Tim Gershon - Centre for High Energy Physicschep.knu.ac.kr/fpcp2004/files/fpcp tim gershon.pdf ·...

transcript

HOT TOPICS FROM BELLE

Tim GershonIPNS, KEK

October 4, 2004

Tim Gershon FPCP 2004 October 4, 2004

BELLE Belle Collaboration

BELLE Belle Detector

BELLE Inner Detector Upgrade - Summer 2003

Number of silicon DSSDs3 layers → 4 layers

Radius of beam piper = 2.0 cm → r = 1.5 cm

Radiation hardness1 MRad → > 20 MRad

Laboratory polar angle coverage23◦ < θ < 139◦ → 17◦ < θ < 150◦

More details in K. Trabelsi’s talk

IMPROVED RESOLUTION!

BELLE KEK

BELLE Integrated Luminosity

• Approaching 300 fb−1 accumulated

• Best day: > 1 fb−1 delivered

• Results presented today use 253 fb−1 on Υ(4S)∼≡ 275 × 106 BB̄ pairs

CONTINUOUS INJECTION

∼ 30% more recordedluminosity

BELLE Some Hot Topics from Belle in 2004

• First studies of AFB in B → K∗l+l−

See talk by Y.J. Kwon

• Observation of CP violation & Evidence for direct CP violation in B → π+π−

See talk by A. Bevan

• Evidence for direct CP violation in B → K+π−

See talk by G. Graziani

• Observation of B → π0π0 and evidence for B → ρ0π0

See above talks

• Further studies of X(3872) . . . and other weird new particles See talk by S.K. Choi

• Time-Dependent CP Violation in b→ s penguin transitions? new results on B → KSKSKS & B → KSπ

See talk by M. Hazumi

BELLE CKM Phenomenology

VCKM =

Vud Vus VubVcd Vcs VcbVtd Vts Vtb

1 − λ2/2 λ Aλ3(ρ− iη)

−λ 1 − λ2/2 Aλ2

Aλ3(1 − ρ− iη) −Aλ2 1

where A, λ, ρ, η are Wolfenstein parameters

From unitarity (V ∗CKMVCKM = 1):

VudV∗ub + VcdV

∗cb + VtdV

∗tb = 0

The Unitarity Triangle

φ1 ↔ β

φ2 ↔ α

φ3 ↔ γ

(0,0) (1,0)

(ρ,η)

φ2φ3

VudVub*

VcdVcb*

VtdVtb*

VcdVcb*

BELLE The Alphabet

With apologies to Z. Ligeti

BELLE φ3 from B → DK

• Can access φ3 via interference between B− → D0K− & B− → D̄0K−

• Reconstruct D in final states accessible to both D0 and D̄0

eg. DCPK− (Gronau, London, Wyler method)

• Can use multibody final states, eg. KSπ+π− (first noted by Atwood, Dunietz, Soni)

B− → D0K− ∼ VusV ∗cb B− → D̄0K− ∼ VcsV ∗

COLOUR ALLOWED COLOUR SUPPRESSED

D K−)

AA — amplituder = ASUPPRESSED/AFAVOURED ∼ 0.1 − 0.2

δ — strong phase difference

BELLE Principle of the Multi-Body Analysis

A. Giri, Y. Grossman, A. Soffer & J. Zupan, PRD 68, 054018 (2003)A. Poluektov et al. (Belle Collaboration), hep-ex/0406067, to appear in PRD.

• Consider D̄0 → KSπ+π−

→ define amplitude at each Dalitz plot point as f(m2+,m

where m+ = mKSπ+, m− = mKSπ

• Consider D0 → KSπ+π−

→ amplitude at each Dalitz plot point is f(m2−,m

•∣

∣f(m2+,m

∣ can be measured using flavour tagged D mesons

• Consider B+ →(

KSπ+π−

→ amplitude is f(m2+,m

2−) + rei(δ+φ3)f(m2

−,m2+)

• Consider B− →(

KSπ+π−

→ amplitude is f(m2−,m

2+) + rei(δ−φ3)f(m2

+,m2−)

• Can extract (r, δ, φ3) from B+ & B− data

BELLE Illustration Using Monte Carlo

Generated 50,000 decays with r = 0.125, δ = 0, φ3 = 70◦

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3M

Ksπ−, GeV

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3M

Ksπ−, GeV

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3M2

Ksπ+, GeV2

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3M2

Ksπ+, GeV2

BELLE First Results from Belle

A. Poluektov et al. (Belle Collaboration), hep-ex/0406067, to appear in PRD.

Using B± → DK± and B± → D∗K± (D∗ → Dπ0)

φ3 = 77◦ +17◦

−19◦ (stat) ± 13◦(syst) ± 11◦(model)

-0.4 -0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4Re(reiθ)

B+→D0K+

B-→D0K-

B→D0π

-0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6Re(reiθ)

B-→D*0K-

B+→D*0K+

B→D*0π

BELLE New Results from BaBar at ICHEP2004

211 × 106BB̄ pairsB. Aubert et al. (BaBar Collaboration), BaBar-CONF-04/043, hep-ex/0408088.

Using B± → DK±, B± → D∗K± (D∗ → Dπ0) and B± → D∗K± (D∗ → Dγ)

φ3 = 88◦ ± 41◦(stat) ± 19◦(syst) ± 11◦ (model)

B± →(

KSπ+π−

DK± B± →

KSπ+π−

D∗K± B± →

KSπ+π−

D∗K±

(GeV/cESm5.2 5.22 5.24 5.26 5.28

BABARpreliminary

(GeV/cESm5.2 5.22 5.24 5.26 5.28

40 BABARpreliminary

(GeV/cESm5.2 5.22 5.24 5.26 5.28

30 BABARpreliminary

BELLE A Comment on the Use of D∗ → Dπ0 and D∗ → Dγ

A. Bondar and T. G., hep-ph/0409281, submitted to PRD(R)

• There is an effective strong phase shift of π between the casesthat D∗ is reconstructed as D∗ → Dπ0 and D∗ → Dγ

• Arises due to CP conservation in the D∗ decay

• In the Dalitz analysis,B± →

KSπ+π−

D∗K± & B± →

KSπ+π−

D∗K±

should be fitted separately (or fix the shift in δ)

• Major ramifications for ADS techniqueB± → D∗K±, D∗ → Dπ0 or D∗ → Dγ, D → K∓π±

can extract φ3 (4 ambiguities) & r using B± → D∗K± alone!

• In Belle analysis, so far we use only D∗ → Dπ0

BELLE New Today : Updated Results from Belle

• Using full data sample : 275 × 106 BB̄ pairs

• Fine tuning of D decay model

• Improved background descriptions

BELLE B± → D(∗)K± Selection

B± → DK±

-0.2 -0.15 -0.1 -0.05 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2∆E (GeV)

5.2 5.22 5.24 5.26 5.28 5.3Mbc (GeV/c2)

276 candidate events (209 ± 16 signal)

B± → D∗K±

-0.2 -0.15 -0.1 -0.05 0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2∆E (GeV)

5.2 5.22 5.24 5.26 5.28 5.3Mbc (GeV/c2)

69 candidate events (58 ± 8 signal)Tim Gershon FPCP 2004 October 4, 2004

BELLE B± →(

KSπ+π−

DK± Dalitz Plot Distributions

M+ = f(m2+,m

2−) + rei(δ+φ3)f(m2

−,m2+)

0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3m2

+ (GeV2/c4)

m2 - (

2 /c4 )

M− = f(m2−,m

2+) + rei(δ−φ3)f(m2

+,m2−)

0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3m2

- (GeV2/c4)m

2 + (G

eV2 /c

BELLE B± →((

KSπ+π−

D∗0K± Dalitz Plot Distributions

M+ = f(m2+,m

2−) + rei(δ+φ3)f(m2

−,m2+)

0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3m2

+ (GeV2/c4)

m2 - (

2 /c4 )

M− = f(m2−,m

2+) + rei(δ−φ3)f(m2

+,m2−)

0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3m2

- (GeV2/c4)m

2 + (G

eV2 /c

BELLE Extraction of f(m2+,m

• Fit Dalitz plot distribution of tagged D mesons from e+e− continuum

• Tag using charge of πs in D∗+ → D0π+s

• Used model defines phase variation of f(m2+,m

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3M2 Ksπ- (GeV2/c4)

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3M2 π+π- (GeV2/c4)

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3M2 Ksπ+ (GeV2/c4)

χ2/ndf = 2.30

(ndf = 1106)

Fine tuning of model little effect on φ3

BELLE Measurement of f(m2+,m

2−) - Results

Resonance Amplitude Phase (◦) FractionKSσ1 1.57 ± 0.10 214 ± 4 9.8%

BW → GS → KSρ0 1.0 (fixed) 0 (fixed) 21.6%

KSω 0.0310 ± 0.0010 113.4 ± 1.9 0.4%KSf0(980) 0.394 ± 0.006 207 ± 3 4.9%KSσ2 0.23 ± 0.03 210 ± 13 0.6%KSf2(1270) 1.32 ± 0.04 348 ± 2 1.5%

UPDATED → KSf0(1370) 1.25 ± 0.10 69 ± 8 1.1%NEW; GS → KSρ

0(1450) 0.89 ± 0.07 1 ± 6 0.4%K∗(892)+π− 1.621 ± 0.010 131.7 ± 0.5 61.2%K∗(892)−π+ 0.154 ± 0.005 317.7 ± 1.6 0.55%

NEW → K∗(1410)+π− 0.22 ± 0.04 120 ± 14 0.05%NEW → K∗(1410)−π+ 0.35 ± 0.04 253 ± 6 0.14%

K∗0(1430)

+π− 2.15 ± 0.04 348.7 ± 1.1 7.4%K∗

0(1430)−π+ 0.52 ± 0.04 89 ± 4 0.43%

K∗2(1430)

+π− 1.11 ± 0.03 320.5 ± 1.8 2.2%K∗

2(1430)−π+ 0.23 ± 0.02 263 ± 7 0.09%

K∗(1680)+π− 2.34 ± 0.26 110 ± 5 0.36%K∗(1680)−π+ 1.3 ± 0.2 87 ± 11 0.11%nonresonant 3.8 ± 0.3 157 ± 4 9.7%

BELLE Test Samples

Fit B, B̄ samples separately, float r±eiθ±, where θ± = δ ± φ3

B± →(

KSπ+π−

(r ∼ 0.01)

-0.15 -0.1 -0.05 0 0.05 0.1 0.15Re(r eiθ)

3425 events

r− = 0.047 ± 0.018

θ− = 193◦ ± 24◦

r+ = 0.039 ± 0.021

θ− = 240◦ ± 28◦

B± →((

KSπ+π−

D∗π±

(r ∼ 0.01)

-0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3Re(r eiθ)

641 events

r− = 0.086 ± 0.049

θ− = 280◦ ± 30◦

r+ = 0.015 ± 0.042

θ− = 170◦ ± 186◦

BELLE Fits to Extract φ3

Fit B± samples separately, float rei(δ±φ3)

B± →(

KSπ+π−

-0.4-0.3-0.2-0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4Re(r eiθ)

B+→DK+

B-→DK-

B± →((

KSπ+π−

D∗K±

-0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6Re(r eiθ)

B-→D*K-

B+→D*K+

PRELIMINARY Results from simultaneous fits (B+ & B−) (Errors from likelihood curves)

? r = 0.247 ± 0.071? φ3 = 63.7◦ ± 15.2◦

? δ = 156.6◦ ± 15.6◦

? r = 0.254 ± 0.116? φ3 = 74.9◦ ± 25.2◦

? δ = 321.3◦ ± 25.0◦

BELLE Systematic Errors

B± → DK± B± → D∗K±

Source ∆r ∆φ3 ∆δ ∆r ∆φ3 ∆δBackground shape 0.027 5.7◦ 4.1◦ 0.014 3.1◦ 5.3◦

Background fraction 0.006 0.2◦ 1.0◦ 0.005 0.7◦ 1.4◦

Efficiency shape 0.012 4.9◦ 2.4◦ 0.002 3.5◦ 1.0◦

Momentum resolution 0.002 0.3◦ 0.3◦ 0.002 1.7◦ 1.4◦

Control sample bias 0.004 10.2◦ 10.2◦ 0.004 9.9◦ 9.9◦

Total 0.030 12.7◦ 11.3◦ 0.016 11.1◦ 11.4◦

BELLE Model Uncertainty

f(m2+,m

2−) =

∣f(m2+,m

∣ eiφ(m2

+,m2−)

• Fit to flavour tagged D sample measures∣

∣f(m2+,m

BUT φ(m2+,m

2−) model-dependent

• Estimate model uncertainty by varying model

Fit model (∆r)max (∆φ3)max (∆δ)max

Meson formfactors Fr = FD = 1 0.01 3.1◦ 3.3◦

Constant BW width Γ(q2) 0.02 4.7◦ 9.0◦

Only K∗, ρ, ω, f0 non-resonant 0.03 9.9◦ 18.2◦

Total 0.04 11◦ 21◦

• Consider CP -tagged D mesons decaying to KSπ+π−

→ amplitude is f(m2+,m

2−) ± f(m2

−,m2+)

• FUTURE: use CP tagged D mesons from cτ factory (ψ′′ → DD̄)↪→ measure φ(m2

+,m2−) ⇒ remove model uncertainty

BELLE Extraction of φ3: B± →(

KSπ+π−

Avoid using fit likelihood errors → use frequentist approach to obtain confidence regions

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350

φ3 (deg)

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350

φ3 (deg)

B± →(

KSπ+π−

DK±: PRELIMINARY

φ3 = 64◦ ± 19◦(stat) ± 13◦(syst) ± 11◦(model)r = 0.21 ± 0.08(stat) ± 0.03(syst) ± 0.04(model)δ = 157◦ ± 19◦(stat) ± 11◦(syst) ± 21◦(model)

r > 0 @ 99.3% CLCPV @ 94% CL

BELLE Extraction of φ3: B± →((

KSπ+π−

D∗K±

Avoid using fit likelihood errors → use frequentist approach to obtain confidence regions

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350

φ3 (deg)

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350

φ3 (deg)

B± →((

KSπ+π−

D∗K±: PRELIMINARY

φ3 = 75◦ ± 57◦(stat) ± 11◦(syst) ± 11◦(model)

r = 0.12+0.16−0.11(stat) ± 0.02(syst) ± 0.04(model)

δ = 321◦ ± 57◦(stat) ± 11◦(syst) ± 21◦(model)

r > 0 @ 56% CLCPV @ 38% CL

BELLE Extraction of φ3: Combined Modes

Use frequentist approach with Feldman-Cousins ordering to obtain confidence regions

φ3 = 68◦ +14◦

−15◦ (stat) ± 13◦(syst) ± 11◦(model)

r(B± → DK±) = 0.21 ± 0.08(stat) ± 0.03(syst) ± 0.04(model)

CPV @ 98% CL

Two standard deviation interval including systematic and model uncertainties:22◦ < φ3 < 113◦

Compare to previous results:

Belle (152 × 106BB̄) BaBar (211 × 106BB̄)φ3 = 77◦ +17◦

−19◦ (stat) ± 13◦(syst) ± 11◦(model) φ3 = 88◦ ± 41◦(stat) ± 19◦(syst) ± 11◦(model)

NB statistical error depends on value of r

r(B± → DK±) = 0.26 +0.10−0.14 ± 0.03 ± 0.04 r(B± → DK±) < 0.18

BELLE Slight Digression on r

Various analyses in the B± → D(∗)K± system provide information about rNaive expectation: r ∼ 0.1 − 0.2

r(B± → DK±)

Dalitz ADSB± →

KSπ+π−

DK± B± →

K∓π±)

Belle r = 0.21 ± 0.08 ± 0.03 ± 0.04 (∗) r < 0.28

BaBar r < 0.18 r < 0.23

(∗) r > 0 @ 99.3% CL (stat)

r(B± → D∗K±)

Dalitz ADSB± →

( )D π0)

D∗K± B± → (( )D γ)D∗ K± B± →

( )D π0)

D∗K± B± → (( )D γ)D∗ K±

Belle r = 0.12+0.16−0.11 ± 0.02 ± 0.04

BaBar r < 0.24 r < 0.21

hep-ph/0409281 possible bias r < 0.13

No serious disagreement with current statistical precision

BELLE Summary

• Many hot topics from Belle . . . I have discussed only one

• Most precise measurement of φ3

φ3 = 68◦ +14◦

−15◦ (stat) ± 13◦(syst) ± 11◦(model)

• Hint of CP violation at 98% CL

• Two standard deviation interval: 22◦ < φ3 < 113◦

• More new results from Belle still to come in this conference!

BELLE Back-Up Slides

BACK UP

BELLE Comparison of SVD1 data and SVD2 data

Comparison for B± → DK±

SVD1: 152 × 106BB̄ pairs

-0.4-0.3-0.2-0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4Re(r eiθ)

B+->D0K+

B-->D0K-

SVD2: 123 × 106BB̄ pairs

-0.4-0.3-0.2-0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4Re(r eiθ)

B+→DK+

B-→DK-

(Errors from likelihood curves)

? r = 0.31 ± 0.11? φ3 = 86◦ ± 17◦

? δ = 168◦ ± 17◦

? r = 0.32 ± 0.10? φ3 = 51◦ ± 18◦

? δ = 158◦ ± 18◦

BELLE Dependence of φ3 Error on r

Nice picture from BaBar!

Br0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3

BABARpreliminary

BELLE Background Treatment

We consider the following sources of background, for B± → DK± :

? Random combinations & real D plus random kaon 21%background level from ∆E distributionstudy Dalitz distribution using data with reversed continuum suppression

∗ BB̄ events 2.3%study using generic Monte Carlo

∗ B± → DK± with misreconstructed D 0.3%study with signal Monte Carlo

∗ B± → DK± with misreconstructed K < 0.4% @ 95% CLstudy with signal Monte Carlo

∗ B± → Dπ± 0.9%background level from ∆E distributionDalitz shape is known

Tim Gershon - Centre for High Energy Physicschep.knu.ac.kr/fpcp2004/files/fpcp tim gershon.pdf ·...

Documents