Using Loss Pairs to Discover Network

Properties

Jun Liu, Mark CrovellaComputer Science Dept.Boston University

Discovering Network Properties

What is the state of the network when packets are being dropped? E.g., What is the buffer occupancy

when packets are being dropped? For a DropTail queue, indicates buffer

size; For an AQM queue, indicates dropping

policy.

Benefits and Difficulties Why is this useful?

Characterizing existing networks; Using information gained to adapt

applications to network status; Debugging network elements.

Why is this hard? Dropped packets carry no information to the

endpoint; Noisy measurements require robust

estimation methods.

The Basic Idea

A packet traveling close to a dropped packet sees similar network state as the dropped one.

We propose a method called Loss Pairs to characterize the dropping function of a network element under some assumptions.

Loss Pairs A non-dropped packet that is close to a

dropped packet can inform the endpoint about network state seen by the dropped packet.

We define a loss pair as two packets p1 and p2 such that

p2 initially follows p1 with time between the trailing edge of p1 and the leading edge of p2;

Exactly one of p1 and p2 happens to be dropped in the network;

p1 and p2 traverse the same sequence of links and routers up to the point one is dropped.

Generally, we consider to be 0.

Assumptions For Using Loss Pairs in Practice

1. Most of the packet losses and delays happen at the bottleneck.

2. The round-trip path and the bottleneck stay stable during measurement.

3. To estimate queue state, packet scheduling must be FCFS.

4. To convert queue occupancy to bytes, bottleneck bandwidth must be known.

Network Setting For Evaluation We consider a 3-hop sample network setting.

Capable of varying cross traffic upstream, downstream and at the bottleneck. Workload : heavy tailed ON/OFF TCP sources.

Goal : Characterize the queue between B and C by passive measurements taken at the sender.

A DCBVisableTraffic

UpstreamCross Traffic

DownstreamCross Traffic

BottleneckCross Traffic

BottleneckLink

Varying Buffer Size Of A DropTail Router The queue state seen by a dropped packet is

a linear function of buffer size.

Estimating Buffer Size of DropTail Routers Tq = the most common RTT of

Loss Pairs. Tp = minimum RTT of all non-

dropped packets. C = link bandwidth of the

bottleneck link Buffer size = C * (Tq – Tp)

Filtering Ability of Loss Pairs

Normal RTT RTT of Loss Pairs

Corresponds to empty buffer

Corresponds to full buffer

Estimation Accuracy UnderLight Cross Traffic

Each crossing path has 1/10th the sources of the main path.

The estimation results are quite good -- all assumptions are met.

Estimation Accuracy UnderModerate Cross Traffic

Each crossing path has 50% of the sources of the main path.

Estimation results are still acceptable -- assumptions are partially met.

Queue delays in non- bottleneck queues are prominent for small buffer sizes.

Estimation Accuracy Under Heavy Cross Traffic

Each crossing path has as many sources as the main path.

Estimation results are poor for small buffers -- assumptions are violated.

However, the results are acceptable on large buffers.

Effect of Cross Traffic Heavy cross traffic upstream ,

downstream or on return path affects accuracy.

Cross traffic at the bottleneck doesn’t affect accuracy -- only affects the number of samples on Loss Pairs.

Characterizing Dropping Curves of AQM Routers New assumption : packet drops are

independent. Estimation Method:

# loss pairs with RTT = x

Dropping ratio = -------------------------------

# trial pairs with RTT = x

A trial pair with RTT = x is a pair of packets with at least one packet not having been dropped.

Characterizing the Dropping Curve of a RED Router

Parameters: min_threshold=9KB, max_threshold=18KB, Mp=0.1

Measured By Loss Pairs Actual Behavior

Characterizing the Dropping Curve of a BLUE Router

Parameters: B=500 pkts, Incr=Decr=0.0025, Holding time = 0.01

sec.

Related Work Measurement of bandwidth by Packet Pairs

Keshav (1991), Bolot (1993), Paxson (1995), Carter & Crovella (1996, Bprobe)

Measurement of bandwidth, delay, mean queue occupancy, etc. by individual packet

Jacobson (1997, pathchar), Downey (1999, pchar), Mah (1999, clink), Lai and Baker (2000), Harfoush et al. (2001)

Measurement of loss rate Duffield et. al. (1999, MINC) Harfoush et. al. (2000, MINT)

Conclusion We propose a new technique for

characterizing the packet dropping behavior of network elements.

By simulation, we have shown that this method is effective in characterizing the dropping patterns of routers.

This method can be used to characterize the queue management scheme being used at the bottleneck link.

For DropTail queues, this method can be used to determine router buffer size.