Post on 04-Jun-2018
transcript
The Quantum MysteryThe Arrow of Time
A Unified Theory
Solving the Quantum Mystery withthe Arrow of Time
Eddy Keming Chen
Department of Philosophy,Rutgers University, New Brunswick
eddy.chen@rutgers.eduwww.eddykemingchen.net
February 5, 2018
The Quantum MysteryThe Arrow of Time
A Unified Theory
The First Puzzle
Our best quantum theories require something called the “wavefunction.”
It is a metaphysically scary object:
high-dimensional
complex numbers
full of arbitrary conventions.
The “quantum mystery”: what is the wave function?
The Quantum MysteryThe Arrow of Time
A Unified Theory
The Second Puzzle
We often see:
Ice melts
Air spreads out
Bananas go bad
We never see:
An ice cube gets bigger
Air contracts to a corner
Bananas become fresher
What explains the arrow of time?
The Quantum MysteryThe Arrow of Time
A Unified Theory
Explain with physics?
There is no arrow of time in fundamental physics.
The fundamental equations are blind to the past /future distinction.
The Quantum MysteryThe Arrow of Time
A Unified Theory
The Two Puzzles
They are often thought to be independent phenomena.
But, are they?
The Quantum MysteryThe Arrow of Time
A Unified Theory
A Unified Theory
In this talk, I propose a new theory of time’s arrow in a quantumuniverse.
It solves both puzzles.
It replaces the wave function with something new.
Further evidence of the ongoing fruitful connections betweenphilosophy and the sciences.
The Quantum MysteryThe Arrow of Time
A Unified Theory
Killing Two Birds with One Stone
Figure: Solving two puzzles with one theory.
The Quantum MysteryThe Arrow of Time
A Unified Theory
Overview
1 The Quantum Mystery
2 The Arrow of Time
3 A Unified Theory
The Quantum MysteryThe Arrow of Time
A Unified Theory
1 The Quantum Mystery
2 The Arrow of Time
3 A Unified Theory
The Quantum MysteryThe Arrow of Time
A Unified Theory
The Quantum Mystery
All of our best quantum theories refer to the gadget called the“wave function.”
It explains:
The double-slit experiment.
Stability of atoms.
Galaxy formation.
Applications:
Electronics.
Quantum computing.
The Quantum MysteryThe Arrow of Time
A Unified Theory
A Wave Function
Figure: Something wavy—the wave function.
The Quantum MysteryThe Arrow of Time
A Unified Theory
Quantum Mechanics
Physical systems are described by a new mathematical gadget:
The wave function: ψ.
It obeys the Schrodinger equation...
It evolves into “branches”: ψa + ψb + ψc + ...
...except when it’s being “observed”:
The wave function “collapses” into one of the branches: ψa
The outcome is random (probability given by the Born rule).
The Quantum MysteryThe Arrow of Time
A Unified Theory
Schrodinger’s Cat Thought Experiment
Figure: QM describes all physical systems—big and small.
The Quantum MysteryThe Arrow of Time
A Unified Theory
Schrodinger’s Cat Described by Quantum Mechanics
Physical systems are described by a new mathematical gadget:
E.g. Schrodinger’s cat at t0: ψKitty(t0)
It obeys the Schrodinger equation...
E.g. Schrodinger’s cat at t1: ψKitty(t1) = ψAlive + ψDead.
...except when it’s being “observed”:
E.g. Schrodinger’s cat at t2: ψKitty(t2) = ψAlive.
The Quantum MysteryThe Arrow of Time
A Unified Theory
The Measurement Problem
There is something wrong...
If the Schrodinger equation is a fundamental law of nature,then it should govern all physical interactions, includingmeasurements.
Hence, the wave function should never collapse; the wavefunction branches will never be reduced to just one.
QM should predict that there is no definite outcome ofexperiment.
But we have definite outcomes of experiment.
The Quantum MysteryThe Arrow of Time
A Unified Theory
Solutions
The measurement problem has been solved.
1 Bohm (1952). Particles with definite locations.
2 Ghirardi, Rimini, and Weber (1986). Wave functionspontaneously collapses. [+ some variants]
3 Everett (1956). All branches of the wave function are real. [+some variants]
The Quantum MysteryThe Arrow of Time
A Unified Theory
Solving the Measurement Problem
These theories clean up the quantum mess:
Logically consistent, very precise.
Nothing special about the use of observations orconsciousness.
But the wave function is still there!
The Quantum MysteryThe Arrow of Time
A Unified Theory
The Quantum Mystery
Even in the cleaned-up versions of quantum mechanics, we are stillleft with the wave function.
It “governs” local ontologies (e.g. particles and fields).
But what is the wave function?
The Quantum MysteryThe Arrow of Time
A Unified Theory
The wave function is metaphysically scary...
The wave function: ψ : R3N → C, where N ≈ 1080.
High-dimensional.
Complex numbers.
Defined with arbitrary conventions.
Quite unlike the local ontology of particles and fields.
The Quantum MysteryThe Arrow of Time
A Unified Theory
The wave function is metaphysically scary...
It is a threat to many metaphysical theses:
Nominalism: The fundamental ontology does not containmathematical objects.
Intrinsicalism: The fundamental ontology can be characterizedintrinsically, without using any arbitrary conventions.
3D-ism: The fundamental space is (more or less)3-dimensional.
Humeanism: The fundamental ontology is a Humean mosaic oflocal matters of particular facts, and everything elsesupervenes on that.
The Quantum MysteryThe Arrow of Time
A Unified Theory
The wave function is metaphysically scary...
Against Nominalism:
Malament 1982: it is impossible to reformulate quantummechanics without reference to mathematical objects.
Against Intrinsicalism:
Maudlin 2013: we need to use arbitrary conventions to definethe wave function.
In Chen (2017b), I prove that we can specify the wave function incompletely nominalistic and intrinsic relations on physicalspace-time.
The Quantum MysteryThe Arrow of Time
A Unified Theory
The wave function is metaphysically scary...
Against 3D-ism:
Albert 1996: because of the wave function, the fundamentalspace is ridiculously high-dimensional—≈ 1080 dimensions.
Against Humeanism:
Teller 1986, Maudlin 2007: the wave function assigns holisticproperties that do not supervene on the Humean mosaic.
In this talk, I will use the data from the arrow of time to build anew quantum theory that is compatible with both theses (and havemany other goodies).
The Quantum MysteryThe Arrow of Time
A Unified Theory
Responses to the wave function
High-dimensional realism.
Albert 1996, Loewer 1996, Ney 2012, North 2013
Multi-field realism.
Chen 2017a, 2017b, Hubert and Romano 2018
Brute Humeanism.
Darby 2012
The nomological view about the wave function.
Goldstein and Zanghi 2013, Miller 2014, Esfeld 2014, Bhogaland Perry 2015, Esfeld and Deckert 2017, Chen ms.
All have heavy costs; some face devastating objections.
The Quantum MysteryThe Arrow of Time
A Unified Theory
Realism
We might need to be less confident in metaphysical realism, ifnone of these realist responses is plausible.
A partial victory for the metaphysical anti-realists.
The Quantum MysteryThe Arrow of Time
A Unified Theory
The Quantum Mystery
Figure: What exactly is the wave function? How to make metaphysicscome out right with QM?
The Quantum MysteryThe Arrow of Time
A Unified Theory
1 The Quantum Mystery
2 The Arrow of Time
3 A Unified Theory
The Quantum MysteryThe Arrow of Time
A Unified Theory
The Arrow of Time
I suggest that the arrow of time holds the key to the quantummystery.
This will become clear after this section.
The Quantum MysteryThe Arrow of Time
A Unified Theory
Back to the second puzzle
There is an arrow of time in our experiences.
Ice cubes will melt in hot waterAir will spread out in a roomFlowers will decay
But there is no arrow of time in fundamental physics.
The Quantum MysteryThe Arrow of Time
A Unified Theory
Macroscopic Physics
Thermodynamics: a branch of physics that deals with macroscopicphenomena.
Macroscopic properties:
volume
pressure
density
entropy
The Quantum MysteryThe Arrow of Time
A Unified Theory
Entropy
Lower entropy:
Ice cube in a cup of coffee.
Air concentrated in a small corner.
Fresh potatoes.
Universe: homogeneous, dense, contracted matter.
Higher entropy:
Ice completely melted in a cup of coffee.
Air spread out to the entire room.
Decayed potatoes.
Universe: matter clumped together as galaxies and planets.
The Quantum MysteryThe Arrow of Time
A Unified Theory
The Second Law
The Second Law of Thermodynamics
Systems evolve from lower to higher entropy (until they reach theentropy maximum).
1 There is an arrow of time in the 2nd Law: future events havehigher entropy than past events.
2 It explains the time-irreversible phenomena—to some extent.
3 It concerns primarily macroscopic phenomena; it is notfundamental physics.
The Quantum MysteryThe Arrow of Time
A Unified Theory
Let’s Go Deeper!
Can we explain the arrow of time with fundamentalphysics?
The fundamental equations are symmetric in time.
Example: ~F = m~a
A piece of chalk
A billiard ball
The Quantum MysteryThe Arrow of Time
A Unified Theory
Time Reversal Invariance (TRI)
A theory T satisfies TRI =def for any sequence ofevents, it is possible in T if and only if its time
reversal is possible in T.
The Quantum MysteryThe Arrow of Time
A Unified Theory
The equations of fundamental physics are time reversal invariant.
Classical Mechanics (e.g. the Newtonian equation ~F = m~a)
Quantum Mechanics (the Schrodinger equation)
General Relativity (Einstein field equations)
Solution: we can add an initial condition.
The Quantum MysteryThe Arrow of Time
A Unified Theory
The Past Hypothesis:
The universe started in a low-entropy state.
The Quantum MysteryThe Arrow of Time
A Unified Theory
What is entropy?
Macrostates vs. Microstates. [Picture: gas in a box]
Classically:
Macrostate: a macroscopic description of the physical system(in terms of volume, density, pressure).
Microstate: a microscopic description of the physical system(in terms of positions and velocities of the particles).
Entropy measures how many microstates are compatible with amacrostate. (Boltzmann)
The Quantum MysteryThe Arrow of Time
A Unified Theory
Translations
A microstate ⇔ a possible world.
A macrostate ⇔ a set of possible worlds (that aremacroscopically indistinguishable).
A phase space⇔ the set of all (nomologically) possible worlds.
The Quantum MysteryThe Arrow of Time
A Unified Theory
The Phase Space
Figure: The phase space has an interesting geometry. Macrostates aredisproportionate in volume. From Penrose (1989).
The Quantum MysteryThe Arrow of Time
A Unified Theory
Figure: Why we need the Past Hypothesis. From Penrose (1989).
The Quantum MysteryThe Arrow of Time
A Unified Theory
The Past Hypothesis (PH): classical
The initial state of the universe has very low entropy.
For the experts: at t0, the microstate of the universe was lying in aspecial macrostate with very small volume on the phase space.
Only one microstate is actual, but there are many to choose from.
Remarkably simple.
Highly informative.
Explains the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics.
It is a law of nature in addition to the equations of CM.
The Quantum MysteryThe Arrow of Time
A Unified Theory
Classical vs. Quantum
A classical system:
Space of possibilities: phase space.
Microstate: a point in phase space X .
Macrostate: a region of phase space M(X ) that includes X .
Entropy of X : volume of M(X ).
A quantum system:
Space of possibilities: Hilbert space.
Microstate: a wave function, ψ.
Macrostate: a subspace of the Hilbert space Hv that includesψ.
Entropy of ψ: dimension of the subspace Hv .
The Quantum MysteryThe Arrow of Time
A Unified Theory
The Past Hypothesis (PH): standard quantum version
The initial quantum state of the universe is a low-entropy wavefunction Ψ0.
For the experts: at t0, the universe is described by a wave functionchosen at random from the set of wave functions in thelow-dimensional subspace.
Only one wave function is actual, but there are many to choosefrom.
Remarkably simple.
Highly informative.
Explains the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics.
It is a law of nature in addition to the equations of QM.
The Quantum MysteryThe Arrow of Time
A Unified Theory
PH is not enough...
In the classical case: given PH, there are still infinitely manypossible phase points to choose from.
In the quantum case: given PH, there are still infinitely manypossible wave functions to choose from.
Some of the microstates are “bad.”
The Quantum MysteryThe Arrow of Time
A Unified Theory
The Statistical Postulate
The Statistical Postulate (SP)
There is a uniform probability distribution over the microstatescompatible with the PH.
SP will ensure that our universe is unlikely to be one of those“bad” microstates.
The Quantum MysteryThe Arrow of Time
A Unified Theory
A Worry
We now have two sources of “randomness” in quantum mechanics:
Probabilities from the Born rule.
Probabilities from SP.
How are they connected?
The Quantum MysteryThe Arrow of Time
A Unified Theory
1 The Quantum Mystery
2 The Arrow of Time
3 A Unified Theory
The Quantum MysteryThe Arrow of Time
A Unified Theory
A Unified Theory of Quantum Mechanics and Time’sArrow
The wave function is the source of the quantum-mechanicalphenomena.
The Past Hypothesis is the source of the arrow of time.
I will propose a unified theory that
gets rid of the wave function;
explains the quantum phenomena;
gets rid of the Statistical Postulate;
explains the arrow of time.
The Quantum MysteryThe Arrow of Time
A Unified Theory
A Unified Theory of Quantum Mechanics and Time’sArrow
Three steps
1 “Ontic Coarse-graining.”
2 The Initial Projection Hypothesis.
3 The Nomological Thesis.
The Quantum MysteryThe Arrow of Time
A Unified Theory
Step 1. Coarse-Graining
Figure: A vector.
Figure: A subspace.
The Quantum MysteryThe Arrow of Time
A Unified Theory
Step 1. Coarse-Graining
Two kinds of coarse-graining:
Epistemic: there is a more fine-grained fact but we do nothave epistemic access to it. So we will use the coarse-grainedfact to represent our ignorances. [standard]
Ontic: the coarse-grained state that we use to represent our“ignorances” in fact carves nature at the joint. There is nomore fine-grained fact. [radical]
Let us try an “ontic coarse-graining” on the quantum state.
The Quantum MysteryThe Arrow of Time
A Unified Theory
Step 1. Coarse-Graining
Let us describe the universe at t0.
The old theory:
Macrostate: S , the low-entropy subspace(PH).
Microstate: Ψ0, a wave function inside S .
SP: a probability distribution over thesubspace S .
My proposal:
Macrostate: the low-entropy subspace S .
The Quantum MysteryThe Arrow of Time
A Unified Theory
Step 1. Coarse-Graining
Some nice mathematical gadgets to describe the subspace S :
Geometric perspective: projection onto S .
Matrix representation: an identity matrix IS restricted to S .
Density matrix: aIS , where a = 1/dimension(S).
The Quantum MysteryThe Arrow of Time
A Unified Theory
Step 1. Coarse-Graining: A Simple Example
Geometric perspective: projection ontoS=v1-v2 plane.
Matrix representation: an identity matrixIS restricted to S=v1-v2 plane. 1 0 0
0 1 00 0 0
Density matrix: aIS , wherea = 1/dimension(S)=1/2. 1/2 0 0
0 1/2 00 0 0
Figure: Subspace v1-v2.
The Quantum MysteryThe Arrow of Time
A Unified Theory
Step 1. Coarse-Graining
For the universe, the initial subspace S is low-dimensional, but itwill be more than 2-dimensional.
My proposal: the subspace represents the initial quantum statecompletely; there is no additional fact about which vectorrepresents the world.
The state of the universe is described by a density matrix and notby a wave function.
The Quantum MysteryThe Arrow of Time
A Unified Theory
Step 1. Coarse-Graining
We just performed an “ontic coarse-graining” on the quantumstate.
Remarks about ontic coarse-graining:
It simplifies the ontology.
It eliminates some unknowable facts.
(Claim:) It is at the right balance of simplicity and empiricaladequacy.
The ontic coarse-graining leads to some surprising consequences.
The Quantum MysteryThe Arrow of Time
A Unified Theory
Step 2. A New Postulate
The Initial Projection Hypothesis (IPH)
The initial quantum state of the universe is W0 = aIS .
(For the experts: at t0, the universe is described by the uniquenormalized projection on the low-dimensional subspace S .)
W0:
encodes the low-entropy information of the PH, giving rise tothe arrow of time.
is governed by a deterministic equation (the von Neumannequation), giving rise to quantum phenomena.
We can reformulate all the realist quantum theories in termsof W0.
The Quantum MysteryThe Arrow of Time
A Unified Theory
Step 2. A New Postulate
Compare:
The Initial Projection Hypothesis (IPH)
The initial quantum state of the universe is W0 = aIS .
The Past Hypothesis (PH): standard quantum version
The initial quantum state of the universe is a wave function Ψ0
that lies in the subspace S .
Same empirical content: the special subspace S .
IPH is no more complex than PH.
IPH is as informative as PH.
The Quantum MysteryThe Arrow of Time
A Unified Theory
Step 2. A New Postulate
The New Theory U:
1 Local ontology: particles or fields.
2 A density matrix.
3 The von Neumann equation.
4 The Initial Projection Hypothesis.
The Quantum MysteryThe Arrow of Time
A Unified Theory
Step 2. A New Postulate
(Questions about empirical equivalence: wave function vs. densitymatrix.)
The Quantum MysteryThe Arrow of Time
A Unified Theory
Step 3. The Nomological Thesis
The Initial Projection Hypothesis (IPH)
The initial quantum state of the universe is W0 = aIS .
Proposal: IPH is a new law of nature.
PH is a law because it is simple and informative.
IPH is as simple and informative as PH.
Therefore, IPH is a candidate law of nature.
The Quantum MysteryThe Arrow of Time
A Unified Theory
Step 3. The Nomological Thesis
The Initial Projection Hypothesis (IPH)
The initial quantum state of the universe is W0 = aIS .
Proposal: IPH is a new law of nature.
W0 is simple to specify.
W0 is unique, i.e. completely specified by a law of nature.
Hence, W0 is nomological.
Hence, there is no need for a probability distribution overinitial states.
The Quantum MysteryThe Arrow of Time
A Unified Theory
The Old Theory vs. the New Theory
The Old Theory
1 Local ontology: particles or fields.
2 Non-local ontology: wave function.
3 Dynamical Law: the Schrodinger equation.
4 The Past Hypothesis.
5 The Statistical Postulate
The New Theory U
1 Local ontology: particles or fields.
2 Non-local ontology.
3 Dynamical Law: the von Neumann equation.
4 The Initial Projection Hypothesis.
5 The Statistical Postulate
The Quantum MysteryThe Arrow of Time
A Unified Theory
The New Theory
The New Theory U
1 Local ontology: particles or fields. [realist ontology]
2 Dynamical Law: the von Neumann equation. [quantumphenomena]
3 The Initial Projection Hypothesis. [arrow of time]
The Quantum MysteryThe Arrow of Time
A Unified Theory
Consequences for 3D-ism and Humeanism
3D-ism and Humean supervenience are no longer in conflict withquantum mechanics.
The problematic non-local ontology became part of a law inthe best system.
The best system supervenes on the 4-dimensional Humeanmosaic of particles and local fields.
The Quantum MysteryThe Arrow of Time
A Unified Theory
Other interesting consequences
The New Theory U has many surprising features:
A unique quantum history.
Parallel to the Weyl Curvature Hypothesis.
Unification of:
1 the universe and subsystem;
2 statistical mechanics and quantum mechanics;
3 two kinds of probabilities.
The Quantum MysteryThe Arrow of Time
A Unified Theory
The Big Picture
Two puzzles:
The quantum mystery.
The arrow of time.
They were thought to be independent puzzles.
Our new theory U provides a unified explanation.
The Quantum MysteryThe Arrow of Time
A Unified Theory
The Big Picture
We have finally solved the quantum mystery.
The quantum state is more coarse-grained than we thought.The quantum state is not ontological but nomological.
The solution depends on our understanding of the arrow oftime.
Interesting consequences to explore in future work.
The Quantum MysteryThe Arrow of Time
A Unified Theory
The Big Picture
Why is the world so unified?
Why is Nature so kind to us?
The Quantum MysteryThe Arrow of Time
A Unified Theory
Bonus: Empirical Equivalence
Criterion for Empirical Equivalence
Two theories A and B are empirically equivalent if at any time t,they assign the same probability distribution over all possibleexperimental outcomes.
We can prove this rigorously in some cases.
Is it enough? Bell’s jumpy Everettian world.
Subsystem analysis.
The Quantum MysteryThe Arrow of Time
A Unified Theory
Bonus: Variations of U
U+
1 No local ontology.
2 Ontic density matrix.
3 Dynamical Law: the von Neumann equation.
4 The Initial Projection Hypothesis.
U- (the ghostly theory)
1 No local ontology.
2 No non-local ontology.
3 Dynamical Law: the von Neumann equation.
4 The Initial Projection Hypothesis.
The Quantum MysteryThe Arrow of Time
A Unified Theory
Bonus: Ontic Coarse-Graining on Classical Phase Space?
Open questions:1 Mathematically: what does a set of phase points represent on
physical space?
Microstate Dispensability: “take out the microstate and youstill have a world.”Valid in QM: still have a density matrix.Fails in CM: no more particles; no obvious counterpart todensity matrix.
2 Conceptually: any motivation for doing so in classicalmechanics?
The Quantum MysteryThe Arrow of Time
A Unified Theory
Bonus: W-BM+IPH
i~dW (t)
dt= [H, W ]. (1)
dQi
dt=
~mi
Im∇qi trCkW (q, q′, t)
trCkW (q, q′, t)(q = q′ = Q), (2)
P(Q(t0) ∈ dq) = trCkW (q, q, t0)dq. (3)
∂trCkW (q, q, t)
∂t= −div(trCkW (q, q, t)v), (4)
W (t0) =IS
dimS, (5)
The Quantum MysteryThe Arrow of Time
A Unified Theory
Bonus: W-EQM+IPH
i~dW (t)
dt= [H, W ]. (6)
m(x , t) = tr(M(x)W (t)), (7)
M(x) =∑i
miδ(Qi − x) (8)
Qiψ(q1, q2, ...qn) = qiψ(q1, q2, ...qn) (9)
W (t0) =IS
dimS, (10)