Post on 09-Aug-2020
transcript
The Spectral Dimension of Arctic Outgoing Longwave Radiation and Greenhouse Efficiency Trends from
2003 to 2016
Colten Peterson1, Xiuhong Chen1, Qing Yue2, Xianglei Huang1
1University of Michigan-Ann Arbor: Climate and Space Sciences and Engineering Dept.
2Jet Propulsion Laboratory: California Institute of Technology
Manuscript Under Revision
Acknowledgements: NASA Terra/Aqua/S-NPP and CERES programs
Email: coltenp@umich.edu
Radiative Responses▪ LW feedback processes
Radiative Implications of a Changing Arctic System
Email: coltenp@umich.edu
v v
WV Feedback
Cloud Feedback
Lapse Rate Feedback
Radiative Responses▪ LW feedback processes▪ Outgoing LW radiation▪ Surface energy budget
Radiative Implications of a Changing Arctic System
Email: coltenp@umich.edu
v v OLR
Surface
Radiation
Budget
𝑭𝒔↑
Radiative Responses▪ LW feedback processes▪ Outgoing LW radiation▪ Surface energy budget ▪ Greenhouse effect (H2O vapor, sea ice loss)
Radiative Implications of a Changing Arctic System
Email: coltenp@umich.edu
v v OLR
Greenhouse EffectSurface
Radiation
Budget
𝑭𝒔↑
Radiative Responses▪ LW feedback processes▪ Outgoing LW radiation▪ Surface energy budget ▪ Greenhouse effect (H2O vapor, sea ice loss)
As GHE → 1 , stronger greenhouse efficiency
Radiative Implications of a Changing Arctic System
Defining Greenhouse Efficiency
GHE(ν) = 𝐹𝑠↑(ν)−𝑂𝐿𝑅(ν)
𝐹𝑠↑(ν)
Email: coltenp@umich.edu
v v OLR
Greenhouse EffectSurface
Radiation
Budget
𝑭𝒔↑
Radiative Responses▪ LW feedback processes▪ Outgoing LW radiation▪ Surface energy budget ▪ Greenhouse effect (H2O vapor, sea ice loss)
Far-Infrared▪ Composes > 60% of Arctic OLR
➢ “dirty window” (400-600 cm-1)
As GHE → 1 , stronger greenhouse efficiency
Radiative Implications of a Changing Arctic System
Defining Greenhouse Efficiency
GHE(ν) = 𝐹𝑠↑(ν)−𝑂𝐿𝑅(ν)
𝐹𝑠↑(ν)
Email: coltenp@umich.edu
v v OLR
Greenhouse EffectSurface
Radiation
Budget
𝑭𝒔↑
Why use spectral fluxes?
1. Identify channels that are contributing to trends in broadband OLR/GHE
2. Provides insight into atmosphere and surface changes
OLR and GHE through a Spectral Lens
Atm. windowFar-IR
Email: coltenp@umich.edu
▪ Atmospheric IR Sounder (AIRS)
▪ Spectral range: ➢ 10-2000 cm-1 (10 cm-1 res.)
▪ Estimates of far-IR spectral flux [W/m2/10cm-1]
▪ Coverage: ➢ Global all-sky and clear-sky➢ 2◦x2.5◦ (lat,lon) grids
AIRS/CERES Spectral OLR Dataset
AIRS Channels(~650-1614cm-1)
Non-AIRS Channels(e.g. Far-IR)
Apply Spectral Angular Distribution Models to
AIRS Radiance
A PCA-based linear regression scheme
Solve for Fluxes
AIRS/CERES Spectral OLR
Collocation:AIRS L1 Radiances + CERES SSF
Spectral Flux Algorithm
Huang et al. 2008,2010,2014Chen et al. 2013
Email: coltenp@umich.edu
Methodology Outline
Email: coltenp@umich.edu
1. What Arctic environmental changes have occurred from 2003-2016?❖ Linear trends of zonal/monthly mean AIRS L3 Ts, QH2O, Tatm retrievals❖ Seasonal Emphasis: March, July, September
Email: coltenp@umich.edu
Methodology Outline
1. What Arctic environmental changes have occurred from 2003-2016?❖ Linear trends of zonal/monthly mean AIRS L3 Ts, QH2O, Tatm retrievals❖ Seasonal Emphasis: March, July, September
2. Arctic Spectral OLR/GHE trends (“Observed”)❖ AIRS/CERES Spectral OLR
❖ Spectral GHE (AIR L3 derived 𝐹𝑠↑)
Email: coltenp@umich.edu
GHE(ν) = 𝑭𝒔↑(ν)−𝑶𝑳𝑹(ν)
𝑭𝒔↑(ν)
Methodology Outline
1. What Arctic environmental changes have occurred from 2003-2016?❖ Linear trends of zonal/monthly mean AIRS L3 Ts, QH2O, Tatm retrievals❖ Seasonal Emphasis: March, July, September
2. Arctic Spectral OLR/GHE trends (“Observed”)❖ AIRS/CERES Spectral OLR
❖ Spectral GHE (AIRS L3 derived 𝐹𝑠↑)
3. Can we simulate OLR/GHE trends?❖ AIRS L3 Radiative transfer model (PCRTM: Liu et al., 2006)❖ Simulator package from Chen et al., 2013
Email: coltenp@umich.edu
GHE(ν) = 𝑭𝒔↑(ν)−𝑶𝑳𝑹(ν)
𝑭𝒔↑(ν)
Methodology Outline
1. What Arctic environmental changes have occurred from 2003-2016?❖ Linear trends of zonal/monthly mean AIRS L3 Ts, QH2O, Tatm retrievals❖ Seasonal Emphasis: March, July, September
2. Arctic Spectral OLR/GHE trends (“Observed”)❖ AIRS/CERES Spectral OLR
❖ Spectral GHE (AIRS L3 derived 𝐹𝑠↑)
3. Can we simulate OLR/GHE trends?❖ AIRS L3 Radiative transfer model (PCRTM: Liu et al., 2006)❖ Simulator package from Chen et al., 2013
4. Sensitivity Analyses (Connect geophysical variable trends to OLR/GHE trends)❖ Vary one L3 variable at a time ❖ Compute OLR and GHE trends due to a particular variable
Email: coltenp@umich.edu
GHE(ν) = 𝑭𝒔↑(ν)−𝑶𝑳𝑹(ν)
𝑭𝒔↑(ν)
Methodology Outline
Email: coltenp@umich.edu
Broadband OLR Comparisons: Spectral Product vs. CERES SSF Edition4
JulyMarch September
All-sky OLR Anomalies
Clear-sky OLR Anomalies
Clear-sky OLR Trends
AIRS L3 Retrieval Trends Analysis
Email: coltenp@umich.edu
AIRS L3 Trend Results: A Warmer & Wetter Arctic March July September
d(QH2O)/dt
d(Tatm)/dt
d(Ts)/dt
Email: coltenp@umich.edu
Key Points
➢ Positive trends in all months
➢ Springtime warming consistent with previous studies
➢ March shows widespread and significant changes
March July September
d(QH2O)/dt
d(Tatm)/dt
d(Ts)/dt
AIRS L3 Trend Results: A Warmer & Wetter Arctic
Email: coltenp@umich.edu
Key Points
➢ Positive trends in all months
➢ Springtime warming consistent with previous studies
➢ March shows widespread and significant changes
March July September
d(QH2O)/dt
d(Tatm)/dt
d(Ts)/dt
AIRS L3 Trend Results: A Warmer & Wetter Arctic
Email: coltenp@umich.edu
Key Points
➢ Positive trends in all months
➢ Springtime warming consistent with previous studies
➢ March shows widespread and significant changes
March July September
d(QH2O)/dt
d(Tatm)/dt
d(Ts)/dt
AIRS L3 Trend Results: A Warmer & Wetter Arctic
Email: coltenp@umich.edu
Key Points
➢ Positive trends in all months
➢ Springtime warming consistent with previous studies
➢ March shows widespread and significant changes
1. Emphasis on March❖ Clear-Sky Spectral OLR and GHE Trends❖ Sensitivity Simulations
Email: coltenp@umich.edu
1. Emphasis on March❖ Clear-Sky Spectral OLR and GHE Trends❖ Sensitivity Simulations
2. Inter-seasonal Comparison❖ The Nuances of QH2O Radiative Effects❖ Utility of spectral fluxes
Email: coltenp@umich.edu
Email: coltenp@umich.edu
March OLR Trends: Increases in Window Regions
Broadband d(OLR)/dt
Email: coltenp@umich.edu
March OLR Trends: Increases in Window Regions
Observed Clear-Sky d(OLR)/dt Simulated Clear-Sky d(OLR)/dtBroadband d(OLR)/dt
March Greenhouse Efficiency Trends
Email: coltenp@umich.edu
Email: coltenp@umich.edu
March GHE Trends: OLR & 𝑭𝒔↑ Compete
Key Points:1. OLR and GHE trend patterns are distinct 2. Positive trends across H2O bands
3. Changes in OLR and Fs↑ compete
d(GHE)/dt is positive if: 𝐝(𝐎𝐋𝐑)/𝐝𝐭
𝐎𝐋𝐑<
𝐝(𝐅𝐬↑)/𝐝𝐭
𝐅𝐬↑
Observed Clear-Sky d(GHE)/dt Simulated Clear-Sky d(GHE)/dt
OLR/GHE Trends Ts, QH2O, Tatm
March Sensitivity Analysis
Email: coltenp@umich.edu
???
Email: coltenp@umich.edu
March Sensitivity Analysis Overview: Ts Dominates
QH20 Changes Only Tatm Changes Only Ts Changes Only
d(OLR)/dt(Simulated)
d(GHE)/dt(Simulated)
Key Points:1. Ts dominates OLR and GHE trends (March, July, Sep)
2. Other variables contribute to far-IR OLR increase
QH20 Changes Only Tatm Changes Only Ts Changes Only
d(OLR)/dt(Simulated)
d(GHE)/dt(Simulated)
Email: coltenp@umich.edu
March Sensitivity Analysis Overview: Ts Dominates
Key Points:1. Ts dominates OLR and GHE trends (March, July, Sep)
2. Other variables contribute to far-IR OLR increase
QH20 Changes Only Tatm Changes Only Ts Changes Only
d(OLR)/dt(Simulated)
d(GHE)/dt(Simulated)
Email: coltenp@umich.edu
March Sensitivity Analysis Overview: Ts Dominates
Key Points:1. Ts dominates OLR and GHE trends (March, July, Sep)
2. Other variables contribute to far-IR OLR increase
March Tatm Impacts: Far-IR Emission and a Warming Troposphere
Email: coltenp@umich.edu
AIRS L3 Tatm Trends
Simulated OLR Trends (Tatm Only)
March Tatm Impacts: Far-IR Emission and a Warming Troposphere
Email: coltenp@umich.edu
AIRS L3 Tatm Trends
Simulated OLR Trends (Tatm Only)
QH20 Changes Only Tatm Changes Only Ts Changes Only
d(OLR)/dt(Simulated)
d(GHE)/dt(Simulated)
Email: coltenp@umich.edu
March Sensitivity Analysis Overview: Ts Dominates
Key Points:1. Ts dominates OLR and GHE trends (March, July, Sep)
2. Other variables contribute to far-IR OLR increase
Seasonal Differences of the Humidity-OLR Trend Relationship
Email: coltenp@umich.edu
d(OLR)/dt(QH2O varies only)
JulyMarch September
OLR changes depend on the seasonality & pressure level of Q changes
Email: coltenp@umich.edu
d(OLR)/dt(QH2O varies only)
JulyMarch September
OLR changes depend on the seasonality & pressure level of Q changes
Email: coltenp@umich.edu
d(QH2O)/dt
d(QH2O)/dt
JulyMarch September
OLR changes depend on the seasonality & pressure level of Q changes
Email: coltenp@umich.edu
d(OLR)/dt(QH2O varies only)
d(QH2O)/dt
d(OLR)/dt(QH2O varies only)
JulyMarch September
OLR changes depend on the seasonality & pressure level of Q changes
Email: coltenp@umich.edu
d(QH2O)/dt Temperature Inversion Layer
No Temperature Inversions
d(OLR)/dt(QH2O varies only)
JulyMarch September
OLR changes depend on the seasonality & pressure level of Q changes
No Temperature Inversions
Email: coltenp@umich.edu
Email: coltenp@umich.edu
1. Arctic is shifting to a warmer, wetter state▪ Increasing surface temperatures, humidity, and tropospheric temperatures
2. OLR and GHE trends have distinct features▪ Across LW frequencies, latitudinal zones, seasons
3. Surface Temperature dominates OLR and GHE trends▪ Important in the context of Arctic amplification ▪ Surface warming causes both OLR and GHE to increase!
4. Spectral dimension offers insight for the Arctic▪ Supplement broadband measurements ▪ Attribute radiative energy budget changes ▪ Far-IR can peer deeper into Arctic atmosphere
Conclusions
Future Opportunities : (1) Apply methods to a spectral feedback study (2) Climate change detection and attribution
Email: coltenp@umich.edu
Thank you for your attention!
Email: coltenp@umich.edu
Supplementary Figures
Email: coltenp@umich.edu
% of Grid Boxes with No Clr-sky CERES SSF
Email: coltenp@umich.edu
Spectral OLR Trends
March
July
Sept.
Observed all-sky Observed clear-sky Simulated clear-sky BB Trends
Email: coltenp@umich.edu
March
July
Sept.
Observed all-sky Observed clear-sky Simulated clear-sky
Spectral GHE Trends
Email: coltenp@umich.edu
July Sensitivity Analysis
QH20 Changes Only Tatm Changes Only Ts Changes Only
d(OLR)/dt
d(GHE)/dt
Email: coltenp@umich.edu
QH20 Changes Only Tatm Changes Only Ts Changes Only
d(OLR)/dt
d(GHE)/dt
September Sensitivity Analysis
Email: coltenp@umich.edu
AIRS-CERES Spectral OLR Algorithm Details
Huang, X., W. Yang, N. G. Loeb, and V. Ramaswamy (2008), Spectrally resolved fluxes derived from collocated AIRS andCERES measurements and their application in model evaluation: Clear sky over the tropical oceans, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D09110,doi:10.1029/2007JD009219
*99.99% of variance can be explained by the first 20 or even less PCs*
Email: coltenp@umich.edu
PCRTM Basics
• Ensemble of atmospheric profiles used to generate radiance spectra
• Matrix formed with N spectra and M channel radiances
• SVD performed to retrieved PCs (orthogonal basis vectors)• Compression of spectral information • ~102 PCs needed • PCs stored in forward model
• Linear combination of PC scores (Yi) and PCs (Ui) generate channel radiances
• Correlation function used to select frequencies for Rmono computation
Email: coltenp@umich.edu
Synthetic Spectral Flux Calculations
• AIRS Level 3 Retrievals• Day/night monthly mean profiles
• Gridded at 1deg x 1deg
• Tatm is reported at 24 levels (1000hPa – 1hPa)
• Q is reported at 12 levels (1000-100hPa)
• PCRTM produces spectra in compressed PC score format
• Spectrum generated at 1cm-1 intervals using PCs and scores
• Summed to 10cm-1
• Average day/night to get monthly mean