System Level Overview of the Hypergolic Gelled Propellant ...GPL Overview 2 Oxidizer workstation...

Post on 25-Sep-2020

0 views 0 download

transcript

System Level Overview of the Hypergolic Gelled

Propellant Lab (GPL)

Purdue University

Maurice J. Zucrow Laboratories

1

Dr. Timothée L. Pourpoint

Dr. Steve Heister

Dr. William Anderson

Dr. Robert Lucht

Dr. Steven Son

GPL Overview

2

Oxidizer workstation

Fuel workstation

General use fume hood

Data acquisition system

Ventilation system

Workbenches

Test stand

LASER

• Dedicated laboratory space for NTO-based and hydrazine-based propellant studies

• Dedicated ventilation system (0.02" H2O P between laboratory and control room)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

1

2

3 4

5

6

7

8

Capillary Rheometer

9

9

Droplet Burning/Vaporization

3

• Gelled MMH Droplet Combustion

• Objective:

• Improve fundamental understanding of the burning behavior of gelled

MMH droplets

• System Capabilities

• Variable chamber conditions

• Inert or oxidizing environment

• Max pressure: ~10 atm

• Max temperature: ~450 K

• Optical access from multiple angles

Droplet Burning/Vaporization

4

1) MMH evaporates from the

droplet surface during

combustion

2) A semi-rigid shell of HPC is

formed

3) The HPC layer blocks diffusion

of the fuel vapor

4) A bubble of MMH vapor is

formed under the HPC layer

(Fig 1-3 )

5) The pressure of the bubble

ruptures the outer layer (Fig 4)

6) A jet of MMH vapor is expelled

from the ruptured area (Fig 4-6)

t = 0ms t = 32ms t = 34ms

t = 35ms t = 38ms t = 39ms

1) 2) 3)

6) 5) 4)

• Results:

Droplet is approximately 2 mm in diameter

MMH Droplet Combustion in a N2O4 Environment

Droplet Burning/Vaporization

5

• Droplets of MMH with 3 wt.% HPC show

dependency between mass burning rate and

droplet surface area.

• Disturbances to the combustion process

caused by accumulation of the solid HPC

layer diminish during the combustion

process.

• Droplets with a liquid layer exhibit the

opposite behavior with increasing

disturbances as combustion progresses.

0

0.5

1

1.5

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1R

ed

uced

Vo

lum

e V

/Vi

Reduced Time t/tb

MMH with 3% HPC

MMH with 3%

Tetraglyme

R² = 0.9122

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

2 4 6 8 10 12

Mass

bu

rn

ing

rate

m

g /

s

Di2 mm2

Droplet Burning/Vaporization

6

• High Repetition Rate Laser Diagnostics

• Objective

• Obtain insight into dynamics of MMH droplet combustion, flame

structure and provide data needed for chemical kinetics modeling

• System Capabilities

• Variable chamber conditions

• Planar Laser Induced

Fluorescence (PLIF) imaging at

up to 5 kHz to observe short

duration combustion phenomena

• Tunable laser wavelength to

excite the OH radical

• High frequency 3-D imaging with

rotating mirror

Droplet Burning/Vaporization

7

2mm

2mm

Pc = 103.4 kPa Pc = 413.7 kPa

Impingement point

2mm

• Results

• OH PLIF images of liquid MMH

droplets burning in air

• OH PLIF images of impinging jet

test of H2O2 – Tetraglyme/NaBH4

Droplet Burning/Vaporization

8

• Hypergolic Droplet Contact Experiment

• Objective

• Explore fundamental combustion phenomena for contacting hypergolic

propellant droplets in a controlled environment

• System Capabilities

• Controlled environment

– Pressure

– Temperature

– Ambient gas composition and velocity

• Impact velocities

– Up to 10 m/s

• Optically accessible

– PLIF, thin filament pyrometry, absorption spectroscopy, etc.

Droplet Burning/Vaporization

9

• Results

• Quantified pre-ignition explosion due

to rapid gas production with

MMH/RFNA

• Examined less toxic hypergolic

propellants

• DMAZ, TMEDA, TMEDA/DMAZ,

BMIMDCA, etc.

• Future Research

• Explore pre-ignition explosion at

higher impact velocities

• Shift toward less toxic hypergolic

propellants

MMH contacting RFNA

• Rheological Characterization of non-Newtonian Propellants

• Objective

• Investigate and quantify non-Newtonian fluid behavior at conditions

experienced by propellants during all stages of operation from low shear

storage up to high shear injection

Non-Newtonian Propellant Characterization

10

• System Capabilities

• Low-intermediate shear rotational rheology

• Propellant yield stress, storage/loss

modulus, etc.

• High shear capillary rheology

• Safe testing of toxic propellants

• Controllable shear rate up to 106 1/s

• Remote operation at driving pressures

up to 3000 psia

Non-Newtonian Propellant Characterization

11

Fuel Side of

Rheometer Cabinet Loading

Tube

Linear

Encoder

Piston

Rod

Waste

Collection Water Flush

Tank

Capillary Assembly

Capillary

Tube Pressure

Transducers

12

Dashed lines represent viscosities

of liquid MMH and RP-1

Non-Newtonian Propellant Characterization

• Results are very similar for MMH and RP-1 gel

• Silica properties dominate rheological behavior

• Viscosity of the gel at high shear is much higher than that of the base fluid

• Direct impact on modeling efforts for gelled propellants

• Results

Spray Ignition/Combustion

13

• Hypergolic Propellant Spray Ignition/Combustion

• Objective:

• Characterize and gain an understanding of the ignition and combustion

characteristics of hypergolic propellant sprays

• System Capabilities

• 60°Included Angle

• 360°Optically Accessible Chamber

• Variable chamber pressure and temperature

• Variable O/F, Rm, injection duration

• Highly repeatable injection conditions

• ~3 ms to steady state injection

• Pulsed operation

Spray Ignition/Combustion

14

• Results:

• MMH/RFNA

• Less Toxic Hypergolic Propellants

• H2O2 – Triglyme/NaBH4

Pulse 1 Pulse 2 Pulsed Actuator Response

5 mm

5 mm 5 mm