Post on 28-Mar-2020
transcript
Jan. 2011
SO2/SO3/Hg and Corrosion Issue Results From DOE/NETL Existing Plants
Oxy-combustion Projects
January 25, 2011London, United Kingdom
2
R. Boyle, 02/11/2009
• Only U.S. government owned & operated DOE national lab
• Dedicated to energy RD&D, domestic energy resources
• Fundamental science through technology demonstration
• Unique industry–academia–government collaborations
National Energy Technology LaboratoryWhere Energy Challenges Converge and Energy Solutions Emerge
West VirginiaPennsylvaniaOregon
3
DOE/NETL CCS Program Goals
90% CO2 capture
99%+ storage permanence
Pre-combustion Capture (IGCC)
< 10% increase in COE1
Post- and Oxy-combustion Capture
< 35% increase in COE2
By 2020, have available for commercial deployment, technologies and best practices for achieving:
*Cost of Electricity includes 50 mile pipeline transport and saline formation storage, 100 years of monitoring
1. Impact of Cost Escalation on Power Systems R&D Goals—Re-baselining APS, CS & FC GPRA R&D Goals, DOE/NETL July 20082. Existing Plants, Emissions & Capture Program—Setting Program Goals, U.S. DOE/National Energy Technology Laboratory, Draft Final Report, February 2009
4
Oxy-combustion Projects Overview
• Combustion/boiler testing– 15 MWth T-fired (Alstom)– Multi-scale wall fired (B&W, REI, Jupiter, Southern Research)– Cyclone (B&W)
• Coupon corrosion testing– NETL ORD– Foster Wheeler
• Flue gas purification systems– Air Products– Praxair– IPR System (NETL ORD & Jupiter)
• Advanced Oxy-combustion Systems– OTM (Praxair)– Chemical Looping (Ohio St. & Alstom)
5
Pulverized Coal Oxy-combustionPartners: 1. Praxair (O2 Membrane, CO2
Purification)2. Air Products (CO2 Purification)3. Jupiter Oxygen (Burners) 4. Alstom (Pilot plant)5. B&W (Cyclone pilot test)6. Foster Wheeler (Corrosion)7. Reaction Engineering Int. (Retrofit)8. Southern Research Institute (Retrofit)9. NETL ORD (Modeling, CO2
Purification)
Challenges• Cryogenic ASUs are capital and
energy intensive• Existing boiler air infiltration• Corrosion and process control• Excess O2 and inerts (N2, Ar) CO2
purification cost
Today: 10 MWe wall-fired test (B&W)5 MWe T-fired pilot (Alstom)5 MWe burner pilot (Jupiter)
by 2015: 1st Gen (Cryogenic) demo.
2020: 2nd Gen demonstration*
Development Timeline
*O2 Membrane + USC materials + Adv. Purification + Adv. Compression
Project Types• “2nd Gen” oxyboiler designs
- Adv. Materials and burners• Existing boiler retrofits
- Air leakage, heat transfer, corrosion, process control
• Low cost O2 (membrane)• CO2 purification• Co-sequestration
6
Boiler Material Development for Oxy-Combustion Foster Wheeler NA, Corp.
• Investigation of oxy-combustion effects on durability of boiler tube materials
• Computational fluid dynamic modeling will predict gas compositions
• Laboratory testing to determine effects on conventional and higher-alloy boiler tubes
Heat Flux
(Btu/hr-ft2)
Division Walls
Burners
OFA Ports
Waterwalls
Heat Flux
(Btu/hr-ft2)
Division Walls
Burners
OFA Ports
Waterwalls
Heat Flux
(Btu/hr-ft2)
Division Walls
Burners
OFA Ports
Waterwalls
7
Oxy-combustion Coupon Studies(Foster Wheeler)
• Two Nominal 500 MWe Air-Fired Boiler Retrofits Studied– Wall-Fired and Tangential-Fired Configurations Compared
• 2.5% Sulfur Illinois # 6 and 0.3% Sulfur Eagle Butte Coals Us
• Ill # 6 Wall-Fired Boiler Uses 68% Flue Gas Recycle– Flue Gas Mixed with O2 Yields 28% O2 by Volume to Boiler– Maximum Furnace Wall Heat Flux ~5% Lower than Air-Fired
• Ill #6 Wall-Fired Boiler Has Highest Furnace Wall Reducing Zones
CO H2S CO2 H2O– Air-Fired 9% 0.14% 11% 8%– Oxy-Fired 20% 0.26% 48% 18%
• Ill #6 Wall-Fired Boiler Gases Selected for Corrosion Testing
8
Gas Compositions Test Plan(Foster Wheeler)
20% CO 5% CO 2% CO 1% O2 5% CO 2% CO 1% O2 Oxy: 2% O2 Air: 3% O2
CO2 55% 67% 69% 70% CO2 13% 14% 14% CO2 69% 14%
H2O 18% 20% 20% 21% H2O 9% 9% 9% H2O 21% 9%
N2 7% 8% 8% 8% N2 73% 74% 76% N2 8% 74%
H2S 0.26% 0.07% 0.03% 0.00% H2S 0.08% 0.03% 0.00% H2S 0.00% 0.00%
SO2 0.17% 0.29% 0.30% 0.32% SO2 0.19% 0.21% 0.20% SO2 0.32% 0.20%
HCl 0.02% 0.02% 0.02% 0.02% HCl 0.02% 0.02% 0.02% HCl 0.02% 0.02%
Total 100% 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100% 100% Total 100% 100%
GasWaterwall: Air-Fired Superheater/ReheaterWaterwall: Oxy-Combustion
Gas Gas
9
Materials Test Plan(Foster Wheeler)
• Waterwalls– Tube Materials (SA210-A1, SA213-T2, SA213-T11)– Weld (T11 to T11)– Weld Overlays (309 SS, Inconel 622, VDM Alloy 33)– Thermal Sprays
10
Materials Test Plan(Foster Wheeler)
• Superheater/Reheater– Tube Materials
• Conventional (SA213-T22, SA213-304H, SA213-317H)• Newer (SA213-T91, NF709, HR3C)
– Weld (T22 to 304H)– Weld Overlays (Inconel 622, VDM Alloy 33, Inconel
72)• Deposit materials refreshed every 100 hours• Three deposit compositions used for each WW and
SH/RH tests (Low, med, high sulfur)
11
12
13
Laboratory Fireside Corrosion Exposures
Fireside Exposure Tests• Determine fireside corrosion ramifications in boilers refitted for
oxyfuel combustion.• Alloys of interest represent 4 currently used boiler alloys:
• T22 (for waterwalls)• T91 (for waterwalls and superheater/reheater tubes)• 347 (for superheater/reheater tubes)• 617 (for superheater/reheater tubes and weld overlays)
Tasks• Initial test to look at ash thickness• Exposure tests for 1000 hours with ash refreshment every 250
hours• Characterize exposed coupons in terms of corrosion kinetics
(primarily by section loss) and corrosion microstructures (by light microscopy, SEM, XRD, and elemental analysis)
14
Fireside Corrosion Exposures—Waterwalls
Oxidative Conditions
450 °C
Gas Phase (2.5 O2) • Air-fired• Oxy-fired with CO2 recycle after
FGD• Oxy-fired with CO2 recycle before
FGD
Ash Phase• Base Case: 5Na2SO4, 5K2SO4,
30Fe2O3, 30SiO2, 30Al2O3
• Base case with 10FeS (for 10Fe2O3)
• Base case with 5C (for 2.5SiO2, 2.5Al2O3)
Reducing Conditions
450 °C
Gas Phase (5 CO)• Air-fired• Oxy-fired with CO2 recycle after
FGD• Oxy-fired with CO2 recycle before
FGD
Ash Phase• Base Case: 5Na2SO4, 5K2SO4,
30Fe2O3, 30SiO2, 30Al2O3
• Base case with 1NaCl (for 0.33Fe2O3, 0.33SiO2, 0.33Al2O3)
15
Fireside Corrosion Exposures—SH/RH
Oxidative Conditions
700 °C
Gas Phase (2.5 O2) • Air-fired• Oxy-fired with CO2 recycle
after FGD• Oxy-fired with CO2 recycle
before FGD
Ash Phase• Base Case 5Na2SO4, 5K2SO4,
30Fe2O3, 30SiO2, 30Al2O3
Fundamental Conditions
650 °C
Gas Phase • Air• 70CO2+30H2O• 70CO2+30H2O+SO2
Ash Phase• A: 50SiO2-25Al2O3-12.5CaO-12.5Fe2O3
• B: 49SiO2-25Al2O3-12.5CaO-12.5Fe2O3-1K2SO4
• C: A mixture of 67% Deposit A and 33% Carbon
• D: 49SiO2-25Al2O3-12.5CaO-12.5Fe2O3-1MgSO4 (liquid at 650 C)
16
Gas Phase DetailsGas Prior
AirPrior Oxy
SH/RH Air
SH/RH Oxy
(FGD)
SH/RH Oxy (wo
FGD)
WW Air
WW Oxy
(FGD)
WW Oxy (wo
FGD)
WW Air
WW Oxy
(FGD)
WW Oxy (wo
FGD)
Oxidative Conditions
Oxidative Conditions
Oxidative Conditions
Reducing Conditions
N2 74.1 0 Bal 8 8 Bal 8 8 Bal 8 8
CO2 14.6 60.1 14 Bal Bal 14 Bal Bal 14 Bal Bal
CO 5 5 5
H2S 0.1 0.1 0.3
H2O 5 32.6 9 20 20 9 20 20 9 20 20
O2 6 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5
SO2 0.3 0.9 0.3 0.3 0.9 0.3 0.3 0.9 0.2 0.2 0.6
17
Fireside Corrosion—Prior Experiments •Temperature = 675 C (1247 F), ~ Superheater Fireside•Gas Linear Velocity = 6 cm/min (not meant to be representative of power plant gas velocities)•Synthetic ash mixtures:
Ash Mixture
Composition, weight %
Fe2O3 Na2SO4 K2SO4 Al2O3 SiO2 Calculated Base/Acid
A 31.67 2.5 2.5 31.67 31.67 0.52
B 30 5 5 30 30 0.54
No Ash
With Ash
18
NETL Office of Research & DevelopmentOxy-combustion Efforts
Fundamental Properties• Combustion and Radiative Property Data
Integrated Pollutant Removal• Field tests of IPR system—Hammond, IN facility• Flame characteristics, analyses of ash and slag, GateCycle
modeling• Corrosion Issues (field tests and laboratory electrochemical tests)
Multi-Scale CFD Modeling • Advanced coal chemistry, gas mixtures, turbulence, burner
geometry, particle models• Simulations of REI/University of Utah facilities• Integration of water wall fireside corrosion models
19
Flue Gas Purification
20
Flue Gas Purification for Oxy-Combustion Air Products and Chemicals, Inc.
• CO2 may need to be cleaned of acidic impurities such as HCl and SO2 before being transported by pipeline for sequestration
• Feasibility of purifying CO2from oxy-combustion will be studied
1. SO2/NOx removal at 1-30 atmospheres pressure
2. Inert removal at 30-110 atmospheres pressure
21
Rig Constructed
ReactorEntire Test Rig
22
Range of Flue Gas Tested
• Low S bituminous oxy-combustion flue gas (WV)
Component Vol %
CO2 15 – 85
H2O 3 - 5
O2 3 - 5
N2 2 - 75
Ar 4 - 5
SO2 600 – 2600 (ppm)
NOX 125 – 400 (ppm)
23
First Test Run Results
-100
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
20:38:24 20:52:48 21:07:12 21:21:36 21:36:00 21:50:24 22:04:48 22:19:12 22:33:36
ppm
v
Time
Oxyfuel 22 January 2010
[FLUGAS]NO.SCALED
[FLUGAS]SO2.SCALED
Condition DSOx Conversion >99%NOx conversion >90%(NOx zero +/- 20 ppmv)
Reactor Inlet Reactor Inlet Reactor Inlet Reactor Inlet
Reactor OutletReactor OutletReactor Outlet
24
Second Campaign
• High S bituminous oxy-combustion flue gas (Illinois)• Test conducted to evaluate wider performance range
– SO2: 20 – 5930 ppm– NOx: 50 – 230 ppm– SO2/NOx ratio: 0.2 – 81
• Reactor performance repeatable – Similar capture rates under similar SOx/NOx ratios
• Hg removal observed at various stages of the process– Most removal in pre-scrubber sump
25
Flue Gas Purification for Oxy-Combustion Praxair, Inc.
• Development of flue gas purification for oxy-combustion retrofits
• Targets:
– 99 percent SO2 and mercury removal
– >90 percent NOx removal
• Separate high and low S coal systems investigated
– Activated Carbon Bed
– Sulfuric Acid Process
– Both use VPSA for addt’l CO2 recovery
• O2, N2, Ar separated and vented
26
Preliminary Results
• SO2 and NO are oxidized and retained on bed
• Dilute acid stream produced
• Performance better at lower Temp, higher Pressure
• Water aids in SO2removal
• >99% SO2 and >96% NOxremoval at 15 barg
• Performance maintained after 30 days testing at bench scale
27
Techno-Economic Study Results
• FGD cannot be eliminated – identified by design team due to limits on pulverizers and boiler MOC. Alternate configuration to minimize:
• System removes 44 to 48% of SOx in FGD, rest in Praxair CPU
28
To Find Out More About NETL’s CO2 Capture R&D:
http://www.netl.doe.gov/technologies/coalpower/ewr/index.htmlhttp://www.netl.doe.gov/technologies/coalpower/ewr/index.html