Post on 13-Apr-2017
transcript
The Evolution of Blended & Competency-Based
Schooling
What Lies Beyond the Horizon?
Tim Hudson, PhDVice President of Learning
DreamBox Learning@DocHudsonMath
Poll: What is your biggest challenge with blended schooling?
- Personalizing learning for every student- Measuring impact- Fidelity of implementations- Getting educators comfortable with blended
learning- Accessing and using actionable data
Poll: What is your level of interest in digital curriculum?
- Just looking at new technologies- Researching possible software solutions for my
school- Interested in grants and funding options for my
school- Interested in pricing- Interested in viewing a demo
studio3architecture.wordpress.com
Today’s GoalsExplore our hidden assumptions and imagine the full implications of blended learning that ensure high achievement and enjoyment for all students.
Surface and reflect upon our own mental models of education, schooling, and learning that inform how we design classrooms, schools, and use educational technology.
“Next Generation” Education?“…one would think that by 2025, age-graded schools and the familiar teaching and learning that occurs today in K-12 and universities would have exited the rear door. Not so. Blended instruction, personalized learning, and flipped classrooms will reinforce the age-graded school, the 19th century organizational innovation that is rock-solid in 2015. That is what I predict for 2025.”
Larry Cuban, 12/2015Stanford University Professor Emeritus of Education
From “Predictions, Dumb and Otherwise, about Technology in Schools in 2025”www.larrycuban.wordpress.com
What is Blended Schooling?
What is Competency-
Based Schooling?
What is Blended Schooling?
What is Competency-
Based Schooling?
Personalized
Schooling
Personalized
Learning
Industrial
Schooling
Industrial
Learning
Personalized (Relational)
Impersonal (Industrial)
LearningPedagogy
withStudents
SchoolingStructures
fromAdults
School Policies & Structures are Designed for
Students as Unique Individuals.
Strategic & Varied Schedule, Location,
Path, Pace
Empowering Learning
Experiences, Critical Thinking, Creativity,
Exploration.Students “Think &
Do” using Their Own Intuitive Ideas
School Policies & Structures are Designed for
Efficiency, Economy & Scale.
Fixed Schedule, Location, Path, PaceAge-Based Pacing
Calendars
Traditional Lesson Paradigm of Mass
InstructionTeach, Practice,
TestStudents “Sit &
Get” the Teacher’s Ideas
Personalized (Relational)
Impersonal (Industrial)
LearningPedagogy
withStudents
SchoolingStructures
fromAdults
Planning Backwards School
Curriculum
© 1998, 2005© 2007
School Policies & Structures are Designed for
Students as Unique Individuals.
Strategic & Varied Schedule, Location,
Path, Pace
Empowering Learning
Experiences, Critical Thinking, Creativity,
Exploration.Students “Think &
Do” using Their Own Intuitive Ideas
School Policies & Structures are Designed for
Efficiency, Economy & Scale.
Fixed Schedule, Location, Path, PaceAge-Based Pacing
Calendars
Traditional Lesson Paradigm of Mass
InstructionTeach, Practice,
TestStudents “Sit &
Get” the Teacher’s Ideas
Personalized (Relational)
Impersonal (Industrial)
LearningPedagogy
withStudents
SchoolingStructures
fromAdults
Plan Curriculum Backwards1. Identify desired
results (for units and lessons)
2. Determine acceptable evidence
3. Plan learning experiences and instruction
Understanding by Design, Wiggins & McTighe, ©2005
Schooling by Design, ©2007, Wiggins & McTighe, p. 6
Where are decisions about
Blended Learning orCompetency-Based
Models made?
Age-GradingSeat-TimeSchedulesCredits
Mission should drive scheduling. Structures
should not drive Mission.
Plan Schooling Backwards
• “Not schooling by habit or impulse.”
• “Without a commitment to mission, we don’t really have a school; we just have a home for freelance tutors of subjects.”
p. 11, 25, Wiggins & McTighe, © 2007
Mission or Habit?“Our mission is to ensure success
for all our students. We will do whatever it takes to ensure
their success – provided we don’t have to
change the schedule, modify any of our existing practices, or adopt
any new practices.”
Revisiting Professional Learning Communities at Work, ©2008, DuFour, DuFour, Eaker, pp. 114-115
What is Blended Schooling?
What is Competency-
Based Schooling?
School Policies & Structures are Designed for
Students as Unique Individuals.
Strategic & Varied Schedule, Location,
Path, Pace
Empowering Learning
Experiences, Critical Thinking, Creativity,
Exploration.Students “Think &
Do” using Their Own Intuitive Ideas
School Policies & Structures are Designed for
Efficiency, Economy & Scale.
Fixed Schedule, Location, Path, PaceAge-Based Pacing
Calendars
Traditional Lesson Paradigm of Mass
InstructionTeach, Practice,
TestStudents “Sit &
Get” the Teacher’s Ideas
Personalized (Relational)
Impersonal (Industrial)
LearningPedagogy
withStudents
SchoolingStructures
fromAdults
Blended
Blended
Is there
an app for
this?
Is there
an app for
this?
Is there
an app for
this?
Is there
an app for
this?
Why don’t we see the term
‘blended’ associated with
other professions?
BLENDEDHOSPITALS
BLENDEDMEDICINE
BLENDEDFARMING
BLENDEDCOOKING
PURPOSE• What are restaurants, farms, hospitals, schools, etc. “in business” to accomplish?
• Regardless of what “school” looks like, what must be accomplished for all students?
Plan Schooling Backwards“Contemporary school reform efforts… typically focus too much on various means: structures, schedules, programs, PD, curriculum, and instructional practices (like cooperative learning)”
[or blended learning][or flipped classrooms][or iPads, hardware, etc][or “gamification”]
p. 234-235, Wiggins & McTighe, © 2007
Plan Schooling Backwards
“Certainly such reforms serve as the fuel for the school improvement engine, but they must not be mistaken as the destination…[which is] improved learning.”
p. 234-235, Wiggins & McTighe, © 2007
Blended Learning
H. Staker, M. Horn, Classifying K-12 Blended Learning, © 2012
Blended Learning
H. Staker, M. Horn, Classifying K-12 Blended Learning, © 2012
online delivery ofcontent & instruction anytime, anywhere
delivery of content & instruction at school
SCHOOLING
Time, Place, Path, Pace
H. Staker, M. Horn, Classifying K-12 Blended Learning, © 2012
Time, Place, Path, Pace
H. Staker, M. Horn, Classifying K-12 Blended Learning, © 2012
• Path: Learning is no longer restricted to the pedagogy used by the teacher. Interactive and adaptive software allows students to learn [in a method that is customized to their needs].
BUT… Learning IS restricted – and limited by – the pedagogy used by the online teacher, in the online instruction, or in designs of the learning software.
Which blended schooling model is better?
FLIPPED-CLASSROOM ENRICHED-VIRTUAL
Blending is a means to what ends?
What is happening with the teacher?What is happening on the
computers?H. Staker, M. Horn, Classifying K-12 Blended Learning, © 2012
SchedulesEquipmentFacilitiesBudgetsClass Size
Planning “Forward” based on resources?
Or Planning Backward from
Mission
Adapted from Schooling by Design, G. Wiggins & J. McTighe, ©2007, p. 6
based on Schooling by Design, ©2007, Wiggins & McTighe, p. 6
Where are decisions about
Blended Learning Models made?
1. Define Learning Principles
2. Establish Curriculum & Assessment
3. Establish Face-to-Face and Online Programs & Practices to Enable Blended Learning
Determine Personnel,
Structures, and Resources
What is Blended Schooling?
What is Competency-
Based Schooling?
Competency Education (iNACOL)• Advance upon demonstrated mastery• Transferable learning objectives that
empower students• Positive, meaningful assessment• Timely, differentiated support• Application and creation of knowledge,
developing important skills & dispositions
http://www.competencyworks.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/iNCL_CWIssueBrief_Implementing_v5_web.pdf
• Advance upon demonstrated mastery• Transferable learning objectives that
empower students• Positive, meaningful assessment• Timely, differentiated support• Application and creation of knowledge,
developing important skills & dispositions
http://www.competencyworks.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/iNCL_CWIssueBrief_Implementing_v5_web.pdf
Competency Education (iNACOL)
Plan Curriculum Backwards
1. Identify desired results (for units and lessons)
2. Determine acceptable evidence
3. Plan learning experiences and instruction
Understanding by Design, Wiggins & McTighe, ©2005
Acquire Knowledge and SkillsInformatio
n
Facts
Procedures
Make Meaning
Concepts
Ideas
Contexts
Situations
Transfer
Independent Use
Unfamiliar Situations
© Authentic Education
Learning Outcomes A-M-T
“You can learnANYTHING online.”
usually means
“You can acquireANY INFORMATION
online.”
Schooling by Design, ©2007, Wiggins & McTighe, p. 6
Where are decisions about
Competency-Based Systems made?
Establish Policies & Structures for
Progressing Based on Competency
Decide on Evidence of Competence
Why “Factory” Model Structures?“…all the rhetoric around how we will shove off the
mantel of “factory education” for the brand new world of “personalized learning” misses a point of
the utmost importance:Factory education was invented as a
form of personalization.”
Mike Caulfield, July 2014Director of Blended and Networked Learning at Washington State University-Vancouver
“The Original Factory Education Was a Personalized Learning Experiment”www.hapgood.us
Will County, Illinois One-Room Schoolhouse, http://polarbearstale.blogspot.com/
Math
Packet 1
Math
Packet 2
Math
Packet 4
Math
Packet 7
Math
Packet 3
Math
Packet 8
Math
Packet 2
Math
Packet 3
Math
Packet 3
Varied Pace Alone Doesn’t Resultin Learning & Understanding
How we Cause Learning1. Identify desired
results (for units and lessons)
2. Determine acceptable evidence
3. Plan learning experiences and instruction
Understanding by Design, Wiggins & McTighe, ©2005
Wiggins on “Mastery”“…the original sin in curriculum design: Take a complex whole, divide it into small pieces, string those together in a rigid sequence of instruction and testing, and call completion of this sequence "mastery."
“How Good is Good Enough?” G. Wiggins, ASCD © 2013
Learning to Drive?
Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday
Friday
Skill + Skill + Skill + Skill + Skill + Skill + Skill +Skill + Skill + Skill + Skill + Skill + Skill + Skill + Skill + Skill + Skill + Skill + Skill + Skill + Skill + Skill + Skill + Skill + Skill + Skill + Skill + Skill + Skill + Skill + Skill + Skill + Skill + Skill + Skill + Skill + Skill + Skill + Skill + Skill + Skill + Skill + Skill + Skill + Skill + Skill + Skill + Skill + Skill l
≠Transfer, Mastery &
Understanding
What do you remember about math from when you were in middle &
high school?
Experience or Instruction?From a 5th grade teacher in NY:“I had a lot of good people teaching me math when I was a student – earnest and funny and caring. But the math they taught me wasn’t
good math. Every class was the same for eight years:
‘Get out your homework, go over the homework, here’s the new set
of exercises, here’s how to do them. Now get started. I’ll be around.’”
p. 55, Teaching What Matters Most, Strong, Silver, & Perini, ©2001
Instruction, Content DeliveryWhole Class or Small Group Instruction
Independent Practice
Whole Class Assessment
Use Data Formatively
to Plan
Use Data Summatively (Competenc
e)
Impersonal by Definition
Let Me Show You How To Do
X
Now You Go DoX
Can You Independentl
y DoX?
Maybe You Need to Be
Shown X Again
You KnowX
Who is doing the thinking?
School & Home WorkAt School:Explicit
Instruction &
Problem Solving
At Home:Practice
Problems
Whole Class Assessment
Maybe you need to be
shown X again
Use Data Summativel
y
Flipped Classroom?At Home:Explicit
Instructional Videos & Online Practice At
School:Guided Practice
& Problem Solving
Whole Class Assessment
Maybe You Need to Watch the Video Again
Use Data Summativel
y
Learning Outcomes?“They were so concerned with
making sure we knew how to do every single procedure we never
learned how to think mathematically. I did well in math but I never understood what I was doing. I remember hundreds of procedures but not one single
mathematical idea.”p. 55, Teaching What Matters Most, Strong, Silver, & Perini,
©2001
Let Me Show You How To Do
X
Now You Go DoX
Can You Independentl
y DoX?
Maybe You Need to Be
Shown X Again
You KnowX
If it’s believed that learners are merely passive receivers of
information and procedures, then what
would logically follow for the design of schools and
lessons and edtech?
Transmission View of Learning
61
Pedagogy, not Technology
Earth 2199
“I know kung fu.”The Matrix, 1999, Warner Brothers, Village Roadshow Pictures
Did educators try to simply transmit information from books to passive students en masse in 2000?
‘At School in the Year 2000’ Image Source via Wikimedia Commons
http://www.sociology.com/2012/11/jobs-and-careers
What’s Different? What’s Similar?
https://medium.com/bright/ipads-teachers-e51896af3930
What’s Different? What’s Similar?
School Policies & Structures are Designed for
Students as Unique Individuals.
Strategic & Varied Schedule, Location,
Path, Pace
Empowering Learning
Experiences, Critical Thinking, Creativity,
Exploration.Students “Think &
Do” using Their Own Intuitive Ideas
School Policies & Structures are Designed for
Efficiency, Economy & Scale.
Fixed Schedule, Location, Path, PaceAge-Based Pacing
Calendars
Traditional Lesson Paradigm of Mass
InstructionTeach, Practice,
TestStudents “Sit &
Get” the Teacher’s Ideas
Personalized (Relational)
Impersonal (Industrial)
LearningPedagogy
withStudents
SchoolingStructures
fromAdults
Blended
Blended
Is there
an app for
this?
Is there
an app for
this?
Is there
an app for
this?
Is there
an app for
this?
Curse of the Familiar“If our problems are mere
inefficiencies – if we need students doing basically
exactly what they've been doing before but faster – then the gambit of building apps that
mirror typical classroom practices will work out great.”
Justin Reich on EdWeekNovember 20, 2013
http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/edtechresearcher/2013/11/edtech_start-ups_and_the_curse_of_the_familar.html
Massive Open Online Course (MOOC)“Each MOOC varies in content, requirements, prerequisites and length,” Tarte said. “Some will contain video lectures, some might have selected readings, and some courses provide quizzes periodically so students can test their understanding of the material.”
High School to Offer College Courses Onlinewww.emissourian.com, November 27, 2013
Thoughtful vs. Thoughtless Blended Learning
… night school instruction was questionable … I heard over and over again about students who never watched or read through any of the instruction material. They simply clicked through screens until they got to assessments and Googled to find answers. Even in rooms where teachers did not allow that practice, instruction from the computer relied on basic “read this” followed by “now answer these questions” approach no different than many textbook-style education methods. Students never had the chance to engage in any activities, projects, or even class discussions to augment their learning. It was all basic regurgitation…”
http://prwhite213.wordpress.com/2014/10/08/thoughtless-vs-thoughtful-blended-learning/
-Patrick White
Fullan: Alive in the Swamp
Fullan & Donnelly, Alive in the Swamp: Assessing Digital Innovations in Education, © July 2013, www.nesta.org/uk
“Technology–enabled innovations have a different problem, mainly pedagogy and outcomes. Many of the innovations, particularly those that provide online content and learning materials, use basic pedagogy – most often in the form of introducing concepts by video instruction and following up with a series of progression exercises and tests. Other digital innovations are simply tools that allow teachers to do the same age-old practices but in a digital format.” (p. 25)
Fullan & Donnelly, Alive in the SwampScorecard: Innovation Index
Fullan & Donnelly, Alive in the Swamp: Assessing Digital Innovations in Education, © July 2013, www.nesta.org/uk
Sample: Assessment Platform
Fullan & Donnelly, Alive in the Swamp: Assessing Digital Innovations in Education, © July 2013, www.nesta.org/uk
Data inform the
Adaptive Engine
Common “Adaptive” Design
Explicit Input, Video Lecture,
Textbook Reading,
Dependent Practice,
“Worksheet” Problems
Digitized Quiz/Test
Items
Mistakes on the Quiz or Test Items
Wiggins on “Mastery”“Indeed, many modern software solutions now exist to help educators track endless small objectives, in the name of "mastery," "proficiency," or "competency." In some units, students cannot advance to the next level until they test out on interim assessments of such bits of knowledge.”
“How Good is Good Enough?” G. Wiggins, ASCD © 2013
1989• “The notion that learning comes about by
the accretion of little bits is outmoded learning theory.
• “Current models of learning based on cognitive psychology contend that learners gain understanding when they construct their own knowledge and develop their own cognitive maps of the interconnections among facts and concepts.” (pp. 5–6)
Shepard, L. A. (1989, April). Why we need better assessments. Educational Leadership, 46(7) quoted in Schooling by Design, Wiggins & McTighe, © 2007 p. 46
Where do we get this notion?
Why does it persist?
Transmission via Print“If, by a miracle of mechanical ingenuity, a book could be so arranged that only to him who had done what was directed on page one would page two become visible, and so on, much that now requires personal instruction could be managed by print.”
Edward Thorndike 1912
Transmission via Print“If, by a miracle of mechanical ingenuity, a book could be so arranged that only to him who had done what was directed on page one would page two become visible, and so on, much that now requires personal instruction could be managed by print.”
Edward Thorndike 1912
What’s the alternative?
What other notions are there?
Curse of the Familiar“If you think that the problems in classrooms are not just about kids
doing things a little faster, but doing different things than is current practice, then you need
to build things that will be unfamiliar.”
Justin Reich on EdWeekNovember 20, 2013
http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/edtechresearcher/2013/11/edtech_start-ups_and_the_curse_of_the_familar.html
Learning Principle“Understandings cannot be given; they have to be engineered so that learners see for themselves the power of an idea for making sense of things.”
p. 113, Schooling by Design, Wiggins & McTighe, ©2007
Don’t Start by Telling
“Providing students with opportunities to first grapple with specific
information relevant to a topic has been shown to create a ‘time for telling’ that enables them to learn much more
from an organizing lecture.”
How People Learn, p. 58
Engineered for RealizationsEngage with & Make
Sense of a Situation
or Context
Student’s Own
Ideas & Intuition
Specific, Instant, Custom
Feedback
Engine Adapts & Differentiate
s
Student Independently Transfers
“Offline,” Too
The Quality of Digital Learning Experiences is
just as important as the Quality of
Classroom Learning
Experiences
Whitepaper
Best Practices for Evaluating
Digital Curricula
Thank youtimh@dreambox.co
mwww.dreambox.co
m@DocHudsonMath
DreamBox Learning® K-8 MathAvailable in English & Spanish
Intelligent Adaptive Learning Engine• Millions of personalized learning
paths• Tailored to a student’s unique needs
Motivating Learning Environments• Student Directed,
Empowering• Leverages Gaming Protocols
Rigorous Mathematics Curriculum• Reporting Aligned to CCSS,
Texas TEKS, Virginia SOL, Indiana IAS, South Carolina, SCCCR, Canada WNCP, & Canada Ontario Curriculum Reports
• Standards for Mathematical Practice
DreamBox Lessons & Virtual ManipulativesIntelligently adapt & individualize to:• Students’ own intuitive strategies• Kinds of mistakes• Efficiency of strategy• Scaffolding needed• Response time
Insight Dashboards
Seeing is believing!
www.DreamBox.com/request-a-demo
We value your feedback, compliments, suggestions, and complaints!
Let us know how we’re doing:
https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/HFB9VX3