sepsis assuit 2012

Post on 22-Mar-2016

219 views 0 download

description

sepsis assuit 2012

transcript

1

New Trends in

Management of Severe Sepsis

Dr. M. HELMI AFIFI(MBBCh, MSc, MD, DHA)

Prof. of Anesthesia & Intensive Care

Menoufiya Faculty of Medicine, Egypt

2

Sepsis: common, lethal, and expensive

• Major cause of morbidity and mortality

worldwide

• Kills ~ 1,400 people worldwide every day

• 400 000 ICU admission /y in USA

• Mortality rate 30–40%

• $50 billion per year in health care costs in USA

Angus DC et al, Crit Care Med 2001; 29[Suppl.]:S109

American Heart Association. Heart Disease and Stroke statistics 2006

Update

Severe Sepsis:

Comparative Incidence and Mortality

†National Center for Health Statistics, 2001. §American Cancer Society, 2001. *American Heart

Association. 2000. ‡Angus DC et al. Crit Care Med 2001

Incidence Mortality

4

Infection

“A microbial phenomenon

due to invasion of host

tissue by microorganisms”

5

Sepsis

“ Systemic host response to

invasive infection”

6

"Except on few occasions,

the patient appears to die

from the body's response to

infection rather than from

it."

Sir William Osler – 1904

The Evolution of Modern Medicine

7

Widespread inflammatory response to a

variety of severe clinical insults

Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome

(SIRS)

Others

Pancreatitis

Trauma

Burn

INFECTION

8

Widespread inflammatory response to a

variety of severe clinical insults

Clinically recognized by the presence of

two or more of the following:

1. Temperature >38°C or <36°C

2. Heart rate > 90/min

3. RR > 20/min or PaCO2 <32 mmHg

4. WBC >12,000 cells/mm3, <4000 cells/mm3

Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome

(SIRS)

9

SIRS + Evidence of infection

Sepsis

INFECTION SIRS

10

Severe SepsisSepsis + Organ dysfunction

Infection SIRS

Acute Organ Dysfunction

Tachycardia

Hypotension

CVP

PAOP

Jaundice

Enzymes

Albumin

PT

Altered

Consciousness

Confusion

Psychosis

Tachypnea

PaO2 <70 mm Hg

SaO2 <90%

PaO2/FiO2 300

Oliguria

Anuria

Creatinine

Platelets

PT/APTT

Protein C

D-dimer

Balk. Crit Care Clin 2000;16:337-52

12

Septic shock

Sepsis

+

Hypotension despite adequate fluid resuscitation

+

Hypoperfusion

13

Septicemia

Sepsis that has an infection

in the bloodstream

itself

14

1. Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome

(SIRS)

2. Sepsis (SIRS + infection)

3. Severe Sepsis (sepsis + end-organ damage)

4. Septic Shock (severe sepsis + hypotension

despite a fluid bolus)

ACCP/SCCM Consensus Conference 1991

Definitions

Bone RC, et al: Chest 1992; 101:1644 –1655

Crit Care Med 1992; 20:864

15

Sepsis: Progressive Disease

Infection Sepsis Severe Sepsis Septic Shock

Microbiological

Phenomenon

Infection

+

SIRS

Sepsis

+

End-Organ

Damage

Severe Sepsis

+

Refractory

Hypotension

16

Sepsis: Pathophysiology

17

Systemic

InflammationCoagulation

Impaired

Fibrinolysis

Sepsis: A complex disease

Sepsis

18

Hemostasis is unbalanced in

severe sepsis

Hemostasis

Coagulation

InflammationFibrinolysis

19

Sepsis: Pathophysiology

Micro-organism

Microbial Products

Host Inflammatory Mediators

Inflammation Coagulation

20

Sepsis: PathophysiologyFinal Common Pathway

Endothelial Cell Injury &

Microvascular Thrombosis

Hypoperfusion/Ischemia

Acute Organ Dysfunction

Death

22

Surviving Sepsis Campaign

Crit Care Med 2008 Reprint

Also published in Intensive Care Medicine

(January 2008)

23

24

Management of Severe Sepsis :

Antibiotics

Source control

Hemodynamic support

Mechanical ventilation

Nutritional support

Renal replacement Rx

Activated Protein C

(Xigris)

Fluid resuscitation

Intensive

Insulin Tx

Low Dose

Steroids

Early

Goal-Directed Rx

Initial Resuscitation

• Fluid resuscitation as soon as sepsis suspected

• Should not wait until ICU admission

• Elevated lactate identifies tissue

hypoperfusion in at-risk patients who are not

hypotensive

• Resuscitation goals: EGDT

Rivers et al. NEJM 2001;345:1368-77

26

SIRS

Sepsis Septic ShockSevere Sepsis

Golden hours

Early goal-directed therapy in severe

sepsis & septic shock

27

From Dellinger RP. Cardiovascular management of septic shock. Crit Care Med 2003;31:946-955.

28

• Involves manipulation of cardiac preload, afterload, and contractility to achieve a balance between systemic oxygen delivery and oxygen demand

• Resuscitation end points: CVP, BP, venous oxygen saturation, arterial lactate concentration

Early goal-directed therapy in severe

sepsis & septic shock

N Engl J Med 2001;345:1368-77

29

30

Central venous and

arterial catheterization

CVP

8 -12 mm Hg

MAP

65 and 90 mm Hg

ScvO2

70%

Goals achieved

Hospital admission

Protocol for Early Goal-Directed Therapy

Crystalloid

Colloid

Vasoactive

agents

Transf. of RBC

until Hct 30%

Inotropic agents

32

Fluid Therapy

• Colloid or crystolloid resuscitation is considered equal

– Natural or artificial colloids (less peripheral edema)

– Crystalloids (less cost)

• Fluid challenge over 30 min

– 500-1000 ml crystalloid

– 300–500 ml colloid

• Target CVP 8 mm Hg (12 mm Hg in mechanically ventilated patients)

33

Vasopressors

• Norepinephrine or dopamine through a central

catheter is the initial vasopressor of choice.

– Failure of fluid resuscitation

– During fluid resuscitation attempts

• Do not use low-dose dopamine for renal protection

• In patients requiring vasopressors, place an arterial

catheter as soon as possible

34

35

Vasopressin and Septic Shock

•• Decreases or eliminates requirements of

traditional pressors

• As a pure vasopressor, expected to decrease

cardiac output

• Consider in refractory shock despite high dose

conventional vasopressors

• 0.01-0.04 units/minute in adults

36

Inotropic Therapy

• Consider dobutamine in patients with measured

low cardiac output despite fluid resuscitation.

• Continue to titrate vasopressor to mean arterial

pressure of 65 mm Hg or greater.

• Do not increase cardiac index to achieve an

arbitrarily predefined elevated level of oxygen

delivery.

Corticosteroids

• IV hydrocortisone 200-300 mg/d for 7 days

– recommended in patients with septic shock

who, despite adequate fluid replacement,

require pressors to maintain adequate BP

– Decreased mortality in patients with relative

adrenal insufficiency

Annane et al. JAMA 2002;288:862-71

Briegel et al. Crit Care Med 1999;27:723-32

38

Controversies and Future Directions

1. How generalizable is EGDT to other populations?

2. How cost-effective is EGDT?

3. How are time and resources utilized so that the

EGDT protocol is accomplished?

4. Which components of EGDT actually make a

difference in outcomes?

39

Mortality Reduction

• 2006 analysis of available randomized and observational data from 12 centers, totaling 1,298 patients, yielded similar results

– Mortality was reduced from 44.8% in the control group to 24.5% in the EGDT group

• This is better than aspirin + streptokinase for MI 5-week mortality (NNT=19) or tPA for acute ischemic stroke within 4.5 hours (NNT=15)

CHEST 2006; 130; 1579-1595.

for every 5 EGDT patients, one life was

saved

40

EGDT decreases health care resource

consumption

• Decrease in vasopressor use, hospital and

ICU LOS, and MV days

• With a long ED wait time for an ICU bed,

there are few options other than making this

an ED intervention

43

44

45

46

47

48

49

Take home message

51

Employ EGDT & Sepsis Bundles in the

treatment of severe sepsis and septic

shock

• if you want to save lives,

• save your institution money,

• improve your department’s

standing in the house of medicine

52

______.wmv______.wmv

Thank You