Post on 04-Jul-2020
transcript
1
Cycle improvements along Tanner Street/Druid Street
Consultation Report & Responses to Issues Raised December 2018
2
Contents
Executive summary ..................................................................................................... 3
1. About the proposal .................................................................................................. 3
1.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................ 3
1.2 Purpose .............................................................................................................. 3
1.3 Detailed description ........................................................................................... 4
2. About the consultation ............................................................................................. 7
2.1 Purpose .............................................................................................................. 7
2.2 Potential outcomes ............................................................................................ 7
2.3 Consultation history ........................................................................................... 7
2.4 Who we consulted .............................................................................................. 7
2.5 Dates and duration ............................................................................................. 8
2.6 What we asked .................................................................................................. 8
2.7 Methods of responding....................................................................................... 8
2.8 Analysis of consultation responses .................................................................... 8
3. About the respondents ............................................................................................ 9
3.1 Number of respondents...................................................................................... 9
3.2 How respondents heard about the consultation ............................................. 9
3.3 Equality Monitoring .......................................................................................... 10
4. Summary of all consultation responses ................................................................. 10
4.2 Question: If you have any further comments about our proposals, please write
these in the box below ........................................................................................... 10
4.2 Stakeholder responses .................................................................................... 11
5. Conclusion and next steps .................................................................................... 13
5.1 Conclusion ....................................................................................................... 13
5.2 Next steps ........................................................................................................ 13
6. Response to the main issues raised ...................................................................... 14
Appendix A: Consultation materials .......................................................................... 16
Appendix B: Stakeholder list ..................................................................................... 20
3
Executive summary
This report outlines the consultation we undertook between 28 September and 19
November 2017 on our proposals to deliver cycle improvements along Tanner
Street/Druid Street. This report details the responses we received, and identifies
how we will respond to issues raised through the consultation process.
1. About the proposal
1.1 Introduction
Between 28 September and 19 November 2017 we consulted on proposals to make
changes to cycling provision along Tanner Street. The following report presents the
outcomes of this consultation and provides detailed responses to the main issues
raised, as well as our next steps.
Our consultation sought views on changes to cycling provision on Tanner Street in
the London Borough of Southwark. As part of the changes, a segregated two-way
cycle track was proposed along the eastern side of Tanner Street to join the
proposed Cycle Superhighway Route 4 (CS4) on the northern edge of Jamaica
Road.
1.2 Purpose
Tanner Street already forms part of Quietway 14, linking Tower Bridge Road to
Canada Water. Quietways are a network of cycle routes throughout London, linking
major destinations and are especially helpful for those who wish to use quieter, low
traffic routes. And included changes for pedestrians, including a new signalised
pedestrian crossing on Druid Street and changes to pavements.
Our proposals support the Mayor of London’s Healthy Streets Approach, which is a
long-term vision to encourage more Londoners to walk and cycle by making
London’s streets healthier, safer and more welcoming.
4
1.3 Detailed description
Our proposals were explained in detail as follows:
5
Changes on Tanner Street/Druid Street
Signalised junction at Tanner Street/Druid Street junction
Upgraded traffic signals at the Tanner Street / Druid Street junction. This junction
currently prioritises Tanner Street’s one-way south-westbound traffic over traffic from
Druid Street. Signalising the junction would allow safer two-way cycle movement
between the Tanner Street / Druid Street junction and Jamaica Road. In addition, it
would provide a new signalised pedestrian crossing across Druid Street
Cycle-specific traffic lights
Low-level cycle-specific traffic lights at the junction to permit cycle movements from:
Tanner Street rail tunnel north to Tanner Street / Jamaica Road
Druid Street (south-eastern arm) to Tanner Street rail tunnel
Tanner Street (northern arm) south to Tanner Street rail tunnel.
Widened pedestrian crossing
Widening the current pedestrian crossing across Tanner Street from 2.4 meters to
3.2 meters to allow more people to use it.
New slip lane for cyclists
The introduction of a new slip lane for cyclists for travel eastwards along Druid Street
from Tanner Street north.
Weight restriction introduced for motor vehicles
Introducing a 7-tonne vehicle restriction for traffic wishing to turn left into the Tanner
Street rail tunnel from Druid Street to prevent larger vehicles encroaching on the new
cycle lane.
Proposed changes on Tanner Street to Jamaica Road
Narrowing Tanner Street to one lane
Narrowing width of Tanner Street to one lane to reduce vehicle speeds.
New segregated cycle track
A new, three meter wide, two-way segregated cycle track between Tanner Street /
Druid Street junction and Jamaica Road to make it easier and safer to cycle along
this section of Tanner Street.
New bus stop bypass
Introduce a new three meter wide bus stop bypass to accommodate the two-way
cycle track. People catching a bus or continuing along the footway would need to
cross the cycle track using marked crossing points. The cycle track would bend
around the bus stop in order to provide a three meter wide pedestrian island. The
narrowness of the existing footway and presence of railings meant it was not
6
possible to retain a continuous footway of sufficient width on the other side of the
new cycle track.
Footway improvements at entrance to the Arnold Estate
Raise the road surface at the entrance to the Arnold Estate to give reduce motor
vehicle speeds. We would also give priority to cyclists on the two-way track over
turning traffic.
Loading bay outside 296 to 301 Tanner Street
A shorter loading bay, reduced from 29 meters to 13.6 meters. Following an
occupancy survey, this reduced length was anticipated to be sufficient for demand.
The loading bay would also be partially inset into the pavement, improving the traffic
flow along Tanner Street.
Improved footway outside shops at 296 to 132 Tanner Street
Align the street furniture and removing the phone box outside the shops to increase
pavement width and improve the street environment
Other sections of this Quietway
The section of Quietway Jamaica Road to Dockhead would run along the proposed
Cycle Superhighway Route 4 (CS4) on Jamaica Road. You can find further details
about CS4 here www.tfl.gov.uk/cs4.
The designs complemented Southwark Council’s proposal to introduce a stepped
contraflow cycle track on a widened pavement underneath the rail bridge between
Maltby Street and Druid Street.
Traffic impacts
We carried out traffic modelling on the proposed scheme and predicted there would
be a negligible impact to traffic and bus services.
7
2. About the consultation
2.1 Purpose
The objectives of the consultation were:
To give stakeholders and the public easily-understandable information about the proposals and allow them to respond
To understand the level of support or opposition for the change/s for the proposals
To understand any issues that might affect the proposal of which we were not previously aware
To understand concerns and objections
To allow respondents to make suggestions.
2.2 Potential outcomes
The potential outcomes of the consultation were:
Following careful consideration of the consultation responses, we decide to proceed with the scheme as set out in the consultation
Following careful consideration of the consultation responses, we modify the proposals in response to issues raised and proceed with a revised scheme
Following careful consideration of the consultation responses, we decide not to proceed with the scheme.
2.3 Consultation history
The proposed works were related to our plans for CS4 Southwark to Greenwich,
which we consulted on in tandem. The factual report and ‘response to issues raised’
document produced for the CS4 Southwark to Greenwich consultation can be found
on our website here: https://consultations.tfl.gov.uk/roads/cs4/
2.4 Who we consulted
We sent emails and letters to local residents and stakeholders, and those who had
been identified as interested in this scheme. This included Southwark Council,
London TravelWatch, the Police and emergency services, walking, cycling and road
user groups, politicians, and local employers and venues. A copy of our stakeholder
email can be seen in Appendix A – Consultation materials. A list of stakeholders we
consulted can be found in Appendix B – List of stakeholders consulted.
8
2.5 Dates and duration
The consultation was held for a period of eight weeks from 28 September to 19
November 2017, at the same time as the CS4 consultation period.
2.6 What we asked
Our consultation contained two questions. These were:
“Do you support the proposals for improved cycling provision on Tanner Street and
Druid Street?” and “Do you have any further comments on our proposal?”
The analysis of these results can be found in section 4.
2.7 Methods of responding
People were invited to respond to the consultation using a variety of methods. They
could respond by accessing the online questionnaire; via our freepost address at
FREEPOST TFL CONSULTATIONS; or by email to consultations@tfl.gov.uk.
2.8 Analysis of consultation responses
Analysis of consultation responses was carried out by the TfL Local Communities
and Partnerships team.
In our survey we asked respondents to indicate their level of support for the
proposals, and to provide thoughts and comments through an open comments box.
Comments received were then grouped in general, and by each section of the
proposals where this was specified.
We created a framework to analyse these comments in a consistent way. Once all
comments were logged and issues tagged, we were able to build a picture of what
respondents were concerned about, or talked about in their comments.
9
3. About the respondents
This section provides more information about who responded to the consultation.
3.1 Number of respondents
We received 174 direct responses to the consultation. Of these, three were
responses from stakeholders representing the local community and interest groups,
and 171 were from individuals, 56 of which described themselves as local residents.
The London Cycling Campaign submitted a statement of support. This can be seen
in section 4.2: Stakeholder responses.
Information about these respondents:
Respondents Total %
Individual responses 164 94
Stakeholder responses 3 2
Not answered 7 4
Total 174 100
3.2 How respondents heard about the consultation
We asked respondents to let us know how they had heard about our consultation;
this allowed us to better understand how our communications methods were utilised.
Out of the 174 individual and stakeholder responses we received, 160 respondents
answered this question as follows:
How respondents heard Total %
Received an email from TfL 23 13
Received a letter from TfL 18 10
Read about in the press 6 3
Saw it on the TfL website 52 30
Social media 42 24
Other (please specify) 19 11
Not Answered 14 8
10
3.3 Equality Monitoring
We sometimes ask respondents to provide information about themselves to help us
ensure our consultations reach all sections of the community and to help improve the
effectiveness of the way we communicate with our customers.
We asked respondents to tell us about their gender, ethnic group, age, sexual
orientation, faith, health and disability. All questions were optional. Any information
provided was kept confidential and used for analysis purposes only.
4. Summary of all consultation responses
We received 174 responses to consultation, which asked one substantive question,
‘Do you support the proposals for improved cycling provision on Tanner Street and
Druid Street?’ This was followed a text box which asked: If you have any further
comments about our proposals, please write these in the box below’. Ninety
respondents took this opportunity.
4.1 Question: Do you support the proposals for improved cycling provision on Tanner
Street and Druid Street?
Number of responses Per cent
Strongly support 128 74%
Support 11 6%
Neither support nor oppose 2 1%
Oppose 8 5%
Strongly oppose 25 14%
4.2 Question: If you have any further comments about our proposals, please write
these in the box below
We asked respondents to provide thoughts on the proposals through an open
comments box. This allowed us to build a picture of what respondents were
concerned about, or talked about in their comments.
Of the 174 people who responded to this consultation, 90 respondents (52 per cent)
provided comments. Fifty-seven, out of the 90 respondents (63 per cent) provided
broadly positive support for the scheme.
The top ten themes made overall, and the number of times these were raised are
shown in the following table:
11
Theme No. of comments
Welcomed the scheme/changes and were supportive of them 37
Concerns that the scheme would increase traffic congestion 17
Felt pedestrians/disabled users' needs ignored in favour of cyclists 10
Noted that the scheme needs to join up with CS4 10
The scheme will make safer cycling or improve cycling provision 10
Did not believe that the project represented good value for money 7
That the changes proposed by us would worsen air quality 6
Wanted it built as soon as possible or believed it was long overdue 5
Felt that motorists were being disadvantaged in favour of cyclists 4
Wanted the proposal extend 4
4.2 Stakeholder responses
This section provides the feedback we received from stakeholders.
Stop Killing Cyclists “Stop Killing Cyclists fully support this consultation, and the wider benefits this link will provide in helping create a joined up cycle network in South East London, along with CS4.”
Wheels for Wellbeing
“This is a response from Wheels for Wellbeing, an award-winning London charity supporting disabled people of all ages and abilities to enjoy the benefits of cycling. Cycling can be easier than walking, a way to keep independent, fit and healthy, a mobility aid, and a useful form of everyday transport. Many aren’t aware of the fact that disabled people cycle. Growing numbers do and use standard bicycles, as well as non-standard cycles. This linkage between Cycle Superhighway 4 and Quietway 14 is welcome as part of providing a strong network of routes in London. Whilst we appreciate that providing sufficient width for cycling is behind design decisions relating to the use of the bus stop bypass as continuation of the footway we would question if concern has been given to finding sufficient width by using more existing carriageway space to continue a pavement alongside the bus stop bypass. If the existing bus stop bypass design is continued it would be interesting to see designs which accommodated access to the pedestrian crossing at the junction from the bus stop island to reduce the need for crossing movements.
12
It is welcome to see that the proposed slip lane from Tanner Street to Druid Street has tactile shown. The slip lane into Druid Street appears rather narrow and we would be cautious that it is ensured that sufficient width is provided for all forms of cycle in it.”
Southwark Cyclists “This response is on behalf of Southwark Cyclists, the London Cycling Campaign Group for the Borough of Southwark. It has been prepared with input from many of our members. Southwark Cyclists are strongly supportive of this scheme. A link from Q14 to CS4 is essential and we are pleased to see this scheme coming to consultation at the same time as CS4.”
London Cycling Campaign
“TfL (in Southwark) Druid Street and Tanner Street junction
20 November 2017 This consultation response is on behalf of the London Cycling Campaign, the capital’s leading cycling organisation with more than 12,000 members and 30,000 supporters. The LCC welcomes the opportunity to comment on proposals. The response is in support of the response from Southwark Cyclists, London Cycling Campaign’s local branch, and was developed with input from LCC’s Infrastructure Advisory Panel.
This scheme is supported, providing a useful link to and from Cycle Superhighway 4 and Quietway 14. That said, design for contra-flow cycling on the one-way sections of both Druid and Tanner Streets must be considered to enable the widest range of people to feel safe cycling along them. And space should be taken from motor vehicles over pedestrians. Given buses on Tanner Street are infrequent, the bus cage should potentially be in the carriageway, enabling pavement to be fully retained on both sides of the street as well as cycle track. Finally, few motor vehicles turn left from Druid into Tanner Street. Banning this turn could be considered to avoid any hook risks, but this should not be considered at the cost of moving this scheme forward for delivery with the rest of Q14 and/or CS4.
General points about cycling schemes:
LCC requires schemes to be designed to accommodate growth in cycling. Providing space for cycling is a more efficient use of road space than providing space for driving private motor vehicles, particularly for journeys of 5km or less. In terms of providing maximum efficiency for space and energy use, walking, cycling, then public transport are key.
13
As demonstrated by the success of recent Cycle Superhighways and mini-Holland projects etc., people cycle when they feel safe. For cycling to become mainstream, a network of high-quality, direct routes separate from high volumes and/or speeds of motor vehicle traffic is required to/from all key destinations and residential areas in an area. Schemes should be planned, designed and implemented to maximise potential to increase journeys – with links to nearby amenities, residential centres, transport hubs considered from the outset.
Spending money on cycling infrastructure has been shown to dramatically boost health outcomes in an area. Spending on cycling schemes outranks all other transport mode for return on investment according to a DfT study. Schemes which promote cycling meet TfL’s “Healthy Streets” checklist. A healthy street is one where people choose to cycle.
All schemes should be designed to enable people of all ages and abilities to cycle, including disabled people.
LCC wants, as a condition of funding, all highway development designed to London Cycling Design Standards (LCDS), with a Cycling Level of Service (CLoS) rating of 70 or above, with all “Critical Fails” eliminated.”
5. Conclusion and next steps
5.1 Conclusion
We have reviewed all of the comments made during the consultation. We intend to
progress our as originally planned, with the inclusion of some changes to the
pedestrian provision, outlined in section 6.
5.2 Next steps
The following table indicates key dates and activities. Dates are subject to change.
Further updates will be provided on the consultation web page.
Activity Date
On street and local press advertisements notifying
statutory notification period changes to Red Route Traffic
Orders
Spring 2019
14
Activity Date
Start date for scheme construction Spring 2019
6. Response to the main issues raised
Concerns that the scheme would increase traffic congestion
We do not anticipate that the scheme will have a significant impact on
congestion in the area. We have undertaken traffic modelling of our proposals
and we predict that it would have no significant impact on motor traffic journey
times. As part of the scheme implementation process we will be monitoring
traffic flow in the area. If any issues do arise, these will be addressed
accordingly.
Felt pedestrians/disabled users' needs ignored in favour of cyclists
We have included one new pedestrian crossing, widening of the existing
pedestrian crossing across Tanner Street from 2.4 metres to 3.2 metres and
are including count down facilities on the traffic lights. To access the bus stop
island, we are providing mini zebra crossings, as well as delineating the cycle
track from the footway and decluttering footways.
Additionally during the Road Safety Audit, we identified some aspects of the
design required amending to ensure that there was not a risk to turning
cyclists colliding with pedestrians. As a result we have changed the road
layout on Druid Street junction with Tanner Street to enable cyclists to turn in
right to avoid risk of collision with pedestrians. An additional benefit of
making these changes is that it will link in with the London Borough of
Southwark’s aspiration for the area.
Noted that the scheme needs to join up with CS4
This scheme is linked with CS4 on Jamaica Road and we will ensure that the
delivery of both schemes is joined up to provide maximum benefits and less
disruption to the all stakeholders.
Did not believe that the project represented good value for money
The cost of the scheme is low in comparison to other larger cycling
infrastructure and major schemes and all costs are scrutinised during the
design process. This scheme provides an important connection for Quietway
14 and CS4 cycle route which will benefit significant numbers of cyclists.
15
That the changes proposed by us would worsen air quality
The traffic modelling for this scheme indicates minor increases in traffic
queueing and congestion as a result of the measures proposed on Tanner
Street and Druid Street. It is not anticipated that this will lead to significant
increases in air pollution. We have a range of measures to tackle air pollution
including the introduction of the Ultra Low Emission Zone (ULEZ) in April
2019.
Felt that motorists were being disadvantaged in favour of cyclists
As part of the Mayor’s Healthy Streets Approach we are trying to prioritise
walking, cycling and public transport to achieve the ambitious target of 80 per
cent of people travelling by sustainable modes by 2041 in London. The
proposals have been subject to traffic modelling and the overall impact on
traffic congestion and vehicle queuing has been shown to be low.
Wanted the proposal extended
The scope of the scheme only extends to the area in which the proposed
Quietway route would use Druid Street and Tanner Street. Unfortunately
extending the scheme beyond the confines of the Quietway would not be
possible due to the financial scope of the project and as this would go beyond
the schemes specified objectives.
16
Appendix A: Consultation materials
- Letter to local residents:
17
Distribution area:
18
Stakeholder email:
From: TfL Consultations Sent: 28 September 2017 10:48 Subject: Have your say on Cycle Superhighway 4 from Tower Bridge to Greenwich Dear Stakeholder
We would like your views on proposals to transform roads in Bermondsey, Rotherhithe, Deptford and Greenwich to make cycling and walking easier, safer and more appealing.
Cycle Superhighway 4 (CS4) would provide a continuous segregated cycle route between Tower Bridge and Greenwich, as well as new pedestrian crossings, better public spaces, and a host of other improvements aimed at creating a more attractive environment for everyone, and accommodating the area’s future growth.
This consultation does not include proposals for Lower Road, which will be consulted on at a later date.
CS4 would form part of London’s expanding network of Cycle Superhighways. These are an
important element of the Mayor’s draft Transport Strategy and Healthy Streets Approach, which
aim to encourage walking, cycling and public transport and make London greener, healthier and
more pleasant.
Our proposals include:
Two-way segregated cycle track on Tooley Street, Jamaica Road, Evelyn Street and Creek Road, providing dedicated space for anyone who wants to cycle
Five new signal-controlled pedestrian crossings and upgrades to over 20 existing pedestrian crossings, making it easier and safer to cross the road
Building on the recent short-term improvements at Rotherhithe Roundabout by redesigning the roundabout to improve safety as part of our Safer Junctions programme
A new eastbound bus gate on the Jamaica Road approach to Rotherhithe Roundabout, giving buses priority at the roundabout and providing better bus access into Lower Road
New and improved public spaces at Deptford High Street and Rotherhithe Roundabout, including new paving and trees
New traffic restrictions, including banned turns on some side roads along Jamaica Road and at Deptford High Street
Changes to some bus stop layouts and locations, including new bus stop bypasses for cyclists
For more information and to give us your views, please visit tfl.gov.uk/cs4. You have until Sunday 19 November 2017 to respond.
We will be holding public events where staff involved in the project will be available to answer your questions. See the website for details of times and locations.
Yours faithfully
Jay Daisi Consultation Team Transport for London
19
Webpage introduction:
20
Appendix B: Stakeholder list
Stakeholders we consulted included:
Local Authorities, statutory and advisory bodies
Greater London Authority
London Borough of Havering
London Borough of Southwark
London Councils
London TravelWatch
South Gloucestershire Council
The Royal Parks
Accessibility groups and charities
Access in London
Action for Blind People
Action on disability
Action on hearing loss
Age UK
Alzheimers society
Anxiety care
Aspire
Brains trust
Carers information services
Change London Climate
Disability Rights UK
Disability Rights uk
Disabled Go
Dyslexia Action
Friends of the Earth
Guide Dogs
Hearing Dogs for the Death
Institute for Sustainability
Leonard Cheshire
Living Streets
Look Ahead
Lupus Trust
Mencap
MS Society
Muscular Dystrophy UK
National Autistic Society
No Panic
Organisation of Blind Africans and Caribbean’s
Parkinson’s UK
Royal Society for Blind Children
Scope
21
Solutions Included
The Ehlers-Danlos Support UK
The Power of Dogs
Thomas Pocklington Trust
Time and talents
Vision UK
Whizz Kidz
Education
The Bosco Centre
Tyssen Community School & Children's Centre
Emergency services and healthcare
London Ambulance Service
London Fire Brigade
Metropolitan Police
New Mill Street Surgery
NHS Southwark Clinical Commissioning group
The Grange Road Practice
Government departments, parliamentary bodies and politicians
Councillor Peter John OBE, Leader of the Council, Southwark
Councillor Ben Johnson, Southwark
Councillor Damian O'Brien, Southwark
Councillor Ian Wingfield, Southwark
Councillor Lucas Green, Southwark
Rt Hon Harriet Harman, Member of Parliament for Camberwell and Peckham
Helen Hayes Member of Parliament for Dulwich and West Norwood
Neil Coyle Member of Parliament for Bermondsey and Old Southwark
Parliamentary Advisory Council for Transport Safety
Department for Transport
Association of Town and City Management
Business and community
Addison Lee
Alive in Space
Better Bankside
Big bus Tours
British Land
Brunel Museum
Carey
CBI
Future inclusion
GMB
22
Golden Tours
Institute of Civil Engineers
London Bubble
London Bus Tours
London City Mission
London First
Planning Design
Puzzle Focus
South Bank
Southwark Pensioners Centre
Space Syntax
St Mary Magdalen Bermondsey
Tall Stories
Team London Bridge
Tesco
Thamesmead Business Services
The Anderson Travel Group
The Guilford Partnership
The Most Holy Trinity Church, Dockhead
The Original Tour
This Place Works
Uber
Urban Movement
Walk London
Transport organisations, business and user groups
Arriva
Bikeworks
BikeXcite
British Cycling
British Motorcycling Federation
Campaign for Better Transport
Central London CTC
Cycle Confident
Cycle Embassy of Great Britain
Cycle Experience
Cycle Systems
Cycle Training UK
Cycletastic
Cycling Instructor
Freight Transport Association
Go Ahead London
Heathrow
I am Road Smart
Licensed Taxi Drivers Association
London Bike Hub
London Cab Drivers Club
23
London Cycling Campaign
Metroline
Mode Transport Planning
National Express
National Express
On your Bike Cycle Training
Ortegalink Ltd
Rail Delivery Group
RMT London Taxi Drivers’ Branch
Road Haulage Association
Road Peace
Royal Automobile Club
Royal Institute of British Architects
Royal Institute of Charted Sprayers
Southwick Cyclists
Spoke Cycling Instruction
Sustrans
The Alliance of British Drivers
The Confederation of Passenger Transport UK
Transport Focus
Transport for All
Vandome Cycles
Wheels for Wellbeing
Utilities
Royal Mail
UK Power Networks