Transversity, Collins and Sivers Effectstheor.jinr.ru/~spin/Spin-Dubna07/2 4TuA/6...

transcript

Introduction Collins effect in SIDIS and e+e− annihilation Sivers effect in SIDIS Conclusions

Transversity, Collins and Sivers Effects fromCOMPASS, HERMES and BELLE Data: New

Global Analysis

Alexei Prokudin

Universita di Alessandria and INFN Sezione di Alessandria

XII Workshop on High Energy Spin Physics

In collaboration with M. Anselmino, M. Boglione, U. D’Alesio,F. Murgia, A. Kotzinian and C.Turk

Alexei Prokudin Dubna, 4 September 2007 Transversity, Collins and Sivers Effects 1

Outline of this talk

1 Introduction

2 Collins effect in SIDIS and e+e− annihilation

The model for Collins FF and transversity

Description of the data & Predictions

3 Sivers effect in SIDIS

The model for the Sivers function

Description of the data & Predictions

4 Conclusions

The fundamental distributions of partons inside a nucleon

UnpolarisedDistribution

f1(x) or q(x)

Distribution ofunpolarised partons inan unpolarised nucleon.Well known

HelicityDistribution

g1(x) or ∆q(x)

Distribution oflongitudinally polarisedpartons in alongitudinally polarisednucleon.Known

TransversityDistribution

h1(x) or ∆Tq(x)

Distribution oftransversely polarisedquarks in a transverselypolarised nucleon.Little known!HERMES and COMPASSfirst experimentalmeasurements

Transversity in SIDIS

Transversity in Semi inclusive Deep Inelastic Scattering lN → l ′hX

Transversely polarised quark fragments into an unpolarised hadron:

Dh/q↑(z ,p⊥) = Dh/q(z , |p⊥|) +1

2Sq′ · (pq′ × p⊥)∆NDh/q↑(z , |p⊥|),

where p⊥ is transverse momentum of produced hadron withrespect to fragmenting quark → non-perturbative effect.

Collins FF

Collins Fragmentation Function

There are two different notations for Collins FF:

Dh/q↑(z ,p⊥) = Dh/q(z , |p⊥|) +1

2Sq′ · (pq′ × p⊥)∆NDh/q↑(z , |p⊥|)

Dh/q↑(z ,p⊥) = Dh/q(z , |p⊥|) +Sq′ · (pq′xp⊥)

zMπH⊥q

1 (z , |p⊥|),

both ∆NDh/q↑(z , |p⊥|) and H⊥q1 (z , |p⊥|) refer to Collins FF

Collins FF

Collins Fragmentation Function

There are two different notations for Collins FF:

Dh/q↑(z ,p⊥) = Dh/q(z , |p⊥|) +1

2Sq′ · (pq′ × p⊥)∆NDh/q↑(z , |p⊥|)

Dh/q↑(z ,p⊥) = Dh/q(z , |p⊥|) +Sq′ · (pq′xp⊥)

zMπH⊥q

1 (z , |p⊥|),

Relation

∆NDh/q↑(z , |p⊥|) =2|p⊥|zMπ

H⊥q1 (z , |p⊥|) .

Trento conventions: A. Bacchetta, U. D’Alesio, M. Diehl, and C. A. Miller,Phys. Rev. D70, 117504 (2004).

Collins effect

Collins effects A ∝ sin(φh + φS)

The azimuthal asymmetry arises due to modulation infragmentation function, the Collins function ∆NDh/q↑(z , |p⊥|)couples to transversity ∆Tq(x)AN ∼ sin(φh + φS) ·∆Tq(x)⊗∆NDh/q↑(z , |p⊥|)

= ∆Tq(x)–

= ∆NDh/q↑(z)–

J. C. Collins, Nucl. Phys. B396 (1993) 161

Collins effect

Collins effects A ∝ sin(φh + φS)

Asin(φh+φS )UT (x , z) ∼

∑q e2

qx∆Tq(x)∆NDh/q↑(z)∑q e2

qxfq(x)Dh/q(z),

Positivity constraints :

|∆NDh/q↑(z ,p⊥)| ≤ 2Dh/q(z ,p⊥)

Soffer bound :

|∆Tq(x)| ≤ 1

[fq/p(x) + ∆q(x)

]J. C. Collins, Nucl. Phys. B396 (1993) 161

Introduction Collins effect in SIDIS and e+e− annihilation Sivers effect in SIDIS ConclusionsThe model for Collins FF and transversity Description of the data & Predictions

SIDIS and e+e− annihilation

SIDIS lN → l ′H1X

ll ’

Collins effect gives rise to azimuthalSingle Spin Asymmetry

= ∆Tq(x ,Q2)–

= ∆NDh/q↑(z ,Q2)–

J. C. Collins, Nucl. Phys. B396 (1993) 161

e+e− → H1H2X

Collins effect gives rise to azimuthalasymmetry, q and q Collins func-tions are present in the process:∆NDh/q↑(z1,Q

∆NDh/q↑(z2,Q2)

D. Boer, R.Jacob and P. J. Mulders Nucl.Phys. B504 (1997) 345

ll ’

N∆ Dh q

Cross Section ∼ sin(φH + φS)·∆Tq(x ,Q2) ⊗ ∆NDh/q↑(z ,Q2)

∆Tq(x ,Q2) 6= 0 ?∆NDh/q↑(z ,Q2) 6= 0 ?

e+e− → H1H2X

N∆ Dh q

Cross Section ∼ cos(φH1 + φH2)·∆NDh/q↑(z1) ⊗ ∆NDh/q↑(z2)

∆NDh/q↑(z1,Q2) 6= 0 ?

∆NDh/q↑(z2,Q2) 6= 0 ?

0.1 0.2 0.3

2 ⟨sin

(φ+φ S)⟩π U

0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

0.1 0.2 0.3

2 ⟨sin

(φ+φ S)⟩π U

0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6

6.6% scale uncertainty

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1Ph⊥ [GeV]

IIIIIIHERMES PRELIMINARY 2002-2004virtual photon asymmetry amplitudesnot corrected for acceptance and smearing

HERMES, proton target,plab = 27.5 (GeV)

HERMES

∆Tq(x ,Q2) 6= 0 !∆NDh/q↑(z ,Q2) 6= 0 !

HERMES Collaboration, A. Airapetianet al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 94 (2005) 012002

e+e− → H1H2X

0 2 4 6 8

0.2 0.3 0.5 0.7 1/0.3 0.5 0.7 1/0.5 0.7 1/0.7 1.0

0.2 0.30.3 0.50.5 0.70.7 1.0

cos(2φ0) method

z1,z2-bin-id

A 12 cos(φ1+φ2) method

BELLE,√

s = 10.52 (GeV),

∆NDh/q↑(z1,Q2) 6= 0 !

∆NDh/q↑(z2,Q2) 6= 0 !

Belle Collaboration,K. Abe et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 96(2006)232002

-210 -110

z 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8

(GeV/c)hT

p0.5 1 1.5

COMPASS, deutron targetplab = 160 (GeV)

COMPASS

∆Tq(x ,Q2) 6= 0 ?∆NDh/q↑(z ,Q2) 6= 0 ?

COMPASS Collaboration, E. S. Ageev et al.,Nucl. Phys. B765, 31 (2007).

e+e− → H1H2X

0 2 4 6 8

0.2 0.3 0.5 0.7 1/0.3 0.5 0.7 1/0.5 0.7 1/0.7 1.0

0.2 0.30.3 0.50.5 0.70.7 1.0

cos(2φ0) method

z1,z2-bin-id

A 12 cos(φ1+φ2) method

BELLE,√

s = 10.52 (GeV),

∆NDh/q↑(z1,Q2) 6= 0 !

∆NDh/q↑(z2,Q2) 6= 0 !

Belle Collaboration,K. Abe et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 96(2006)232002

ll ’

N∆ Dh q

Are HERMES and COMPASS datacompatible?

Fit HERMES & BELLE and check ifwe describe COMPASS data.

e+e− → H1H2X

N∆ Dh q

∆NDSIDISh/q↑

(z) = ∆NDe+e−

h/q↑(z) ?

Fit simultaneously HERMES, COM-PASS and BELLE data sets.

Unpolarised distribution and fragmentation functions.

fq/p(x , k⊥) and Dh/q(z , p⊥) TMD distribution and fragmentationfunctions are used.We assume the k⊥ and p⊥ dependences to be factorized in aGaussian form

fq/p(x , k⊥) = fq/p(x)e−k2

⊥/〈k2⊥〉

π〈k2⊥〉

Dh/q(z , p⊥) = Dh/q(z)e−p2

⊥/〈p2⊥〉

π〈p2⊥〉

〈k2⊥〉 = 0.25 (GeV2)

〈p2⊥〉 = 0.2 (GeV2)

M. Anselmino, M. Boglione, U. D’Alesio, A. Kotzinian, F. Murgia, A. Prokudin,Phys. Rev. D71, 074006 (2005).

Unpolarised distribution and fragmentation functions.

fq/p(x , k⊥) and Dh/q(z , p⊥) TMD distribution and fragmentationfunctions are used.We assume the k⊥ and p⊥ dependences to be factorized in aGaussian form

Distribution functions:fq/p(x) GRV LO 1998M. Gluck, E. Reya, and A. Vogt, Eur. Phys. J. C5, 461 (1998).

Fragmentation functions:Dh/q(z) KretzerS. Kretzer, Phys. Rev. D62, 054001 (2000).

Collins function

Model for Collins FF

∆NDh/q↑(z , |p⊥|)=⇒ we use factorization of z and p⊥and Gaussian dependence on p⊥

∆NDh/q↑(z , p⊥) = 2NCq (z) Dh/q(z) h(p⊥)

e−p2⊥/〈p2

⊥〉

π〈p2⊥〉

NCq (z) = NC

q zγ(1− z)δ (γ + δ)(γ+δ)

γγδδ

h(p⊥) =√

2ep⊥M

e−p2⊥/M2

where NCq , γ, δ, and M are parameters.

Collins function

Model for Collins FF

∆NDh/q↑(z , |p⊥|)=⇒ we use factorization of z and p⊥and Gaussian dependence on p⊥

∆NDh/q↑(z , p⊥) = 2NCq (z) Dh/q(z) h(p⊥)

e−p2⊥/〈p2

⊥〉

π〈p2⊥〉

NCq (z) ≤ 1

h(p⊥) ≤ 1

positivity constraint |∆NDh/q↑(z ,p⊥)| ≤ 2Dh/q(z ,p⊥) is fulfilled.

Transversity

∆Tq(x , k⊥) =1

q (x)[fq/p(x) + ∆q(x)

] e−k2⊥/〈k2

⊥〉T

π〈k2⊥〉T

NTq (x) = NT

q xα(1− x)β (α + β)(α+β)

ααββ,

NTq , α, β and 〈k2

⊥〉T are parameters.

NTq (x) ≤ 1

thus Soffer bound

|∆Tq(x)| ≤ 1

[fq/p(x) + ∆q(x)

]is fulfilled.

Description of Asin(φh+φS)UT

We use HERMES and COMPASS data sets on Asin(φh+φS )UT in the

fitting procedure, we use one of the two sets of data from BELLEcorresponding to either cos(ϕ1 + ϕ2) or cos(2ϕ0) extractionmethod.Favored and unfavored fragmentation functions are defined asfollows:

D fav (z) ≡ Du→π+(z) = Dd→π−(z) = D u→π−(z) = D d→π+

Dunfav (z) ≡ Du→π−(z) = Dd→π+(z) = D u→π+

(z) = D d→π−(z)

HERMES Collaboration, L. Pappalardo et al., in the proceedings of the XIVInternational Workshop on Deep Inelastic Scattering, Tsukuba city, Japan, April20th - April 24th. (2006).COMPASS Collaboration, E. S. Ageev et al., Nucl. Phys. B765, 31 (2007).

Belle Collaboration, R. Seidl et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 232002 (2006).

Description of the data Anselmino et al Phys.Rev.D75:054032,2007

Table: FIT I cos(ϕ1 + ϕ2) and FIT II cos(ϕ0) are within 1σ

TransversityFIT I NT

u = 0.48± 0.09 NTd = −0.62± 0.30

FIT II NTu = 0.42± 0.09 NT

d = −0.53± 0.28

FIT I α = 1.14± 0.68 β = 4.74± 5.45FIT II α = 1.20± 0.83 β = 5.09± 5.87

Collins FFFIT I NC

fav = 0.35± 0.16 NCunf = −0.85± 0.36

FIT II NCfav = 0.41± 0.10 NC

unf = −0.99± 1.24

FIT I γ = 1.14± 0.38 δ = 0.14± 0.36FIT II γ = 0.81± 0.40 δ = 0.02± 0.37

FIT I M2 = 0.70± 0.65 GeV2

FIT II M2 = 0.88± 1.15 GeV2

Description of BELLE data

BELLE cos(ϕ0)

) 2, z 1

0.2 < 0.310.2 < z < 0.510.3 < z

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8-0.05

0.2 < 0.710.5 < z

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8

< 110.7 < z

BELLE cos(ϕ1 + ϕ2)

) 2, z 1

, z 1(z

0.2 < 0.310.2 < z < 0.510.3 < z

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8-0.05

0.2 < 0.710.5 < z

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8

< 110.7 < z

Solid line corresponds to FIT II, dashed line corresponds to FIT I

Description of BELLE data

BELLE cos(ϕ0)

) 2, z 1

0.2 < 0.310.2 < z < 0.510.3 < z

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8-0.05

0.2 < 0.710.5 < z

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8

< 110.7 < z

BELLE cos(ϕ1 + ϕ2)

) 2, z 1

, z 1(z

0.2 < 0.310.2 < z < 0.510.3 < z

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8-0.05

0.2 < 0.710.5 < z

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8

< 110.7 < z

FIT I and FIT II are compatible

Description of HERMES data Asin(φh+φS)UT

HERMES Asin(φh+φS )UT

ep → eπX , plab = 27.57 GeV.) hφ

+ Sφsi

A) hφ

+ Sφsi

x z (GeV)TP

+π HERMES 2002-2004

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6-0.14

-0.08-0.06

-0.020

-π0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

HERMES Collaboration, L. Pappalardo et al., in the proceedings of the XIVInternational Workshop on Deep Inelastic Scattering, Tsukuba city, Japan, April20th - April 24th. (2006).

Description of COMPASS data Asin(φh+φS+π)UT

COMPASS Asin(φh+φS+π)UT

µD → µhX , plab = 160 GeV.)π

hφ+ Sφ

+ Sφsi

x z (GeV)TP

0.1 +h COMPASS 2002-2004

-210 -110 1

0.1 -h

0.26 0.5 0.74 0.98 0.5 1 1.5

COMPASS Collaboration, E. S. Ageev et al., Nucl. Phys. B765, 31 (2007).

hφ+ Sφ

+ Sφsi

x z (GeV)TP

0.1 +h COMPASS 2002-2004

-210 -110 1

0.1 -h

0.26 0.5 0.74 0.98 0.5 1 1.5

Why Asin(φh+φS+π)UT ∼ 0? One of the reasons is that < x >∼ 0.03

(< x >HERMES∼ 0.1)is very small and ∆Tq(x) → 0.

hφ+ Sφ

+ Sφsi

x z (GeV)TP

0.1 +h COMPASS 2002-2004

-210 -110 1

0.1 -h

0.26 0.5 0.74 0.98 0.5 1 1.5

But deuteron target allows us to fit ∆Td(x) as combination of∆Tu(x) + ∆Td(x) enters into the asymmetry.

Collins fragmentation function

f DN ∆-

v DN ∆

f DN ∆-

v DN ∆

z (GeV)p

1 2 = 2.4 GeV2Qz = 0.36

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.80

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 10

1 2 = 2.4 GeV2Qz = 0.36

compared to Ref. [1] (dashed line) and Ref. [2] (dotted line)[1] A. V. Efremov, K. Goeke, and P. Schweitzer, Phys. Rev. D73, 094025(2006).[2] W. Vogelsang and F. Yuan, Phys. Rev. D72, 054028 (2005).

Collins fragmentation function

f DN ∆-

v DN ∆

f DN ∆-

v DN ∆ z (GeV)p

1 2 = 2.4 GeV2Qz = 0.36

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.80

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 10

1 2 = 2.4 GeV2Qz = 0.36

Right panel: solid line corresponds to FIT II, dashed linecorresponds to FIT I

Transversity d

x (GeV)k

x = 0.1

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1-0.2

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1-0.2

x = 0.1

This is the firstextraction of transversityfrom experimental data.

∆Tu(x) > 0 and∆Td(x) < 0

Both ∆Tu(x) and∆Td(x) do not saturateSoffer bound.

HERMES data alonefixes well ∆Tu(x) whileHERMES+COMPASSalows us to extract∆Td(x).

Transversity d

x (GeV)k

x = 0.1

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1-0.2

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1-0.2

x = 0.1

∆Tu(x) > 0 and∆Td(x) < 0

Transversity d

x (GeV)k

x = 0.1

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1-0.2

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1-0.2

x = 0.1

∆Tu(x) > 0 and∆Td(x) < 0

Transversity d

x (GeV)k

x = 0.1

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1-0.2

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1-0.2

x = 0.1

∆Tu(x) > 0 and∆Td(x) < 0

PREDICTIONS

ep → eπX , plab = 6 GeV.

) hφ+ Sφ

x z (GeV)TP

+π JLab 6 GeV

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1-0.14

-0.08-0.06

-0.020

-π0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

COMPASS

µp → µhX , plab = 160 GeV.

+ Sφsi

hφ+ Sφ

x z (GeV)TP

0.1 +h

-210 -110 1

0.1 -h

0.26 0.5 0.74 0.98 0.5 1 1.5

JLab can improve our knowledge of transversity in high x region.COMPASS operating on proton target is expected to measure 5%asymmetry at x ∼ 0.2

PREDICTIONS

eN → eπX , plab = 6 GeV.

) hφ+ Sφ

x z (GeV)TP

0.1 +π JLab N 6 GeV

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

-π0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

HERMES

ep → eKX , plab = 27.57 GeV.

) hφ+ Sφ

x z (GeV)TP

+K HERMES 2002-2004

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

JLab can improve our knowledge of ∆Td(x) transversity usingneutron target. Prediction of the model are compatible with Kaondata from HERMES.

PREDICTIONS

) hφ+ Sφ

x z (GeV)TP

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

-π0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

HERMES

) hφ+ Sφ

x z (GeV)TP

+K HERMES 2002-2004

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

Asin(φh+φS )UT |proton ∼ 4∆Tu(x)∆NDh/u↑(z) + ∆Td(x)∆NDh/d↑(z)

Asin(φh+φS )UT |neutron ∼ 4∆Td(x)∆NDh/u↑(z) + ∆Tu(x)∆NDh/d↑(z)

Introduction Collins effect in SIDIS and e+e− annihilation Sivers effect in SIDIS ConclusionsThe model for the Sivers function Description of the data & Predictions

Sivers effect

Sivers effect A ∝ sin(φh − φS)

The azimuthal asymmetry arises due to modulation in partondensity, the so called Sivers function ∆N fq/p↑ is the difference ofparton distributions in a polarized hadron.AN ∼ sin(φh − φS) ·∆N fq/p↑(x , k⊥)⊗ Dh/q(z)

= ∆N fq/p↑–

= Dh/q

D. Sivers, Phys. Rev. D41(1990) 83

Sivers effect

Asin(φh−φS )UT (x , z) ∼

∑q e2

qxz∆N fq/p↑(x)Dh/q(z)∑q e2

qxfq(x)Dh/q(z),

|∆N fq/p↑(x , k⊥)| ≤ 2fq(x , k⊥)

Two different notations:

fq/p↑(x , k⊥) = fq/p(x , k⊥) +1

2∆Nfq/p↑(x , k⊥) S

T· (P× k⊥)

= fq/p(x , k⊥)− f ⊥q1T (x , k⊥)

ST· (P× k⊥)

Sivers effect

Asin(φh−φS )UT (x , z) ∼

∑q e2

qxz∆N fq/p↑(x)Dh/q(z)∑q e2

qxfq(x)Dh/q(z),

|∆N fq/p↑(x , k⊥)| ≤ 2fq(x , k⊥)

Two different notations:

Relation

∆Nfq/p↑(x , k⊥) = −2|k⊥|mp

f ⊥q1T (x , k⊥) .

Trento conventions: A. Bacchetta, U. D’Alesio, M. Diehl, and C. A. Miller,Phys. Rev. D70, 117504 (2004).

Sivers function

Model for Sivers function

∆Nfq/p↑(x , k⊥)=⇒ we use factorization of x and k⊥and Gaussian dependence on k⊥

∆Nfq/p↑(x , k⊥) = 2Nq(x) fq(x) h(k⊥)e−p2

⊥/〈k2⊥〉

π〈k2⊥〉

Nq(x) = Nq xaq(1− x)bq(aq + bq)

(aq+bq)

aaqq b

h(k⊥) =√

2ek⊥M ′ e

−k2⊥/M′2

where Nq, aq, bq, and M ′ are parameters.

Sivers function

Model for Sivers function

∆Nfq/p↑(x , k⊥)=⇒ we use factorization of x and k⊥and Gaussian dependence on k⊥

∆Nfq/p↑(x , k⊥) = 2Nq(x) fq(x) h(k⊥)e−p2

⊥/〈k2⊥〉

π〈k2⊥〉

Nq(x) ≤ 1

h(k⊥) ≤ 1

positivity constraint |∆N fq/p↑(x , k⊥)| ≤ 2fq(x , k⊥) is fulfilled.

Description of Asin(φh−φS)UT

We use HERMES and COMPASS data sets on Asin(φh−φS )UT in the

fitting procedure.u, d and sea Sivers functions are fitted.For sea Sivers functions we use

∆N fu/p↑(x , k⊥) ,∆N fd/p↑(x , k⊥) ,∆N fs/p↑(x , k⊥) ,∆N fs/p↑(x , k⊥).

HERMES Collaboration, Diefenthaler M., HERMES measurements of Collins and Siversasymmetries from a transversely polarised hydrogen target, arXiv:0706.2242COMPASS Collaboration, Martin A. COMPASS results on transverse single-spinasymmetries Czech. J. Phys. B56, F33-F52 (2006).

Description of the data

Table: Best values of the free parameters for the u, d and sea Siversfunctions.

χ2/d.o.f. = 1.

u Nu = 0.33+0.062−0.067

Sivers au = 0.58+0.86−0.46 bu = 2.6+4.4

−2.3

function

d Nd = −1.00+0.004−0.000

Sivers ad = 0.75+0.65−0.36 bd = 1.1+2.5

−0.92

function

sea Nu = 0.005+0.24−0.15 Nd = −0.36+0.39

−0.51

Ns = −0.19+0.61−0.74 Ns = 1.00+0

−0.00059

Sivers asea = 1.5+2.6−1.2 bsea = 11+31

function

〈k2⊥〉 = 0.25 GeV2 M ′2 = 0.41+0.41

−0.18

Description of HERMES data Asin(φh−φS)UT

HERMES Asin(φh−φS )UT

ep → eπX , plab = 27.57 GeV.

x z (GeV)TP

0π HERMES 2002-2005

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5

-π0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

HERMES Collaboration, Diefenthaler M., HERMES measurements of Collins and Siversasymmetries from a transversely polarised hydrogen target, arXiv:0706.2242

Description of COMPASS data Asin(φh−φS)UT

COMPASS Asin(φh−φS )UT

µD → µhX , plab = 160 GeV.

x z (GeV)TP

0.1 +π COMPASS 2003-2004

-310 -210 -110 1

0.1 -π

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 0.5 1 1.5

COMPASS Collaboration, Martin A. COMPASS results on transverse single-spinasymmetries Czech. J. Phys. B56, F33-F52 (2006).

x z (GeV)TP

0.1 +π COMPASS 2003-2004

-310 -210 -110 1

0.1 -π

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 0.5 1 1.5

Why Asin(φh−φS )UT ∼ 0?

x z (GeV)TP

0.1 +π COMPASS 2003-2004

-310 -210 -110 1

0.1 -π

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 0.5 1 1.5

sin(φh−φS )UT

)hydrogen

∼ 4 ∆Nfu/p↑ Dhu + ∆Nfd/p↑ Dh

x z (GeV)TP

0.1 +π COMPASS 2003-2004

-310 -210 -110 1

0.1 -π

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 0.5 1 1.5

sin(φh−φS )UT

)deuterium

∼(∆Nfu/p↑ + ∆Nfd/p↑

) (4 Dh

u + Dhd

)Alexei Prokudin Dubna, 4 September 2007 Transversity, Collins and Sivers Effects 47

x z (GeV)TP

0.1 +π COMPASS 2003-2004

-310 -210 -110 1

0.1 -π

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 0.5 1 1.5

sin(φh−φS )UT

)deuterium

∼(∆Nfu/p↑ + ∆Nfd/p↑

)∼ 0

x z (GeV)TP

0.1 +π COMPASS 2003-2004

-310 -210 -110 1

0.1 -π

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 0.5 1 1.5

But deuteron target allows us to fit better ∆Nfd/p↑ as combination

of ∆Nfu/p↑ + ∆Nfd/p↑ enters into the asymmetry.

Sivers function

sx (GeV)k

x = 0.1

0.2 x = 0.1

-310 -210 -110 1

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1-0.2

0.2 x = 0.1

∆Nf(1)q (x) ≡

∫d2 k⊥

k⊥4mp

∆Nfq/p↑(x , k⊥) = −f⊥(1)q1T (x) .

KAON HERMES AND COMPASS DATA

HERMES

x z (GeV)TP

0.2 +K HERMES 2002-2005

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5

-K0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

DSS KRE HKNS

HERMES

x z (GeV)TP

0.2 +K HERMES 2002-2005

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5

-K0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

Kaon FF as given by De Florian et al. in Ref.de Florian D., Sassot R., and Stratmann M. Phys. Rev. D75 114010 (2007)

(right panel) are compared the Kretzer (dotted lines) and HKNSset (dashed lines) of fragmentation functions (left panel).

Fragmentation function

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 10

DSS KRE HKNS

K+(us), π+(ud) thus knowledge of s → K+ FF is very important

KAON HERMES AND COMPASS DATA

COMPASS

µD → µKX , plab = 160 GeV.

x z (GeV)TP

0.1 +K COMPASS 2003-2004

-310 -210 -110 1

0.1 -K

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 0.5 1 1.5

HERMES

x z (GeV)TP

0.2 +K HERMES 2002-2005

0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5

-K0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

Model description of COMPASS and HERMES Kaon data.

PREDICTIONS

ep → eπX , plab = 6 GeV.

x z (GeV)TP

0.15+π JLab 6 GeV

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

-π0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

COMPASS

µp → µπX , plab = 160 GeV.

x z (GeV)TP

0.1 +π

-310 -210 -110 1

0.1 -π

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 0.5 1 1.5

JLab can improve our knowledge of Sivers function in high xregion. COMPASS operating on proton target is expected tomeasure 5% asymmetry for h+.

PREDICTIONS

x z (GeV)TP

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

ep → eKX , plab = 6 GeV.

x z (GeV)TP

0.15 +K JLab 6 GeV

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

-K0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

JLab can improve our knowledge of ∆Nfd/p↑ using neutron target.

CONCLUSIONS

First extraction of transversity for u and d quarks, ∆Tu(x)and ∆Td(x), from HERMES, COMPASS and BELLE data ispresented.

Transversity ∆Tq(x) is found not to saturate Soffer bound(q(x) + ∆q(x))/2.∆Tu(x) > 0 and ∆Td(x) < 0

Estimates of the Collins fragmentation functions for favouredand unfavoured fragmentation have been obtained.∆ND fav

h (z , |p⊥|) > 0 and ∆NDunfh (z , |p⊥|) < 0

Sivers functions for u, d and sea quarks are extracted fromHERMES and COMPASS data.

Predictions for Collins and Sivers asymmetries at JLab andCOMPASS (with the proton target) are presented andexpected to be sizable.

CONCLUSIONS

h (z , |p⊥|) > 0 and ∆NDunfh (z , |p⊥|) < 0

CONCLUSIONS

h (z , |p⊥|) > 0 and ∆NDunfh (z , |p⊥|) < 0

CONCLUSIONS

h (z , |p⊥|) > 0 and ∆NDunfh (z , |p⊥|) < 0

CONCLUSIONS

h (z , |p⊥|) > 0 and ∆NDunfh (z , |p⊥|) < 0

CONCLUSIONS

h (z , |p⊥|) > 0 and ∆NDunfh (z , |p⊥|) < 0

THANK YOU!

Transversity, Collins and Sivers Effectstheor.jinr.ru/~spin/Spin-Dubna07/2 4TuA/6...

Documents