System Defintion: R7, R8, R9 System R8 = Cantilever beam = slide 2 System R9 = Full Machine = slide...

Post on 18-Jan-2018

223 views 0 download

description

R9-Problem Studied – Composite system including machine represented by M1, K1 M1 L=29” a=21” 1” Concentrated mass 18.0 kg=39.7 lbm 12” Bar properties Rho=0.282 lbm/inch^3 E=2.9E7 psi (Bar mass =62.5kg) Fapplied K1

transcript

System Defintion: R7, R8, R9

• System R8 = Cantilever beam = slide 2• System R9 = Full Machine = slide 3• System R7 = All except machine mass/spring – see

slide 4

R8-Problem Studied. Absorber on fixed mount

L=29” a=21”

1”

Concentrated mass 18.0 kg=39.7 lbm

12”Bar propertiesRho=0.282 lbm/inch^3E=2.9E7 psi(Bar mass =62.5kg)

FappliedSomewhereAlong beam

R9-Problem Studied – Composite system including machine represented by M1, K1

M1

L=29” a=21”

1”

Concentrated mass 18.0 kg=39.7 lbm

12”Bar propertiesRho=0.282 lbm/inch^3E=2.9E7 psi(Bar mass =62.5kg)

FappliedK1

R7-Problem Studied

L=29” a=21”

1”

Concentrated mass 18.0 kg=39.7 lbm

12”Bar propertiesRho=0.282 lbm/inch^3E=2.9E7 psi(Bar mass =62.5kg)

Fapplied Massless rolling support allows displacement in lateral direction, but enforces slope of absorber perpendicular to the base as signifified by red right-angle symbol

R7-Driving Point Transfer Fn at Base. Note vertical axis is 100*Hv =100*V/F in metric unitsSlope to left suggests M=66kg. Total mass is 62.5kg

M =1/[w*Hv]= 1/[2*pi*10.5*0.00023)=66 kg

M =1/[w*Hv]= 1/[2*pi*1.4*0.001729]=66 kg

R7 FIT 5-40hz => M= 60.3kg

Comparison of FE results vs SDOF best fit

0.0000001

0.000001

0.00001

0.0001

0.001

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40

Freq (hz)

|H|=

|Vel

ocity

/For

ce|

H=V/FSDOF Fit of HWeightWindow

Interval:5.0-40.0hz. Best fit:M=60.3, K=2.12E+6 .

R7 10-38hz => M= 57.9kg

Comparison of FE results vs SDOF best fit

0.0000001

0.000001

0.00001

0.0001

0.001

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40

Freq (hz)

|H|=

|Vel

ocity

/For

ce|

H=V/FSDOF Fit of HWeightWindow

Interval:10.0-38.0hz. Best fit:M=57.9, K=2.04E+6 .

R7 15-36hz => M= 55.3kg

Comparison of FE results vs SDOF best fit

0.0000001

0.000001

0.00001

0.0001

0.001

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40

Freq (hz)

|H|=

|Vel

ocity

/For

ce|

H=V/FSDOF Fit of HWeightWindow

Interval:15.0-35.9hz. Best fit:M=55.3, K=1.94E+6 .

R7 20-34hz => M= 52.3kg

Comparison of FE results vs SDOF best fit

0.0000001

0.000001

0.00001

0.0001

0.001

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40

Freq (hz)

|H|=

|Vel

ocity

/For

ce|

H=V/FSDOF Fit of HWeightWindow

Interval:20.0-33.9hz. Best fit:M=52.3, K=1.84E+6 .

R7 25-32hz => M= 52.3kg

Comparison of FE results vs SDOF best fit

0.0000001

0.000001

0.00001

0.0001

0.001

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40

Freq (hz)

|H|=

|Vel

ocity

/For

ce|

H=V/FSDOF Fit of HWeightWindow

Interval:25.0-31.9hz. Best fit:M=52.3, K=1.84E+6 .

R7 28-30.7hz => M= 52.3kg

Comparison of FE results vs SDOF best fit

0.0000001

0.000001

0.00001

0.0001

0.001

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40

Freq (hz)

|H|=

|Vel

ocity

/For

ce|

H=V/FSDOF Fit of HWeightWindow

Interval:28.0-30.7hz. Best fit:M=52.3, K=1.84E+6 .

R7 29.5-30.1hz => M= 52.3kg

Comparison of FE results vs SDOF best fit

0.0000001

0.000001

0.00001

0.0001

0.001

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40

Freq (hz)

|H|=

|Vel

ocity

/For

ce|

H=V/FSDOF Fit of HWeightWindow

Interval:29.5-30.1hz. Best fit:M=52.3, K=1.84E+6 .

R9 Full System

R9 - Bode 5-40hz

R7 Bode 5-40hz

R8 Bode 1-300hz

R8-Impact/Monitor 4.2” from base (loc = 1)

R8-Impact/Monitor 12.6” from base (loc = 5)

R8-Impact/Monitor 21” from base = at loc of concentrated mass. (loc=9)

R8-Impact monitor 29” from base = at end of absorber (loc=11)