Union Pacific PowerPoint Specs - Department of Energy Pacific RailroadUnion Pacific Railroad...

Post on 13-Apr-2018

222 views 1 download

transcript

Union PacificRail TransportationUnion PacificRail Transportation

Rodger DolsonSeptember 2005Rodger DolsonSeptember 2005

OutlineOutline• Union Pacific Overview

• Operating Environment

• Future Plans

• Hazardous Materials

• Routes

• Dedicated Service

• Summary

• Union Pacific Overview

• Operating Environment

• Future Plans

• Hazardous Materials

• Routes

• Dedicated Service

• Summary

Union Pacific RailroadUnion Pacific RailroadNorthern RegionNorthern Region

Western Region

Western Region

Southern RegionSouthern Region

Central RegionCentral Region

Union Pacific Fast FactsUnion Pacific Fast Facts

Miles of Track 32,832Employees 48,000 Annual Payroll $3.3 BPurchases Made $3.1 BLocomotives 7,861Freight Cars 87,497

SafetySafetyEmployee

1999 2005YTD

55.1%

1999 2005YTD

1999 2005YTD

40.6%

34.8%

Public

CustomerDerailment Frequency

2004 Commodity Mix$12.2 Billion2004 Commodity Mix$12.2 Billion

Ag Products15%

Automotive11%

Chemicals14%

Energy20%

Intermodal19%

Industrial Products

21%

Ag Products15%

Automotive11%

Chemicals14%

Energy20%

Intermodal19%

Industrial Products

21%

Sustained DemandSustained Demand

165

170

175

180

185

190

195

200

S03

N J04

M M J S N J05

M M J

7-D

ay C

arlo

adin

gs

165

170

175

180

185

190

195

200

S03

N J04

M M J S N J05

M M J

7-D

ay C

arlo

adin

gs

Last 23 Month VolumesLast 23 Month Volumes

Previous Record Volumes – Any YearPrevious Record Volumes – Any Year

Flood EmbargoFlood EmbargoPRB

IncidentsPRB

Incidents

Secular Drivers

• Transpacific Trade

• Population Growth

• Highway Infrastructure

• Crude Oil

Secular Drivers

• Transpacific Trade

• Population Growth

• Highway Infrastructure

• Crude Oil

Growth In Key CorridorsGrowth In Key Corridors

LALA

El Paso

PhoenixPhoenix

TucsonTucson

Missouri Valley

Missouri Valley

ChicagoClintonClinton

Houston

San Antonio

San Antonio

Laredo

Up 50%Up 50%

Up 20%Up 20%

Up 80%Up 80%

Velocity Improvement StrategyVelocity Improvement Strategy

• Resources

• Network Solutions

• Capital

• Resources

• Network Solutions

• Capital

Crews 2004 2005Trainmen Grads 4,979 1,979Engineer Grads 680 2,058

Crews 2004 2005Trainmen Grads 4,979 1,979Engineer Grads 680 2,058

Resource Supply & ProductivityResource Supply & Productivity

Locomotives New 393 315Short-Term Lease Units 350 (125)

Locomotives New 393 315Short-Term Lease Units 350 (125)

Freight CarsNew or Leased Cars 5,000 4,200Freight CarsNew or Leased Cars 5,000 4,200

Work Events/Train (Scheduled Network)

33% 29%20%

10%5% 3%

0 1 2 3 4 >4Work Events/Train

Work Events/Train (Scheduled Network)

33% 29%20%

10%5% 3%

0 1 2 3 4 >4Work Events/Train

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 90%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

% of Total

Network SolutionsUnified PlanNetwork SolutionsUnified Plan

Switches / Trip

Objectives• Reduce Total Workload• Increase Velocity• Reduce Dwell• Improve AchievabilityDesign• Clean Sheet• Network Modeling• Enhance RecoverabilityImplementation• Connect to LEAN Initiative• Run the Plan

Capital Investment2005Capital Investment2005

$2.8+ Billion• Engineering - $1.35 B

– 850+ Miles of Rail– 4.4 Million Ties

• Capacity - $290 MM• Facilities - $220 MM • Equipment/Other -

$260 MM• Long-Term & Flexible

Operating Leases -$700 MM

$2.8+ Billion• Engineering - $1.35 B

– 850+ Miles of Rail– 4.4 Million Ties

• Capacity - $290 MM• Facilities - $220 MM • Equipment/Other -

$260 MM• Long-Term & Flexible

Operating Leases -$700 MM

Railroad Capital InvestmentsRailroad Capital Investments• Maintenance-of-Way

– 2004 4.2 million ties and 870 miles of rail– 2005 4.4 million ties and 850 miles of rail

• Locomotives– 2004 743 new units and short-term leases– 2005 315 new units (return 125 short-term leases)

• 2005 Freight Car Acquisitions (new or leased cars)– Mechanical Reefers - Bi-Levels– C3 and C5 Covered Hoppers - Coal Gondolas/Hoppers– Food Grade C5s

• Maintenance-of-Way– 2004 4.2 million ties and 870 miles of rail– 2005 4.4 million ties and 850 miles of rail

• Locomotives– 2004 743 new units and short-term leases– 2005 315 new units (return 125 short-term leases)

• 2005 Freight Car Acquisitions (new or leased cars)– Mechanical Reefers - Bi-Levels– C3 and C5 Covered Hoppers - Coal Gondolas/Hoppers– Food Grade C5s

2005 Capacity Improvements2005 Capacity Improvements

ChicagoChicago

DFWDFW

HoustonHouston

KCKC

Southern Tier Routes

Southern Tier Routes

ChicagoChicago

Kansas CityKansas City

LaredoLaredo

DFWDFW

HoustonHouston

North-South RoutesNorth-South Routes

PortlandPortland

OaklandOakland

SeattleSeattle

Salt Lake City

Salt Lake City

Central Corridor RoutesCentral Corridor Routes

GrandJct.GrandJct.

Mason City

Mason City

PhoenixPhoenix

San Antonio

San Antonio

LaredoLaredo

NL RockNL Rock

Siding ExtensionsSiding Extensions

SalemSalemSt. LouisSt. Louis

ChicagoChicago

TucsonTucson

LA BasinLA Basin

Terminal ImprovementsTerminal ImprovementsCorridor ImprovementsCorridor Improvements

Des MoinesDes Moines

El PasoEl Paso

San Antonio

San Antonio

N. PlatteN. Platte

Our Message to CustomersOur Message to Customers• Unified Plan Will Drive Velocity Improvement

• Lean Management & Other Initiatives Will Improve Productivity

• Capital Investment Will Provide Additional Capacity

• Velocity, Productivity and Capacity Will Allow Us to Handle Future Growth

• Price Improvement Needed to Improve ROI to Support Needed Capital Investment

• Unified Plan Will Drive Velocity Improvement

• Lean Management & Other Initiatives Will Improve Productivity

• Capital Investment Will Provide Additional Capacity

• Velocity, Productivity and Capacity Will Allow Us to Handle Future Growth

• Price Improvement Needed to Improve ROI to Support Needed Capital Investment

General Routing/ Operating Considerations General Routing/ Operating Considerations

. Standard Operating Rules

. Speed

. Weight

. Dimensions

. Mileage

. Any Special Conditions

. Standard Operating Rules

. Speed

. Weight

. Dimensions

. Mileage

. Any Special Conditions

Other (Wastes, Combustible Liquids, Class 1, Class 4,

Class 7)

Other (Wastes, Combustible Liquids, Class 1, Class 4,

Class 7)

Class 9Class 9

Class 3Class 3

Mixed LoadMixed Load

Class 5Class 5

Class 6Class 6

Class 8Class 8

20%20%

15%19%19%

18%18%

3%3%2%2%

8%8%

15%15%

Class 2Class 2Class 7 = 00.8%Class 7 = 00.8%

Total Hazmat Total LoadsTotal Hazmat Total Loads

= 530,023= 9,457,803= 530,023= 9,457,803

UP Hazardous Material2004UP Hazardous Material2004

Hazardous Materials ConsiderationsHazardous Materials Considerations• Normal Handling – Manifest Service

• Fed Regulations– Form 8620 – Instruction For Handling

Hazardous Materials

• Train Placement

• Key Trains – 50 Mph

• Protocols For Elevated Security

• Normal Handling – Manifest Service

• Fed Regulations– Form 8620 – Instruction For Handling

Hazardous Materials

• Train Placement

• Key Trains – 50 Mph

• Protocols For Elevated Security

Emergency ResponseEmergency Response• Union Pacific Response Management

Control Center (RMCC)

• UP Response Procedures Align With – National Incident Management System (NIMS)

– National Response Plan (NRP)

• Up Links Into NIMS Structure

• Union Pacific Response Management Control Center (RMCC)

• UP Response Procedures Align With – National Incident Management System (NIMS)

– National Response Plan (NRP)

• Up Links Into NIMS Structure

National Incident Mgmt System (NIMS)National Incident Mgmt System (NIMS)

Incident Commander

Public InformationOfficer Liaison Officer

Safety Officer

LogisticsOperationsPlanningFinance

Private ResourcesRailroad, Shipper, ContractorsLocal ResourcesFire, EMS, Police, UtilitiesFed/State ResourcesState/Fed Environmental, State Police

Hazardous Materials RespondersHazardous Materials Responders

Hazardous Materials RespondersHazardous Materials Responders

Chemical Trans Safety Reg MgrsChemical Trans Safety Reg Mgrs

Hazardous Materials RespondersHazardous Materials Responders

Chemical Trans Safety Reg MgrsChemical Trans Safety Reg MgrsChemical Trans Safety MgrsChemical Trans Safety Mgrs

Hazardous Materials RespondersHazardous Materials Responders

Chemical Trans Safety Reg MgrsChemical Trans Safety Reg MgrsChemical Trans Safety MgrsChemical Trans Safety MgrsSpecial Agents / Hazardous MaterialsSpecial Agents / Hazardous MaterialsEnvironmental MgrsEnvironmental Mgrs

Hazardous Materials RespondersHazardous Materials Responders

PortlandPortland

OaklandOakland

BloomingtonBloomingtonLong

BeachLong

Beach

TucsonTucson

El PasoEl Paso

SeattleSeattle

San Antonio

San Antonio

LaredoLaredo

SpringSpringFt. WorthFt. Worth

HoustonHouston

LivoniaLivonia

Kansas CityKansas City

North Little RockNorth Little Rock

St. LouisSt. Louis

NorthlakeNorthlakeOmahaOmaha

DenverDenverSalt LakeCity

Salt LakeCity

RosevilleRoseville

St. PaulSt. Paul

San FranciscoSan Francisco

NorthPlatteNorthPlatte

WestmorelandWestmorelandShreveportShreveport

DallasDallas

TucumcariTucumcari

PocatelloPocatello

StocktonStocktonSparksSparks

AvondaleAvondaleChemical Trans Safety Reg MgrsChemical Trans Safety Reg MgrsChemical Trans Safety MgrsChemical Trans Safety MgrsSpecial Agents / Hazardous MaterialsSpecial Agents / Hazardous MaterialsEnvironmental MgrsEnvironmental Mgrs

Routing to Yucca Mtn.Routing to Yucca Mtn.

KansasCity

Yucca Mtn.

Memphis

St. Louis

Chicago

New OrleansNew Orleans

UP GatewaysUP Gateways

Eastern OriginsEastern Origins

SNF / Dedicated TrainsSNF / Dedicated Trains

• Common Carrier Obligation Applies

• Dedicated Train – Shipper’s Choice

• Good Precaution– Less Handling

– Best Available Technology

– More Control

• Common Carrier Obligation Applies

• Dedicated Train – Shipper’s Choice

• Good Precaution– Less Handling

– Best Available Technology

– More Control

Settlement AgreementSettlement Agreement• Complaint Dates Back To March 1981

• Settled Sept. 2004

• Approved July 2005

• Effective Sept 2005

• Rate Issues Resolved

• Structure To Move Forward

• Complaint Dates Back To March 1981

• Settled Sept. 2004

• Approved July 2005

• Effective Sept 2005

• Rate Issues Resolved

• Structure To Move Forward

SummarySummary• Union Pacific Is Positioned For Growth

• Rail Is A Safe Option For Movement Of SNF

• We Have Experience Handling SNF

• We Support The Dedicated Train Option

• Settlement Agreement Provides Structure Going Forward

• Union Pacific Is Positioned For Growth

• Rail Is A Safe Option For Movement Of SNF

• We Have Experience Handling SNF

• We Support The Dedicated Train Option

• Settlement Agreement Provides Structure Going Forward