Post on 10-Jan-2016
description
transcript
TOP200 UKRAINE - THIRD UNIVERSITY RANKING
1
Dr. O. LINOVITSKAYA, Institute for Applied Information Technologies
www.euroosvita.net
Kyiv, Ukraine UNESCO Chair “Higher technical education, applied system analysis and informatics“
The project «University ranking: TOP200” was implemented by UNESCO chair “Higher technical education, applied system analysis and Informatics” (Ukraine) based on the Memorandum signed on July 6, 2006 between this chair and UNESCO-CEPES.
The UNESCO chair coordinates the work as to working out, introduction and development of international expertise of education quality and university ranking in Ukraine.
Organizational aspectsOrganizational aspects
2
www.euroosvita.net
Kyiv, Ukraine UNESCO Chair “Higher technical education, applied system analysis and informatics“
Organizational aspectsOrganizational aspects
3
www.euroosvita.net
Kyiv, Ukraine UNESCO Chair “Higher technical education, applied system analysis and informatics“
Features of higher education in Ukraine.Features of higher education in Ukraine.
An increase of number of higher educational institutions for the An increase of number of higher educational institutions for the last decadelast decade ..
Insufficient financing of universities, including scientific projectsInsufficient financing of universities, including scientific projects..
Small number of publications of the university lecturers in Small number of publications of the university lecturers in foreign publicationsforeign publications..
Absence of objective and independent web-sources reflecting Absence of objective and independent web-sources reflecting activities of universitiesactivities of universities..
Lack of practice in the analysis of job placement for graduates Lack of practice in the analysis of job placement for graduates from educational institutions.from educational institutions.
4
www.euroosvita.net
Kyiv, Ukraine UNESCO Chair “Higher technical education, applied system analysis and informatics“
The main criteria of the method were The main criteria of the method were selected based on the followingselected based on the following ::
Criteria must have unique interpretationCriteria must have unique interpretation;;
MMust be accessible and easily checked up by public ust be accessible and easily checked up by public representativesrepresentatives;;
They must be universal in order to have the possibility to They must be universal in order to have the possibility to compare universities belonging to different groupscompare universities belonging to different groups;;
To enable to include national universities in international To enable to include national universities in international systems of ratingsystems of rating..
5
www.euroosvita.net
Kyiv, Ukraine UNESCO Chair “Higher technical education, applied system analysis and informatics“
Method of raMethod of ranknking universities in ing universities in UkraineUkraine
Criteria, definitions, rating factorsCriteria, definitions, rating factors
Activities of the higher educational institutions are estimated on the Activities of the higher educational institutions are estimated on the basis of the general index of rating estimation - basis of the general index of rating estimation - ІІGG which is integral which is integral and determined by three complex criteriaand determined by three complex criteria : :
ІІGG = = IITTjj + + IILL jj ++ I IIN IN jj
IITjTj — — Index of quality of scientific pedagogical potential, the value of Index of quality of scientific pedagogical potential, the value of which changes in the range which changes in the range [0-50%]; [0-50%];
IIL jL j — — Index of Index of educationeducation quality, changes in the range quality, changes in the range [0-30%];[0-30%];
IIININ jj — — Index of international recognition, changes in the range Index of international recognition, changes in the range [0-[0-20%].20%].
6
www.euroosvita.net
Kyiv, Ukraine UNESCO Chair “Higher technical education, applied system analysis and informatics“
Method of university raMethod of university ranknking in Ukraineing in Ukraine
Every complex criterion is determined by the group of indicators, the list of Every complex criterion is determined by the group of indicators, the list of which with proper coefficients is given in the tablewhich with proper coefficients is given in the table..
Groups of indexes j ITj weights
Scientific pedagogical potential
1Number of academicians of Ukrainian National academy of science among teaching staff
18
2Number of corresponding members of Ukrainian National academy of science among teaching staff 8
3 Number of academicians of specialized academies of sciences 5
4 Number of corresponding members of specialized academies of sciences 3,0
7
www.euroosvita.net
Kyiv, Ukraine UNESCO Chair “Higher technical education, applied system analysis and informatics“
Method of raMethod of ranknking of universities in ing of universities in UkraineUkraine
Every complex criterion is determined by the group of indicators, the list of Every complex criterion is determined by the group of indicators, the list of which with proper coefficients is given in the tablewhich with proper coefficients is given in the table..
Groups of indexes j ITj
weights
Scientific pedagogical potential
(cont.)
5Number of professors among teaching staff of higher educational institutions
2,5
6Number of associate professors among staff men of higher educational institutions
0,5
7Number of doctors of science among staff men of higher educational institutions
2,5
8 Number of PhD’s among teaching staff of higher educational institutions 0,5
9Number of professors awarded with state awards for science and technology
2,0
10 Number of patents for inventions 0,5
new Expert estimation 7,5
8
www.euroosvita.net
Kyiv, Ukraine UNESCO Chair “Higher technical education, applied system analysis and informatics“
Method of raMethod of ranknking of universities in ing of universities in UkraineUkraine
Every complex criterion is determined by the group of indicators, the list of which Every complex criterion is determined by the group of indicators, the list of which with proper coefficients is given in the tablewith proper coefficients is given in the table..
Groups of indexes j IL j weights
Quality of education
11Number of students, winners and awardees of international olympiads (contests)
5
12Quantity of students, winners and awardees of all Ukrainian olympiads (contests)
1,5
13Correlation of masters quantity to the quantity of specialists and bachelors degrees
5
14Level of development of university facilities 11
new expert estimation 7,5
9
www.euroosvita.net
Kyiv, Ukraine UNESCO Chair “Higher technical education, applied system analysis and informatics“
Method of raMethod of ranknking of universities in ing of universities in UkraineUkraine
Every complex criterion is determined by the group of indicators, the list of witch Every complex criterion is determined by the group of indicators, the list of witch with proper coefficients is resulted in the tablewith proper coefficients is resulted in the table..
Groups of indexes j IIN j weights
International
recognition
15 Number of foreign students 5
16 Membership in the European Association of Universities 3
17 Membership in Magna Charta Universitatum 3
18 Membership in Eeuroasiaa Association of Universities 2
19 Membership in Black Sea University Network 1
20Membership in International Association of Universities
1
new informational softwareinformational software 5
10
www.euroosvita.net
Kyiv, Ukraine UNESCO Chair “Higher technical education, applied system analysis and informatics“
Method of raMethod of ranknking of universities in ing of universities in UkraineUkraine
Ratio of quantitative and qualitative analysis of main criteriaRatio of quantitative and qualitative analysis of main criteria
11
Ratio of quantitative and qualitative estimation
20%expert estimation
80%quantitative estimation
www.euroosvita.net
Kyiv, Ukraine UNESCO Chair “Higher technical education, applied system analysis and informatics“
Administrative and Educational system “Osvita”
12
Data bases Data bases
InternetInternet
UniversitiesEducation institution
Otherorganization
Otherorganization
Regionalcentre
Districtadministration
NACNACIndustrial complex
www.euroosvita.net
Kyiv, Ukraine UNESCO Chair “Higher technical education, applied system analysis and informatics“
System of determination of universities ranking on the basis of UIS
13
University Ranking
Student contingent Teaching staff
Educationprogram
Research
Data about students• progress;•attendant;•participation in social activities;•participation in scientific conferences;•number of masters;•number of post-graduates;•number of sent down students
Material and technical basis of
universityUniversity monitoring
Number of theses (candidate,doctor); monograph, articles
International cooperation
Expert estimation
Main server of data base
register of universities;applicant;students;graduates;teachers;University resources
www.euroosvita.net
Kyiv, Ukraine UNESCO Chair “Higher technical education, applied system analysis and informatics“
SStagetagess of of formation of formation of Ukrainian universities Ukrainian universities raranknking ing systemsystem
2006г - 2006г - for the first time the methods of rfor the first time the methods of rankinganking was introduced at the was introduced at the conference IREG in Berlinconference IREG in Berlin.. The Memorandum was signed The Memorandum was signed between UNESCO chair “Higher technical education, applied system analysis and Informatics” (Ukraine) and UNESCO-CEPES.
2007г – project launch, the first ranking issue. At that stage only quantitative measures were used (16 indicators). DDevelopmentevelopment of s of software informational project provision .oftware informational project provision .
2008г – 2008г – methods specification according to methods specification according to the the best practices and best practices and recommendations. An increase of the recommendations. An increase of the used quantitused quantitativeative criteria up to 20 criteria up to 20 ..
2009г – 2009г – expert expert estimationestimation is is incluincludedded into the into the ranking ranking systemsystem. . Introduction Introduction of of the index of informational software. the index of informational software. LLaunchaunching the project on ing the project on the formation of the formation of a a unifiedunified informational ra informational rankingnking system system..
14
www.euroosvita.net
Kyiv, Ukraine UNESCO Chair “Higher technical education, applied system analysis and informatics“
Value of IG for period 2007 - 2008
15
01020
30405060
7080
National TarasShevchenko
University of Kyiv
The NationalTechnical University
of Ukraine “KievPolytechnic Institute
(KPI)”
V. N. KarazinKharkiv National
University
National TechnicalUniversity "Kharkiv
PolytechnicalInstitute"
National MedicalUniversity of A. A.
Bogomolets
01020
30405060
7080
National TarasShevchenko
University of Kyiv
The NationalTechnical University
of Ukraine “KievPolytechnic Institute
(KPI)”
V. N. KarazinKharkiv National
University
National TechnicalUniversity "Kharkiv
PolytechnicalInstitute"
National MedicalUniversity of A. A.
Bogomolets
2007
2008
2009
ІІG year
www.euroosvita.net
Kyiv, Ukraine UNESCO Chair “Higher technical education, applied system analysis and informatics“
Number of universitiesNumber of universities participat participatinging inin tthe project has he project has increasedincreased..
More universities actively discuss the More universities actively discuss the ranking ranking resultsresults..
More universities have become members ofMore universities have become members of international associations international associations..
Discussions in mass media are the evidence of risDiscussions in mass media are the evidence of risinging interest of public, interest of public, employers employers to the university ranking system, which in its turn influences the to the university ranking system, which in its turn influences the universities policiesuniversities policies
PPubliublication of ranking resultscation of ranking results gives gives the public an access to earlier closed the public an access to earlier closed information characteinformation characterizingrizing variousvarious aspects of aspects of universityuniversity activit activitiesies ..
Positive aspects of universities Positive aspects of universities raranknking ing
16
www.euroosvita.net
Kyiv, Ukraine UNESCO Chair “Higher technical education, applied system analysis and informatics“