Post on 23-Apr-2020
transcript
Standards and AR Status as of June 20 2011
Chris6ne Perey PEREY Research & Consul6ng
Overview
• AR Perspec6ves vary widely and are evolving • To whom are AR Standards important?
– Publishers – Standards Development Organiza6ons – Industry Associa6ons
• The Interna6onal AR Standards Community – Ac6vi6es – Achievements – Future Direc6ons
June 20, 2011 (c) 2011 Chris6ne Perey 2
An Ecosystem Perspec6ve of AR
CONTENT Providers/Publishers
PACKAGING
DELIVERY
Enablers Providers of AR-‐enabling technology
Brands and Merchants
CLIENT DEVICES
The Ph
ysical W
orld
The Digital W
orld
June 20, 2011 (c) 2011 Chris6ne Perey 3
An Architecture Perspec6ve of AR
User Experience
Presenta6on/Representa6on/Interac6ons
Content/Augmenta6ons
Processing Sensors
Other Local and Cloud Resources June 20, 2011 (c) 2011 Chris6ne Perey 4
Mul6ple AR Domains
• Databases and Interac6vity
• Discovery, Transport and Pla]orms for publishers
• Camera and live video
• Compass and GPS
Geospa6al Computer Vision
Content Infra-‐structure
June 20, 2011
AR UX
(c) 2011 Chris6ne Perey 5
AR Topics Landscape and Relevant Organizations
Source: Interna6onal AR Standards Mee6ng October 2010
June 20, 2011 (c) 2011 Chris6ne Perey 6
Content
June 20, 2011 (c) 2011 Chris6ne Perey 7
June 20, 2011 (c) 2011 Chris6ne Perey 8
Location/GeoSpatial Standards SensorWeb
Acceleration APIs Sensor APIs
3D Data Formats
Browser Standards
Points of Interest
Mobile hardware interfaces
X3D X3Dom
Mobile software interfaces
Display Technology
Standards Development Organiza6ons
Graphics Repreesentation
For which Augmented Reality is Relevant June 20, 2011 (c) 2011 Chris6ne Perey 9
In addi6on to those on slide 9
• Standards bodies which are beginning to examine (may work on) Augmented Reality – Object Management Group – OASIS – SEDRIS Technologies – BSI – NISO
– IETF – MIPI – ETSI
June 20, 2011 (c) 2011 Chris6ne Perey 10
Industry Associa6ons Represent member interests/requirements • Relevant non-‐AR associa6ons
– GSMA – SID – MMA – IGDA – IEEE – ACM – BuildSmart – Automo6ve industry? – NFAIS – Tourism industry? – Museum curators associa6ons
• AR-‐specific groups – AR Consor6um – Open AR Web – WaveAR – AR DevCamp
• Content developers and curators
June 20, 2011 (c) 2011 Chris6ne Perey 11
The Interna6onal AR Standards Community
• Grassroots – Without administra6ve role or structure – Composed of people seeking open and interoperable AR content and experiences
• Across the AR ecosystem and expert domains – Companies, Universi6es, Research Groups – Wealth of knowledge in implementa6on of AR
• Visibility into ac6vi6es of many Standards Development Organiza6ons (SDOs)
June 20, 2011
hip://www.arstandards.org (c) 2011 Chris6ne Perey 12
June 20, 2011
Ac6vi6es
(c) 2011 Chris6ne Perey 13
Outreach
Advocacy
Mee6ngs
Document/Disseminate
Monitor/Dialog
Publicize Community
• AR Standards mailing lists – http://ARstandards.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion – http://ARstandards.org/mailman/listinfo/news
• Encourage community support and engagement – Pos6ngs to mailing lists – SDOs in which your company or ins6tute is a member – Sponsorship of (and/or par6cipa6on in) AR community
• Support standards in implementa6on roadmaps
• Recommend standards to strategic partners
June 20, 2011
Outreach
(c) 2011 Chris6ne Perey 14
for open/interoperable AR
• Community must advocate to – Technology media – Bloggers – AR Pla]orm providers – Consumer electronics manufacturers – Network access/transport providers
June 20, 2011
Advocacy
(c) 2011 Chris6ne Perey 15
Monthly Community Conference Call
• Purpose – To engage with broader community unable to aiend face-‐to-‐face mee6ngs
– To collaborate and advance (work together on) community resources between mee6ngs
• Schedule and agendas to be determined – Subscribe to announcements mailing list for more
June 20, 2011
Mee6ngs
(c) 2011 Chris6ne Perey 16
Face-‐to-‐Face Mee6ngs
Mobile AR
Summit 60
par6cipants, 34 papers
W3C AR and the Web 40
par6cipants 22 papers
First Interna-‐6onal AR Standards Mee6ng
50 par6cipants 12 papers
Second Interna-‐6onal AR Standards Mee6ng
45 par6cipants 23 papers
Third Interna6onal AR Standards Mee6ng
45 par6cipants 40+ references
June 20, 2011 (c) 2011 Chris6ne Perey 17
Mee6ngs
June 20, 2011
Next Mee6ng (the Fourth)
• October 24-‐25, 2011 – Basel, Switzerland
• Objec6ves – Increase community diversity, size – Sharing of Open and Interoperable AR ini6a6ves – Advance community resources – Examine emerging issues or challenges
• Posi6on Papers highly recommended – Deadline September 20, 2011
hip://www.perey.com/ARStandards/fourth-‐interna6onal-‐ar-‐standards-‐mee6ng/
ISMAR2011
Mee6ngs
(c) 2011 Chris6ne Perey 18
Filh Interna6onal AR Standards Mee6ng
• Begin planning – March 19 2011 – Aus6n, TX
June 20, 2011
Mee6ngs
(c) 2011 Chris6ne Perey 19
Resources: Posi6on Papers
• Over 70 papers published – Geo-‐Spa6al – Visual AR – Architectures and Reference Models – User Experience with AR – Ver6cal market experiences/use cases – Challenges for market growth
June 20, 2011
Document/Disseminate
(c) 2011 Chris6ne Perey 20
Resources: AR Use Cases
• To extract concrete components • Determine which components in common • Prioritize focus for future work • Three Broad use case categories
– Guide – Create – Play
June 20, 2011
Document/Disseminate
(c) 2011 Chris6ne Perey 21
Resources: AR Terminology
• Define and Illustrate “Na6ve” AR terms and synonyms
• Other communi6es – Seman6c Web – Geo-‐spa6al – Developers, User Experience Designers – Computer Vision – Social – End Users – Gamers
June 20, 2011
Document/Disseminate
(c) 2011 Chris6ne Perey 22
Web site, Ustream, Present
• Maintain/improve Web site • Develop presenta6ons about AR Standards for use in third party conferences/mee6ngs
• Mailing lists
June 20, 2011
Document/Disseminate
(c) 2011 Chris6ne Perey 23
With SDOs
• Refresh the SDO landscape (Oct 2010) • Develop frameworks and reference models • Develop, refine and share use cases for AR
June 20, 2011
Monitor/Dialog
(c) 2011 Chris6ne Perey 24
SDOs and Industry bodies
• Testbeds for AR – Can we iden6fy and use “Living Labs”? – Can there be cross-‐SDO testbeds? – Focus on interfaces, but invite hardware vendors – Open vs. closed test beds (IPR) – Goals? Interoperability vs. compliance – TrakMark WG (AR Benchmark tes6ng)
June 20, 2011
Monitor/Dialog
(c) 2011 Chris6ne Perey 25
For more informa6on
hip://www.arstandards.org
June 20, 2011 (c) 2011 Chris6ne Perey 26
Mobile Augmented Reality
Chris6ne Perey cperey@perey.com +41 79 436 68 69 +1 (617) 848-‐8159
Reality Improved
June 20, 2011 (c) 2011 Chris6ne Perey 27