Post on 06-Jan-2016
description
transcript
Status of Physics AnalysesStatus of Physics Analysesin ALEPHin ALEPH
Günther DissertoriGünther DissertoriCERN , EP-DivisionCERN , EP-Division
on behalf of the ALEPH Collaborationon behalf of the ALEPH Collaboration
LEP Physics Jamboree, July 10 LEP Physics Jamboree, July 10 2001, 2001,
LEP Physics Jamboree, July 10, 2001
G. Dissertori 2
Status of the DetectorStatus of the Detector
LEP Physics Jamboree, July 10, 2001
G. Dissertori 3
Outlook LEP1:Outlook LEP1:
– Tau PhysicsTau Physics– Heavy Flavour PhysicsHeavy Flavour Physics– QCDQCD
LEP 1LEP 1
LEP Physics Jamboree, July 10, 2001
G. Dissertori 4
Weak Dipole Moments of the Weak Dipole Moments of the LeptonLepton
AimAim : Study the Lorentz : Study the Lorentz structure of this couplingstructure of this coupling
e+
e- -
+
??
MethodMethod : Likelihood fit : Likelihood fit (simultaneous for all couplings) to (simultaneous for all couplings) to fully differential cross section for fully differential cross section for
XeeXdd
dn
cos
Production decay : , , a120 (3)
q
m
dq
miie 55 22
av
q
m
dq
miie 55 22
av
DataData : 155 pb-1 (1990-1995) : 155 pb-1 (1990-1995) 39k events 39k events
95% CL upperlimits |Re()| |Im()|
1.05 x 10-3 2.22 x 10-3
d[e cm] 5.42 x 10-18 11.93 x 10-18
LEP Physics Jamboree, July 10, 2001
G. Dissertori 5
DataData : 1991-1995 : 1991-1995 – 4 million evts, 670k b-tagged evts4 million evts, 670k b-tagged evts
AFB0,b = 0.1009 0.0027 0.0012
sin2 W = 0.23193 0.00056
AFB0,b = 0.1009 0.0027 0.0012
sin2 W = 0.23193 0.00056
FINAL, CERN EP/2001-047
AAFBFBbb using Jet Charge using Jet Charge
AimAim :Measure :Measure
MethodMethod : inclusive measurement : inclusive measurement– b-tag via NN (30% more stat)b-tag via NN (30% more stat)– Improved jet charge tag includesImproved jet charge tag includes
fast Kaon taggingfast Kaon tagging primary+secondary vertex chargeprimary+secondary vertex charge
– lower systematics becauselower systematics because lower mistag ratelower mistag rate purities from double tag methodpurities from double tag method
bb
bb
bb
bb
totb AFB
b = -
sin2 W
LEP Physics Jamboree, July 10, 2001
G. Dissertori 6
Accepted Accepted by Phys.Lett.Bby Phys.Lett.B
xBwd = 0.716 0.006 0.006
SLD : xBwd = 0.710 0.003 0.005 0.004
xBwd = 0.716 0.006 0.006
SLD : xBwd = 0.710 0.003 0.005 0.004
b Quark Fragmentation Functionb Quark Fragmentation Function
AimAim : measure the spectrum : measure the spectrum of of xxEE = E = EBB / E / Ebeambeam
MethodMethod : semi-exclusive reconstruction : semi-exclusive reconstruction – B B D D(()) ll – 5 channels for D5 channels for D(()) decays decays
– EE from missing energy in hemisphere from missing energy in hemisphere
– Unfold raw distribution with resolution matrix from MCUnfold raw distribution with resolution matrix from MC– avoid model dependence by iterative methodavoid model dependence by iterative method
DataData : 1991 - 1995 : 1991 - 1995 4 million hadr. Z decays4 million hadr. Z decays 3400 B3400 B00 and B and B candidates candidates
bbBB
LEP Physics Jamboree, July 10, 2001
G. Dissertori 7
Inclusive b semileptonic BRInclusive b semileptonic BR
AimAim : measure the BRs : measure the BRs– BR(b BR(b X X l – BR(b BR(b c c X X l
cc
bb WW--
ll
MethodMethod : 2 analyses : 2 analyses
– b-tag b-tag OROR high p high p lepton lepton OROR
charge+impact parameter tagcharge+impact parameter tag– search for lepton (e, search for lepton (e, ) in ) in
opposite hemisphereopposite hemisphere improved dE/dx (TPC pads)improved dE/dx (TPC pads)
– A) fit pA) fit p spectrum spectrum
– B) measure charge correlationB) measure charge correlation
DataData : 1991 - 1995 : 1991 - 1995– combine results a) and b) combine results a) and b)
BR (b X l ) = 0.1070 0.0010 0.0024 0.0025model
BR (b c X l ) = 0.0818 0.0015 0.0023 model
BR (b X l ) = 0.1070 0.0010 0.0024 0.0025model
BR (b c X l ) = 0.0818 0.0015 0.0023 model
0008.00012.0
Sending to journal
Statistical errors only
LEP Physics Jamboree, July 10, 2001
G. Dissertori 8
ss and QCD Colour factors and QCD Colour factors
2
2
2
s
s
s
CF
CA
nfTF
QCD : SU(3) CF=4/3, CA=3, TF=1/2
AimAim : measure simultaneously : measure simultaneously the strong coupling and the QCD the strong coupling and the QCD colour factors using colour factors using 4-jet evts4-jet evts
MethodMethod : Fit : Fit NLONLO predictions to 4-jet predictions to 4-jet observables observables – RR44 (y (ycutcut) )
– four angular correlations in 4-jet eventsfour angular correlations in 4-jet events Bengtsson-Zerwas angle, …Bengtsson-Zerwas angle, …
DataData : 1994 - 1995 : 1994 - 1995 2.5 million hadr. Z decays2.5 million hadr. Z decays 163k 4-jet evts (y163k 4-jet evts (ycutcut = 0.008) = 0.008)
ss(M(Mzz) = 0.119 ) = 0.119 0.006 0.006 0.022 0.022
CCAA = 2.93 = 2.93 0.14 0.14 0.49 0.49
CCFF = 1.35 = 1.35 0.07 0.07 0.22 0.22
ss(M(Mzz) = 0.119 ) = 0.119 0.006 0.006 0.022 0.022
CCAA = 2.93 = 2.93 0.14 0.14 0.49 0.49
CCFF = 1.35 = 1.35 0.07 0.07 0.22 0.22
LEP Physics Jamboree, July 10, 2001
G. Dissertori 9
ss and QCD Colour factors... and QCD Colour factors...
Using all variablesUsing all variables Using only angular correlations +Using only angular correlations +assuming standard hadronization corrections!assuming standard hadronization corrections!
Massless gluino at NLO!
LEP Physics Jamboree, July 10, 2001
G. Dissertori 10
ss from Event Shapes from Event Shapes
AimAim : measure : measure ss from fit of from fit of NLO+resummed QCDNLO+resummed QCD predictions predictions to event shape distributionsto event shape distributions
MethodMethod : from hadronic Z decays : from hadronic Z decays
– Thrust, -lnyThrust, -lny33, M, Mhh, C, Cparpar, B, Btottot, B, Bww
– at LEP1 at LEP1 andand LEP2 LEP2
– hadronization corrections from hadronization corrections from
MCMC
– consistent treatment of consistent treatment of
systematic errors at all energiessystematic errors at all energies
)ln()()(1 2 yfyByA
dy
d mnsss
had
DataData : combined fit to 91 - : combined fit to 91 - 207 GeV207 GeV ss(M(MZZ) = 0.1203 ) = 0.1203 0.001 0.001 0.0013 0.0013
0.00460.0046theotheo
ss(M(MZZ) = 0.1203 ) = 0.1203 0.001 0.001 0.0013 0.0013 0.00460.0046theotheo
LEP Physics Jamboree, July 10, 2001
G. Dissertori 11
Outlook LEP2:Outlook LEP2:
– WW (FSI)WW (FSI)– Exotics : Exotics :
anomalous couplingsanomalous couplings single topsingle top
– ““Standard exotics”:Standard exotics”: SUSYSUSY HiggsHiggs
LEP 2LEP 2
LEP Physics Jamboree, July 10, 2001
G. Dissertori 12
Bose-Einstein Correlations in WW Bose-Einstein Correlations in WW eventsevents
AimAim : look for BE correlations : look for BE correlations between pions from different Wsbetween pions from different Ws
WW11WW22
BE?BE?
BE?BE?
BEBE BEBE
MethodMethod : measure the observable : measure the observable
– mixedmixed hadronic parts of different semi-leptonic evts hadronic parts of different semi-leptonic evts
22
BE no MC,mixedhadr
Bkgr -DATA mixedhadr
Ep Q
22
BE no MC,mixedhadr
Bkgr -DATA mixedhadr
Ep Q
DataData : 183 - 208 GeV : 183 - 208 GeV
Q(GeV)Q(GeV)
Confirms our previous results:Confirms our previous results:
BE correlations between pions from different Ws BE correlations between pions from different Ws are disfavouredare disfavoured
LEP Physics Jamboree, July 10, 2001
G. Dissertori 13
Particle Flow in WW eventsParticle Flow in WW events
AimAim : look for colour : look for colour reconnection effects in fully reconnection effects in fully hadronic WW evtshadronic WW evts
WW22
DD
CCBB
WW11AA
MethodMethod : apply the same : apply the same selection as for W mass analysisselection as for W mass analysis– project chg+neutral particles
into planes between jets from Ws– compute the ratio of particle flow
in different interjet regions
DataData : 189 - 207 GeV : 189 - 207 GeV
– compare to predictions of compare to predictions of different MC modelsdifferent MC models
– check SKI for different Kcheck SKI for different Kii values values
Minimum at Ki 3.570% CR at 189 GeV.
Systematics under study
Ki
2
LEP Physics Jamboree, July 10, 2001
G. Dissertori 14
Reduction in FSI uncertainty on Reduction in FSI uncertainty on MMWW? ?
AimAim : Make W mass analysis in : Make W mass analysis in fully hadronic channel more robust fully hadronic channel more robust w.r.t. colour reconnection effectsw.r.t. colour reconnection effects
– b) b) cut outcut out particles which particles which lie in interjet region lie in interjet region are soft are soft
MethodMethod : : – a) apply a) apply cone jet algorithmcone jet algorithm in in
order to recompute jet directionsorder to recompute jet directions study dependence on study dependence on cone size Rcone size R
e.g. expected for R=0.75 reduction by a factor of 2 in mW, with 13% increase in statistical uncertainty
e.g. expected for R=0.75 reduction by a factor of 2 in mW, with 13% increase in statistical uncertainty
Mass shifts vs R
0
0.025
0.05
0.075
0.1
0.125
0.15
0.5 1 1.5 2
R (rad)
m
W (
GeV
)
SK1 k=0.65
SK1 100%
Herwig CR
Durh
am
mm
W(G
eV
/c2)
LEP Physics Jamboree, July 10, 2001
G. Dissertori 15
Anomalous Neutral CouplingsAnomalous Neutral Couplings
AimAim : look for anomalous contr. : look for anomalous contr.– in SM forbidden at tree levelin SM forbidden at tree level– model them by anomalous vertex contributions model them by anomalous vertex contributions
hh,Z,Z1,..,41,..,4
MethodMethod : same topology as radiative : same topology as radiative returnsreturns– 2 jets + isolated photon2 jets + isolated photon
– measure cross section, cos (measure cross section, cos (), angle(), angle(--jets)jets)
– likelihood including anomalous couplingslikelihood including anomalous couplings
e+
e-
q
q
Z*,*
Z
DataData : 189-207 GeV , >600 pb : 189-207 GeV , >600 pb-1 -1 no deviation from SM observedno deviation from SM observed
LEP Physics Jamboree, July 10, 2001
G. Dissertori 16
Single Top ProductionSingle Top Production
AimAim : look for FCNC : look for FCNC– in SM only via loops in SM only via loops <10<10-9-9 fb fb– model FCNC by anomalous vertex contributionsmodel FCNC by anomalous vertex contributions
MethodMethod : depending on W decay from t : depending on W decay from t bW, search forbW, search for– W W qq’ : qq’ : 4 jet topology 4 jet topology – W W ll 2 jets + isolated lepton2 jets + isolated lepton– tag the b-jettag the b-jet– mmtoptop dependence dependence reduced by re- reduced by re-
optimizationoptimization
e+
e- t
c/u
DataData : 189-207 GeV , 625 pb : 189-207 GeV , 625 pb-1 -1 no significant excess observedno significant excess observed
LEP Physics Jamboree, July 10, 2001
G. Dissertori 17
Impact of Higgs searches on LSP Impact of Higgs searches on LSP limitlimit
AimAim : study impact of Higgs : study impact of Higgs searches on m(LSP) limit searches on m(LSP) limit
DataData : take limits on m : take limits on mhh<113.5 GeV/c<113.5 GeV/c22 as well as MSSM scan as well as MSSM scan
tan
m(L
SP)
m(LSP)
MethodMethod : radiative corr. to Higgs : radiative corr. to Higgs
mass = mass = f(log(mf(log(mstopstop/m/mtoptop), tan), tan))
– limit on mlimit on mhh limit on limit on mmstopstop vs vs
tantan limit on limit on MM2 2 vs tanvs tan for fixed for fixed
mm00 improve limit improve limit m(LSP) vs tanm(LSP) vs tan
– small msmall m00 m = m m = m no sensitivity no sensitivity
(corridor)(corridor) but small mbut small m00 small slepton masses small slepton masses
~~
LEP Physics Jamboree, July 10, 2001
G. Dissertori 18
Impact of stau mixing on LSP limitImpact of stau mixing on LSP limit
AimAim : avoid drop in m(LSP) limit : avoid drop in m(LSP) limit for large stau mixingfor large stau mixing
small mixing large
)tan(
1,~
2,~
2,~
~
m
m
AmmM
R
L
MethodMethod :design dedicated searches for :design dedicated searches for
– tau final statestau final states
– ““invisible” final statesinvisible” final states
– for for large tanlarge tan, deep gaugino region, deep gaugino region
DataData : 189 - 208 GeV : 189 - 208 GeV
Chargino+selectron incl incl (ISR analysis)
...~~ 01
01
02
~
No mixingNo mixing maximal mixingmaximal mixing
Stau mixing angle
LEP Physics Jamboree, July 10, 2001
G. Dissertori 19
Status of the SM Higgs SearchStatus of the SM Higgs Search
Results published in Results published in PLB 495 (2000) 1 : 3PLB 495 (2000) 1 : 3 excess excess– 2 independent analysis streams. Analyses frozen before data taking!2 independent analysis streams. Analyses frozen before data taking!
During last months following developmentsDuring last months following developments
– Additional MC Additional MC more precise shapes and efficienciesmore precise shapes and efficiencies
– all Y2K data reprocessed in December 2000 (gained all Y2K data reprocessed in December 2000 (gained 1pb 1pb-1-1)) NOTENOTE : : 3 most significant candidates were already reprocessed 3 most significant candidates were already reprocessed
before the publication, showing that they are stablebefore the publication, showing that they are stable
– New LEP ENew LEP ECM CM (about 140 MeV lower)(about 140 MeV lower)
– improved treatment of improved treatment of beam-induced backgroundbeam-induced background studied on random triggers, “dirty MC” generated, cleaning studied on random triggers, “dirty MC” generated, cleaning
procedure implementedprocedure implemented
– further systematic studiesfurther systematic studies evaluated evaluated impact of uncertaintiesimpact of uncertainties from b-tagging, correlations in from b-tagging, correlations in
discriminating variables, jet smearing, gluon splitting, discriminating variables, jet smearing, gluon splitting, ss, MC , MC description of selection variables description of selection variables on (1-CLon (1-CLbb))
LEP Physics Jamboree, July 10, 2001
G. Dissertori 20
Status of the SM Higgs Search...Status of the SM Higgs Search...
Outcome :Outcome :
The effects of recent changes and of systematic uncertainties are within 0.2
as estimated in our publication
The effects of recent changes and of systematic uncertainties are within 0.2
as estimated in our publication
We are very close to publishing our final paper on this We are very close to publishing our final paper on this topic...topic...
LEP Physics Jamboree, July 10, 2001
G. Dissertori 21
SummarySummary
Plenty of (preliminary and final) physics results Plenty of (preliminary and final) physics results
using data collected by ALEPH at LEP1 and LEP2.using data collected by ALEPH at LEP1 and LEP2.
Extensive work put into the Extensive work put into the studies of systematic studies of systematic
uncertainties of the SM Higgs searchuncertainties of the SM Higgs search– result is stable. result is stable. Final publication to come soon. Final publication to come soon.
For more details, have a look atFor more details, have a look at
http://alephwww.cern.ch/ALPUB/oldconf/summer01/http://alephwww.cern.ch/ALPUB/oldconf/summer01/
summer.htmlsummer.html