Post on 24-Mar-2020
transcript
Running Head: TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 1
Tattooed and Tenacious:
Developing and Designing a Museum Exhibit without a Team
by
Amy E. Cohen
July 31, 2015
Submitted in Partial Fulfillment
Of the Requirements for the Degree of
Master of Arts
in
Museum Studies
in the
Graduate School of Professional Studies
at
John F. Kennedy University
Approved by:
__________________________ __________________________ ______________
Adrienne McGraw Susan B. Spero, Ph.D. Date
Program Chair, Museum Studies Professor, Museum Studies
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 2
Abstract
This paper explores the exhibit development process for “Tattooed and Tenacious: Inked
Women in California’s History,” an exhibition created by a sole developer/designer and shown
from July 9 to September 9, 2015 at the Hayward Area Historical Society, a small institution
located in the San Francisco Bay Area of California. The literature review examines meaning-
making in museum exhibitions and reveals the importance of having a dedicated visitor advocate
on exhibition development teams, interactive experiences in exhibits, and a narrative- or story-
based approach to exhibits. The methodologies discussed in this paper include informal
interviews and Google Consumer Surveys, as well as the research and planning process related
to the development of an exhibit on women and tattoos. The content of the project, including all
label text, images, and graphics, can be found within the Project Content section. Conclusions
and recommendations, tailored to graduate students and exhibit professionals creating exhibits
without a team, conclude the master’s project.
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 3
Acknowledgements
In spite of the title of this paper, nothing is ever really accomplished alone. I offer special thanks
to the following people for their unflagging assistance, encouragement, and good humor.
David Cohen, Mary Danaher Cohen, and Laura Cohen
Adrienne McGraw and Susan Spero at John F. Kennedy University
Diane Curry and John Christian at the Hayward Area Historical Society
Lyle Tuttle at the Lyle Tuttle Tattoo Art Museum
and
the amazing women in my cohort who are nothing short of inspirational!
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 4
Table of Contents
Executive Summary 5
Literature Review 9
Methodology 21
Project Content 35
Conclusions and Recommendations 62
Reference List 72
Appendix A: Google Consumer Survey Data 78
Appendix B: Informal Interview Questions 81
Appendix C: Project Timeline 82
Appendix D: Budget 85
Appendix E: Kickstarter Summary and Reward Levels 86
Appendix F: Floor Plan and Photographs of the Exhibit 94
Appendix G: Sample Graphic Design Elements 100
Appendix H: Adobe Trails Article 103
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 5
Executive Summary
For my master’s project, I developed, designed, and installed a museum exhibition at the
Hayward Area Historical Society in Hayward, California. The exhibit, entitled “Tattooed and
Tenacious: Inked Women in California’s History,” explores the stories of California women and
tattoos, pre-World War II. On display between July 9 and September 9, 2015, the exhibition
featured historical photographs, tattoo flash (premade tattoo designs) drawn by female tattooists,
and tattooing artifacts from the time period, as well as engaging interactive elements. To create
the exhibit, I spent the better part of a year researching the relationship between pre-WWII
women and tattoos through a variety of sources, including personal communication with well-
known tattoo artists and historians. I also performed front-end evaluation, using online surveys
and in-person interviews to help inform the topics covered in the exhibition. The major content
areas that emerged from research and visitor feedback included: Native tattoo traditions;
sideshow/circus’ tattooed ladies; the first female tattooists; wealthy women and their ink; and the
mechanics of tattooing.
Before developing the physical exhibit and designing the various interactive elements,
however, I reviewed exhibit-related literature significant to the field. Because the topic of
“exhibit development” is so broad, I approached this literature through the lens of meaning-
making. As I believe that developing a space where visitors can create their own personal
meaning is one of the most important goals for any exhibition, I reviewed a few approaches that
lend themselves to achieving this objective. The first method that I examined was the role of the
“visitor advocate” in the exhibit process: a staff member already involved in the development
and/or design process that is, ideally, tasked with keeping the needs of the visitor at the forefront.
To create an exhibit that allows visitors the opportunity to make meaning, the visitor advocate
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 6
must, as her name suggests, keep the visitor experience at the forefront of every decision and
continuously champion the needs of the visitor (Kamien, 2001; Kamien and McKenna-Cress,
2013; McLean, 1993; Heumann Gurian, 2005; and many more). Whether working alone or as
part of a team, the visitor advocate ensures that the exhibition is not about the whims of a curator
or exhibit developer, but instead about helping visitors connect with content in a powerful and
meaningful way.
Another way that the literature suggests that visitors can make their own meaning is
through the inclusion of interactive experiences. Hands-on interactives provide visitors with
entry points into content that may not have been easily accessible through traditional exhibit
techniques (such as reading labels or looking at objects), and learning and intelligence theories
help to explain why some visitors learn best through hands-on approaches. Some of the theories
embraced by the field include Howard Gardner’s multiple intelligences, David Kolb’s
experiential learning theory, Bernice McCarthy’s 4MAT system, and Lev Vygotsky’s theory of
learning through social interaction (Gardner, n.d.; SUNY Cortland 2004; Excel Inc., 1992;
Vygotsky, 1978). Valuing interactive experiences within exhibits reflects a now-common trend
in exhibit development: a move away from behaviorist approaches to exhibits (namely, thinking
of visitors as empty vessels, waiting to be filled with knowledge from the museum) and towards
a constructivist approach (one in which the visitor retains the power of constructing their own
learning, and creates their own meaning based on their personal knowledge and life experiences
[Hein, 2012]). Exhibit developers can and should accommodate different learning styles,
personality types, and types of intelligence to make it easy for visitors to connect with exhibit
content, and providing interactive experiences is one such way to do so.
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 7
Using a narrative approach to exhibit content is the third and final method of fostering
meaning-making discussed in this thesis. To explore this, this paper uses Leslie Bedford (2014)’s
definition of a “narrative approach:” a method that creates or tells stories to engage visitors,
sharing larger, universal messages through specific narratives rather than traditional
chronological or thematic interpretations that express information in generalized terms (p. 64).1
Coupled with the narrative approach is a strong focus on visitor emotions within the exhibit.
Rather than expecting visitors to connect with material in an academic or intellectual way,
exhibit developers are creating spaces in which visitors can have emotional or imaginative
reactions to exhibitions (Roberts, 1997; Worts, 1995; McLean and Pollock, 2010; Kamien and
McKenna-Cress, 2013). These emotions can create powerful connections for visitors, and
provide yet one more point of entry for visitors’ meaning-making.
Briefly explored at the end of the literature review is the ongoing debate of the
importance of objects within exhibitions. Unsurprisingly, many members of the field argue that
objects can trigger emotional responses in visitors, and, as such, can foster a deeper connection
between the museum, the exhibition content, and the visitor (Csikszentmihalyi & Rochberg-
Halton, 1987; Conn, 2009; Tisdale, 2011; Latham, 2013).
Though I kept this literature in mind throughout the exhibit development and design
process, I also had to deal with the realities of creating an exhibition with several constraints.
The first constraint was that I was effectively developing the exhibition as an individual, rather
than with a team. Luckily, I was able to lean on members of my cohort, friends, family, advisors,
members of the Hayward Area Historical Society staff, and mentors in the field, asking their
advice and opinions during different parts of the process. Even so, exhibition development is
1 It is worth noting that my exhibit attempts to integrate the thematic and narrative approaches.
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 8
most successful when it is a team effort, and I recognize the limitations of creating an exhibit as
a largely solo – though still visitor-focused – effort (exhibition development teams are explored
by many authors; see McLean, 1993; Kamien, 2001; and Kamien and McKenna-Cress, 2013 for
just a few discussions).
Other constraints for the project included the abbreviated timeline (approximately nine
months from the conception of the idea to installation) and the small budget. To overcome the
monetary limitation, I successfully ran a crowd-funding campaign through Kickstarter to raise an
additional $2,500 (the Hayward Area Historical Society generously funded $1,000 of the
exhibit).
In conclusion, this project brought with it insight into my personal and professional
processes, as well as recommendations for others developing and designing exhibitions on their
own. Some of these recommendations include taking advantage of the knowledge and opinions
of museum professionals, friends, and family around you; being open to input and collaboration
for all aspects of the exhibit; seeking out members of any community represented within the
exhibit for their knowledge and content expertise;2 and, of course, remembering to stay excited
about and engaged with the content of the exhibit. Without a continual spark, the exhibit will fall
flat for both the developer and the visitor.
2 For this exhibit, the tattoo community was absolutely supportive. Their kindness and generosity, mentioned throughout the paper below, made the process much easier and the end result much more intriguing.
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 9
Literature Review
In this literature review, I will be discussing literature relevant to the final product of my
master’s project: an exhibit on California women and tattoos. Because I developed and designed
the entire exhibit, it was difficult to decide how to narrow down this literature review; the exhibit
development process, learning theories, visitor motivations, exhibit design, and other relevant
topics could all have been at home here. However, I have chosen to focus on a topic closely
related to exhibits, and, perhaps, one of the most important reasons to create exhibitions in the
first place: how adult visitors make meaning within museums, and, specifically, within an
exhibition. As such, this literature review will explore museum and educational thinkers’
perspectives on how exhibitions can be developed to foster opportunities for adult visitors to
create and make meaning, especially in light of the field’s concerted shift from “thinking about
visitors as an undifferentiated mass public to…active interpreters and performers of meaning-
making practices within complex cultural sites” (Eilean Hooper-Greenhill as cited in Macdonald,
2007, p. 150).
Meaning-Making
Before we can begin, the term “meaning” must be defined, albeit loosely. As interpreted
by Leslie Bedford, Lois Silverman (2002)’s four definitions for “meaning” in the museum
experience include:
The communicator’s intention; a particular understanding of something, i.e., an
interpretation on the part of the visitor; an individual’s subjective valuing of
something, i.e., the reason that something is personally meaningful; and meaning
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 10
as ‘deep, pivotal, memorable, life-changing significance’ [Silverman, 2002, p.5].
(Bedford, 2014, 41).
Lois Silverman’s definitions can provide a framework for understanding meaning within the
context of this literature review; although other museum thinkers have different definitions of
meaning, they are similar to Silverman’s remarks above.
Many museum professionals have written about the importance of creating spaces
wherein adult visitors can define and create their own personal meanings, and that visitors come
to museums to make meaning through objects and ideas (Roberts, 1997; Macdonald, 2007;
Bitgood, 2013; Falk & Dierking, 2012; Wilkening & Chung, 2009; Bedford, 2014; and Burd
Schiavo, 2013 provide just a small sampling of this). Kathleen McLean and Wendy Pollock
(2010) provide a short overview of why it is important to foster these spaces within the walls of a
museum:
It is not enough to simply bring people together…Convivial museums deepen the
conversation and foster a genuine meeting of minds by offering up some ‘third
thing’ as a focus of common interest and concern. That third thing could be an
inspiring object or work of art, a program about a pressing local issue, an
intriguing phenomenon, a provocative story. Sharing these experiences with
others and grappling with what they mean transforms a museum visit into a
convivial experience that opens the way to engagement. (p. 105)
In other words, it is important for museums to act as places where visitors can develop
and engage with highly individualized meaning both internally and socially.
In addition, Falk and Dierking (2012) emphasize that meaning is highly individualized
and constantly changing. Not only will different visitors have different experiences in the same
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 11
exhibit, but that the same person who attends on two different days will have two different
experiences in that same exhibit (Falk, 2012, p. 213); they also highlight that visitors will create
or find different meanings based on their visit agenda (Falk, 2012, p. 213-214). So, to ensure the
creation of exhibits that allow for this exploration of meaning, the exhibit development team
must also recognize the significance of this process. This is where the visitor advocate comes in.
The Visitor Advocate
While a variety of approaches to the exhibit development process have been detailed and
tested over the years, the team approach is the most common within larger museums (Kamien,
2001). Janet Kamien’s 2001 article on different team-based approaches to exhibit development
examines different team models, and is still widely cited by the field (and, it should be noted, her
work heavily influenced the Smithsonian’s 2002 report, “The Making of Exhibitions: Purpose,
Structure, Roles and Process”). In her article, she details six different exhibit development team
structures:
• the developer model, in which a content interpreter (exhibit developer) is supported by
specialists that may include curators, evaluators, writers, and researchers;
• the team approach model, in which a curator, designer, and educator share equal
responsibilities and authority;
• the curatorial model, in which the curator holds the power over the final outcome;
• the broker model, in which a project manager reports to the client, keeping the exhibit
designer and exhibit developer on task;
• the architectural model, wherein the designer holds the most authority as supported by the
institution; and
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 12
• the theatrical model, where a director utilizes the expertise of the entire team, each
member of which has their own specialties (2001, p. 116, 121).
Kamien revisits these approaches with co-author Polly McKenna-Cress in 2013’s
Creating Exhibitions: Collaboration in the Planning, Development, and Design of Innovative
Experiences. In both texts, Kamien (2001), and then Kamien and McKenna-Cress (2013), note
that it is the exhibit developer, educator, or some combination thereof that must act as an
advocate for the visitor experience. As they write,
Whatever the model, the basic idea remains important: Although all exhibitions
are indeed ‘about something,’ the most important outcome is that they be of
interest, meaning, and utility to the end user and that nothing should be allowed to
get in the way of that ultimate aspiration. The most straightforward way to make
sure that this necessity is actually carried out is to personify it on the team, usually
in the form of an exhibit developer. (Kamien and McKenna-Cress, 2013, p. 27)3
In Planning for People in Museum Exhibitions, Kathleen McLean (1993) notes that this notion of
advocating for the visitor met with resistance in the field. Although this text is now over two
decades old, her writing is still relevant today, specifically in detailing how some museum
professionals feel about the visitor: “…some of us still see the public as the inevitable irritation
in an otherwise glorious profession. We often act as if visitors are intruders, running amok in our
well-designed sanctuaries. We’re pleased when people attend our museums, but irritated if
visitors don’t behave in a reverent manner” (McLean, 1993, p. 2).
3 Indeed, McKenna-Cress and Kamien suggest having five different bases for advocacy: 1. Advocacy for the Institution; 2. Advocacy for the Subject Matter; 3. Advocacy for the Visitor Experience; 4. Advocacy for the Design (physical and sensory); 5. Advocacy for the Project and Team (2013, p. 22).
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 13
Other museum thinkers, including but not limited to Elaine Heumann Gurian, Judy Rand
and Paul Orselli, also advocate for an approach to exhibition development that includes a
dedicated visitor advocate – a person who can not only translate the academic work of the
curator, or the technical language of the scientific phenomena, into a visitor-friendly, accessible
exhibit, but also keep the visitor and their quest to find relevance and meaning in exhibitions at
the forefront of every decision. To reiterate the above literature, we can again turn to McKenna-
Cress and Kamien (2013) for an apt summary: “The team of advocates needs to ensure that the
exhibition experience is comfortable, engaging, memorable and ultimately meaningful. Visitors
who are comfortable and confident are more likely to have meaningful experiences” (p. 133).
Interactive Experiences
Current thought leaders in the museum field have posited a number of ways in which
visitors can deeply and meaningfully engage with exhibition content. One way for this to occur is
to include interactive experiences within the exhibition. No longer do visitors expect or desire to
be a sponge, soaking up information presented by the museum; rather, they want to actively
engage with exhibits to create their own, personal, relevant meanings. Nina Simon (2010)’s The
Participatory Museum and accompanying Museum 2.0 blog highlight how to engage visitors
through active experiences, as well as provide evidence as to why this is so important. Bonnie
Sachatello-Sawyer and her co-authors (2002) also suggest that adults need to be actively engaged
to make meaning. In Adult Museum Programs: Designing Meaningful Experiences, the co-
authors often reiterate that adult learners “prefer to be actively involved in the learning process,”
and not just act as passive vessels being filled with knowledge (Sachatello-Sawyer et. al, 2002, p.
4). Although these sentiments refer to adult programming needs, they are still quite applicable to
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 14
exhibitions. Even Beverly Serrell (1996) touches upon this in her text Exhibit Labels, reflecting
on the importance of creating exhibit elements that actively engage different types of learners (p.
66).
Interactive experiences are especially important because they are inclusive of differing
learning styles and preferences. Two early champions of interactivity in museum exhibits include
Frank Oppenheimer and Michael Spock, former directors of the Exploratorium and the Boston
Children’s Museum, respectively. They were pioneers in the museum field for their inclusion of
interactive exhibit elements that deftly incorporated a variety of learning modalities. As Elaine
Heumann Gurian (1991) writes, “The major experiments Oppenheimer and Spock initiated –
introducing contextual, direct-experience interactivity to the exhibition floor – changed the face
of museums permanently by inviting the audience to participate in their own learning” (p. 153).
So, to properly discuss meaning making through exhibition-based learning, it is necessary to
include a brief review of notable educational theories that have made their way into the museum
world and now inform the exhibition development process.
The following educational theories, only lightly touched upon here, have made a major
impact on the museum world and have informed museum professionals’ reasoning for including
more interactive experiences within exhibits. Howard Gardner’s (n.d.) theory of multiple
intelligences expanded upon the written and aural intelligences so often favored by scholars by
introducing seven personal intelligences: linguistic, logical-mathematical, musical, bodily-
kinesthetic, spatial, interpersonal, and intrapersonal; he later added naturalist, for a total of eight
different types (Gardner, n.d.). Including exhibit elements that incorporate entry points for
visitors of these eight different intelligence types – rather than just linguistic and logical-
mathematical – can allow more visitors the opportunity to feel engaged with the element and to
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 15
make their own meaning. For example, an exhibit that teaches visitors about gravity could
include a text panel with charts explaining the scientific concept to appeal to visual and logical-
mathematical learners; a small ledge from which bodily-kinesthetic learners could jump down,
physically experiencing how gravity pulls on their bodies; and a poetic excerpt from Isaac
Newton’s diary detailing how he felt when he first understood the concept, with opportunities to
craft their own poems, to appeal to linguistic learners. According to Gardner, these three entry
points would provide more visitors with more opportunities to connect with the material and act
as a more inclusive approach to exhibit development and design.
Lev Vygotsky’s (1978) theory of learning also provided museum professionals with
another reason to incorporate interactive elements. In his 1978 text Mind in Society: The
Development of Higher Psychological Processes, Vygotsky posited that learners construct
knowledge through social interaction. According to Vygotsky’s theory, exhibit elements that
necessitate social interaction, rather than silent contemplation, allow visitors to more fully
connect with the material at hand; social interaction encourages visitors to not only learn from
the institution and the content it chooses to present, but also from the other visitors in their party
or at the museum. Other museum thinkers, such as Marilyn Feinchel and Heidi A.
Schweingruber (2010), and educational thought leaders, including Etienne Wenger (1998) and
Ann L. Brown and Joseph Campione (1996) build upon Vygotsky’s work, suggesting the
importance of social interaction for learning and meaning making.
Other notable learning theories provide further reasons to incorporate additional
opportunities for visitors to create meaning. Popular theories that have influenced the museum
field include experiential learning, the 4MAT system, and constructivism. David Kolb’s (as cited
in SUNY Cortland, 2004) experiential learning theories also provided a new lens for looking at
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 16
learning. He suggested that learners go through a cyclical process while learning a new concept
or skill; these four steps are concrete experience, observation and reflection, applying abstract
concepts, and active experimentation (SUNY Cortland, 2004). Bernice McCarthy’s 4MAT
system, created in the 1990s, expanded upon Kolb’s theories, assigning questions to his
categories: 1. Why?, 2. What?, 3. How?, and 4. What If? (Excel Inc., 1992). And, the oft-cited
George Hein’s work on constructivism – an educational philosophy that gives the power to the
learner herself, one that emphasizes that all meaning and knowledge is constructed by the learner
– has been highly influential.4 Of progressive education in museums, Hein (2012) writes that
“Visitor contributions to museum interpretation goes back at least fifty years and requires
recognition that information transfer is not a sufficient basis for developing museum exhibitions.
Rather, by applying…dialogue between visitors and exhibit developers…an exhibition’s
meaning is enlarged” (p. 183).
The above approaches to learning and meaning-making have influenced many museum
workers. There has been a concerted move, at least in scholarly literature, away from behaviorist
approaches to education (when a visitor simply responds to stimuli presented by the museum)
and towards this constructivist approach, which emphasizes the input of the learner. In addition,
John Falk’s (1993, 2000) notion of free-choice learning has also affected the way in which
exhibitions are developed and designed. Chandler Screven (1987), a museum exhibition
evaluator, agrees, noting that “Museum learning is self-paced, self-directed, non-linear, and
visually oriented” (as cited in Gurian, 1991, p. 154). It is with this understanding that educators
instruct exhibit developers to provide for and accommodate different learning styles, personality
types, and types of intelligence (Roberts, 1997, p. 140-143; Serrell, 1996, p. 62). It is by
4 Hein’s work is based on the even more oft-cited John Dewey.
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 17
including multiple points of entry into a topic – often done so by keeping the above theories in
mind – that visitors can then have the opportunity to make their own meanings, as borne out by
studies completed by many of the above-cited authors (Samis & Michaelson, 2013, p. 59).
The Narrative Approach
In addition to creating exhibits with interactive experiences that cater to visitors’ different
learning styles, museum professionals have been creating more opportunities for personal
meaning-making by incorporating narrative within exhibits. While chronological and thematic
interpretations are still well-used, Leslie Bedford (2014) argues for a story-filled approach in her
book, The Art of Museum Exhibitions: How Story and Imagination Create Aesthetic Experiences.
As she writes,
For exhibition makers, [a narrative exhibition] means engaging all our senses
including the somatic or physical, speaking to our emotions, using the specific to
generate connections to the familiar and universal, and telling us something about
someone we are going to care about. Something happens in the imagination in the
face of a real story; it creates a new one [emphasis added]. (Bedford, 2014, p. 64)
For Bedford, a successful exhibition is one that uses a narrative approach – one that shares a
specific story to represent the larger, general concepts presented – as it allows visitors to deeply
engage with the material and make their own meaning.
Lisa C. Roberts’ (1997) seminal work, From Knowledge to Narrative: Educators and the
Changing Museum, also reflects the importance of a narrative approach to exhibitions, and is a
text upon which Bedford (2014) built. Roberts’ text examines education in museums, which she
describes as “not just interpreting objects but also deciphering interpretations – anticipating and
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 18
negotiating between the meanings constructed by visitors and the meanings constructed by
museums” (p. 3). Though Roberts explores education through multiple lenses, including
education as entertainment, empowerment, experience, and ethics, it is her last lens that fits best
within the context of this literature review: education as narrative endeavor. It is important to
note, however, that Roberts uses the term “narrative” slightly differently that Bedford does,
noting that narrative is not just sharing a story in an exhibit, but "…the creation of a story.
[Narrative] aims to establish not truth but meaning; explanation is achieved not through
argument and analysis but through metaphor and connection" (Roberts, 1997). According to
Roberts, visitors compose narratives about what they see, whether through reminiscences,
fantasies, or other types of personal involvement, and use the museum’s narratives of an object
or exhibit to inform their own (1997, p. 138). It is through these deep, personal associations that
visitors can create meaning for themselves, though Roberts often cautions that it is up to the
museum – and not the visitor – to take steps to negotiate the differences between the museum
narrative and the visitor narrative.
Though couched under the idea of playing to emotions, McKenna-Cress and Kamien
(2013) argue for a similar narrative-based approach, though for a different reason than Bedford
(2014) and Roberts (1997): “Museums have found they must offer something that is both
different from and complementary to the learning we can do online, and one way to do that,
which has always been important if unacknowledged, is by engaging the visitors’ emotions” (p.
71). Even as early as 1995, Douglas Worts noted the importance of allowing visitors to create
meanings through an emotional or imagination-based approach: “…museums generally
encourage visitors to defer any personal idiosyncratic meaning-making process to the meanings
that conform to the expert consensus…By encouraging people to experience objects with all of
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 19
their perceptual capabilities (cognition, emotion, imagination, intuition and physical interaction)
the museum can become a much richer forum” (p. 129). McLean and Pollock (2010), too, are
proponents of attracting and impacting visitors through a narrative and/or emotional approach to
exhibitions.
A current debate in the field is whether meaning is held in objects (as Serrell [1996] aptly
puts it when she reminds her readers of “a very powerful modality: the real thing”) or within the
larger thematic concerns of the exhibition (p. 67). While there had been a move away from the
importance of objects within exhibitions for non-art museums, the pendulum has now begun to
swing back towards appreciating physical objects as holders of meaning. Kiersten Latham (2013)
suggests that objects significantly shape visitors’ experiences; her analysis of “numinous”
objects looks to answer how and why some objects cause powerful visitor reactions. Steve Conn
(2009) resoundingly answers “yes” when he asks the question Do Museums Still Need Objects?
in a book title; Rainey Tisdale’s (2011) of that book also agrees, writing that “objects are a
crucial element of our approach to authenticity” (p. 20). In her writings, Gurian (2005) highlights
the importance of visitors connecting with objects in an emotional manner. Gurian (2005) also
cites numerous thinkers on the importance of objects; “Objects in exhibitions can elicit
emotional responses. The presence of certain artifacts can evoke memories and feelings. Mihaly
Csikszentmihalyi and Eugene Rochberg-Halton’s (1987) book The Meaning of Things suggests
that it is the emotional overlay we place upon impersonal objects that transforms them into
objects of meaning” (as cited in Gurian, 2005, p. 154).
Regardless of the use of objects, however, it is clear that most many thought leaders in
the museum field agree that an emotional and/or narrative approach to an exhibition provides
abundant opportunities for visitors to connect with each other and the museum (Serrell, 1996, p.
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 20
67). It is worth noting that, although this literature review examines current trends in the museum
field, many of these ideas have been around for many years. As McLean (1993) reminds her
readers, the use of narrative and storytelling in exhibitions had made its way into museum
missions by the 1800s (p. x). However, the use of an emotions-based approach to exhibitions still
raises questions in the field; a 2013 Museums Association conference in Great Britain asked
museum professionals, “Is your museum devoid of emotion?...Museums need to become places
where emotion is encouraged, where stories are told, and where a visceral response is preferable
to an intellectual one.”
Conclusion
In summary, this literature review explores how current museum professionals create
opportunities for visitors to make their own meanings within museum exhibitions, and how
elements of the exhibit development process can support this. These include having a visitor
advocate on the exhibit development team; including hands-on, interactive exhibit elements (or,
at the least, a variety of elements that play to the strengths of adult visitors with myriad learning
styles); and revealing the themes of an exhibition through narrative- or emotions-based
approaches.
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 21
Methodology
Developing and designing my exhibition was a relatively smooth process. Beginning with
copious amounts of research on women and tattoos, I honed in on the topic of California women
and tattoos, pre-WWII. After completing this research, I began to develop themes and a Big Idea
for the exhibition, as well as a detailed timeline and budget. In the chapter that follows, I
examine my content and exhibit development processes and constraints.
Research
To begin my research, I browsed the web to find out what information was readily
available on women and tattoos before the 1960s, the time period when tattooing again became
popular. To my surprise, I found that there were many blog posts, articles, and images already
online. However, as I explored further, I noticed that most of these sources repeated the same
limited biographical information, placing these early women in the context of their male
relationships (rather than celebrating the women for their own lives), and lacking citations of
credible sources. Even so, this quick scan gave me a baseline for my research.
I next turned to tattoo sourcebooks and academic texts on tattoos. These resources
provided the foundation for the exhibition. Exceptionally helpful academic texts were Margot
Mifflin’s 2013 book Bodies of Subversion: A Secret History of Women and Tattoo (3rd ed.) and
Amelia Klem Osterud’s 2014 text, The Tattooed Lady: A History (2nd ed.). Both books were
written by scholars and deal almost exclusively with women and tattoos. There are also a variety
of online sources that have excellent photographic archives, but little in the way of source credit
or biographical information (often, even the name of the photograph subject is missing). I also
used JFK University’s “One Search” tool, accessed through the library website. To find articles,
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 22
I used search terms that related to women and tattoos, including combinations of the following
terms (I have notated them as if doing a Boolean search): “tattoo*,” “body art,” “body ink,”
“ink*,” “tattooist,” “tattoo artist,” and “woman,” “women,” “female,” “lady,” etc. In addition, I
searched for specific people and/or occupations, such as “Artoria Gibbons,” “Betty Broadbent,”
or “Tattooed Lady.”
I also spoke with tattoo artists and historians for this project. I visited Madame
Chinchilla, a well-known California tattooist and curator of the Triangle Tattoo Museum, at her
tattoo studio/museum in Fort Bragg, CA. She shared insights into early women and tattoos and
loaned me tattoo-related texts from her personal library, as well as provided me with
introductions to other tattoo historians (or, at the least, gave me permission to identify myself in
initial introductions as referred by her). I also spent upwards of 10 hours with Lyle Tuttle, a
famous (or, perhaps, infamous) San Francisco tattoo artist and historian.5 We combed through
his archives, providing me with supplemental information for many of the tattooed women I had
researched. He also shared knowledge of a female tattooist in San Francisco that I had never seen
referenced previously. In addition, Lyle generously offered important artifacts from his
collection for display during the exhibition, including Tattooed Lady/tattoo artist Betty
Broadbent’s portable tattooing kit (complete with tattoo machines, footswitch, and ink),
Broadbent’s stage costumes, and a sideshow circus banner – all connected to tattooed California
women.
I also connected with seminal tattoo historian Chuck Eldridge of the Tattoo Archive
(formerly of Berkeley, CA, and now located in North Carolina) and New York tattoo artist
Spider Webb (nee Joseph O’Sullivan), both of whom have excellent collections of tattoo
5 Lyle has been tattooing since 1949, has tattooed on all seven continents, and helped start the tattoo craze in the 1960s when he tattooed Janis Joplin.
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 23
paraphernalia and/or historic photographs. And, though not for a specific research need, I talked
to my personal tattoo artist, Hannah Wednesday (Miller) at Tuesday Tattoo, about the feasibility
of exhibit components related to contemporary artists. She connected me with other
contemporary female artists in the Bay Area as well as participated in the creation of a tattooed
mannequin for the exhibit.
One of the most difficult parts of this project has been tracking down appropriate credit
lines and/or getting permission to use images. Initially, very few people responded to my
inquiries, so I continued my search to acquire the correct permissions and/or pay the correct fees
to use specific images in the exhibition. However, I broadened my search and contacted seminal
tattoo artists/tattoo historians to acquire images, and was extremely supported by the tattoo
community. Special thanks must go to Lyle Tuttle of San Francisco’s Lyle Tuttle Tattoo Art
Museum and Studio and New York tattoo artist Spider Webb for allowing the use of images or
objects from their collection at no cost, as well as to Chuck Eldridge of North Carolina’s Tattoo
Archive, who approved altering and editing images from his collection so that they could be used
within engaging interactives within the exhibition.
Of course, I also completed research related to the exhibition development process to
complete my literature review. As with my tattoo research, I used the JFK University’s “One
Search” tool and Google Scholar, as well as previous course readings and museum texts that I
acquired throughout my studies. When researching online, I used combinations of search terms
that included (again, in Boolean terms): “exhibit*,” “development,” “visitor advocate,” “meaning
making,” “narrative in exhibit*,” “storytelling in exhibit*,” etc. I also used the names of specific
authors and educators, such as “David Kolb” and “Lisa Roberts,” to find texts written both by
and about them and their ideas.
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 24
Project Content
Through my research, I found that the history of tattoos in California is distinctly divided
into two sections: pre- and post-1960s. Major events in the 1960s – most notably the feminist
movement and famed rock star Janis Joplin flaunting her tattoos on stage – marked a turning
point in who got tattoos and set the stage for a tattoo explosion that has continued in earnest
today (Mifflin, 2013; L. Tuttle, personal communication, April 19, 2015). The themes that arise
in this later period are quite different from that of pre-1960s tattooing, and trying to incorporate
the important ideas and figures of both time periods created, in my mind, a disjointed exhibition.
So, due to the size of the space and the amount of time I had to develop and design the
exhibition, I decided to focus on the stories of the foremothers of modern tattooing: pre-WWII
women.
Honing in on this specific time period gave me the opportunity to delve more deeply into
the world of women and early tattooing.6 Within the exhibit, I cover the following topics (I write
this in the present tense as the exhibit continues to tour throughout California):
• Tattoo traditions of Native women and their tribes
• Wealthy women and early tattoo fads
• Tattooed ladies as circus sideshow attractions
• Female tattooists
• And, briefly, tattooing culture after World War II
6 For my purposes, “California women” included any person who self-identified as a woman, though as far as I can tell from my research all of the women in the exhibit were female, assigned female at birth. I also included any woman with a tie to California, no matter how tenuous. Since many tattooed women were itinerant, I chose to share the stories of women who were documented as living in California for even the briefest periods of time.
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 25
An introduction panel begins the exhibit and informs visitors’ expectations by explicitly denoting
what will be explored – and what will not be covered – in the exhibition, while a conclusion
panel anchors the show and provides brief information on post-WWII tattooing. To provide
additional context for the exhibit, I also briefly discuss the mechanics of tattooing, including
tattoo machines and ink. Threaded throughout these exhibit text panels are discussions of gender
and gender stereotypes, and the recognition that women have been tattooed and shaped tattoo
culture for years. The Project Content chapter of this thesis includes all of the labels and text
found in this exhibition. In addition, the exhibit features five interactive pieces, explained in
more detail in the Project Content section. All of the interactives have instructional/directional
text that had been briefly prototyped before the exhibition opened. I shared drafts of each
interactives’ text with friends and family to ensure that the directions were clear, succinct, and
engaging.
I specifically chose to explore the history of women and tattoos because of visitor
feedback. One-fifth of the respondents to my online survey selected this as a topic they were
interested in learning about (“the history of women and tattoos” was the survey’s second most-
selected choice; “different styles of art in modern tattooing” came in first place by a non-
statistically significant margin of ~1%).7 The informal interviews conducted at HAHS had
similar results; even when unprompted, respondents noted that they would like to learn about the
history of women and tattoos. My evaluation methods and results are explored in depth in the
following section.
7 I included a mannequin featuring artwork by contemporary Bay Area female tattoo artists in the exhibition to address this, even though tattoo art itself is not a focus of the exhibit.
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 26
Visitor Feedback
To inform the content of this exhibition, I incorporated a variety of front-end evaluation
activities. Informal focus groups, online surveys conducted through Google Consumer Surveys,
and informal interviews at the museum shaped the ways in which I developed the exhibit.
Informal focus group. The first time I gathered visitor feedback was in an informal
focus group with students at the high school where I worked while in graduate school. Although
this was an unplanned session, I am including it within the parameters of this project’s front-end
evaluation because it provided me with a useful starting point for thinking about the exhibit. For
example, the students – who knew me well and felt comfortable sharing their candid (and
brutally honest) opinions with me – questioned the relevancy of some of my proposed
interactives, while also supporting the direction I was planning to go with others. This group also
confirmed that the topic was interesting to this age group, validating the “cool” factor of the
project.
Online surveys. I also created two online surveys related to California women and
tattoos. Both were administered through Google Consumer Surveys, a service which asks visitors
to specific sites to answer a survey question in exchange for access to content. Because Google
collects demographic data from anyone who uses its services, I did not need to include any
specific demographic questions in my survey; that information was already readily available for
each survey taker. Because of this, surveys administered through Google Consumer Surveys can
be sent to specific groups of respondents, pre-sorted by age, gender, location, etc. As such, I
chose to administer each survey to Californians specifically. I did not further narrow by age or
gender.
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 27
I created two different surveys for this online platform. The first survey was open-ended,
asking the question “When you think about women and tattoos, what comes to mind?” I did not
expect to receive thoughtful answers from this question;8 rather, I was simply interested in
finding out knee-jerk reactions to the concept of “women and tattoos” from a broad range of
people. The 252 responses were evenly split between positive and negative answers, and detailed
results for this survey are displayed as both a word cloud and a chart in Appendix A. The second
survey was structured, asking “In a museum exhibit on California women and tattoos, what
would you most like to learn about?” I provided six different options, as well as an
“Other/Write-In” section; the order of the choices was randomized by Google for each
respondent, and each respondent was allowed to choose only one answer. The choices for this
survey, also answered by 250 Californians, are listed below from most- to least-popular:
• Different art styles in modern tattooing (21.2%)
• The history of women and tattoos (20.0%)
• The reasons why women get tattoos (15.2%)
• The mechanics of tattooing (14.0%)
• Personal stories of women and their tattoos (12.8%)
• Female tattoo artists (12.0%)
• Other/Write-In, most often answered with variants of “I don’t care” or “I don’t want to
see anything related to tattoos” (4.8%)
8 This was a good thing…if I was expecting deep answers I would have been sorely disappointed!
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 28
I wasn’t sure if respondents would be interested in learning about the history of women and
tattoos, and so I was especially pleased to get confirmation that I was on the right track for the
content of this exhibition. Appendix A presents all of the data garnered from online surveys.
Informal interviews. In addition to the online surveys, my school colleague Erin
Fleming and I conducted in-person interviews with museum and museum café visitors at HAHS.
I visited the museum on March 7, 2015 from 10 a.m. to noon to conduct surveys; Erin attended
on March 21. For my visit, I contracted the services of Jennifer Spotswood, a professional
museum evaluator and John F. Kennedy University Museum Studies alumna. Jennifer led me
through best practices for these interviews, critiqued and improved my questions, and
interviewed museum and café visitors during this session (Appendix B lists the questions asked
of each interviewee). In total, we spoke with 10 respondents who expressed a range of opinions
on tattoos.9 Erin spoken with 7 respondents, for a total of 17 interviewees. Though this number is
not statistically significant, almost all of the interviewees had similar thoughts. Respondents
either felt that tattoos were unappealing and uninteresting, or that a tattoo exhibit would be cool
and exciting. Notably, the interests of the latter group followed the same trends as that of my
second online survey question. Curiosity about the different styles of tattoo art and the history of
women and tattoos was particularly high, and respondents often mentioned these concepts
without prompting from the evaluator or me. As such, I was confident that an exhibition focusing
on the history of women and tattoos would appeal to many visitors.
9 We also asked questions relating to sound stories during these sessions; these interview questions were provided by Erin. As they are not relevant to my topic, I am not including that data here. However, it can be found in Erin Fleming’s 2015 John F. Kennedy University Master’s Project.
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 29
Project Planning Process
Organizing the process. Throughout this project, organizational methods have played a
very important role. For this exhibit, I experimented with a few electronic methods of
organization, most successfully with an online platform called Trello, but found that the tried-
and-true method of keeping a notebook and coding my notes by theme, trend, and/or exhibit
component worked best. Eventually, much of my project work outgrew the notebook, migrating
into relevant word documents and a large, physical, written “map” that I continued to update as I,
in turn, updated the exhibit. The physical representation of the exhibit’s themes and content also
acted as an inspiration board; potential photographs and graphic design approaches surrounded
the poster as it hung on my wall.
Process overview. During my initial research, I amassed copious amounts of content on
women and tattoos. As I was not yet sure about the scope of the exhibition, my research included
content that reached well into the 1990s. As I continued to research this topic, I found that I was
most interested in the foremothers of modern tattooing and the earliest women to have tattoos.
As such, I kept narrowing my focus until I reached what was, to me, a natural breaking point: the
major global event of World War II.
While researching, I started notating possible themes for the exhibit, as well as kept a
running list of possible text panels, images, interactives, and objects for display. I then began
drafting a “Big Idea” (popularized by Serrell, 1996). This, of course, went through a variety of
iterations. The Big Idea played a different role for me in this process than it does for many other
exhibit development processes, however. In team-driven processes, the Big Idea acts as a
touchstone for team members, keeping everyone on the same page. In an individual project,
however, the Big Idea served to remind me of what content was important – as opposed to
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 30
interesting, but extraneous – as well as gave me a way to talk about the exhibit in a succinct way.
As such, the Big Ideas (also expressed in the Project Content chapter below) are:
Big Idea: Women and tattoos have been interconnected throughout California’s
history, and tattooed women helped break down gender barriers due to their
independent and persevering spirits.
Irreverent Big Idea: Tattooed women are badass and not a new phenomenon.
As the sole individual developing and designing this exhibition, I crafted the Irreverent Big Idea
to be helpful to me, personally, during the content and exhibit development process. While
others may consider it uncouth, I have found it to be the most succinct way of expressing the
main message of the exhibit, and for that reason am including it here.
Internal project timeline. The final internal project timeline (see Appendix C) was only
slightly edited from the initial draft, as I was able to meet most of my internal deadlines. The
most significant edit to my timeline pertained to my proposed online crowd-funding campaign. I
first planned to run a Kickstarter campaign from April through May. However, I delayed the
launch in order to incorporate a finalized, concrete budget – a move that helped my campaign
look more professional and organized – and to create a companion video.
Budget. The Hayward Area Historical Society generously provided $1,000 towards the
fabrication of this exhibition, but as I began to develop the exhibit, I determined that this would
not be enough (Appendix D reflects my final budget with line items). In establishing my budget,
I combed online stores to find quality items at a low cost. This included items for the interactive
elements detailed in the Project Content chapter, such as a tablet, postcards, and colored pencils.
I also contacted vendors for printing estimates for both the postcards and large-scale images, as
well as consulted with John Christian at the Hayward Area Historical Society on typical costs.
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 31
To determine image reproduction fees, I contacted archive centers or browsed their websites to
find typical fees for non-profit exhibition use. After carefully planning my exhibit’s budget, I
found that I needed to raise an additional $2,500. To meet this goal, I decided to run a
Kickstarter.
Kickstarter is an online crowdfunding platform that provides entrepreneurs and
businesses the opportunity to capture mostly small donations from a large number of people. The
only requirement for creating a Kickstarter campaign is that the funds must go towards a specific
project, rather than ongoing operating support; a screen capture of the Kickstarter page,
including the project description and FAQ, can be found in Appendix E. Drawbacks of this
system are that a small percentage of the funds raised go to Kickstarter, and that none of the gifts
made through Kickstarter are tax-deductible.
Successful Kickstarter campaigns offer incentives to encourage giving at higher levels.
As such, I created a tiered system of Kickstarter rewards to funders of the project, known as
“backers” on Kickstarter. These rewards include: acknowledgement on a panel within the
exhibit, stickers featuring flash – premade tattoo designs often found on the walls of tattoo shops
– from pre-WWII female tattooists, postcards featuring a female tattooist’s flash or photograph
of a tattooed lady, a tote bag featuring the title of the exhibition, a private curatorial tour (led by
me), and an invitation to the opening night reception (Appendix E lists these reward levels and
descriptions). I carefully designed these rewards, as well as a video and concept, to help me
reach my fundraising goal of $2,500. I reached out to potential donors to pre-seed some of this
funding, so I felt confident that I could make this goal within my chosen timeframe of just three
weeks. Luckily, this proved to be the case. With targeted soliciting of friends and family – as
well as outreach to the broader museum community – I hit my goal of $2,500 in less than one
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 32
week. By the end of three weeks, I had raised $3,798, or 150% of my goal. After subtracting
credit card and Kickstarter fees, I raised a total of $3,482.76 through the crowdfunding platform
for my project.
Constraints of Project
Budget. While there were certainly limitations for this exhibition, they are no different
than what any small institution faces when developing and designing an exhibition. The first
constraint was, of course, the budget. As noted above, HAHS generously supplied $1,000 for the
fabrication of the exhibition. However, as I wanted to include technology, a variety of
interactives, and large-format images of women with tattoos, I was unable to keep costs below
this amount (Appendix D). To overcome this constraint, I created and promoted a Kickstarter,
detailed above. I also had support in the form of well-known tattoo artist and historian Spider
Webb. After a brief phone conversation, he gave me permission to use any image in his
collection – which spans thousands of photographs – for free. This kind offer meant that the use
of images in the exhibit was limited only by fabrication costs, rather than by image
rights/reproduction fees. Without this, the exhibition would have had substantially less images on
display and, as such, could not have included as many stories of pre-WWII women with tattoos.
Staffing. The number of people working on this exhibit – ie, just me – functioned as
another limitation. As cited by numerous authors and discussed at length in this project’s
literature review, exhibition development is most successful as a team effort (though this is
explored by many authors, see McLean, 1993; Kamien, 2001; and Kamien and McKenna-Cress,
2013 for excellent overviews of the team process in exhibit development and design). However,
because this is exhibition was developed and designed as my graduate project, it was difficult for
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 33
me to reconcile these two aspects – after all, how much could I delegate while still calling the
project “mine”? So, while the research, development, and design were almost totally handled by
me, I made an effort to make the project more collaborative in the evaluation and interactive
elements of the exhibit.
For evaluation, I contracted the services of a professional evaluator, as detailed in a
previous chapter. As evaluation is not my strong suit, I found it especially important to reach out
to others to help me shape my questions and perform the actual evaluation. To create stronger
interactives, I also relied on the expertise and ideas of those around me (though not as many
people as I would have liked, given the time constraints). Through conversations with friends,
members of my cohort, and museum professionals, I was able to think more deeply and
creatively about my proposed interactives, as well as devise inexpensive solutions to what
initially seemed like expensive ideas. While most of the concepts behind the interactives did not
change from their initial conception to the final product, the means of production almost
certainly did. Collaborating with others to further develop the exhibit interactives – which,
especially in early discussions, further strengthened the themes of the exhibit itself – was
extremely satisfying, and I am grateful to those who took the time to work with me.
Other Constraints. Other constraints for this project included time limits, the gallery
space, and access to technology. The timeline for this exhibition worked well enough for my
purposes, but more time for content and exhibit development would have been ideal. The gallery
space is approximately 63” x 35”, or just about 2200 square feet. Though considered small by
industry standards, the space is rectangular and quite open, providing myriad ways to use the
space. However, due to the gallery’s secondary use as a community meeting space, each piece of
the exhibit had to be movable, with any immobile or fragile elements placed against a wall. This
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 34
limited the layout of the exhibition. In addition, one side of the gallery has large windows that let
in direct sunlight. As such, this affected what types of objects could be on display, and in what
area of the room they could be placed. Lastly, access to technology at HAHS is a large
constraint. Because the museum has only one TV screen available for use, any other piece of
technology – from tablets to projectors to monitors – must be supplied by the guest curator.
Since any additional technology, then, came from my budget, I chose to include only one tech-
based interactive within the exhibit, even though it would have been preferable to include more
high-tech elements. This element is described in full at the end of the next section, Project
Content.
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 35
Project Content
The following chapter includes all of the text for the exhibition coupled with
representative images, as well as in-depth descriptions of the exhibit’s interactive components.
The exhibit, titled “Tattooed and Tenacious: Inked Women in California’s History,” was on
display at the Hayward Area Historical Society in Hayward, CA from July 9 to September 9,
2015. Photos of the exhibit, as well as the final floor plan, can be seen in Appendix F. To make
the exhibition script especially clear, the actual text of the exhibit is included below in a different
font than the rest of the text of this thesis.
All section panels measured 18”x24”, except the introductory panel, which measured
24”x36”. Secondary panels measured 10”x13”, interactive instruction panels measured 8”x10”,
and caption labels (ie standalone panels, and not the secondary captions on the section panels)
measured 6”x6”. Representative graphic design elements can be viewed in Appendix G.
Big Idea: Women and tattoos have been interconnected throughout California’s history, and
tattooed women helped break down gender barriers due to their independent and persevering
spirits.
Irreverent Big Idea: Tattooed women are badass and not a new phenomenon.
Intro Panel:
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS: INKED WOMEN IN CALIFORNIA’S HISTORY
Today, more women than men have tattoos.
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 36
Almost a quarter of American women have permanent ink, compared to just 19% of men.
Younger people are even more likely to be tattooed, as more than a third of Americans
between the ages of 18 and 40 have skin art.
But, what about the first women to get tattooed?
Who were they, and why did they get inked?
They came from across the U.S. and crossed class lines. From the upper-class woman who
followed a trend, to the working-class woman who worked in a sideshow, American women
have always had an intimate and fascinating relationship with tattoos – and in California, it was
no different.
Step inside to discover some of the stories of tenacious and tattooed women in California’s
history.
Section Panel:
NATIVE INK
From north to south and from valley to coast, California native women are part of a rich
tattooing tradition.
Whether done to ensure a long and happy life, to enhance a woman’s features, or as part of a
complex puberty ritual, almost every California tribe had a tattooing tradition.
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 37
While tribes like the Pomo, Eastern Miwok, and Chukchansi practiced body tattooing,
California native women most commonly inked their chins. Designs varied by tribe, and the
image next to this panel denotes a few of these patterns. Often,
a female elder held special knowledge of tattooing and any
related rituals, making these women the earliest female
tattooists in the state.
Chin tattoos became less and less common throughout the
twentieth century. But now, some California native women have revived the practice,
permanently inking their faces using the same hand tattooing process as their ancestors.
Caption on section panel:
A principal female shaman of the Hupa people with chin
tattoos, c. 1923. The Hupa hail from Northwestern
California.
Associated Secondary Panel:
OLIVE OATMAN
Traveling west with her family in 1851, 13-year-old Olive was kidnapped by members of a Yavapai
tribe.
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 38
Treated as slaves by the Yavapai, Olive and her sister were held captive for a year before they
were traded to a friendly Mohave tribe in Southern California.
It was near the border between modern-day California and Arizona that Olive received her
facial tattoo. These five blue lines were carefully placed to emphasize Olive’s broad features.
Olive’s upper arms were also marked with vertical bands. This ink physically reflected the love
of her Mohave family, and was a permanent reminder of this even after she returned to white
society in 1856.
Caption Label:
TATTOO DESIGNS
This 1920 chart shows several examples of native women’s
facial tattoos.
A. Yurok B-C. Costanoan D. Sinkyone E-F. Maidu G. Yuki H-L.
Chukchansi and Yokut
Caption Label:
O CHE CHE
In this 1903 photograph, O Che Che, a Mohave woman, wears a chin
tattoo made of five straight lines.
The Mohave people are indigenous to Southwestern California, Arizona,
and Nevada.
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 39
Section Panel:
WEALTHY WOMEN AND TATTOO FADS
In 1897, The New York World reported the shocking “fact” that 75% of American society
women had permanent ink.
While it’s highly unlikely that 75% of these women really got tattooed, upper-class American
women had indeed jumped on the tattoo bandwagon. Taking cues from their European
counterparts, elite American women chose to get inked to display
their daring, adventurous spirits. While their tattoos depicted
family crests, portraits of lovers, or nature imagery, these women
had only one requirement: that the art could easily be hidden by
clothing.
Aimée Crocker, the Sacramento railroad heiress, got multiple
tattoos throughout the course of her unconventional, world-traveling life. A woman who cared
little for society’s norms, she loved showing off her tattoos – including the two serpents on her
lower arms, seen in the photograph next to this panel.
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 40
Caption on section panel:
Lady Randolph Churchill, an English society woman and Winston
Churchill’s mother, inspired elite California women with her tattoo. She
sported a snake design on her wrist.
Caption Label:
DRESS
Society women easily covered tattoos with fashionable dresses like this one, c. 1907.
The high neck, long sleeves, and long hem hid these women’s body art, which ranged from
illustrations of family crests and favorite cars to flowers.
Section Panel:
A LIFE ON DISPLAY
When the first Tattooed Ladies appeared on stage in 1882, they were billed as “living art
galleries.”
“Tattooed Ladies,” as these heavily inked performers were called, traveled across the country
in circus sideshows. Primarily working-class women, they were covered with permanent body
art from neck to feet.
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 41
It wasn’t the art that customers paid to see, however. Men, women, and children ogled
Tattooed Ladies as they stood on display with other “freaks” in the sideshow.
It would have been a titillating display – these women were fully inked and less-than-fully
dressed. But for Tattooed Ladies, presenting their bodies in this way was a small price to pay.
After all, they thought, what could be better than getting to travel the country, and even the
world, when women had few options outside of marrying and staying home to raise children?
Sidebar: Sideshow Salaries
Tattooed Ladies’ lives were balancing acts between public display and personal independence,
but the salary certainly didn’t hurt its appeal. In the 1890s, most working-class families lived on
$300 to $500 a year. A Tattooed Lady – especially a well-known one – could make $100 to $200
a week. In today’s dollars, that’s equivalent to $2,500!
Associated Secondary Panel:
BEHIND THE INK
Tattooed Ladies crafted stories about their body art to appeal to the masses.
Tattooed Ladies made a personal choice to get inked, but this truth was not scandalous
enough to sell sideshow tickets. Playing to Americans’ fascination with the Wild West, many
Victorian-era Ladies invented stories of kidnappings and forced tattooing by “savage” Native
Americans.
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 42
These stories changed with the second wave of performers in the 1920s and 1930s. These
women “revealed” that they got inked to secure the affection of a tattooist husband-to-be or
to find a life of adventure. These themes of love and independence reflected the changing
roles of women in American society.
Associated Secondary Panel:
BETTY BROADBENT
Betty was the most famous and beloved Tattooed Lady of all time.
After getting her first tattoo at the age of 14, Betty Broadbent
eventually wore over 350 distinct designs. She chose to get inked with a
variety of images, from portraits of public figures like Charles Lindbergh
and Queen Victoria to religious icons like the Madonna and child.
Betty memorably displayed her tattoos during a televised beauty pageant at the 1939 World’s
Fair to challenge conventional standards of beauty. Sadly, she didn’t win.
After tattooing in San Francisco and Florida for years, Betty became the first person inducted
into the Tattoo Hall of Fame in 1981.
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 43
Associated Secondary Panel:
TATTOOED MEN
Tattooed Men paved the way for their female counterparts.
One of the most famous Tattooed Men was Captain Costentenus.
He was covered with tattoos, including his face, scalp, genitals,
and finger webbing. The Captain claimed to be an Albanian prince
forcibly tattooed by island natives, but historians believe that he
got inked for the sole purpose of exhibition.
The popularity of Tattooed Men waned when Tattooed Ladies began to work in sideshows.
The women’s risqué clothing and defiance of traditional gender roles made for a much more
scandalous – and profitable – display.
Section Panel:
POPULAR IMAGERY
Limited technology, not gender, influenced the tattoo choices of sideshow performers.
Patriotic, religious, and nature-themed designs reigned supreme for heavily tattooed people of
all genders. However, the limitations of early equipment created a certain “look” for all tattoos.
The first wave of Tattooed Ladies had designs that used heavy black ink, as well as the only
other available colors: dark red and navy blue.
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 44
By the 1910s, tattoo technology had greatly advanced. Intricate designs in a variety of colors
became possible. Lady Viola sported the faces of six presidents on her chest, while Artoria
chose to wear her favorite religious imagery. Such icons lent an air of respectability to the
Tattooed Lady.
Sidebar: The Last Supper
Reproductions of Leonardo da Vinci’s masterpiece “The Last Supper” were especially popular
with Tattooed Ladies. At least three, including Artoria, at right, had this intricate design across
their back. [These three images not included in this thesis]
Caption Label:
LADY VIOLA
Billed as “The Most Beautiful Tattooed Woman in the World,” Lady
Viola’s ink featured portraits of famous people and places. On her
upper back, Viola even had an image of the U.S. Capitol Building.
Look for the six presidents inked on her chest.
After retiring from the circus, Lady Viola lived and tattooed in Fresno with her husband and
nine children. She came out of retirement for one last sideshow tour at the age of 73, making
her the oldest performing Tattooed Lady in the U.S.
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 45
Caption Label:
ARTORIA
Completely tattooed by her husband, Red, Artoria Gibbons’ body
art was truly that: art. A deeply religious woman, Artoria chose
tattoos that spoke to her spiritual side. Reproductions of
paintings by Raphael and Michelangelo mingled with patriotic
designs and illustrations of angels and saints.
Though she traveled across the U.S. as a Tattooed Lady, she and Red eventually settled in
California to work together as tattooists.
Caption Label:
SIDESHOW COSTUMES
Tattooed Lady Betty Broadbent wore these costumes on stage. The outfits’ refined, feminine
look reinforced the message that Betty and other Tattooed Ladies promoted off-stage: that
they were just as beautiful, cultured, and classy as non-inked women.
Caption Label:
SIDESHOW BANNER
This huge poster, created by circus banner painter Snap Wyatt, would have been one of many
that lined the walkway leading up to the sideshow tent. Wyatt’s colorful banners often noted
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 46
that the featured attraction was indeed “alive,” and not deceased and stuffed, to entice
potential customers to come inside.
Section Panel:
LEARNING THE TRADE
Becoming a tattooist wasn’t easy…especially if you were a woman.
Male tattooists jealously guarded the secrets of “their” trade, worried that teaching other men
would create too much competition. Most disliked taking apprentices for this very reason.
It was even tougher for women looking to break into the business. Not only did women have to
contend with tattooists’ concerns about competition, but they also had to deal with the sexism
entrenched in American society. As such, almost all early female tattooists learned how to
tattoo from – and set up shop with – their husbands.
Against the odds, these women established successful careers in California and beyond. Like
their male counterparts, female tattoo artists worked in busy port towns like San Francisco,
Los Angeles, and San Diego, catering to sailors down by the docks.
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 47
Sidebar: From the Sideshow to the Shop
For many Tattooed Ladies, exhibiting their bodies on stage was just the beginning. To make
ends meet during the circus off-season, performers picked up tattoo machines and shifted the
focus from their bodies to customers’ - both men and other women.
Tattooed Ladies of the 1920s and 1930s often worked as tattooists well into old age, ensuring a
second career after their performing days were over.
Associated Secondary Panel:
MAUD WAGNER
Maud Stevens Wagner was the first non-native American woman
known to tattoo.
A circus contortionist and aerialist, Maud met tattooist and future
husband Gus Wagner in 1904 and asked him to “tattoo her all over
and teach her to tattoo.” She eventually moved to L.A., where she, her husband, and their
daughter Lotteva all tattooed together.
Maud helped pave the way for female tattoo artists in the U.S. Even so, she originally had to
advertise her services under the name M. Stevens Wagner, as many men wouldn’t knowingly
come to a shop to get a tattoo from a woman. While there is some evidence of earlier female
tattooists, their names are lost to history.
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 48
Associated Secondary Panel:
TATTOO FLASH
Tattooists often used pre-drawn designs known as “flash.”
Both male and female tattooists had a large selection of flash
available for customers. Though these images were often
created by the tattooists themselves, tattooists also used designs
by other artists.
Dorothy “Dainty Dotty” Jensen, a former Fat Lady with Ringling Brothers Circus, created both
sheets of flash seen here. Her tattooist husband, Owen, taught Dotty the trade. They made
their home together in Los Angeles after the end of World War II.
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 49
Caption Label:
LOTTEVA WAGNER
The L.A.-born Lotteva Wagner, daughter of
renowned tattooists Maud Stevens Wagner and
Gus Wagner, created this religious flash.
Lotteva never got tattooed herself – a unique trait for a tattoo artist – but was well-regarded in
the industry for her work.
Caption Label:
RUTH WEYLAND
Tattoo artist Ruth Weyland worked in
San Francisco in the 1930s. While well-
known for tattooing overtly lesbian
imagery, like the 1933 design seen here,
she also loved to tattoo sailors, calling
them “the gems of the earth.”
This photo of Ruth was doctored to make her look heavily tattooed, though the reason for this
remains a mystery.
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 50
Caption Label:
“PAINLESS” NELL BOWEN
“Painless” Nell Bowen tattooed in San Diego during and after World War II, catering to the
city’s large seafaring population.
Nell owned and operated five tattoo shops at one time – a huge feat even today – and
employed male and female tattooists. She and her crew worked quickly, inking as many sailors
as possible in one day, but often sacrificed cleanliness to do so.
Caption Label:
MADAM AUSTIN
Not much is known about Madam Austin, a Californian tattoo artist,
except that she worked in a shop with several well-regarded male
tattooists in San Francisco.
Fellow tattoo artist Irene “Bobbie” Libarry took this never-before-seen
photo in 1915.
Section Panel:
HOW TO TATTOO
Tattoo needles push ink into the skin to leave a lasting mark.
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 51
Originally, all tattoos were done by hand. First, the tattooist would dip a single needle,
sharpened bone, thorn, or other stylus into pigment. Then, she or he would poke the stylus
into the second layer of skin, forcing the ink a millimeter deep. Sometimes called “hand
tattooing” or “stick-and-poke,” this method is still used around the world.
In the U.S., most tattooists use an electric tattoo machine. Patented in 1891, the machine
punches from one to thirty-two pointed needles through the skin at once. Tattoo ink is then
forced into the open holes.
The ink is typically made of metal salts – like zinc (yellow or white), cobalt (blue), and iron
(black, brown, and red) – and suspended in a carrier solution. The carrier, usually ethyl alcohol
or purified water, helps to keep the color evenly distributed while also disinfecting the
pigment.
Sidebar: Needles
Needles can puncture the skin up to 3,000 times per minute during a tattoo. Artists use a foot
pedal to control the machine’s electric motor, which in turn controls the speed that the needles
move. Tattoo artists also use different types of needles for different parts of the process,
depending on how detailed the image is or how much ink they want delivered to the skin at
once.
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 52
Associated Secondary Panel:
DOES IT HURT?
Yes…but not as much as you’d think.
Inked people often describe the sensation of getting tattooed as similar to a bee sting, a pinch,
or even a slight tickle. If you’ve never been tattooed before, try pinching yourself a few times in
a row to get an idea of what it feels like.
But remember, the level of discomfort depends on a number of factors, including the location
of the tattoo, the skill of the tattoo artist, and personal pain tolerance.
Caption Label:
TATTOOING KIT
San Francisco tattoo artist and sideshow attraction Betty Broadbent used this portable
tattooing kit.
Like other traveling artists, her kit would have included a tattoo machine or two, needles, ink,
and other necessary items.
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 53
Conclusion Panel:
THE CONTINUING STORY OF WOMEN AND TATTOOS
The ominous reputation of tattoos – a perception that still plagues inked women today – grew
stronger after World War II. In the 1950s, large numbers of outlaw bikers, gang members,
felons, and other social outcasts began getting tattoos. This meant that tattooed women now
shone in a less-than-favorable light.
It wasn’t until the late 1960s that there was another tattoo revolution. When rock singer Janis
Joplin showed her delicate body art on stage, women across the country clamored for their
own. The emerging feminist movement of the 1970s, too, prompted even more women to get
inked. Feminists chose to get tattooed to visibly reclaim their bodies and confirm their
independence.
Today, tattoos are more popular than ever. But, for how long? As tattooed Millennials and Gen
Xers age, will their children want to get inked and look like their mothers? There’s no way to
know for sure. But one thing is clear: the future of tattoos will continue to be shaped by its
past, and by the tenacious, inked women who staked out their place in California’s history.
Associated Secondary Panel (for Mannequin):
TATTOOING TODAY
Six Bay Area tattoo artists collaborated on this mannequin. This piece gives just a glimpse of the
artistry and creative skill of contemporary female tattoo artists across California.
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 54
Torso
Jen Marshall and Chelsey Munster
Simms Ink
Hayward, CA
Left Arm
Carolyn LeBourgeois
FTW Tattoo Parlor
Oakland, CA
Right Arm
Hannah Wednesday and Candi Kinyobi
Tuesday Tattoo
San Francisco, CA
Hands
Kristy Quinones
Black and Blue Tattoo
San Francisco, CA
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 55
Acknowledgment Panel:
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Thank you to the following people for their support:
Adrienne McGraw and Susan Spero at John F. Kennedy University
Diane Curry and John Christian at the Hayward Area Historical Society
Lyle Tuttle at the Lyle Tuttle Tattoo Art Museum
And, extra special thanks to the Kickstarter backers who helped fund this exhibit:
Hideko Akashi
Austin Beer
Heather Bouchey
Mary Bourke
Brittany Bradley
Alida & Todd Bray
Peter Castillo
Monica Chew & Chris Karlof
David Cohen
Laura Cohen
Lori Cohen
Mary Danaher Cohen
Jonah Comstock
Ivan Cooper
Ofer dal Lal
Bill Dalzell
Brian “Fred” Danaher
Rose Danaher
Brian Davidson
Cara Dodge
Jordan Evins
Sara Flynn & Don Libbey
Mark Foster
Michael Fox
Joe Franke
Ellen & Bob Freeman
Aaron Tynes Hammack
Tamara Hayes
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 56
John Heylin
Jessica Hicks
Alexandra Higgins
Lesli & Rob Hobart
Alexander Jackson
Robert & Joyce Kleiner
Kelly Kunaniec
Shyam Lal & Rami Randhawa
Jackie Larson & David Schoenstein
Terri Le
Ryan LeBlanc & Chelsea Matthews
Mary Anne Longpre
Katherine Lord
Sarah Marsom
Mitzi Mathews
Adrienne McGraw
Alec McMullen
Gale & Ross Miller
Sarah Moir
Dave Oshry
Triana Patel
Kathy Patterson & Joe Boboschi
Michelle Powers
Candice Rankin
Eleanor Sandys
Jennifer Spotswood
Bob & Cindy Stern
Kat Sullivan
William Wild
Colin Williams
Dennis Yang
This exhibit was developed and designed by Amy Cohen of Oakland, California.
Interactives
Detailed below are the five interactive elements of the exhibit, as well as the instructional
text that appeared next to each component.
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 57
Tattoo flash postcards. The postcard-flash interactive was the largest and most
successful participatory component in the exhibit. To begin, visitors chose from three designs
featuring the outline of replicas of pre-WWII female tattooists’ original flash. Colored pencils sat
on the table where visitors colored in the postcard based on their imagination or the actual colors
of the flash (I provided an image of the actual flash for reference). Visitors could clip their
finished postcards to rows of colorful twine with clothespins, or they could take their design
home. This interactive helped visitors think about the steps of creating a tattoo (outline, shading,
color), as well as provided a creative entry point for connecting with female Californian
tattooists. Indeed, many visitors even replicated the flash designs, complete with color and
shading, by drawing them in a larger format on the table’s paper covering. From my
observations, the interactive also seemed to help normalize women with tattoos (or reinforce the
idea that many women have tattoos); many of the colored-in products featured hand-drawn
tattoos carefully added to the women depicted in the flash designs. In addition, this interactive
brought in the community element, as visitors viewed other participants’ designs and shared their
own – whether by leaving it at the museum, talking about the design when they brought it home,
or mailing it off to friends and family elsewhere in the world. This activity seemed to be the most
popular interactive in the exhibit, based on observational and anecdotal evidence.
The instructions for this interactive are as follows:
TATTOO FLASH
Tattoo artists often separate the tattoo process into three steps: outlining the
design in black ink, shading for dimension, and adding in color.
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 58
Try your hand at shading and coloring flash – pre-made tattoo designs – by
early female tattoo artists.
Or, add your voice to the discussion. Write your thoughts on women and tattoos
on any postcard, and post it here.
Funhouse mirrors. This interactive consisted of a wall of mirrors with wavy edges. On
the mirrors, the outline of an arm and of a neck/shoulders combination boasted a variety of
tattoos in red, black, and blue, hand-drawn by guest artist Jessica Hicks. Visitors could line
themselves up with these drawings to see how they would look with tattoos. Admittedly, the
concept worked better in theory than in reality, as the body parts drawn on the mirror did not
match up with body parts in reality. However, visitors still understood the concept, and I now
know to tackle this type of project from a different angle if using it in a different exhibit.
Appendix F includes a photograph of a visitor interacting with the exhibit element.
The instructions for this interactive are as follows:
STEP RIGHT UP…
The Tattooed Ladies who worked as circus sideshow attractions were almost
completely covered with permanent ink.
What would you look like - or how would you feel - if you had just as much ink?
Line up your body with the outlines in our version of circus funhouse mirrors to
find out.
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 59
Flipbook illustrating the tattoo process. This simple interactive consisted of three
transparency sheets, laid one on top of the other and pinned to the “Mechanics of Tattoing” wall.
Each layer physically illustrated a different step of the tattooing process, and when combined
depicted a complete tattoo with color, shading, and outline. Guest artist Hicks also created the
tattoo design for this straightforward component, which was extremely well-received by visitors
for its intuitive and low-effort approach to explaining the tattoo process. Appendix F includes a
photograph of this exhibit element.
The instructions for this interactive are as follows:
THE STAGES OF A TATTOO
When creating a colorful tattoo, artists often go through three distinct steps:
1. Outlining
2. Shading
3. Coloring
Flip through these transparencies to see the evolution of a color tattoo.
Draw-your-own tattoo design. During installation, I realized that I did not have enough
material to fully cover a wall originally planned to be part of the Tattooed Lady section. To solve
this issue, I added butcher paper (already owned by the Hayward Area Historical Society) and a
prompt asking visitors to draw their own tattoo designs. While the HAHS staff was skeptical that
this would elicit any meaningful responses, I am happy to say that this addition to the exhibit
seemed to have been a big hit. At the opening reception, visitors – including Lyle Tuttle and
Carolyn LeBourgeois, two tattoo artists – added designs to the wall with colored pencils that I
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 60
had already purchased for the exhibit. As such, adding this interactive essentially cost nothing,
but created another place for visitors to interact with the material. By the end of the exhibit’s
three-month run, all kinds of visitors had participated, from children who added designs near the
floor to adults who drew more sophisticated images near the top.10
The instructions for this interactive are as follows:
DRAW A TATTOO
Sketch a tattoo right here on this wall. Start from scratch, or expand on other visitors’
drawings to create collaborative, one-of-a-kind designs.
Share your tattoo story with Instagram. To experiment with using technology in the
exhibit and in this particular gallery space, I purchased an Android tablet so that visitors could
take photos of and share their own tattoos. Because I did not have the funds available to build my
own software platform for this activity, I chose to use Instagram, a popular social media
platform, to facilitate this endeavor. I asked visitors to take a photo of their favorite tattoo, and
then add a caption about the design. I anticipated that this would not be a very popular aspect of
the exhibit, as it required a high investment of time and energy (both to take the photo and write
about it, and to understand how to use the tablet to do so). As such, I can understand why this
was the least-used parts of the exhibit, though some visitors did engage with the tablet and add
meaningful captions about their tattoos.
The instructions for this interactive are as follows:
WHAT’S YOUR STORY?
10 Surprisingly, there were no inappropriate drawings of any kind!
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 61
No matter what gender you identify with, we want to know the story behind your
tattoo.
Take a picture of your favorite tattoo. Then, tell us a little bit about yourself and the
reason you got inked.
Don’t have a tattoo? Snap a photo of yourself and tell us why.
Along with these general directions, I also wrote detailed instructions on how to take
photographs and post to Instagram. These notes stood upright in a plastic stand next to the tablet.
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 62
Conclusions and Recommendations
My exhibit, “Tattooed and Tenacious: Inked Women in California’s History” opened at
the Hayward Area Historical Society on July 9, 2015, with a reception the following day.
Covering topics from tattoos and Native women to the working-class women who worked as
sideshow attractions, this exhibit put these pre-WWII tattoo pioneers in the spotlight.
Photographs of tattooed women and female tattoo artists combined with engaging text panels to
tell their stories. A hand-painted mannequin – a collaborative effort by current Bay Area female
tattoo artists and specially commissioned for this exhibition – also highlighted how far women
and tattooing have come. Interactive components and tattoo-related artifacts, plus the
photographs and text, provided multiple entry points into the story of tattooed women in
California.
This chapter discusses just some of what I discovered while developing, designing, and
installing this exhibit, including what I learned about myself as an emerging museum
professional and what I would do differently if embarking on this journey a second time. In
addition, this section also provides recommendations for other individuals developing an
exhibition without a team, with a special focus on graduate students who may undertake a similar
project to fulfill their thesis requirements.
What I Learned About Myself as an Emerging Museum Professional
Through this project, I learned more about my preferred working styles, strengths, and
weaknesses, especially as related to the exhibit development process.
Working independently. I was extremely interested to see how I could tackle a large
public-facing project – like this exhibition – without a set team. Would I be able to stay on track
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 63
if I did not have to be accountable to team members on a weekly basis (not including, of course,
my thesis advisors)? Would I be creative enough to come up with interesting and fun ideas for
interactives and content? How well would I be able to edit the exhibition, and would I be able to
get rid of stale ideas without a push from a team member?
Luckily, all these questions were answered throughout the process with, I believe, a
resounding “yes.” Of course, this exhibit was not really completed only by me. As mentioned in
previous chapters, I received support and advice from a variety of people, including my thesis
advisors, school colleagues, the staff at the Hayward Area Historical Society, members of the
tattoo community, and my friends and family. However, the process of working through ideas
independently before consulting with others – rather than brainstorming all together, as I am
used to doing in this process – worked especially well for me. Although I was already aware of
this preference, working on this exhibit solidified my desire to think through ideas in private, and
then present an idea for critical analysis. Of course, some of my ideas completely changed after
consulting with others, while others retained much of what I originally presented. However, I
was pleased to note that I was able to discard ideas that did not work without feeling like the
process had gone off track, or like I was too attached to a specific idea – something that initially
concerned me.
Working independently did not only apply to creating an exhibit as an individual,
however. For me, this project also meant working at a different pace than almost every other
student in my thesis cohort. While it could be disconcerting for some students to have a different
timeline than other members of their group, I did not find it to be problematic.
Writing labels. Another aspect of my professional life that I already understood, but
strengthened throughout the course of the exhibit, was my love of writing exhibit labels.
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 64
Distilling information into accessible, palatable, and interesting text is quite enjoyable, and
became the part of this project that I most enjoyed. My goal for this exhibition was to keep all
section labels at 200 words or less, and all captions at 75 words or less. I did not want to put a
book on a wall. Once I installed the exhibit, I realized that the show looked more text-heavy than
I would have liked. Even so, I did keep to my set word counts for most panels, and am looking
forward to continuing to work on my writing and editing skills.11
I also encountered a few writing-related bonuses related to the solo exhibit development
process. The first is that, because I did all of the research myself, I deeply understood the content
and the important themes for the topic. I did not have to rely on another person to tell me what
they found most significant in each section; rather, I innately knew which stories I wanted to
highlight, and which parts I could cut as needed. By the end of the project, I felt like an expert on
the topic of pre-WWII California women and tattoos; I am not sure that I would have felt the
same way had another team member done most of the research.
The second writing-related bonus is that I had the ultimate choice as to how the final text
would read – a luxury not often available to writers working with a team, or for a client, project
manager, or supervisor who has the final say (Serrell, 1996). I was lucky to have five label
editors who pored over my writing and provided critical input that greatly improved all of my
labels. But, because writing is so personal, I preferred some of my word choices or phrases over
those suggested by editors. As a small example, one of my exhibit headings includes the phrase,
“a rich tattooing tradition.” During each run-through, one editor noted that I should remove the
word “rich.” But, I wanted to keep that word in the heading – and, because I was the sole
developer/curator, I did! It would be interesting to do further evaluation to see if some of my
11 I’m also looking forward to getting better at removing passive voice from my writing!
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 65
linguistic selections were the right choice or not, but being able to make such a decision without
deferring to others was a clear bonus for this project.
Working with the community. Engaging with – and asking for help from – the tattoo
community proved to be a necessity for this exhibit, and it surprised me how painless it was to
do so. I originally anticipated that it would be difficult to connect with people in the tattoo
community, but in reality it was quite easy and fun. The people that I talked to were excited to
hear about a museum exhibit on women and tattoos; many went out of their way to connect me
with others in the community, to loan me items or images for the show, and/or to participate in
the mannequin project for a very small stipend. This may have been an anomaly, but I like to
think that my authentic interest in hearing peoples’ stories and knowledge helped make the
process relatively painless. This innate curiosity should serve me well as I begin to immerse
myself in exhibition work.
Lessons from the Process: What I Would Do Differently
While I am happy with the final product, there were, of course, things that I would do
differently if I were to repeat the process. This section outlines the three biggest blunders that I
made during this project: printing too-small graphics, not fully prototyping interactives, and
waiting to finish my research before beginning to plan the exhibit.
Sizes of graphics and text panels. The first aspect of the exhibit that I would change is
the one that is most obvious to visitors upon seeing the exhibition: the need to enlarge every
single image and text panel. While I printed out various images and text panels to scale to try to
understand how they would look in the gallery, I did not fully develop my spatial awareness of
the exhibit space. All of the images could have been increased in size by at least 50%, while
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 66
some of the smaller images could have even been doubled in size (almost every photograph in
the exhibit had a high enough resolution to allow for this). I could also have enlarged section
panels from 18”x24” to 24”x36”, although the size of the text in the smaller panels still
conformed to legibility standards (Serrell, 1996). My inability to accurately envision the sizes of
the graphics and panels in the exhibit meant that, at the end of installation day, I had a blank wall
originally planned to be part of the Tattooed Ladies section. Thanks to some quick thinking, I
turned the wall into another interactive: the Draw-Your-Own-Tattoo wall. This component ended
up working well, becoming a fun and successful exhibit element. However, solving problems at
the last minute is decidedly not ideal, and I could have avoided this with better-informed spatial
planning.
In the future, I plan to create accurate mock-ups of the walls of the exhibit space using a
computer program like Google SketchUp, Floorplanner, or even InDesign. Using these mock-
ups, I can move and resize labels and images, gaining a better grasp of ideal sizes and placement
before going to print. On a positive note, I plan to travel the exhibit throughout California, and
these smaller images and panels may help the exhibit fit into the galleries of smaller host
institutions.
Developing and prototyping interactives. While I prototyped some of the interactives
and their subsequent instructions, I did so in a haphazard manner and not as extensively as I
would have liked. Simply put, I ran out of time. I thoroughly discussed the initial ideas for most
of the interactive elements – including the postcards to color in, the tattoo transparency flipchart,
the “funhouse” mirrors, and the share-your-story tech piece – with different sets of people prior
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 67
to installation. However, we debated all of the merits and drawbacks of these elements only in
theory, as no physical representation of the interactives existed in reality.12
The botched “funhouse” mirrors element most illustrated my need to prototype. This
component features a wall of mirrors with wavy edges; on the mirrors, a drawing of an arm and a
drawing of a neck/shoulders have a variety of tattoos in red, black, and blue. Ostensibly, visitors
could line themselves up with the drawings to see how they would look with tattoos. In reality, it
was difficult to create drawings of human body parts on a mirror that corresponded to the body
in real life. If I had spent more time researching how to create this effect, or experimented with
different angles and body parts, this interactive would have been much more effective. As it
stands, visitors still understood the concept, but had trouble making the interactive work
properly. Indeed, I debated whether or not this should even be installed after I realized that it was
not a well-functioning piece. However, I chose to include it in the exhibit in its off-kilter iteration
as visitors could still comprehend the meaning behind the interactive (ie what would you look
like with tattoos?), and got some kind of social interaction out of the component (even if that
social interaction was just talking about how the shoulders on the mirror, for example, were so
broad).
Diving into exhibit development earlier. My final significant lesson learned through my
master’s project relates to my project timeline. Looking back, I should have gotten started on all
aspects of the exhibit development and design process earlier (as noted by a variety of authors,
including Kamien and McKenna-Cress, 2013, starting a project with an understanding of the
integration of content and physical exhibit elements is necessary to create an excellent exhibit).
For this project, I waited until I felt confident in the completion of my research before beginning
12 The one exception to this was the postcard interactive; I mocked-up a few different designs, tried coloring in them in myself, and shared potential images to determine which pictures most resonated with people.
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 68
to think deeply about the physical exhibit. In reality, I could have been working on developing
interactives, evaluating different label designs, and connecting with people in the tattoo world
who could loan me objects or work on the mannequin project all while continuing to do research.
Looking back, I feel that I may not have been confident enough to move forward without a deep
understanding of the topic, but I could have been more successful in a variety of exhibit areas if I
had pressed ahead regardless of my comfort level. However, one benefit to waiting – though I do
not believe it outweighs the cons – is that I was able to connect more deeply with tattoo
historians about my project. For example, I am not sure if Lyle Tuttle, the tattoo artist who
loaned me pieces from his collection, would have been so enthusiastic about sharing his
knowledge and artifacts with me if I did not have a thorough understanding of tattoo history.13
Admittedly, one way to solve this problem would have been to commit more time to research at
the beginning of the process, but this ideal can be hard to achieve with the realities of life.
Recommendations
While some of the following recommendations apply to any exhibit developer working
without a team, my target audience for this section is future graduate students taking a similar
unchartered path for their thesis project. Many of these recommendations also function as
personal reminders as I enter the work force as a museum professional focused on exhibitions.
Getting input. My highest recommendation is to get as much input as possible from a
variety of people. If I had developed or designed this exhibit in a vacuum, it would have been
substantially less successful. Opportunities for input from potential visitors and museum
13 I do believe he would have loaned me the pieces, but he may have been less involved in the process, and subsequently would not have asked to promote the exhibit on his website, attended the opening, or hosted me at his home in Ukiah to share even more pieces from his collection, etc.
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 69
professionals range from developing and prototyping interactives to reading through labels to
narrowing down the topic, and more. Continually receiving input – from both in-person advisors
and from the literature – can only make the exhibit stronger, and can provide solid reasons for
why something would – or would not – work in the show. Receiving valuable opinions can also
replicate, in some small way, working on an exhibit team in a museum setting.
Just ask. There is nothing wrong with asking someone for help, or to loan an object, or to
donate time or money, or to sit down with you and chat about a possible interactive component.
While it sounds obvious, the worst that someone can say is “no,” and many people will say yes.
It is always worth asking; just be sure to give whomever you are asking for something plenty of
time before your deadline.
Work with a supportive staff. Sometimes, working with a supportive staff is not
possible; people are busy, or, if you’re a guest curator, your contact at a museum is simply
having a bad day…every time you speak with them. However, being able to rely on at least one
empathetic and responsive staff member is crucial. I feel very lucky that the staff at the Hayward
Area Historical Society cared so much about both the end product and my experience throughout
the process. If your contact is not working out, set up a time to meet with her or him and ask how
you can better communicate your needs, as well as work out clear expectations about who
handles what aspects of your exhibit. If you find that you still cannot salvage the relationship,
another staff member at the same museum may be able to act as a middleman.
Small spaces are ideal. Consider the size of the space for your exhibition. I took the
exhibition space offered to me without really considering how much work it would be to fill up
the space (and, indeed, parts of my exhibit looked quite sparse). If I had to restage the exhibit, I
would have chosen a smaller space for my first independent exhibit project.
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 70
Don’t neglect your written thesis. Have a clear idea for the direction of your thesis and
do not neglect it. One of my greatest struggles during this process was that I consistently worked
on the physical exhibit to the detriment of the written (and graded) portion of my master’s
project. Although your classmates will be on a different schedule, let their stress and freak-outs
be a reminder that you, too, will feel that way if you leave the written portion of your project to
the last second.
Have fun. Don’t forget: this is your exhibit, showcasing your creative skills and interests.
Getting to create an exhibit – a tangible product – from scratch is not only excellent work
experience, but also a fitting capstone to a hands-on graduate program. Choose a topic that you
like, dig in, meet new people, and have fun!
Final Thoughts
As I wrap up this project, happy with how visitors received “Tattooed and Tenacious:
Inked Women in California’s History” at the Hayward Area Historical Society (and looking
forward to seeing the exhibit installed at its next location), I can say with certainty that creating
an exhibit for my master’s project was the right choice for me. Developing and designing an
exhibit from scratch – coupled with diving into the literature about the exhibit development
process – bolstered my knowledge of and confidence in developing exhibitions, provided me
with an opportunity to delve into my interests in a way that a traditional thesis may not have, and
connected me with great people both in and out of the museum field.
This exhibit also gave me the chance to share my graduate work with people who would
never have cracked open the pages of this thesis. Inviting family and friends – both new and old
– to experience an exhibit that I was proud of made my accomplishments in graduate school
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 71
seem all the more worthwhile. And, getting to see visitors’ reactions to my exhibit – not just in
theory, but in the real world – has made me even more excited to continue to work on exhibits as
I join my new colleagues in the museum field.
So, if you are a graduate student reading this thesis to determine whether or not an
unconventional master’s project is right for you, take my advice: just do it! Run with the
opportunity, create something new and exciting, and show the field just how tenacious you can
be.
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 72
Reference List
Alonso, H. & Hayward, J. (2013). Creating apps for in-gallery interpretation. Exhibitionist,
32(2), 37-41.
American Alliance of Museums Curators Committee. (2014). Excellence in exhibition: Label
writing competition 2014. Washington, DC: AAM. Retrieved from http://aam-
us.org/docs/default-source/awards/2014-excellence-in-label-writing-winners.pdf.
American Alliance of Museums Curators Committee. (2013). Excellence in exhibition: Label
writing competition 2013. Washington, DC: AAM. Retrieved from http://aam-
us.org/docs/default-source/awards/2014-excellence-in-label-writing-winners.pdf.
American Alliance of Museums Curators Committee. (2012). Excellence in exhibition: Label
writing competition 2012. Washington, DC: AAM. Retrieved from
http://www.curcom.org/2012_label_full_report.pdf.
Bedford, L. (2014). The art of museum exhibitions: How story and imagination create aesthetic
experiences. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
Bicknell, S. & Mann, P. (1993). A picture of visitors for exhibition developers. In G. Durbin
(Ed.), Developing museum exhibitions for lifelong learning (142-147). London, England:
The Stationery Office.
Bitgood, S. (2013). Attention and value: Keys to understanding museum visitors. Walnut Creek,
CA: Left Coast Press.
Bogle, E. (2013). Museum exhibition planning and design. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
Bridal, T. (2013). Effective exhibit interpretation and design. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 73
Brown, A. L. & Campione, J. C. (1996). Guided discovery in a community of learners. In K.
McGilly (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice
(p. 229-325). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books.
Burd Schiavo, L. (2013). Object lessons: Making meaning from things in history museums.
Exhibitionist, 32(1), 48-52.
Carnall, M., Ashby, J. & Ross, C. (2013). Natural history museums as provocateurs for dialogue
and debate. Museum Management and Curatorship, 28(1), 55-71.
Clerk, C. (2009). Vintage tattoos: The book of old-school skin art. New York, NY: Universe
Publishing.
Conn, S. (2009). Do museums still need objects? Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania
Press.
Dana, J. C. (1917). The gloom of the museum. In G. Anderson (Ed.), Reinventing the museum:
The evolving conversation on the paradigm shift (2nd ed.) (p. 17-33). Lanham, MD:
AltaMira Press.
Diamond, J., Luke, J., & Uttal, D. (2009). Practical evaluation guide: Tools for museums and
other informal educational settings (2nd ed.). Lanham, MD: Altamira Press.
Eldridge, C.W. (n.d.) The tattoo archive [used multiple pages on website]. Retrieved from
http://www.tattooarchive.com/.
Excel, Inc. (1992). The 4MAT system: A cycle of learning. Barrington, IL: Self-published.
Faden, R. (2012). Creative adaptation: Exhibitions in the downturn. Exhibitionist, 31(2), 58-63.
Falk, J. H. (1993). Assessing the impact of exhibit arrangement on visitor behaviour and
learning. In G. Durbin (Ed.), Developing museum exhibitions for lifelong learning (p.
117-122). London, England: The Stationery Office.
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 74
Falk. J. & Dierking, L. (2000). Learning from Museums: Visitor Experiences and the Making of
Meaning. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
Falk. J. & Dierking, L. (2012). The museum experience revisited. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast
Press.
Faron, R. & Banda, J. (2014). Exhibition carts: Intentionally designed spaces on the move.
Exhibitionist, 33(1), 20-25.
Fenichel, M. & Schweingruber, H. A. (2010). Surrounded by science: Learning science in
informal environments. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Gardner, H. (n.d.). The components of MI. Retrieved from http://multipleintelligencesoasis.org/.
Gilbert, S. (2000). Tattoo history: A source book. New York, NY: Juno Books LLC.
Gurian, E. H. (2005). Civilizing the museum: The collected writings of Elaine Heumann Gurian.
London: Routledge.
Hein, G. E. (2012). Progressive museum practice in the twenty-first century. In Progressive
museum practice: John Dewey and democracy (p. 177-200). Walnut Creek, CA: Left
Coast Press.
Kamien, J. (2001). An advocate for everything: Exploring exhibit development models. Curator:
The Museum Journal, 44(1), 114-128.
Kennedy, E. L. and M. D. Davis (1993). Boots of leather, slippers of gold: The history of a
lesbian community. New York, NY: Routledge.
Krutak, L. (2010). Marks of transformation: Tribal tattooing in California and the American
Southwest. Retrieved from
http://www.vanishingtattoo.com/california_tattooed_tribes.htm.
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 75
Madame Chinchilla (2003). Electric tattooing by women, 1900-2003. Fort Bragg, CA: Isadore
Press.
Mann, S., Moses, J, & Fisher, M. (2013). Catching our breath: Assessing digital technologies for
meaningful visitor engagement. Exhibitionist, 32(2), 15-19.
Macdonald, S. (2007). Interconnecting: museum visiting and exhibition design. CoDesign:
International journal of cocreation in design and the arts, 3(S1), 149-162.
McKenna-Cress, P. & Kamien, J. (2013). Creating exhibitions: Collaboration in the planning,
development, and design of innovative experiences. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
McLean, K. (1993). Planning for people in museum exhibitions. Washington, DC: Association of
Science-Technology Centers Publications.
McLean, K. & Pollock, W. (2010). The convivial museum. Washington, DC: Association of
Science-Technology Centers Publications.
Mifflin, M. (2009). The blue tattoo: The life of Olive Oatman. Lincoln, NE: University of
Nebraska Press.
Mifflin, M. (2013). Bodies of subversion: A secret history of women and tattoo (3rd ed.).
Brooklyn, NY: powerHouse Books.
Mortati, M. (2014). Design intentionality and the art museum. Exhibitionist, 33(1), 34-39.
Museums, Libraries, and Archives Council (n.d.). Inspiring learning: Improvement toolkit for
museums, libraries, and archives.
Orselli, P. (2008, July 17). Planning for people in museum exhibitions: An interview with Kathy
McLean [Blog interview]. Retrieved on Dec. 14, 2014 from
http://blog.orselli.net/2008/07/planning-for-people-in-museum.html.
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 76
Osterud, A. K. (2014). The tattooed lady: A history (2nd ed.). Lanham, MD: Taylor Trade
Publishing.
Rand, J. (2007). The visitors' bill of rights: A list of important human needs, seen from the
visitors' point of view. In G. Anderson (Ed.), Reinventing the museum: The evolving
conversation on the paradigm shift (2nd ed.) (p. 315-316). Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.
Roberts, L. (1997). From Knowledge to Narrative: Educators and the Changing Museum.
Washington, DC: Smithsonian Books.
Samis, P. & Michaelson, M. (2013). Meaning-making in nine acts. Exhibitionist, 32(1), 54-59.
Serrell, B. (1996). Exhibit labels: An interpretive approach. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press.
Silverman, L. (2010). The social work of museums. New York, NY: Routledge.
Simon, N. (2010). The participatory museum. Santa Cruz, CA: Museum 2.0.
Simon, N. (2012). The event-driven museum? Reconsidering the role of exhibitions in tough
economic times. Exhibitionist, 31(2), 46-50.
Smithsonian Institution (2002). The making of exhibitions: Purpose, structure, roles and process.
Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution, Office of Policy and Analysis.
Snider, J. (2013). The construction of meaning. Exhibitionist, 32(1), 72-76.
SUNY Cortland (2004). Concrete/reflective/abstract/active – David Kolb. Retrieved from
http://www.web.cortland.edu/andersmd/learning/kolb.htm.
Tisdale, R. (2011). Do history museums still need objects? History News, 66(3), 19-24.
Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes.
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Weaver, S. (2007). Creating great visitor experiences: A guide for museums, parks, zoos,
gardens, and libraries. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 77
Webb, S. (2002). The great book of tattoo. Atglen, PA: Schiffer Publishing Ltd.
Webb, S. (1976). Heavily tattooed men and women. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Book
Company.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge,
England: Cambridge University Press.
Wilkening, S., & Chung, J. (2009). Life stages of the museum visitor: Building engagement over
a lifetime. Washington, DC: The AAM Press.
Worts, D. (1995). Visitors make their own meaning. In G. Durbin (Ed.), Developing museum
exhibitions for lifelong learning (123-130). London, England: The Stationery Office.
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 78
APPENDIX A: Google Consumer Survey Data
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 79
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 80
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 81
APPENDIX B: Informal Interview Questions
When you think about women and tattoos, what comes to mind?
What do your friends or family think about women with tattoos?
Why do you think women get tattoos?
What questions do you have about tattoos?
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 82
APPENDIX C: Project Timeline as of July 31, 2015
Italicized dates were those required by either John F. Kennedy University or the Hayward
Area Historical society. Non-italicized dates were much more flexible.
January
Jan. 28: Project Timeline Due
Jan. 31: Finalize front-end survey questions
Ongoing: Continue research
February
Feb. 11: Literature Review Due
By Feb. 14: Reach out to Hannah (my tattoo artist) and other local female artists
By Feb. 28: Conduct evaluation at HAHS – two in-person visits – and set up Google Consumer
Surveys
By Feb. 28: Finalize themes for exhibit
Ongoing: Continue research
March
March 1: Determine AV needs
March 11: Creative brief due (themes, content, title, etc.)
By March 15: Begin securing permissions/rights as needed (most likely, for a video clip)
March 23: Compile budget and itemized list of needs for exhibition
Ongoing: Continue research
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 83
April
April 15: Progress Report and Methodology Due
April 15: First draft of exhibition script
By April 18: First round of prototyping for interactives
April 30: Second draft of exhibition script
May
May 1: 700-word Adobe Trails (HAHS Newsletter) article and marketing materials due to HAHS
May 1: Finalize budget based on interactives
May 10: Finalize Kickstarter levels, video, etc.
May 13: Final draft of written thesis due (minus conclusion)
May 16: Finalize design elements (labels, panels, etc.)
May 30: Draft of exhibition floor plan/layout
June
June 1: Launch Kickstarter
June 6: Finalize label text
June 18: Send final labels/design files to printer
June 21: Kickstarter ends
July
July 1: Pick up mannequin parts from tattoo artists
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 84
July 7-8: Install exhibition at HAHS
July 9: Exhibition officially opens at HAHS
July 10: Opening night reception at HAHS
July 17: Draft of Conclusions chapter due
July 19: Kickstarter backer tour #1 of the exhibit
July 31: FINAL THESIS DUE
August
August 1: Ship all Kickstarter rewards to backers
August 7: Kickstarter backer tour #2 of the exhibit
August 12: JFK University tour of the exhibition
September
September 9: Exhibition closes
September 10: De-install exhibition at HAHS
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 85
APPENDIX D: Final Budget as of July 31, 2015
Item Actual Cost Notes
Tattoo Artist Stipends for Mannequin Work $1,550.00 Originally set to be $750; most artists' stipends
doubled thanks to fundraising success
Graphics/Panel Printing $1,200.00 Estimated (still waiting on final invoice)
Kickstarter Incentives/Postage $400.00 Stickers; tote bags; plus estimated shipping (does not include postcards)
Postcards $395.00 Includes 5 different designs for interactives and Kickstarter rewards
Image Permission Fees $375.00 For 7 images; most image usage approved without fees
Tablet for Interactive $199.64
Supplies for Postcard Section $103.34 Not including postcards, but including twine, clothespins, buckets to hold the postcards, colored pencils, etc.
Artist Stipend for Interactives $100.00 Hand-drawn work on mirror and transparency interactives
Mirrors for Interactive $59.97
Transparencies $39.99
Mannequin $0.00 Donated
Graphic Design $0.00 By me
Object Loan Fees $0.00
Install Labor $0.00 Donated
TOTAL $4,422.94 $1000 of this covered by HAHS; add'l $3,482.76 raised from Kickstarter (after CC fees)
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 86
APPENDIX E: Kickstarter Summary and Reward Levels
The following text and images appeared on my Kickstarter page for the project, along with a
short video explaining the exhibit and how I planned to use the funds raised. The below image
depicts the homescreen of the project halfway into the campaign.
The Project
Today, more women than men have tattoos. But what about the first California women to get
tattooed? Who were they, and why did they get inked? With your help, the amazing history of
these early tattooed women will come to life in a new museum exhibit.
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 87
From the upper-class women who started the tattooing trend, to the working-class Tattooed
Ladies who graced the stages of circus sideshows, to some of the first female tattoo artists in
California, it's time for these women to be in the spotlight and get the credit they deserve for
shaping tattoo culture on the West Coast!
Tattooed Lady and tattooist Betty Broadbent, who had a tattoo shop in San Francisco for many
years! Courtesy of Spider Webb.
My name is Amy Cohen, and I'm a grad student finishing my M.A. in Museum Studies this June.
For my master's project, I drew on inspiration from my own life - my love of museums, history
and tattoos - to create an exhibit that shares the stories of early California women and their ink.
Called Tattooed and Tenacious: Inked Women in California's History, the exhibit will run
from July 9 to August 16, 2015 at the Hayward Area Historical Society (HAHS).
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 88
Tattooed Lady Artoria Gibbons, who worked as a tattoo attraction in LA and lived throughout
California. Courtesy of Spider Webb.
Why Support This Project?
It's important to me to create an exhibit that honors these pioneering women, and shares their
stories in all their glory. But to do that, I need your help! The Hayward Area Historical Society,
the non-profit museum providing gallery space for this exhibit, has generously supplied $1,000
for the show, but that's not enough to put together a really engaging and powerful exhibit. This
isn't going to be just a "book on the wall," but an exhibit with cool interactive elements and great
photographs of pre-WWII tattooed women and female tattooists.
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 89
I've talked to tattoo artists and historians up and down the coast, as well as on the other side of
the country. I've researched tattoo culture pre-WWII in California. And, I've been focusing on
making this exhibit the best it can be for almost a year, while also working a full-time job and
going to school. Please help make my dream exhibit a reality by supporting this
Kickstarter!
Tattooed Lady and tattooist Lady Viola, who toured with the Ringling Bros. and Barnum &
Bailey's Circus. After her circus days were over, she lived in Fresno where she ran her own
tattoo shop. From the Tattoo Archive - Winston Salem, NC.
Rewards
To say thanks for your support, I hope you'll enjoy the rewards listed at right. All of the tattoo
flash (aka premade designs) featured in these rewards was drawn by female tattooists who
worked and lived in California before World War II.
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 90
[Images of different reward options, from stickers to postcards to tote bags, were placed here].
Any level of support makes a big difference, and I'll be acknowledging you for your support in
the exhibit! In addition, backers at almost every level get stickers and postcards featuring
original tattoo flash that isn't available anywhere outside of this exhibit. Or, become a backer at a
higher level to gain access to a very special curatorial tour. You'll get behind-the-scenes info and
hear even more stories about tattooed women that didn't make it into the exhibit! The tour date
for this reward level will be selected post-campaign with the input of backers at this level.
Budget
I've made concerted efforts to keep costs low, but I still need to raise an additional $2,500 to
create a really amazing exhibit.
The biggest part of my budget is related to a special project featuring current Bay Area tattoo
artists. To show how far women have come in the tattoo industry, female Bay Area tattoo artists
are collaborating on a mannequin that showcases their tattoo art. I've set aside half of my budget
to help compensate these artists for their time, energy, and skill. While that's still not enough to
do them justice, it is a step in the right direction!
Along with stipends for artists, this $2,500 will help me pay for: interactive exhibit
elements, like a tablet that allows visitors to share pictures of their own tattoos; photographs
and labels printed on eco-friendly canvas (rather than foamcore); Kickstarter rewards and
postage for shipping everything to backers; and materials for the exhibit, like colored pencils
to color in postcards featuring flash from female tattooists.
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 91
This Kickstarter has reached its goal, which is fantastic! Now, all of the additional funds will go
towards better exhibit components (for example, more tech for interactive exhibit elements,
additional designs for the postcards, etc.) and towards providing additional compensation for
artists for their work.
And finally...
Thank you for backing!
I can't wait to share the stories of these amazing tattooed women, all thanks to your generosity
and support. See you in Hayward in July!
Risks and challenges
My exhibit is opening on July 9 even if this campaign isn't successfully funded - but I hope that
won't be the case! This means that all of the aspects of my exhibit - including the postcards,
stickers, etc. - have already been designed and are ready to be ordered. As such, I don't anticipate
any setbacks in fulfilling rewards.
In addition, my full-time work contract ends on June 30 (not related to this exhibit), so I will
have a lot of extra time to fulfill these rewards :).
Lastly, I will aim to keep backers informed of any unexpected delays, and to communicate with
all of the lovely backers for this project on a regular basis.
If you have any other questions or concerns, please message me and I'll do my best to address
them. Thank you again for your support!
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 92
Reward Levels
Reward 1: Pledge $1 or more
You'll receive Amy's undying gratitude and thanks for supporting her project!
Reward 2: Pledge $5 or more
All of the above, plus acknowledgement in the exhibit. Your name will be printed on a panel and
installed in the exhibit so that every visitor knows how great you are.
Reward 3: Pledge $15 or more
All of the above, plus a large limited edition sticker featuring a tattoo design by Dainty Dotty
Jensen, printed just for this exhibit.
Reward 4: Pledge $25 or more
All of the above, plus two limited edition postcards made just for this exhibit! You'll receive
postcards featuring a tattooed lady and an old-school tattoo design that you can color in yourself.
Reward 5: Pledge $50 or more
All of the above, plus all of the limited edition goodies made just for this exhibit! You'll receive
all four of the postcards of tattooed ladies and tattoo designs to color yourself and both stickers
featuring Dotty's flash.
Reward 6: Pledge $75 or more
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 93
All of the above, plus a super limited edition navy blue tote bag featuring the title of the exhibit,
"Tattooed and Tenacious."
Reward 7: Pledge $150 or more
Limited reward (20 spots)
All of the above, plus a private tour of the exhibit with Amy, the curator, in Hayward, CA. Hear
more amazing stories about tattooed women, including many tales that didn't make it into the
exhibit! Sorry, no airfare/travel/accommodations included.
Reward 8: Pledge $250 or more
Limited reward (10 spots)
All of the above, plus a special invitation for you and a guest to attend the exhibit's opening
reception in Hayward, CA in July 2015 (details will be sent to backers). Backers will also receive
four free admission passes for HAHS! Sorry, no airfare/travel/accommodations included.
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 94
APPENDIX F: Floor Plan and Photographs of the Exhibit
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 95
Examples of displays within the exhibit
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 96
Tattoo artist Lyle Tuttle contributing to the Draw-Your-Own-Tattoo wall
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 97
Completed postcards from the tattoo flash interactive, as well as part of the set-up of the wall
A visitor taking a “selfie” at the funhouse mirrors station
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 98
The finished mannequin, featuring the work of six Bay Area tattoo artists
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 99
The transparency interactive, with the “color” layer held up and the “outline” and “shading”
transparency pages lying flat below
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 100
APPENDIX G: Sample Graphic Design Elements
Section Panel (18”x24”):
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 101
Secondary Panel (10”x13”):
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 102
Interactives Panel (8”x10”):
Caption label (6”x6”):
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 103
APPENDIX H: Adobe Trails Article
This article was written by me and appeared in the Summer 2015 edition of Adobe Trails, the
Hayward Area Historical Society’s quarterly newsletter. I am including it here as it was a major
marketing piece for the exhibition. It also expresses some of my personal reasons for creating the
exhibition and previews the content of the exhibit.
Community Gallery Spotlight
Tattooed and Tenacious: Inked Women in California’s History
My name is Amy Cohen, and I have tattoos. You wouldn’t be able to tell just by looking at me.
An elbow-length cardigan easily covers my five relatively large tattoos, all inked into my upper
arms. It’s only when I’m wearing a sleeveless shirt that flowers, an hourglass, and other colorful
images suddenly appear.
These permanent pictures surprised and worried some of my family and friends. “You’ll ruin
your looks!” or “What about when you get older? How will you look then?” or “Only rebels and
bikers get tattoos!” were common refrains. Well, I’m not exactly a rebel, and I don’t have a
motorcycle, so why permanent ink? Why get an image tattooed on me for the rest of my life?
My personal reasons aren’t very exciting. I simply like how tattoos look, and once I found an
artist who matched my personal aesthetic (the amazing Hannah Wednesday at Tuesday Tattoo), I
just kept going back for more. But the more tattoos I got, the more I wondered about why other
women got inked. When did women begin getting tattoos? And why did these women decide to
get them?
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 104
I set out to do some research on this very topic, with special attention placed on my adopted
home of California. As a history buff and tattooed woman, I couldn’t wait to uncover the
underground history of women and tattoos, and the compelling stories of some pretty amazing
women.
***
I was most drawn to the story of the tattooed lady – the circus freak, the sideshow attraction. To
get work as a “tattooed lady,” as they were billed throughout California, the US and Europe (and
how I’ll refer to them here), women had to be completely covered with ink from neck to ankle.
In other words, only their heads, hands, and feet were free from permanent marking. The earliest
tattooed ladies, appearing on stage in 1882, had relatively simplistic or heavy-looking designs,
created with only two colors of ink. What they lacked in aesthetics, though, they made up for
with wild stories.
Early tattooed ladies told stories of captivity and forced tattooing, of far-flung California
abductions and doting fathers who tattooed their daughters to discourage kidnappings. In reality,
many tattooed ladies made the choice to get tattooed to escape lives of drudgery, looking for
adventure and travel in the place of dreary chores. And, it didn’t hurt that tattooed ladies made
good money. In the 1890s, a working class family made $300 to $500 per year, whereas a
tattooed lady could make $100 to $200 per week.
During the slow summer months, some tattooed ladies turned to tattooing others – almost
entirely a man’s game – to make money and keep busy. In California, tattooed ladies-turned-
TATTOOED AND TENACIOUS 105
tattooists set up shop in major port cities like San Francisco, Los Angeles, and San Diego.
Tattooed lady Betty Broadbent tattooed in San Francisco for many years; Lady Viola (pictured
here) owned and operated a tattoo shop in Fresno after appearing on stage; Painless Nell Bowen,
though not a tattooed lady, owned five different shops in the San Diego area; and even the circus
performer “Dainty Dottie” Jensen picked up a tattoo gun and got to work in Southern California.
***
These are just some of the stories I found in my research. Is it a coincidence that I got my biggest
tattoos when I moved to California? With the legacy of women and tattoos here, I like to think
that it’s not. It’s comfortable to have tattoos here, as evidenced by the number of women who
wear them today – and part of that acceptance comes from the legacy of tattooed ladies and other
inked women. Even my family and friends have come around, appreciating tattoo art for its
beauty or meaningful expression (some even ask when I’ll be getting my next one!). I don’t think
I’ll ever be as heavily inked as a tattooed lady, but one thing’s for sure: I can’t wait to be a part
of the next chapter in the long history of California women and tattoos.
***
View the upcoming exhibit Tattooed and Tenacious: Inked Women in California’s History in the
Community Gallery from July 9 to August 16 and share your thoughts on tattoos! This exhibit is
developed and designed by Amy for her Master’s Project; she graduates from John F. Kennedy
University this summer with her M.A. in Museum Studies.