Post on 08-Jan-2017
transcript
9 March 2016SESAR Exchange Theatre, World ATM Congress 2016
SESAR VIRTUAL CENTRES: BREAKING THE MYTH
SESAR Virtual Centres : breaking the myth
2
SESAR Virtual Centres : breaking the myth
3
SESAR Virtual Centres : breaking the myth
4
Virtual Centre Concept - context
5
Geographical decoupling of:• ATM Data Service Providers (ADSPs) • Air Traffic Service Units (ATSUs)
In SESAR 1 and in the future: decoupling through open and standardised
service interfaces
Service Oriented Architecture:• Dataflows organised through Services• Open and common service interfaces• Standardised service interfaces as final
objective
Virtual Centre Concept - benefits
6
Virtual Centre Concept, a technical enabler for:
•Optimized technical infrastructure costs to provide ATM Data•Dynamic airspace allocation allowing optimisation of ATM operations:
Delegation of sectors during peak hours
Closure of an ATSUs during night•Contingency scenarios between European ATSUs
Virtual Centre - context
7
OPEN AND STANDARD SERVICE INTERFACES
SERVICE PROVIDER FOR VIRTUAL CENTRES
Virtual Centre - context
8
OPEN AND STANDARD SERVICE INTERFACES
SPECIALISED SERVICE PROVIDERS BY SERVICE(S)
Inter Service Providers Services
Virtual Centre - context
9
OPEN AND STANDARD SERVICE INTERFACES
Inter Service Providers Services
SPECIALISED SERVICE PROVIDERS BY SERVICE(S)
Virtual Centre - context
10
OPEN AND STANDARD SERVICE INTERFACES
Inter Service Providers Services
SPECIALISED SERVICE PROVIDERS BY SERVICE(S)
Gateway
Virtual centre – context - SESAR 1 Scope
11
OPEN AND STANDARD SERVICE INTERFACES
Necessary Dataflows
SPECIALISED SERVICE PROVIDERS BY SERVICE(S)
Gateway
Service interface design in SESAR1SERVICE PROVIDER FOR VIRTUAL CENTRES
Virtual Centre Concept - involved partners
14
NATS
DSNA
DFS
ENAVENAIRE
Skyguide
Eurocontrol
INDRA
THALES
SELEX
FREQUENTIS
7 ANSPs
4 INDUSTRY PARTNERS
Main steps
17
Feasibility study for Virtual Centre Concept
Common service architecture
Common list of operations / service
Common logical payloads in messages
Proof of concept : Demonstrations !!!
SESAR Virtual Centres : breaking the myth
18
19
Virtual Centre Services for CWPs
The main objective of SESAR1 Virtual Centre is to define Services needed by CWPs for normal operation
Operational Modelling described each of the capabilities provided by an En-route/Approach ATS Node
Service Modelling described each of the Service Interfaces for the CWP
SESAR Factsheet on operational modelling methodology was adopted
SESAR Working Method Services AdoptedWhat is a Service?
service modelling : covered scopesd CHMI Management
CHMI
SUR
MONA
CONF
AMAN
SNET
AGDS
- ATC Clearances- ATC Instruction- Planning Inputs- Sequence Advisory Acceptance
TP&M
FPLD
C&T
SSRCM
ATCO
(from Misc)
SUPP
CORR
LTCM
OPSUP
Surveillance Data
«flow»
Surveillance Weather
«flow»
Monitoring Aids«flow»
TBS Related Alerts«flow»
Conflict Data«flow»
Manual Monitoring Aids Interaction
«flow»
Coordination&TransferData «flow»
Safety Nets Notifications«flow»
Active Pattern and AFIs
«flow»
Arrival Fl ight Metering
«flow»
Arrival Sequence Data
«flow»
CTA Processing
«flow»
Coordination&TransferData Inputs
«flow»
Departure Sequence Data
«flow»
CTA Processing«flow»
Airspace Mgt Notifications
«flow»
Arrival Sequence Inputs
«flow»SFPL Change Request
«flow»
Manual ConflictInteraction«flow»
Mode A Code Mgt
«flow»
CTA Processing
«flow»
CTA Processing«flow»
Trajectory Inputs«flow»
Manual Correlation Mgt
«flow»
Sequence Advisories Acceptance
«flow»
CPDLC UplinkInternal
«flow»
Flight Data
«flow»
Complexity Mgt Data
«flow»
Mode A Code Mgt
«flow»
Commands
«flow»
Track SFPL Correlation Data«flow»
Arrival Constraint«flow»
CPDLCDownlinkInternal
«flow»
CM DownlinkInternal
«flow»
Air-GroundInconsistencies
«flow»ADS-C DownlinkInternal
«flow»
Airspace MgtNotifications
«flow»
Trajectory Data«flow»
Airspace & Sectorisation
«flow»
SURV
SNET
AMANFlight Data
CORR
C & T
TRAJECTORYCONF
MONA
AGDS
SSR CM
LTCM
SUPP
OPSUP
Primary Services
Secondary Services
Not addressed CWP
90 % of the scope covered
Note: Primary Services shall be validated during the Project Demonstration Phase.
Service Identification - Project 10.1.7 TAD used to define Primary & Secondary services
21
Virtual Centre Services for CWPs
Primary Services:
CWPFlight Data & Trajectory
Coordination & TransferCorrelation
Surveillance
Surveillance Data
SFPL Change Request
Flight Data
Manual Correlation Mgt
Correlation Data
C & T input
C & T Data
Flight Data Management Service:This Service supports the Controller to input information in the system.
Flight Data Distribution Service:Distributes updates at every modification of the Flight Data.
Co-ordination & Transfer Service:Manages Coordination and Transfer operations..
Correlation Distribution Service:Provides a pairing between a System Flight Plan and a System Track.
Correlation Management Service:manually correlates/ de-correlates a System Flight Plan to/from a System Track.
Surveillance Data Distribution Service:Provides a representation of the actual air traffic situation.
22
Virtual Centre Services for CWPs
Surveillance Data
Flight Data
Manual Correlation Mgt
Correlation Data
C & T input
Secondary Services:
Conflict Management
SafetyNets
MonitoringAids
ArrivalManagement
Conflict Data
Manual Conflict Interaction
Safety Net Notification
Monitoring Aids
Arrival
Arrival Data
Flight Data & Trajectory
Correlation
Surveillance
Coordination & Transfer
C & T Data
CWPSFPL Change Request
Maturity of Services
The Maturity of two of the SET1 services:– FlightDataManagementServices:
• CORE vs Extension - 68% / 32% • Note: critical flight data such as Aircraft id, Aircraft type, flight plan status
has been agreed as CORE for the Flight Data Management Service– CoordinationandTransferServices:
• CORE vs Extension - 30% /70%• Note: Critical Co-ordination data such as Coordination Reference, Speed,
heading, SFL has been agreed as CORE for the C&T service
23
Lessons learned:
•Substantial activity to model all CWP / Service Providers interactions•Defined 90% of service interfaces for CWP•50% of the service interfaces are common across Industrial Partners
SESAR Virtual Centres : breaking the myth
24
Demonstration
Why demonstration?
25
To show and assess the technical feasibility ofusing open service interfaces
Demonstration: the objectives
Service Orientation Multi-vendors
Service provider
independence
CWP provider independence Remote Usage
Services
Demonstration set-up
27
ServiceProvider
CWP
"Demo #7"used asillustration
28
Operations demonstrated in Demo #7
FlightDataDistribution publishFlightDataDistribution
FlightDataMgmt requestProcessCFL requestProcessDirect requestProcessHeading requestProcessRFL requestProcessRoute requestProcessSpeed
SurveillanceDistribution publishSurveillanceData
CorrelationDistribution publishCorrelationData publishAllCorrelationData
CoordinationAndTransferMgmt assumeFlight handOver
Demo #7: Set-up
29
Demo #7: Set-up
30
skyguide
Frequentis
RemoteNATS
RemoteEC
Remote(Geneva)
Remote(Geneva)
Simplified NATS airspace
Demo #7: Set-up
31
NATS Remote Position
skyguide Remote Position
Eurocontrol Remote Position
Visualizer
FRQ CWPs skyguide CWPs
Service Orientation Multi-vendors
Service provider
independence
CWP provider independence Remote Usage
Services
Demonstration outcomes
Top results:CWPs Services meet the expectations Feasibility assessment of the concept is green
34
SESAR Virtual Centres : breaking the myth
35
Conclusion: Achievements
11 Partners have developed a common model for CWP services All major service interfaces for CWPs have been designed Service interfaces as a basis for Virtual Centre Concept are integrated in SESAR framework Service interfaces implemented in 5 Service Providers and 8 different CWPs Successful demonstrations including multi-vendor collaboration at several European sites Virtual Centre Concept Event and communication to ATM community
Feasibility of Virtual Centre Concept positively assessed
36
VIDEO
37
SESAR Virtual Centres : breaking the myth
38
Virtual Centre Concept in future R&I
39
Business improvements
Most promising virtual centre
scenarios
Technical solutions
Operational drivers
Virtual Centre Concept in future R&I 2016-2019
40
Scope Extension : Voice, TWR, ATFCMImpact study on overall architecture
Technical Verification
Technical solutions
Business improvementsBusiness Validation
Business ModellingCost effectiveness
Operational
drivers
Operational Validation
SESAR Virtual Centres : breaking the myth
41
Thanks for your attention
42