Post on 18-Dec-2015
transcript
Smart Transportation
Brian D. Hare, P.E.PennDOT Bureau of DesignAASHTO SCODJuly 17, 2008
A New Era in Transportation Planning & Design
Why is transportation changing?
What is smart transportation?
How do we do this?
1
All photographs and images from PennDOT, Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin, Orth-Rodgers, or public domain, unless otherwise noted.
Content for Session
2
3
Why is transportation
changing?
1
asphalt: + 197%
Image Source: Used by license agreement from morguefile.com. Photographers (top to bottom): kevinrosseel, clconroy, grafixar, slartibartfastSources: Steel: Ohio DOT; Copper and Asphalt: MetalPrices.com; Concrete: Economagic.com.
From 2003 to 2008…
copper: + 389%
steel: + 338%
concrete: + 138%
Sources: FHWA Bid Price Index for PA (BPI), Engineering News Record Construction Cost Index (CCI), Bureau of Labor and Statistics Consumer Price - Index (CPI), compared to 3% Annual Increase Base Line (Calendar Year)
Inflation Indices
Revenue sources for financing
transportation projects are severely limited.
Nearly 25% of Pennsylvania’s bridges are structurally deficient,
compared with just 12% in the U.S.
Pennsylvania ranks last in the nation in this statistic.
Even if we did have the money, we can no longer afford the conventional approach to tackling transportation/
land use issues.
$8,000: avg. annual cost of owning a car
18% of an average household budget spent on transportation
Jan 2003 June 2008 Increase
Gasoline $1.41 $4.02 +185%
Diesel $1.50 $4.72 +215%
Source: U.S. Department of Energy; Bureau of Labor Statistics
Our families cannot afford it…
Our environment cannot afford it…
Photographer: rosevita. Used through license agreement with morguefile.com
Our quality of life cannot afford it…
Pennsylvania is not alone… every state is grappling with these issues.
“The problems we have created cannot be solved with the same thinking that created them….”
Image Source: Library of Congress, Prints & Photographs Division. Original copyright expired.
“We are pushing ahead with a great road program, a road program that will take this Nation out of its antiquated shackles of secondary roads… It will be a nation of great prosperity, but will be more than that: it will be a nation that is going ahead every day. With… our population increasing at five every minute, the expanding horizon is one that staggers the imagination.”
— October 29, 1954
We’re up to the challenge.
Source: FHWA
210,896 lane miles in less than 50 years
What is Smart Transportation?
2
“Smart Transportation is partnering to build great
communities for future generations of
Pennsylvanians by linking transportation investments and land use planning and
decision-making.”
More … Less…
creativity cost
flexibility design constraints
More … Less…
listening conflicts
More … Less…
Photographer: kevinrosseel. Used through license from Morguefile.com
efficiency confusion
More … Less…
choices limitations
More … Less…
lasting solutions “do-overs”
More … Less…
Photographer: ladyheart. Used through license agreement with morguefile.com
community sprawl
More … Less…
Photo Source: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Visualizing Density program. Authorized for use in public presentations.
1. It is more costly2. It always requires design exceptions, which = failure3. It is not concerned with safety4. FHWA is not on-board5. This is just another temporary initiative that will
disappear with the next administration6. It does not apply to suburban or rural communities7. We cannot coordinate land use and transportation
decisions8. It is just a way to save money
Top Myths About Smart Transportation…
MythBusters
How do we do this?
3
1. Linking Planning and NEPA /New Project Development
Process
2. Context-Sensitive Solutions
3. Fitting the Solutions to the Problem (right-sizing)
4. Smart Transportation Guidebook
5. Revisions to Design Manuals
6. Revisions to HOP Process
7. Smart Transportation Performance Measures
8. Others?
Integrating Smart Transportation
Smart Transportation Guidebook
The Smart Transportation Guidebook is fully compatible and consistent with
AASHTO.
1. Introduction
2. Tools and Techniques
3. A Local Commitment
4. Land Use Context
5. Transportation Context
6. Designing the Roadway
7. Roadway Guidelines
8. Roadside Guidelines
9. Road System Issues
Guidebook Table of Contents
Some Guiding Principles
• Tailor the Solutions and Approach
• Plan and Implement Projects in Collaboration with
the Community
• Plan for Alternative Modes
• Use Sound Professional Judgment
• Scale the Solutions to the Problem
Chapter 1: Introduction
1. Money counts
2. Leverage and preserve existing investments
3. Choose projects with high value/price ratio
4. Safety always and maybe safety only
5. Look beyond level-of-service
6. Accommodate all modes of travel
7. Enhance local network
8. Build towns not sprawl
9. Understand the context; plan and design within the context
10. Develop local governments as strong land use partners
Applying the Smart Transportation Themes
A. Understand the problem and the context before programming a solution for it.
B. Utilize a multi-disciplinary project team for its breadth of view and expertise in varying issues.
C. Develop a project-specific communication plan to ensure timely and efficient agency and community input.
D. Establish project objectives that include the full spectrum of transportation needs and quality of life objectives.
Chapter 2: Tools & Techniques
E. Focus on alternatives that are affordable, cost effective, and meet project needs and objectives.
F. Agree on simple but wide-ranging measures of success.
G. Consider a full set of alternatives to address the project needs and objectives.
H. Systematically compare the alternatives using the measures of success to determine the best “fit” transportation investment.
I. 2.2 Smart Transportation Tools & Techniques
Chapter 2: Tools & Techniques
• Partnering with local officials is an essential element of
Smart Transportation
• The longevity of PennDOT’s investment depends on the
municipal plans created today.
“The future is purchased by the present.”
– Dr. Samuel Johnson
Chapter 3: A Local Commitment
PennDOT’s Role
• Manage statewide and
regional mobility
• Allocate and manage
state/federal transportation
funds
• Maintain and improve
transportation infrastructure
Municipality’s Role
• Manage local mobility
• Maintain the local circulation
system
• Manage and control land use
and development
Differing Roles Require Partnering
Land Use Context + Roadway Type
Chapter 4: Land Use Context
• Land use context – land
area comprising unique
combination of land uses,
density, building form
• Common place types
found in every PennDOT
district
RURAL
SUBURBAN CORRIDOR
TOWN / VILLAGE CENTER
TOWN / VILLAGE NEIGHBORHOOD
URBAN CORE
SUBURBAN CENTER
SUBURBAN NEIGHBORHOOD
Land Use Contexts
RURAL SUBURBAN URBAN
Rural Suburban
Neighborhood
Suburban Corridor Suburban Center Town/Village
Neighborhood
Town Center Urban Core
DENSITY
UNITS1 DU/ac - 8DU/ac 1 DU/ac – 8DU/ac 2 – 30 DU/ac 3 – 20 DU/ac 4 – 30 DU/ac 8 – 50 DU/ac 16 – 75 DU/ac
BUILDING
COVERAGENA <20% 20% - 35% 35% - 45% 35% - 50% 50% - 70% 70% - 100%
LOT
SIZE/AREA20 acres 5,000 – 80,000 sf 20,000 - 200,000 sf 25,000 – 100,000 sf 2,000 – 12,000 sf 2,000 – 20,000 sf 25,000 – 100,000 sf
LOT
FRONTAGENA 50 to 200 feet 100 to 500 feet 100 to 300 feet 18 to 50 feet 25 to 200 feet 100 to 300 feet
BLOCK
DIMENSIONSNA 400 wide x varies 200 wide x varies 300 wide x varies 200 by 400 feet 200 by 400 feet 200 by 400 feet
MAX. HEIGHT 1 to 3 stories 1.5 to 3 storiesretail-1 story; office 3-5 stories 2 to 5 stories 2 to 5 stories 1 to 3 stories 3 to 60 stories
MIN./MAX.
SETBACKVaries 20 to 80 feet 20 to 80 feet 20 to 80 feet 10 to 20 feet 0 to 20 feet 0 to 20 feet
Defining the Contexts
Land Use Context + Roadway Type
Chapter 5: Transportation Context
Just a few reasons…
• Some arterials carry predominantly
local traffic and have many access
points
• The design speed for the arterial
class can be too high for an arterial
serving as the “Main Street” of a
community
• As land uses change, so should
roadway design
Both of these roadways are principal arterials
Why rethink function classification?
Roadways in Context
• Know the land use context
• Know the role of the roadway within the network
• Know the roadway type
• Set the desired operating speed
• Refer to the Matrix for the starting design values
Requisite for process: understand the flexibility provided by
the AASHTO Green Book
Design Using the Principles
Can standards, alone, ensure an adequate design?
Regional Arterial
Community Arterial
Community Arterial
Absent strong enforcement, drivers tend to drive as fast as
they believe the road can safely accommodate, regardless of
posted speed.
“One recipe for a longer life; never exceed the speed limit.” Unknown
“Speed provides the one genuinely modern pleasure.” Aldous Huxley
Unintended Consequence
Definition: The speed of traffic that, in the expert judgments of
the highway engineer and community planner, best reflects the
function of the roadway and the surrounding land use context.
Simple Definition: The speed at which we would like vehicles
to travel.
Desired Operating SpeedAlso Known as “Design To” or “Target Speed”
• Forge a stronger relationship between posted speed limit,
design speed and operating speed
• Relate roadway type to land use context
• Use roadway and roadside design elements to encourage
compliance with the posted speed
Why Desired Operating Speed?
• Horizontal and Vertical
Curvature
• Sight Distance
• Street Trees
• Lane Widths
• Shoulder Widths
• Total Roadway Widths
• Clear Zone
• Access Density
• Signal Density
• Median
• On-Street Parking
• Curbs
• Pedestrian Activity
• Roadside Development
• Traffic Calming
• Superelevation
• Curb Return Radii
• Horizontal Offset between
Inside Lane and Median Curb
Using Design Elements to Enforce Desired Operating Speed
Guidelines:
• Give motorists adequate warning of context change
• Do not introduce change in increments greater than 10 MPH.
– Greater changes in mph is possible with use of traffic signals,
roundabouts, other measures
• Use roadway and roadside elements to provide “visual cues”
Safe Transitions Between Contexts
• Change 8 ft shoulder to parking lane
• Introduce a bike lane
• Narrow the lane width
• Introduce curvature or roundabout
• Install gateway treatment
– Landscaping
– Medians
– Curb extensions
– Decorative pavement
Example Roadway Transition Tools
Travel Lanes
• Take full advantage of range of lane widths
– Consider 10 ft. lanes for low-speed urban arterials
– Consider 11 ft. lanes for roads at 35 mph or higher
– Consider 12 ft. lanes for heavily trafficked roadways with high
truck volumes
10 ft. travel lane
Chapter 7: Roadway Guidelines
But aren’t narrow travel lanes less safe?
“No indication that the use of 10- or 11-ft. lanes rather than
12-ft. lanes for arterial midblock segments leads to increase in
accident frequency”Source: I. Potts, et. al., “Relationship of lane width to safety for urban and suburban arterials,” TRB 2007.
Travel Lanes
What is the best means of accommodating bicyclists?
Bike lane
Wide curb lane Roadway with shoulders
Bicycle Facilities
• Answer: It depends!
Achieve consensus with
local stakeholders.
– Bike lanes are preferred by
bicyclists of average skill,
and have some safety
advantages over wide curb
lanes
– Effect of 4 to 6 ft. shoulders
is very similar to bike lanes
– Wide curb lanes are often
preferred by experienced
bicyclists
Bicycle Facilities
• Width ranges from 4 to 18 ft.,
depending in part whether it
houses a left turn lane
• Physical or two-way left turn
lane?
– Depends on number of left turns,
total volumes
• Physical medians are best for
pedestrians on multi-lane roads
Medians
• In urban contexts, choose the smallest curb radius that
can accommodate the design vehicle
– Balance the need to accommodate truck turning movements
with the benefit of smaller crossings for pedestrians
• Add width of parking and
bike lanes when determining
effective curb radius
Intersections
Chapter 8: Roadside Guidelines
• Sidewalk network is the best gauge of
community’s “walkability”
• Provide sidewalks along both sides of
all roadways in commercial areas, and
along all arterials and collectors in
residential areas
• Strive for “clear sidewalk width”
of 5 to 8 ft.
• Provide more intensive crosswalk
treatments for major roadways
Pedestrian Facilities
• “Farside” bus stops are preferred to “nearside” bus stops
– Pedestrian crashes at bus stops are more associated with nearside
stops
– Farside bus stops are shorter, giving more room for on-street
parking
• Be prepared for greater interest in public transit!
Public Transit
• Landscaping integrates roadway into the surrounding
environment
– Provide buffer strips of 4 to 5 ft. between sidewalk and road
– Trees in medians reduce perceived width of street, and help calm
traffic
– Avoid trees in clear zone on suburban and rural streets posted 45
mph or above, or if street is uncurbed
Landscaping
• Not always feasible to improve sidewalks, curb cut ramps,
utilities, etc.
– Consider cost, needed Right-of-Way
• Sidewalks are recommended for State/Federal funded
projects except under several conditions:
– Pedestrians prohibited from roadway
– Cost is “excessively disproportionate” to need
Conduct Cost-Benefit Analysis for Roadside Features
Chapter 9: Road System Issues
• Use physical design, striping strategies to slow vehicles
to the desired operating speed
– Consider on higher order roadways, using such measures as
road diets, curb extensions, and roadside design
Before After
“Road Diet” on Arterial Roadway in Ocean City, NJ
Traffic Calming
• Encourage municipalities to pass access management ordinances,
focusing on arterials.
• Preserves the taxpayers investment in their transportation system.
Poor access management on suburban corridor
Access Management
• Insure that the design is maintainable and fits into the
District’s Traffic Operations Plans
• Emergency response MUST be considered. Coordinate
with Emergency Service Providers to understand response
routes and response times. Be sure to:
– Modify the design to accommodate emergency service vehicles
– Show functionality of traditional street design through computer
programs such as AutoTURN and/or actual street tests
Operations & Maintenance
Could the application of Smart Transportation result
in design exceptions?
Yes, AND…
AASHTO acknowledges the need for design exceptions.
Applied Design Flexibility 86
2004 AASHTO Flexibility Guide
“Design exceptions are acceptable
and useful tool when
evaluated and applied properly”
* Thorough evaluation and documentation is mandatory
And there must be no compromise in safety
Design Exceptions
Applied Design Flexibility 87
REMEMBER…
Flexibility = New Perspective» Thorough Evaluation STILL Required
» Engineering Judgment VITAL
» Safety Review STILL Required
» Documentation is VITAL
When Considering Design Exceptions
“Courage is being scared… but saddling up anyway.”
— John Wayne
Smart Transportation
Thank You!www.dot.state.pa.us
A New Era in Transportation Planning & Design