Integration of new usages such as storage heating & cooling
EN 50438 IEC 61850 series TS 50549-1 & 2 ISO/IEC 15118 IEC 62786 IEC 61851
Smart Markets and Active Customers
•Enable DSO to act as market facilitator and grid optimiser •Develop demand response and demand side management programmes •Aggregate distributed energy resources and e mobility •Baance the power grid
IEC 61968/61970/62325 (CIM) IEC 62056 (DLM/COSEM) IEC 61850 series SEP 2.0, Open ADR, ...
• SG Standards will not be
rolled out in a single
swoop
•A multitude of standards
are required must act
rapidly
•Timely availability of
standards
•DSOs must act rapidly to
ensure they are heard
•Ongoing discussions with
EU Task Force
•Cognisance of ENTSO-e
Network codes
58 Energy Networks Association
Smart Meters
ICT
DG Connections
EVs
Cyber Security
R&D & Innovation - >200 SG projects in Europe
Main areas of progress on smart grid
standards in Europe
59 Energy Networks Association
Perceived lack of engagement by GB
Technical Committee stakeholder representation.
International and European
Certain Member states driving the European SG agenda
Need to avoid gold plated standards
Standards not fit for GB – IEC/EN
Changing GB policy to suit Europe policy ( why fix what
is not broken)
Need more of GB practice into Europe/International
standards (LCNF projects)
Implications for smart grid
development in GB
60 Energy Networks Association
EU Network Codes
RFG
DCC
https://www.entsoe.eu/
61 Energy Networks Association
Insufficient resources (experts)
– Smart Grid Consistent Set of Standards
– New Applications & Methodology
– Interoperability
– Information Security (SGIS)
Avoid the potential for “gold plated” Standards
BSI L/13 – Policy committee? - JESG for Standards
Ofgem Low Carbon Networks Fund – Use out put to develop standards
DECC/Ofgem SGF – Actively engaged in SG Standards
Next steps
62 Energy Networks Association
Thank you
‘An ENA Perspective’
Setting standards for the future
Dr Howard Porter, Chief Executive, BEAMA (Chair)
David Johnson, Steering Group Member,
CEN/CENELEC and ETSI – Smart Grid Coordination
David Spillett, Engineering Policy & Standards
Manager, Energy Networks Association
Richard Schomberg, VP Smart Energy Standards,
EDF Group and Chairman of IEC’s Strategic Group
on Smart Grid
Lunch and Networking Break
The Future: Regulation driving innovation, consumer benefits and commercial opportunities
Lawrence Slade, Chief Operating Officer, Energy UK
(Chair)
Dora Guzeleva, Head of Distribution Policy, Ofgem Mark Thompson, Project Delivery Manager,
Energy Innovation Centre Professor Harriet Bulkeley, Durham Energy Institute Dr Howard Porter, Chief Executive, BEAMA
Regulation driving innovation and consumer benefits
Dora Guzeleva, Head of Networks Policy
Ofgem
68
Smart Grid Forum
• Established by DECC & Ofgem in May 2011
• Brings together DNOs, NG, suppliers, technology providers, consumer groups, academics, Government and Regulator
• 2nd year work programme consisted of 5 work streams
Work stream Details
WS1 Developed DECC low carbon scenarios
WS2 - closed High level Smart Grids evaluation framework
WS3 DNOs model building on evaluation framework
WS4 Identifying closing doors
WS5 Ways of working – learning dissemination
WS6 Regulatory & commercial issues
Year 3 work programme and potential new work steams to be considered by the forum at its next meeting on 25 April
69
Smart Grids Forum – Work Stream 6 – last year
• We have examined regulatory and commercial barriers to deploying smart grids incl. DSR
Conclusions on barriers to DSR for DNOs
1. There are relatively few – DNOs already using it!
2. Some technical specifications may need updating – ER P2/6
3. Connection charging rules may need slight amendment
• We have also identified a need to assess barriers and the need for commercial enablers from a broader perspective
70
Work stream 6 – further programme
Develop a number of options for the development of and consumer engagement with Smart Grids Stage 1
A B C D
Roles and relationships for relevant parties under different options & trigger points for these roles
Stage 2
Commercial /regulatory arrangements for each option to effectively discharge roles & identify barriers to and enablers for these arrangements
Stage 3
Output
Defined roles and relationships with supporting commercial/regulatory arrangements across a range of options & trigger points
71
How this fits with wider DSR work
Smart Grids Forum (WS6)
EU policy / codes
Use of smart metering data
Smarter markets DSR
project
Structure of charges:
socialisation & price signals
Evaluating the benefits of smart
grids (WS3 model)
Utilising learning from
LCNF
72
Stages
Stage 1 Production for the development of and consumer engagement with Smart Grids
Stage 2
Roles and relationships required between industry parties and consumers
Identification of trigger points for each option
Stage 3 Commercial and regulatory arrangements for each option
Stage 4 Commercial and regulatory barriers and enablers for each option
Stage 5 Conclusion
Project will be broken down into distinct stages which will mostly run in series to each other. In most cases, learning from one stage will feed into the next stage which will build upon it
(Summer) 2013
(Winter) 2013
(Spring) 2014
(Autumn) 2014
(Winter) 2014
73
Areas of work for this year
Assessment of Options Including impact of current policy reforms on development of market options
Learning from Smart Grids LCN Fund trials Research and international experience on smart grids including DSR
Roles and relationships of parties in the value chain for each option Trigger points to move to certain roles and relationships
Summary Report Consultation
Stage 1 Stage 2
Generation of Options
74
Consumer Engagement - Examples of LCNF Trials
Customer Led
Network Revolution
DUoS price signals, a number of innovative time of use, restricted
hours and direct control tariffs, provided through suppliers, as
well as industrial and commercial DSR
Low Carbon London Time of use DUoS tariffs with domestic customers and demand
response trials with industrial and commercial customers
BRISTOL A variable tariff to encourage electricity use at times of high PV
generation
Capacity to
Customers
Demand response contracts which will reduce the consumption
following system faults as well as new connections customers
offered managed contracts for a reduced connection charge
FALCON Commercial agreements with industrial and commercial
customers who have the ability to control load in short periods of
time
New Thames Valley
Vision
Automated demand response in commercial premises
Innovation Squared Automated control of electric vehicle charging
75
Two Examples of Projects
Customer-led Network Revolution
(Northern Powergrid)
Low Carbon London (UKPN)
Innovation to facilitate low carbon technologies into urban and suburban networks. Leverages London’s low carbon initiatives.
Trialling of smart meters and customer-side interactions with new network technologies (such as storage).
LESSONS LEARNED SO FAR ARE SHARED ACROSS THE INDUSTRY
Learning emerging – 2013 key year for 1st year projects trials
Learning Outcomes Customer led network revolution
What are the current & emerging demands on the network
How flexible are customers
What are the optimum solutions to resolve network constraints
What are the most effective means to deliver these solutions
Low Carbon London
What smart metering data DNOs require
How do customers respond to price signals
What strategies are required to deal with connection of HP & EV
How do you combine commercial & technical arrangements for network management
DSR in the Low Carbon Networks Fund
76
Engaging Consumers with Smart Grids
Initial Findings from the Customer-Led Network Revolution project
Harriet Bulkeley
Durham University
A quest for the holy grail?
• Realising consumer benefit is recognised as central to making the case for smart grids
• The engagement of consumers is also recognised as critical to their successful implementation
• Yet there is a persistent sense that consumers lack the understanding to participate in the smart grid
• And that we know little about what shapes consumer engagement with the use and provision of energy
Understanding energy use
As easy as ABC … … or need for a new language?
“For the most part, social change is thought to depend upon values and attitudes (the A), which are believed to drive the kinds of behaviour (the B) that individuals choose (the C) to adopt” Shove 2010: 1274
• Values and attitudes are not held by individuals but shaped by social conditions/context
• Technologies, artefacts and material conditions shape both what we do and how/why we choose to do it
• Agency – the ability to act – is not held by individuals, but socially and materially structured (e.g. school runs, working days, reheating food)
Understanding energy use
Consumer engagement with energy is not about Attitudes, Behaviour and Choice
Instead the challenge is to understand why/how different practices are adopted and why/how they change
Social Science Methodology
• Survey of participants in the CLNR Trial
▫ Approximately 600 domestic customers
▫ Approximately 150 SME customers
• In-depth interviews and site visits
▫ Approximately 150 domestic interviews (including some repeats as trial progresses)
▫ Approximately 50 SME interviews
LO1 Initial Findings: Understanding
current consumption and generation
• Domestic transitions: household change, compaction and multiple living arrangements may shape how we can understand ‘average’ household consumption
• Home economies: we find active energy management
in many households, often based on ‘know how’ rather than formal knowledge and use of multiple resources
• Shadows of technologies past: people use new
technologies with a memory of their old systems, in turn shaping how effective and efficient their energy use is
Managing the home energy economy
Cooking Chores
“I might do my frozen veg for 4 or 5 mins (in the micro) but that’s me lot really. I think I use more gas than electric really, because when I do my cooking and froze it I'll heat it up on the hob. I take it out in the morning, leave it out to thaw, then heat it up in the hob. Very, very rarely use the microwave. It’s using electricity, it’s cheaper to leave it out on the kitchen top. I mean I do use it of I've forgotten to leave it out."
"Well, I usually wait until its quite a bit then I'll wash, There's a lot of things that can be dried in the drier but not everything like jeans and some t-shirts with pictures on, I don’t want to spoil'em. I dry my towels in there because when you hang them out they go rock hard but that’s something that does take a lot I think, the drier.” “"With this good weather I've had everything washed, jackets and trousers. These last few days it’s been washing mad, so suddenly the good weather has made me use the washer - but not the drier."
LO2 Initial Findings: understanding
customer flexibility • Rhythms and routines: energy load curve is driven by
habitual routines and daily rhythms • Thresholds: energy peaks are related to coming into/leaving
households – e.g. showers, putting the kettle on, meals
• Flexibility is evident: changes made to when/where energy using practices take place, to the way in which the services provided by energy are achieved (e.g. fuel switching, using other resources), and through the curtailment of practices
• Engagement is central: issues of trust, of contributing to a collective good (‘the grid’), and of personal benefits (not always financial) are important
Examining (in)flexibility
Cooking – less flexible Chores – more flexible
“We're quite traditional, lunch is at 12, tea is 5. … Its based around work. There will be times when you get in late but its not that often” "I just thought if I can save the environment at my age then yeah I'll do my bit. It has learnt 'us a lesson in one respect in that I used to just fill the kettle up and plonk it on. Now when I see that little thing go orange I just think no … I just put enough in for a cup. Because you can be very neglectful with things you know."
“Now that we got that (tariff) my wife’s been putting a wash in after 8 o clock at night, and before she goes to work she’ll hang it out.”
“Things like laundry, putting the dishwasher on. We used [to] put it on after tea, now it’ll get left ‘til the next morning, or after 8.”
Enabling flexibility: early findings
• Dual fuel households have more Load Flexibility due to their ability to fuel switch away from electricity when required.
• Where there are households for whom 9-5 working is not the norm, there is the possibility of greater Practice Flexibility
• Active use of timers on white goods enables Practice Flexibility where households are aware of this functionality.
• Engagement with the IHD appears to encourage and provide affirmative feedback on TOU related flexibility.
Fostering engagement: early findings
• Experience of the ‘workings’ of the grid whether through previous interruptions / strikes or through proximity to visible infrastructure is associated with greater openness to flexibility and engagement.
• Effective communication of the challenges facing the grid from a trusted individual has a positive effect on flexibility and may create the opportunity for a more interactive relationship between customers and bodies representing or liaising with ‘the grid’.
• The absence of sales messages builds trust with customers which may then create possibilities for engagement.
Summary
• We need a new vocabulary – the language of ‘consumers’ may mean we are not looking in the right places for solutions
• We find that there is significant variation between different practices in terms of drivers and the factors that shape the extent to which they are (in)flexible
• Our research suggests that many households have a great deal of practical ‘know how’ about their energy use – this could be a resource for smart grid development
• Engaging households with smart grids will require a different set of relationships between the providers and users of energy – the supplier/consumer relationship may not be adequate for this task
For further information:
h.a.bulkeley@durham.ac.uk
http://www.networkrevolution.co.uk
A Smart Grid for the end consumer Innovation and market opportunities
Dr Howard Porter, BEAMA CEO
Seizing the smart grid opportunity, British Academy, 16th April
A strong investment case for Smart Grids
UK manufacturing and opportunities for oversees markets
We need to fulfil the innovation and export potential of the industry to develop smart grid solutions
The UK have an opportunity to take a lead in the international market for Smart Grids
Customer engagement will be key
The Commercial Opportunity
27 million electricity meters and 23 million gas meters in UK homes by 2019
Enabling Smart Grid applications - the first step in developing a domestic market
What will Smart Metering provide?
In home displays
Data
Automated and accurate billing
Consumers to gain a better understanding of their consumption
Smart Metering - Catalyst for customers to take action
Customers will start to demand services rather than receive them
Designing a smart grid with the customer in mind - what are the benefits?
A big educational challenge – how do we engage and educate the customer?
Smart Meter Rollout
Data Communications
Companies (DCC)
GAS METER ELEC METER
DCC WAN
IHD
Space
heating
Security
Hot
water
Healthcare
Communication
s Hub
Smart Meter HAN
Smart Home HAN MANDATED
NON REGULATED
REGULATED
NOT MANDATED
EV
charging PV/other
Third party service/Green deal
providers
White
applianc
es Heating/
lighting
controls
Trusted Gateway
Heat
pumps
Installation of low carbon
technologies requiring
notification to networks
CAD
Heat
Meter
Gas
Meter
Electricity
Meter
Water
Meter
Hub
IHD (In
House
Display)
DCC (Data & Communication Company)
HAN Home area
network
WAN
Regulated energy
use: eg EV point?
CAD (Customer
Access
Device)
Energy
Suppliers
Internet, Satellite GSM etc
PV
Heat
pump
heating lighting media comms security Monitor & control
← Load
← Peak load
← Power factor
← frequency
SMART Meter roll-out
© Legrand Electric Limited 2012
Interoperability of smart home technologies
CAD – critical to engaging the customer and enabling automation
A big educational challenge – for the customer and the installer
DSR trials in UK
Conclusions
The Future: Regulation driving innovation, consumer benefits and commercial opportunities
Lawrence Slade, Chief Operating Officer, Energy UK
(Chair)
Dora Guzeleva, Head of Distribution Policy, Ofgem Mark Thompson, Project Delivery Manager,
Energy Innovation Centre Professor Harriet Bulkeley, Durham Energy Institute Dr Howard Porter, Chief Executive, BEAMA
Coffee and Networking Break
The Policy Challenge (open panel discussion)
Lord O’Neill, Chairman, SmartGrid GB (Chair)
Ben Wilson, CFO and Director of Strategy and
Regulation, UK Power Networks Laurence Carpanini, Director of Smart Metering and
Smart Grids, IBM United Kingdom Limited Richard Dick, Chairman, Lucy Switchgear (EMS) Ltd Lawrence Slade, Chief Operating Officer, Energy UK
Closing Remarks
Lawrence Slade, Chief Operating Officer,
Energy UK