Warm Mix Asphalt

Post on 19-Feb-2016

94 views 0 download

Tags:

description

Warm Mix Asphalt. Technical Working Group Meeting Marriott Hunt Valley Inn Baltimore, MD Dec. 12-13, 2007. Warm Mix Asphalt Characterization. Binder Properties Mixture Properties. Acknowledgements. Matt Corrigan – Program Manager Jagan Guddimettla – Mix Project Engineer - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

transcript

Federal Highway AdministrationOffice of Pavement TechnologyOffice of Pavement Technology

Warm Mix AsphaltWarm Mix Asphalt

Technical Working Group MeetingMarriott Hunt Valley Inn

Baltimore, MDDec. 12-13, 2007

Federal Highway AdministrationOffice of Pavement TechnologyOffice of Pavement Technology

Warm Mix AsphaltCharacterization

Binder PropertiesBinder PropertiesMixture PropertiesMixture Properties

Federal Highway AdministrationOffice of Pavement TechnologyOffice of Pavement Technology

AcknowledgementsMatt Corrigan – Program Manager

Jagan Guddimettla – Mix Project EngineerSatish Belagutti – Binder Project EngineerRaj Dongré – DLS, IncJustin Tesch – Mix TechJoshua Thompson – Mix TechDavid Heidler – Binder TechDarnel Jackson – Binder Tech

also:

TFHRC GroupNelson GibsonScott ParobeckFrank Davis

Federal Highway AdministrationOffice of Pavement TechnologyOffice of Pavement Technology

ProjectsWarm Mix Asphalt Projects

Location Mix Design Lab Compaction Level, gyrations

Base Binder Grade Technologies

Hall St, St. Louis, MO 12.5mm Superpave 100 PG 70-22

Aspha-Min Evotherm Sasobit

I-70 w of Eisenhower Tunnel, Frisco, CO

9.5mm Superpave 75 PG 58-28

Advera Evotherm Sasobit

E Entrance Rd, Yellowstone National Park, WY

19mm Hveem 75 PG 58-34 Advera

Sasobit

Federal Highway AdministrationOffice of Pavement TechnologyOffice of Pavement Technology

FHWA Power Chart12.5 mm Superpave, MO 0672

1912.59.54.752.361.180.60.30.0750

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0 .0

Sieve Size Raised to 0.45 Power

Perc

ent P

assi

ng

0

1

JMFMaximum Density LinePCS

Federal Highway AdministrationOffice of Pavement TechnologyOffice of Pavement Technology

FHWA Power Chart9.5mm Superpave, CO0777

1912.59.54.752.361.180.60.30.0750

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0 .0 4 .0

Sieve Size Raised to 0.45 Power

Perc

ent P

assi

ng

0

1

Maximum Density Line

Production Average

PCS

Federal Highway AdministrationOffice of Pavement TechnologyOffice of Pavement Technology

FHWA Power Chart19 mm Hveem, WY 0778

0.075 0.3 0.6 1.18 2.36 4.75 9.5 12.5 25190.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

70.0

80.0

90.0

100.0

0 4

Sieve Size Raised to 0.45 Power

Perc

ent P

assi

ng

0

1

Maximum Density Line

JMF

PCS

Federal Highway AdministrationOffice of Pavement TechnologyOffice of Pavement Technology

Binder Characterization

Federal Highway AdministrationOffice of Pavement TechnologyOffice of Pavement Technology

Objective• Evaluate the effects of three Warm Mix

process namely Sasobit, Aspha-Min and Evotherm on M320-Table 2 Performance Grade

• To Compare the Performance Grades of Warm Mix processes with the base asphalt used in preparing warm mix asphalts

Federal Highway AdministrationOffice of Pavement TechnologyOffice of Pavement Technology

Study Approach

• Experiment Design– Base Asphalt PG 70-22– Base Asphalt + 1.5% Sasobit– Base Asphalt + 5.26% Aspha-Min– Evotherm – (emulsion)

Federal Highway AdministrationOffice of Pavement TechnologyOffice of Pavement Technology

Hall St, St. Louis, MOM320 ContinuousPerformance Grade

M320, Table 2Performance Grade

Additive Rate, by wt of binder

Base 70.9 – 24.870.9 – 24.8 70 - 2270 - 22

Sasobit 76.5 – 22.876.5 – 22.8 76 - 2276 - 22 1.5%

Aspha-Min 72.4 – 24.672.4 – 24.6 70 - 2270 - 22 5.26%

Evotherm - recovered

(ASTM D 6934)66.6 – 26.766.6 – 26.7 64 - 2264 - 22

Federal Highway AdministrationOffice of Pavement TechnologyOffice of Pavement Technology

Hall St, St. Louis, MO

-24.8 -22.8 -24.6

70.9 76.5 72.4

-32

-16

0

16

32

48

64

80

Base Asphalt Sasobit Aspha-min

Asphalt Binders

Cont

inuo

us P

G

High TemperatureLow Temperature

Federal Highway AdministrationOffice of Pavement TechnologyOffice of Pavement Technology

PG Comparison - Evotherm

-23.3 -25.9 -26.6 -26.7

70.1 68.2 67.6 66.6

-32

-16

0

16

32

48

64

80

BASF Method-BASF BASF Method-FHWA British ASTM D6934

Asphalt Binders

Cont

inuo

us P

G

High TemperatureLow Temperature

Federal Highway AdministrationOffice of Pavement TechnologyOffice of Pavement Technology

I-70, Frisco, COM320 ContinuousPerformance Grade

M320, Table 2Performance Grade

Additive Rate, by wt of binder

Base 59.9 – 30.359.9 – 30.3 58 – 2858 – 28

Sasobit 64.2 – 29.264.2 – 29.2 64 – 2264 – 22 1.5%

Aspha-Min 61.1 – 30.961.1 – 30.9 58 – 2858 – 28

Advera 60.7 – 30.460.7 – 30.4 58 - 2858 - 28 4.33%

Evotherm NO DATANO DATA

Federal Highway AdministrationOffice of Pavement TechnologyOffice of Pavement Technology

I-70, Frisco, CO

-30.3 -29.2 -30.4 -30.9

59.9 64.2 60.7 61.1

0

-32

-16

0

16

32

48

64

80

Base Sasobit Advera Asphamin Evotherm

Asphalt Binders

Cont

inuo

us P

G

High TemperatureLow Temperature

Federal Highway AdministrationOffice of Pavement TechnologyOffice of Pavement Technology

East Entrance Rd, Yellowstone, WY

M320 ContinuousPerformance Grade

M320, Table 2Performance Grade

Additive Rate, by wt of binder

Base 60.2 – 34.160.2 – 34.1 58 – 2858 – 28

Sasobit 65.1 – 32.065.1 – 32.0 64 – 2864 – 28 1.5%

Advera 61.2 – 33.261.2 – 33.2 58 – 2858 – 28 5.2%

Federal Highway AdministrationOffice of Pavement TechnologyOffice of Pavement Technology

East Ent Rd, Yellowstone, CO

-34.1 -32 -33.2

60.2 65.1 61.2

-48

-32

-16

0

16

32

48

64

80

Base Sasobit Advera

Asphalt Binders

Cont

inuo

us P

G

High TemperatureLow Temperature

Federal Highway AdministrationOffice of Pavement TechnologyOffice of Pavement Technology

Findings• Sasobit – increase of 1 high temp grade • Aspha-Min - no impact on PG grade• Evotherm - recovered at BASF, no effect on the

PG • Evotherm - recovered from the stored emulsion

was reduced by one grade

Federal Highway AdministrationOffice of Pavement TechnologyOffice of Pavement Technology

Findings• Emulsion recovery processes had no effect on

the PG. The PGs from all three recovery methods were found to be the same.

• ASTM D6934 was found to be the quickest and easiest process to recover the Evotherm residue from emulsion.

Federal Highway AdministrationOffice of Pavement TechnologyOffice of Pavement Technology

Mixture Characterizations

Federal Highway AdministrationOffice of Pavement TechnologyOffice of Pavement Technology

Objectives• When should performance specimens be

tested• What are the effects of reheating on

performance test properties• Approach

– Immediate Testing– Delayed Testing– Reheated Testing

Federal Highway AdministrationOffice of Pavement TechnologyOffice of Pavement Technology

St. Louis Paving Schedule

• Control (12.5mm PG 70-22) – 5/17/06• Sasobit – 5/18/06• Sasobit – 5/19/06• Evotherm – 5/22/06• Evotherm – 5/23/06• Aspha-Min – 5/25/06

Federal Highway AdministrationOffice of Pavement TechnologyOffice of Pavement Technology

Sampling• IMMEDIATE Testing

– Next day after manufacture• Truck bed ≈ every 2hrs of production

– Volumetric• Pb – Ignition• Gmm• Gmb

– SPT; TSR; Hamburg

Federal Highway AdministrationOffice of Pavement TechnologyOffice of Pavement Technology

Sampling• DELAYED Testing

– 2-3 weeks after manufacture• Truck bed ≈ every 2 hrs of production

– Volumetric• Pb – Ignition• Gmm• Gmb

– SPT; TSR; Hamburg

Federal Highway AdministrationOffice of Pavement TechnologyOffice of Pavement Technology

Sampling• REHEATED (TFHRC)• 1~2 tons

– 15 – 5 gallon buckets– SPT; TSR; Hamburg

• Nelson Gibson - TFHRC

Federal Highway AdministrationOffice of Pavement TechnologyOffice of Pavement Technology

SGC

• 6 nights - 366 specimens

Federal Highway AdministrationOffice of Pavement TechnologyOffice of Pavement Technology

Dynamic Modulus (E*)• Test Temperatures

– 4.4º C (40º F)– 21.1º C (70º F)– 37.8º C (100º F)– 54.4º C (130º F)

• Frequency Sweep– 0.1, 0.5, 1, 5, 10, 25 Hz

Federal Highway AdministrationOffice of Pavement TechnologyOffice of Pavement Technology

Master Curve – Arrenhius Fit

1

10

100

1000

10000

1.E-10 1.E-08 1.E-06 1.E-04 1.E-02 1.E+00 1.E+02 1.E+04 1.E+06

Reduced Time, sec

E*, k

si

4.4° C 21.1° C37.8° C 54.4° CFit

0.1 Hz1 Hz5 Hz25 Hz

Federal Highway AdministrationOffice of Pavement TechnologyOffice of Pavement Technology

E* - Master CurveHall St, St. Louis, MO

10

100

1000

10000

100000

1.E-09 1.E-07 1.E-05 1.E-03 1.E-01 1.E+01 1.E+03 1.E+05

Reduced Time, sec

E*,

MP

a

Control - Immediate

Control - Delayed

Control - Reheated

Federal Highway AdministrationOffice of Pavement TechnologyOffice of Pavement Technology

E* - Master CurveHall St, St. Louis, MO

10

100

1000

10000

100000

1.E-09 1.E-07 1.E-05 1.E-03 1.E-01 1.E+01 1.E+03 1.E+05

Reduced Time, sec

E*,

MP

a

Sasobit - ImmediateSasobit - DelayedSasobit - Reheated

Federal Highway AdministrationOffice of Pavement TechnologyOffice of Pavement Technology

E* - Master CurveHall St, St. Louis, MO

10

100

1000

10000

100000

1.E-09 1.E-07 1.E-05 1.E-03 1.E-01 1.E+01 1.E+03 1.E+05

Reduced Time, sec

E*,

MP

a

Evotherm - ImmediateEvotherm - DelayedEvotherm - Reheated

Federal Highway AdministrationOffice of Pavement TechnologyOffice of Pavement Technology

E* - Master CurveHall St, St. Louis, MO

10

100

1000

10000

100000

1.E-09 1.E-07 1.E-05 1.E-03 1.E-01 1.E+01 1.E+03 1.E+05

Reduced Time, sec

E*,

MP

a

Aspha-Min - ImmediateAspha-Min - DelayedAspha-Min - Reheated

Federal Highway AdministrationOffice of Pavement TechnologyOffice of Pavement Technology

E* - Master CurveI-70, Frisco, CO

10

100

1000

10000

100000

1.E-09 1.E-07 1.E-05 1.E-03 1.E-01 1.E+01 1.E+03 1.E+05

Reduced Time, sec

E*,

MP

a

Control MixAdveraSasobit

Federal Highway AdministrationOffice of Pavement TechnologyOffice of Pavement Technology

E* - Master CurveE. Entrance Rd, Yellowstone, WY

Pb - 5.3%, Mix Design Replication

10

100

1000

10000

100000

1.E-09 1.E-07 1.E-05 1.E-03 1.E-01 1.E+01 1.E+03 1.E+05

Reduced Time, sec

E*,

MP

a

Control Mix Advera

Sasobit

Federal Highway AdministrationOffice of Pavement TechnologyOffice of Pavement Technology

E* - Master CurveE. Entrance Rd, Yellowstone, WY

Average WMA Production

10

100

1000

10000

100000

1.E-09 1.E-07 1.E-05 1.E-03 1.E-01 1.E+01 1.E+03 1.E+05

Reduced Time, sec

E*,

MP

a

Control Mix Advera

Sasobit

Federal Highway AdministrationOffice of Pavement TechnologyOffice of Pavement Technology

Flow Number, Fn• Test Temperatures

– LTTPBind, Version 3.1 Software– Site pavement temperature @ 98% Reliability

• Pvmt Temp, ± 6° C

Federal Highway AdministrationOffice of Pavement TechnologyOffice of Pavement Technology

Flow Number, FnHall Street, St. Louis, MO

• Test Temperatures– 46º C (115º F)– 52º C (126º F)– 58º C (136º F)

• Loading– 600 kPa – Deviator Stress– 0 kPa – Confining Pressure

Federal Highway AdministrationOffice of Pavement TechnologyOffice of Pavement Technology

Flow Number, FnImmediate and Delayed Test Specimens

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

Contro

l

Sasob

it T1

Sasob

it T2

Evothe

rm T1

Evothe

rm T2

Aspha

- Min

Contro

l

Sasob

it T1

Sasob

it T2

Evothe

rm T1

Evothe

rm T2

Aspha

- Min

Contro

l

Sasob

it T1

Sasob

it T2

Evothe

rm T1

Evothe

rm T2

Aspha

- Min

Flow

Num

ber,

cycl

es

46° C 52° C 58° C

Federal Highway AdministrationOffice of Pavement TechnologyOffice of Pavement Technology

Flow Number, FnImmediate and Delayed Test Specimens

0

500

1000

1500

2000

Contro

l

Sasob

it T1

Sasob

it T2

Evothe

rm T1

Evothe

rm T2

Aspha

- Min

Contro

l

Sasob

it T1

Sasob

it T2

Evothe

rm T1

Evothe

rm T2

Aspha

- Min

Contro

l

Sasob

it T1

Sasob

it T2

Evothe

rm T1

Evothe

rm T2

Aspha

- Min

Tota

l Cyc

les

@ 5

% S

trai

n

46° C 52° C 58° C

Federal Highway AdministrationOffice of Pavement TechnologyOffice of Pavement Technology

Flow Number, Fn

I-70 - Frisco, CO• Test Temperatures

– 36º C (97º F)– 42º C (108º F)– 48º C (118º F)

• Loading– 689 kPa (100 psi) – Deviator Stress– 69 kPa (10 psi) – Confining Pressure

Federal Highway AdministrationOffice of Pavement TechnologyOffice of Pavement Technology

Flow Number, Fn

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

Control Advera Sasobit Evotherm

Flow

Num

ber,

cycl

es

36° C 42° C 48° C

Federal Highway AdministrationOffice of Pavement TechnologyOffice of Pavement Technology

Flow Number, Fn

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

Control Advera Sasobit Evotherm

Tota

l Cyc

les

@ 5

% S

trai

n

36° C 42° C 48° C

Federal Highway AdministrationOffice of Pavement TechnologyOffice of Pavement Technology

East Entrance Rd - Yellowstone, WY• Test Temperatures

– 46º C (115º F)– 52º C (126º F)– 58º C (136º F)

• Loading– 689 kPa (100 psi) – Deviator Stress– 69 kPa (10 psi) – Confining Pressure

Flow Number, Fn

Federal Highway AdministrationOffice of Pavement TechnologyOffice of Pavement Technology

Flow Number, Fn

Federal Highway AdministrationOffice of Pavement TechnologyOffice of Pavement Technology

Findings• Immediate vs Delayed Testing

– Evotherm & Aspha-Min• Performance testing - delayed after specimen

manufacture– Sasobit

• Performance testing can be conducted immediately after specimen manufacture

Federal Highway AdministrationOffice of Pavement TechnologyOffice of Pavement Technology

Courtesy of the FHWA Mobile Asphalt Laboratories

Federal Highway AdministrationOffice of Pavement TechnologyOffice of Pavement Technology

Federal Highway AdministrationOffice of Pavement TechnologyOffice of Pavement Technology

LA

ID

A Z

U T

M T

W Y

N M

CO(R ef e re e)

A L

F L

S C

T N

K Y

INO H

N C

S D

K S

N E

M N

W I

IA

IL

M O

A R

M S

O K

N D

O R

CAN V

* N VC C

W A

T X

M I

GA

A K

H I

P A

M E

VA

N Y

C T

W V

D C

M D

N J

VTN H

M A

RI

S ta tes U sin g D irec t T en sio n

Report Only