Sound follows function

Post on 10-Apr-2015

257 views 0 download

description

Sound follows function. Sound communication and the relevance of timbre. Presentation at the 2nd International VDT Symposium (Kai Bronner & Rainer Hirt)

transcript

wew

Sound follows functionSound communication and the relevance of timbre.

Lecturer: Rainer Hirt & Kai Bronner (audio-branding.de)

wew

01 Acoustic signs and its functions02 Overview ongoing Functional-Timbre-Study (FTS)

wew

01 Acoustic signs and its functions02 Overview ongoing Functional-Timbre-Study (FTS)

wew

01 Acoustic signs and its functions

wew

A. Basics

A. Basics B. Study C. Results

Signs?

A. Basics B. Study C. Results

Signs!A sign is a stimulus pattern that has a meaning.

A sign stands for something else.

A. Basics B. Study C. Results

Semiotics: Theory of signs

IndexAn „Index“ is defined by some sensory feature(something directly visible, audible, smellable, etc) that is connected to it.

A. Basics B. Study C. Results

Semiotics: Theory of signs

IconAn icon is a pattern that physically resembles what it „stands for“.

A. Basics B. Study C. Results

Semiotics: Theory of signs

SymbolSymbols are arbitrary and unmotivated, reliant on conventional usage to determine meaning.

A. Basics B. Study C. Results

Acoustic signs?

A. Basics B. Study C. Results

Acoustic signs!

Index Icon SymbolIndex becomes Icon

Symbol becomes Icon

A. Basics B. Study C. Results

Applications of acoustic signs

Auditory Display Audification Auditory-User-Interface

Corporate SoundCultural

A. Basics B. Study C. Results

Basic design-approaches of acoustic signs:

Auditory iconsAuditory symbolsAuditory symcons (Mixed)

wew

B. Empirical study

A. Basics B. Study C. Results

Ambition & research questions

1. Appropriateness of Auditory icons/symbols and symcons for the transfer of information-functions:–> Advice–> Warning–> Emergency

2. Effects of the mixture of icon and symbol („auditory symcon“)

3. Advantages of acoustic signs for „public-user-interfaces“

A. Basics B. Study C. Results

Analysis of a situation– Talks with manfactures and customers (Höft-Wessel, ICA, DB)

– Secondary literature

– Preliminary study (semantic field-analysis)

A. Basics B. Study C. Results

Study objectTicket machine

A. Basics B. Study C. Results

Study designStudy method: Descriptive study

Survey sample size : N=22 Age average: 35 yearsWomen/Men: 10/12

A. Basics B. Study C. Results

Lab set-up> Lectern (Terminal-simulation)> Table-PC (Touchpad)> Headphone

A. Basics B. Study C. Results

Stimuli

321

321

symboliciconic

symconic

Advice: „Ticket ready for collection“

Advice: „Money ready for collection “

Warning: „Timeout“

Emergency: Deterrence

Context-Soundscape (Trainstation)

321

321

A. Basics B. Study C. Results

Evaluation methodsSemantic differential

A. Basics B. Study C. Results

Evaluation methodsSemantic differentialCategorical scaling

A. Basics B. Study C. Results

Evaluation methodsSemantic differentialCategorical scalingResponse time measurement

A. Basics B. Study C. Results

Evaluation methodsSemantic differentialCategorical scalingResponse time measurementParticipant observation

A. Basics B. Study C. Results

Evaluation methodsSemantic differentialCategorical scalingResponse time measurementParticipant observationAssociation analysis

wew

C. Results

A. Basics B. Study C. Results

Ambition & research questions

1. Appropriateness of Auditory icons/symbols and symcons for the transfer of information-functions:–> Advice–> Warning–> Emergency

2. Effects of the mixture of icon and symbol („auditory symcon“)

A. Basics B. Study C. Results

Ambition & research questions

Auditory Symbol Auditory Symcon

Advice

Warning

Emergency

Funtion(intention) partially transferred

Funtion(intention) transferred

Funtion(intention) not transferred or false interpretation

Auditory Icon

A. Basics B. Study C. Results

Ambition & research questions

3. Advantages of acoustic signs for „public-user-interfaces“

A. Basics B. Study C. Results

Ambition & research questions

3. Advantages of acoustic signs for „public-user-interfaces“

The meaning of function of acoustic signs is comprehended intuitively.

A. Basics B. Study C. Results

Further investigationsThe study reveals amongst others, that further investigation on the acoustical parameter „timbre“ is required.

In the literature there is nearly no advice for selecting timbre according an information-function.

Thus, an ongoing study that addresses the perception of timbre is topic of the further presentation.

wew

02 Timbre and function

A. Timbre: definition & properties B. Sound perception C. Study design

A. Timbre: definition & propertiesB. Sound perceptionC. Study design

wew

A. Timbre: definition & properties

A. Timbre: definition & properties B. Sound perception C. Study design

Timbre – what? Definition

Definition (American Standards Association 1960) Timbre is that attribute of auditory sensation in terms of which a listener can judge that two sounds similarly presented and having the same loudness and pitch are dissimilar.

A B

A. Timbre: definition & properties B. Sound perception C. Study design

Timbre properties

Verbal descriptionsovertone constellation: bright, dark, mellow, hollow, purenoise content: raspy, breathy, hoarse attack: smooth, abrupt, sharp, gentle, easing

Relationspitch - frequencyloudness - amplitudetimbre - multiple interacting acoustic factors

A. Timbre: definition & properties B. Sound perception C. Study design

Timbre properties

H. Fletcher (1934)Experiments show that a simple one-to-one relationship does not exist betweenthe two sets { loudness, pitch, timbre } and { sound intensity, fundamental frequency and overtone structure }

sound intensity

fundamental frequency

overtone structure

loudness

pitch

timbre

A. Timbre: definition & properties B. Sound perception C. Study design

Timbre propertiesMore than one dimension: multidimensionality

Erickson (1975)Clearly timbre is a multidimensional stimulus: it cannot be correlated with any single physical dimension.

Plomp (1982)Sounds cannot be ordered on a single scale with respect to timbre. Timbre is a multidimensional attribute of the perception of sounds.

A. Timbre: definition & properties B. Sound perception C. Study design

Multi-Dimensionality-Scaling MDSMDS studies reveal perceptual dimensions correlated with acoustic parameters corresponding to spectral, temporal and spectrotemporal properties of the sound events.

– experiments with paired sound stimuli– rating of similarity– axes corresponding to timbre‘s main perceptual dimensions –> timbre space

A. Timbre: definition & properties B. Sound perception C. Study design

DimensionsDimension I = brightness Low brightness : french horn and cello

High brightness : oboe, muted trombone

Dimension II = spectral fluxHigh synchronicity and low fluctuation :

clarinet, saxophone

Low synchronicity and high fluctuation :

flute, violoncello

Dimension III = attack quality More transients : strings, flute

Fewer transients : brass, bassoon

Dimension I

Dimension IIIDimension II

A. Timbre: definition & properties B. Sound perception C. Study design

Timbre dimensions and related parametersAcross studies, several acoustic/physical parameters corresponding to timbre dimensions were found:

– Spectral centroid

– Spectral deviation

– Spectral density

– Attack time

– Decay time

–Amplitude envelope

– Spectral flux

– Pitch strength

– Attack synchronity

– Attack centroid

– Noisiness

...

wew

B. Sound perception

A. Timbre: definition & properties B. Sound perception C. Study design

Timbre and psychoacoustic properties Interview Dr. Gerhard Thoma, chief sounddesigner BMW:(http://www.goethe.de/ges/wrt/dos/aut/sou/de2169434.htm , 10/2007)

(...) There are sets of regression equations that help calculating/predicting a desired sound perception, for example a sporty sound:

a x sharpness + b x roughness + c x fluctuation strength, … = sportiness.!!

About 80 % of people will evaluate the sound in terms of sportiness.But:„acid test“in driving situation (context) = proof of validity!(...)

A. Timbre: definition & properties B. Sound perception C. Study design

Psychoacoustic properties and cognitive/affective evaluation – simple psychoacoustic parameters only refer to fixed relations of perception and instantaneous stimuli (Haverkamp 2007)

– psychoacoustics are only capturing parts of human sound perception, largely excluding important affective + cognitive evaluation (Vjästfall/Kleiner 2002)

– any endeavour to evaluate (product) sounds by psychoacoustics solely will fail in the end (Blauert/Jekosch 1997)

A. Timbre: definition & properties B. Sound perception C. Study design

Sound perception: target groups/context– individual differences of preferences of particular groups of people for qualitatively different product sounds– no simple „universal“ manipulation that will have the same effect on the sound quality of products (Spence & Zampini 2006)

–> target groups (age, cultural background, milieus/lifestyle) have to be taken into account–> it is important to consider the kind/type of product = context

A. Timbre: definition & properties B. Sound perception C. Study design

Emotional evaluation and functional contentModel of affective circumplex (Russell, 1980)

Activation

Deactivation

PleasantUnpleasant

tense

nervous

stressed

upset

alert

excited

elated

happy

sad

depressed

bored

contented

serene

relaxed

Emergency

Warning

AdviceConfirmation

A. Timbre: definition & properties B. Sound perception C. Study design

Sound perception:evaluation of sound (timbre)

To be taken in account:

– psychoacoustic properties of sound

– learned associations

– cultural background and personal experiences (target group)

– context: mood of subjects, expectations, situation

– influence from other modalities (vision, touch,...)

wew

C. Study design

A. Timbre: definition & properties B. Sound perception C. Study design

Functional Timbre Study („sound-colour the Gestalt“)VARIABLES (TIGA)

Independent:Timbre T Gestalt G [pitch contour, rhythm, tone duration]

Dependent:Information-function I [function, e.g. emergency, warning, advice/confirmation]

Attribution A [emotional/affective evaluation: warm, harsh, sharp,...]

A. Timbre: defi nition & properties B. Sound perception C. Study design

Sound-colour the GestaltApproach:sound-colour T the Gestalt G and examine evaluations of subjects regarding information-function I and attribution A

A. Timbre: definition & properties B. Sound perception C. Study design

Example of stimuliSame Gestalt, different timbre

A B

A. Timbre: definition & properties B. Sound perception C. Study design

Study DesignStep 1: free association task3 Gestalt x 8 Timbre = 24 sound-stimuli are evaluated by subjects–> pool of attributes

Step 2: rating of stimuliRating of 24 stimuli on Likert scales of attributes obtained from step 1 + assessment of given information function

Step 3: analysis of resultsPrincipal-Component-Analysis, Generalized-Linear-Models.Examination of correlations between acoustic properties, rated attributes, information function.

–> Findings and results serve as a basis for further investigations!

A. Timbre: definition & properties B. Sound perception C. Study design

Study Design Timbre selectionTimbre differing in parameter values („timbre dimensions“)

spectral content:

temporal content:

attack/cutoff:

static dynamic

bright

hard soft hard soft

static dynamic

dull/dim

hard soft hard soft

A. Timbre: definition & properties B. Sound perception C. Study design

Study Design Gestalt creation Typical forms of sound-gestalt (learned associations)descending major third of a doorbell („ding dong“) (association: welcome) wailing siren, in germany a fourth: a-d a-d (police or ambulance) (association: emergency - alert)

Scherer/Osinsky 1977Tonality: major mode: indicative of pleasantness and happiness minor mode: disgust and anger

Rhythm: rhythmic: more active, fearful, surprised nonrhythmic: boredom

Activity = Fast tempo, high pitch level, many harmonics, large pitch variation, sharp envelope, small amplitude variation

A. Timbre: definition & properties B. Sound perception C. Study design

Fields of expertise/collaborationRelevant fields of expertise:music psychology, sound-/acoustic-communication, sounddesign, sound-/music-computing, statistical methods –> interdisciplinary team

We are not the only ones:Product Sound Design Group TU DelftMusic Technology Group BarcelonaMusic, Mind and Machine Group (MIT Media Lab , USA)Music Information Retrieval Community –> exchange of findings, knowledge + possible collaborations

A. Timbre: definition & properties B. Sound perception C. Study design

What is the use??

Product Sounddesign

Audio-Branding

AUI (Auditory User Interfaces)

Music Information Retrieval MIR (music catalogues, sound-databases)

Mpeg7-Classification

Electronic Music Distribution

„Perceptual Software-Synthesizers“

...

wew

Thank you!