The MED Biodiversity Protection Knowledge...

transcript

The MED Biod iversit y Prot ect ion Know ledge Plat form Em anuele Mancosu/Sonsoles San Rom án Eu rop e a n Top ic Ce n t re – Un ive rsit y o f Ma la g a (ETC-UMA)

“Brid g in g th e Sc ie n ce -Pra c t ice -Po licy Ga p in Me d it e rra n e a n Biod ive rsity Pro te c t ion ” 25 October 20 17, Barcelona

MED Biod iversit y Prot ect ion Com m unit y

PANACeA objectives

Aim o f th e p la t fo rm a s m a in too l to syn th e t ize

a n d d isse m in a te sc ie n t ific kn ow le d g e a n d b e st p ra c t ice

Biod ive rsity p ro te c t ion e ffo rt s b y th e MED

Com m u n ity o f p ro je c t s: • Mon ito rin g p ro toco ls on c lim a te ch a n g e a n d

m a rin e lit t e r

• Ma n a g e m e n t o f Posid on ia a n d b e a ch d u n e s

• Ne w te ch n o log ie s fo r w a te r m on ito rin g

• Gove rn a n ce m od e ls fo r fish e rie s a n d w e t la n d s

• ….

MED Biodiversity Protection Knowledge Platform

Synergies with Modular partners

Synergies with Axis Sustainable tourism

Synergies with the MED programme

01234567

General overview Inputs from MPs by type

MED Platform implementation

Conceptual model - functionalities

I. Search interface

II. Metadata information

III. Data preview

IV. Data access and/or download

V. Access to restricted data

VI. Communication with interested users

I. Search Engine

II. Map Viewer

III. Metadata catalogue

IV. Document viewer

V. Communication tool

VI. Publishing/upload tool

Conceptual model – tools/modules selected

Support the definition on what is a priority and what is not: Geodatabase, geographic data, tabular data

MED Platform modules

According to the data received from the community! e.g. pilot sites of Biodiversity community

I. Search engine

II. Map Viewer

IV. Document viewer

Tools versus Software solutions • How good is a certain software solution at providing certain

functionality?

• What offers the highest degree and quality of integration achieved among the selected software solutions to provide a coherent user experience?

• How complex are the configuration, integration and

customization, to match budget available and project deadlines?

MED Platform search engine examples

MED Platform data viewer examples

MED Platform modules assessment

Functionality Usability Documentation Installation Reliability Average score

CKAN 8 9 8 6 9 7,8

ESRI geoportal 8 6 6 6 7 7,2

GeoNetwork 8 8 9 9 9 8,6

GeoNode 7 9 7 7 8 7,6

Functionality Usability Documentation Installation Reliability Average score

CKAN 7 9 8 6 9 7,8 GeoNetwork 8 9 9 9 9 8,8 GeoNode 8 9 7 7 8 7,8

Search engine

Data viewer

MED Platform metadata catalogue

Tools toward software solutions

I. Search Engine

II. Map Viewer

IV. Document viewer

Contents Introduction 1. Definitions 2. What do we have? 2.1 Metadata schemas 2.2 Keywords thesauri 3. Schema implementation and compatibility 3.1 Schema comparison 3.2 Metadata profile

MED Platform metadata concept

• Spatial data requirements?

• Interreg MED requirements?

• Other projects’ requirements (e.g. BluetourMED)?

• Where is the compromise?

Metadata: set of elements that describe a resource Metadata schema: define fields and structure of the resource information e.g. ISO 19115/19139 Metadata keywords: free text or established by a controlled vocabulary (thesaurus) e.g. GEMET, KEEP

Software Storage Creation Import Export CKAN (with plugins) Own schema

supporting DCAT-AP 1.1 and the most relevant fields from ISO 19139 XML

Own schema DCAT-AP 1.1 DCAT-JSON, ISO 19139 XML

ISO 19139, DCAT RDF

Geonetwork (with plugins)

Any schema can be stored

ISO 19139 XML, Dublin Core XML, ISO 19115-3 XML, SensorML

ISO 19139 XML, Dublin Core XML, ISO 19115-3 XML, SensorML, DCAT RDF

Geonode (with plugins)

Own schema supporting most relevant fields from ISO 19139 XML

Own schema ISO 19139 XML (subset)

Atom, NASA DIF XML, Dublin Core XML, ebRIM XML, FGDC XML, ISO 19139 XML

MED Platform physical implementation

Option 1 Option 2

MED Platform entry page - examples

MED Platform data visualization options

Navigation through address bar

Metadata information

License information

MED Platform potential use - examples

https://www.eea.europa.eu/ds_resolveuid/08C5534B-EB57-46F5-90DA-E6ED861806C3

Distribution of the marine Angiosperm Posidonia oceanica and Zostera sp. in the Mediterranean, P. Panayiotides, HCMR

POSBEMED France Italy Spain Greece Cyprus

Aggregation of site data to national extent data

Source: MWO 2012

MED Platform potential use - examples

Human Pressure Indicator

Cumulative pressure on pilot sites

Cumulative pressure on pilot sites – on-going

Pilot Protected areas and participating sites

MED Platform data policy

Draft prepared by ETC-UMA, and circulated among partners

OBJECTIVE: regulating and promoting data resulting from the modular projects in axis 3.2. including data access, data sharing and data utilization of results of the MED Biodiversity Protection Community.

Data copyright should be correctly cited when used to produce new knowledge, with an open source policy that does not allow commercial use nor sub-licensing as Interreg MED programme stated in the Programme Manual: Standard for activities and productions.

Contents A. Introduction (PANACeA) B. Scope C. Terms and conditions (data policy) D. Access and availability (Data distribution) E. Restrictions F. Copyrights G. No Commercial Use H. No Sub-licensing or Redistribution I. License and Attribution J. Disclaimer of warranty K. Contact Information

Next steps: PANACeA MED platform

PANACeA platform developments and knowledge exchanges about: • Geoportals (AMAre..) • Spatial data standards (EMODnet…) • Metadata standards • Other…

20 November 2017

• Beta version of the platform

December 2017

emanuele.mancosu@uma.es sonsolessanroman@uma.es

MED Biodiversity Protection Community https://biodiversity-protection.interreg-med.eu

The MED Biodiversity Protection Knowledge...

Documents