Post on 20-Mar-2016
description
transcript
1
The European Commission’s Policy on Corporate
GovernanceCorinna Ullrich, DG MARKT, EU Commission
Summit for the future, Amsterdam, 4 May 2006
2
Corporate governance in the EU
• Main responsibility for corporate governance questions with DG Internal Market
• Focus on relationship between the organs of the company and between the company and its shareholders/(potential) investors
• Other aspects dealt with by other Commission services (in particular DG Employment)
3
Key corporate relationships
Board CEO
Shareholders
Appoints/removesControlsApproves
ReportsSubmits
Manages company in shareholders interests
Appoint boardApprove accounts
ACCOUNTABLE
ACCOUNTABLE
4
Development since 1998• 1998 Commission communication: ‘Financial Services: building a framework
for action’: – No single CG model but emerging consensus on common principles:
• equitable treatment of shareholders • transparency and accountability of the corporate process
• 1999 Financial Services Action Plan – EU involvement in this area confined to reviewing existing national CG so
as to identify legal or administrative barriers which could frustrate the development of a single EU financial market.
• 2002 Weil, Gotshal, Manges comparative study of CG codes (35 national, OECD, ICGN, 2 EU)
– Strong similarities amongst CG codes convergence factor– No obstacle to investment
No need for an EU CG code Need to lower barriers to shareholder participation
and information (i.e., facilitate cross-border voting and enable shareholders to evaluate the governance of corporations)
5
Winter Report (11/2002)• High level group of 7 company law experts chaired by
Jaap Winter, set up by Commission in 2001 to issue recommendations on the modernisation of the EU company law framework
• Corporate scandals Mandate extended in 2002 to cover additional CG issues
• Winter Report conclusions with regard to CG– Disclosure mechanisms are central to any sound CG– Shareholders have a watchdog role to play– Independent non-executive directors are an important safeguard
and should monitor areas where conflicts of interest can arise– Remuneration of management is a key area of conflicts of
interests, where independent directors should therefore play a leading role
– No need for EU CG code, but EU should co-ordinate efforts of MS
6
Commission Action Plan (05/2003)• Action plan on modernising company law and
enhancing corporate governance• Policy objectives:
– Protection of shareholders and third parties/fostering of investors’ confidence
– Foster competitiveness of EU businesses• Key CG lines of action
– Enhance disclosure– Modernise the board of directors– Co-ordinate Member States’ CG efforts– Strengthen shareholders’ rights, notably in a cross-border
context• CG measures targeted to listed companies
7
Short term measures of the Action plan (2003-2006)
• Enhance disclosure– Directive amending the 4th and 7th company law directives
(corporate governance statement, related party transactions and off-balance sheet agreements) – agreement 12/2005, official adoption and publication imminent
• Modernise the board of directors – Recommendation on the remuneration of directors – Adopted
12/2004– Recommendation on the role on independent non-executive directors
– Adopted 02/2005– Directive amending the 4th and 7th company law directives
(responsibility of board members)• Co-ordinate Member States’ CG efforts
– Creation of the European Corporate Governance Forum – 10/2004• Strengthen shareholders’ rights, notably in a cross-border context
– Proposal for a directive on shareholders’ rights - 01/2006
8
Consultation on mid- and long term measures of the Action plan
• Starting point: – Situation in the „outside“ world has changed since
2003– Also general policy approach changed: Lisbon
agenda (focus on boosting competitiveness of companies)
• Public consultation launched in December 2005 (deadline end of March)– „Better Regulation“– over 260 written replies
• Public hearing on 3 May
9
Consultation on mid- and long term measures of the Actionplan
First impression: Whereas stronger support for certain actions in Company Law on many Corporate Governance issues views more or less evenly split
• on one hand „regulatory fatigue“/requests for a phase of digestion
• on the other hand need for certain additional action is recognised, e.g.
• shareholders‘ rights, • disclosure of voting policies of institutional investors,• porportionality of ownership and control
10
Consultation on mid- and long term measures of the Action plan
• Summary report on written contributions and hearing
• To be published in the coming weeks (and in any case before the summer)
• Then decision on what follow-up should be (automn 2006)
11
Questions?