Post on 23-Mar-2020
transcript
Water Quality Monitoring and Aquatic Organisms: The Importance of Species IdentificationAuthor(s): Vincent H. Resh and John D. UnzickerSource: Journal (Water Pollution Control Federation), Vol. 47, No. 1 (Jan., 1975), pp. 9-19Published by: Water Environment FederationStable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25038592Accessed: 01/12/2010 16:11
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available athttp://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unlessyou have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and youmay use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use.
Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained athttp://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=wef.
Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printedpage of such transmission.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range ofcontent in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new formsof scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Water Environment Federation is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Journal(Water Pollution Control Federation).
http://www.jstor.org
Water quality monitoring and aquatic organisms: the importance of
species identification
Vincent H. Resh and John D. Unzicker
Several
methods have been used to
analyze the effects of human activities on aquatic environments. They include
the use of selected chemical and physical parameters, as well as a variety of biologi cal measurements that range from bacterio
logical analyses to bioassay studies of fish
and other aquatic organisms. Although macroinvertebrates are rarely used in bio
assay studies,1 they have proven to be ex
tremely useful in water quality monitoring in two different methods of investigation: studies of community diversity and use as
indicator organisms.
The first approach to water quality anal
ysis with macroinvertebrates involves de
termining the degree of organization that is present in the structure and composition of the component species of the benthic
community. These mathematical expres sions, termed diversity indexes, are widely used and of great potential value.2-4 There
are, however, many problems inherent both in the choice of an index5 and in the in
terpretation of the meaning of the estimate
of organization or diversity index that is
calculated.6
The second approach involves the use
of macroinvertebrates as indicator orga nisms. While there have been several use
ful reviews of the literature on the use of
indicator organisms,7-11 the recent mono
graph by Sladecek12 is currently the most
comprehensive work on the subject. It is
interesting to note that the use of this
saprobic or indicator organisms system has been accepted and applied by the majority of hydrobiologists in continental Europe and the Soviet Union. It is only in Great Britain and North America that the indi
cator organisms system has not received
wide acceptance.12
Several investigators have cited certain
taxonomic groups as characteristic of clean
water and others as characteristic of pol luted water. Beck13 developed a biotic
index of water quality based on a mathe
matical comparison of the numbers of or
ganisms that can tolerate no significant amounts of pollution with those that can
tolerate moderate amounts. The limita
tions of arbitrarily assigning entire taxo
nomic groups (usually family level or
above ) a tolerant or intolerant designation, as was done in the biotic index and in sev
eral other proposed biological formulae14'15 are obvious. For instance, not all chiron
omids or oligochaetes are limited to
strictly polluted conditions.16"22 In the
classic stream pollution recovery pattern,23 in which the dissolved oxygen (do) con
centration gradually increases from a mini
mum level in the septic zone of extreme
pollution to a higher level in the zone of
recovery, certain species in the genera Chironomus and Simulium are among the
first insects to appear in the recovery zone.
Some species in these genera are also often
found only in clean water conditions with a high concentration of do, however. Even
in genera with pollution tolerant species, there often exists a wide range of ecologi cal tolerances that allows organisms that
have been taxonomically placed in the
same genus to be designated pollution tol
erant and pollution intolerant.
The futility of attempting to develop water quality criteria by using indicator
organisms that have been identified only to
the generic level is illustrated in Table I.
-Vol. 47, No. 1, January 1975 9
Resh and Unzicker
TABLE I.?Benthic macroinvertebrate genera for which water quality tolerances have been established
for more than a single species.1 Column headings indicate tolerant, facultative, and/or intolerant.
T/F T/F/I F/I
Placobdella Dina Hyallela Palaemonetes Procladius Psectrotanypus Rheotanytarsus Callibaetis Helisoma Musculium
Parachironomus Palpomyia Pleurocera Gyraulus Quadrula
Plumatella Asellus Cambarus Procambarus Pentaneura Albabesmyia Coelotanypus Tanypus Cricotopus Chironomus Cryptochironomus Dicrotendipes Glyptotendipes Polypedilum Calopsectra (T/I) Telmatoscopus (T/I) Tabanus Caenis Stenelmis Tropisternus (T/I) Goniobasis Physa Lymnaea Planorbis Ferrissia Unio Sphaerium Pisidium
Orconectes Clinotanypus Orthocladius Psectrocladius Xenochironomus Harnischia Tanytarsus Micropsectra Simulium Hydropsyche Stenonema Hexagenia Acroneurita Sialis Argia Enallagma Gomphus Dineutus Valvata Ancylus Lampsilis Anodonta
Labrundinia Corynoneura Thienenmanniella Diamesa Stenochironomus Stictochironomus PsedochironomUvS Microtendipes Tribelos T?pula Macronemum Hydroptilia Chimarra Viviparus Campeloma Amn?cola Truncilla
In this table, the genera of aquatic macro
invertebrates for which water quality tol erances to decomposable organic wastes have been established for more than a sin
gle species (of a particular genus) are listed according to the arbitrary assign
ment of the individual species' water qual ity tolerances. These data are compiled from Table 7 of the M acroinvertebrate Section of Weber.1 In that review, the index species are classified according to the
arbitrary categories of (a) tolerant, "fre
quently associated with gross organic con tamination . . .
thriving under anaerobic
conditions"; ( b ) facultative, "frequently as
sociated with moderate levels of organic contamination'; and (c) intolerant, "not found associated with even moderate levels of organic contaminants and . . . intolerant
of moderate reductions in dissolved oxy gen." Of the 89 genera for which water
quality tolerances have been established for more than a single species, the compo nent species fell into different tolerance
categories in 61 of the genera examined. The largest group of genera in Table T
belong to the category in which some spe cies in the genus were judged tolerant to
pollution, others in the same genus were
designated intolerant to pollution, and others were classified as facultative with
regard to pollution tolerances. This table is a summary of the current state of knowl
edge concerning indicator organisms, and,
perhaps better than any other example, it
emphasizes the need for species-level iden tifications in ascertaining water quality tolerances. Above all else, it signifies the
questionable value of the generic-level taxonomic unit as a water quality indicator.
In practice, generic identifications have to be made either during the process of
arriving at the species identifications or
during the process of assessing what ma
terial is worth identifying to the specific level ( for example, water quality studies ).
The use of the genus as an end point in
identifications is of dubious value, how ever. For instance, in examining the range of tolerances present in Table I, the num
ber of genera that are either entirely tol erant or intolerant to organic pollution is
small when compared with the number of
genera containing species with different
pollution tolerances. This raises the ques tion of the value of identifying organisms below the family level if the generic level is the most precise level that may be ar
rived at with any degree of confidence in
the accuracy of the determinations.
While it is true that the family-level identification tells us nothing about eco
10 Journal WPCF
Water Quality Monitoring
logical indicators or water quality, it seems
equally true that generic-level identifica tions will not yield a great deal of addi tional information and may not be worth the time and effort. In fact, an empirical observation of the diversity in the sample
may be all that is needed to draw the same
conclusions that are reached after a de
tailed and costly appraisal made from
generic-level identifications. In most groups of aquatic insects, iden
tification of the immature stages cannot
currently be made below the generic level.
Unfortunately, it is the immature stage in the life cycle of an aquatic insect that is
most commonly enoountered by hydro biologists. Wiggins
24 pointed out that in
one of the best known orders of aquatic insects, the Trichoptera (caddis flies), im
mature and adult stages have been asso
ciated for only 20 percent of the total North American species. Basically, this critical lack of information is the reason
why usable larval keys for species-level identifications have not been developed.
There have been several keys developed for species-level identifications that are
confined to the fauna of a small region or to cases in which associations of immature and adult stages have been made for only a fraction of the species in the genus. These keys are rarely open-ended, that is,
by following through the series of choices made in each of the couplets, it is very likely that an identification may be made and may seem correct. If a species-level key were based on information dealing
with only a percentage of the species of that genus, however, an incorrect identi fication might quite easily often be logi cally determined. Likewise, if the key
were based primarily on associations of eastern U. S. species, identifications of
specimens from the western U. S. would not likely be correctly determined. In both of the above cases, it would be
particularly easy for misidentification to occur if the key were not well illustrated or did not contain an adequate morphological and ecological description that could be used in a final verification of the species level identification.
Even when associations have been made and species-level identification keys have been constructed, the problem of discover
ing ecological tolerances for each individual
species still exists. Several investigators have attempted to correlate habitats of macroinvertebrates with water chemistry analyses.8'
25~28 The major difficulty in us
ing these techniques is that water chemis
try parameters may fluctuate widely and
rapidly because of temporary pollutional effects or dilution from rainfall, and the
component species of the biotic community may better serve as a reflection of past, rather than present, water
chemistry con
ditions.
An alternative approach has been the use of laboratory studies in developing tolerance levels for aquatic insects sub
jected to environmental stresses, such as
heated water,29-32 pH,33'34 low levels of
do,3540 and extremes in other physical and chemical factors. Gaufin41 reported the results of detailed laboratory studies in
which the larvae of 20 species of aquatic insects and one species of amphipod were
exposed to high water temperatures, low do concentrations, and low levels of pH in order to determine their tolerances to these
parameters. One problem with the lab
oratory based technique is that little is known about the maintenance of immature
stages of aquatic insects under controlled
laboratory conditions and the effect of the stresses of an artificial environment on the
organisms themselves. The method has, however, proven effective with certain spe cies and has been used to evaluate their reactions to particular stresses. Difficul ties in using the laboratory technique to
develop water quality criteria at the spe cies level may arise because of two factors.
First, because closely related species may have drastically different water quality tolerances to a particular stress, all species
must undergo laboratory testing before a
final evaluation can be made. Second, be cause organisms in nature are subjected to a variety of physical and chemical stresses, there is the possibility that a synergistic effect caused by the interaction of com
-Vol. 47, No. 1, January 1975 11
Resh and Unzicker
bined stresses may have a greater influ ence than either of the two stresses alone.42
With the recent increase in the number of federally and locally funded environ
mental research projects, the lack of knowl
edge about the water quality tolerances of aquatic macroinvertebrates and the pau
city of identification keys to immature
stages of aquatic insects have suddenly become serious problems. These are
caused by the demand for consulting ser
vices in the identification of aquatic ben thos for faunal surveys and the preparation and evaluation of species lists for environ
mental impact statements. Although em
phasized in the literature for many years, the need for keys and basic life history in
formation for aquatic macroinvertebrates is now recognized by a growing number of
biologists. A potentially valuable source of baseline
data for a particular area are the specimens that were collected during earlier studies
and deposited in university or permanent museum collections. The preparation of
any type of environmental inventory or the assessment of an area for an environmental
impact statement usually requires a rou
tine search for pertinent available litera ture on the area to be examined. Rarely are floral and faunal lists published for pre cise sites that may be proposed for facili ties such as nuclear reactor plants or other
major construction projects. Museums,
however, usually maintain extensive col
lections that greatly exceed the published records of an area, and catalogues and col
lection data are often available. Even if
the collections are unidentified, they may serve as representative samples of the earlier biota of the area to be examined.
While ichthyologists have occasionally made use of museum collections to ex
amine faunal changes, records of such a
procedure being followed by invertebrate
zoologists or aquatic entomologists are con
fined to a single study, that of Starrett.43 Larimore and Smith44 used the fish collec tions of the Illinois Natural History Sur
vey to illustrate changes in the fish fauna of Champaign County, 111., over a 60-yr period of urban growth and development
in the area. Their conclusions indicate that even with fish, a group far more sen sitive to environmental stress than benthic
macroinvertebrates, the information that
may be derived from a comparison of past and present studies is extremely useful in
evaluating pollutional effects on the bio
logical community. The potential value of
comparing museum collections with pres ent population is well documented by Starrett's study of Illinois River mussels.
In the following example, water quality tolerances are developed for caddis flies of the genus Athripsodes by using conven
tional water chemistry techniques, litera ture reviews, and a reexamination of pre vious collecting sites to determine temporal faunal changes. This genus was chosen for several reasons. First, the species in it have varied life histories. Second, be cause of its large size and widespread dis
tribution, it is one of the most frequently collected caddis flies in aquatic surveys. Third, larval and adult associations for
species in this genus have also allowed for
species-level identifications of the imma ture stages, and keys have been developed for the eastern North American species.45
While caddis flies have often been re
garded as clean water species, several stud ies 27>46 have indicated that many of them
may occupy fairly polluted aquatic habi tats. It should be emphasized that several features of caddis flies as a group make them particularly useful in studies of this
type. These features include the presence of both tolerant and intolerant species, a
workable adult taxonomy, and the availa
bility of several successful techniques for the associations of immature and adult
stages.47-49
The genus Athripsodes is the sixth larg est genus of caddis flies in North America.
Many of the approximately 40 species names assigned to the genus may be syn
onyms. In many preimpoundment surveys, larvae of Athripsodes spp. typically appear in compiled species lists along with other common triehopteran genera such as Cheu
matopsyche, Hydropsyche, and Hydroptila. In the genus Athripsodes, the species an
cylus, angustus, cancellatus, dilutus, resur
12 Journal WPCF
Water Quality Monitoring
gens, tarsipunctatus, and transversas are
widely distributed over eastern North
America, while several additional species seem to be more locally distributed within this range. In establishing larval-adult as
sociations, Athripsodes larvae and pupae have been collected from localities ranging from Ontario to Florida, including small
standing pools, large rivers, small glacial lakes, and the Great Lakes.
The A. cancellatus has been reported as
being abundant in large rivers such as the St. Lawrence River50 and the Niagara River.51 Likewise, A. annulicornis, tarsi
punctatus, and transversus are typically found in both large and small rivers. Spe cies such as A. ancylus, dilutus, and flavus are common in small to moderate sized
streams, often occurring together in collec tions. Larvae and pupae of the locally dis tributed A. nephus inhabit "black water streams" of high tannic acid content, such as the tributaries of the Suwannee River in
Georgia and northern Florida. Larvae of A. slossonae have been collected in the
small, slow moving backwaters of a trout stream in Virginia, where the predominant caddis flies were temporary pool limneph ilids. The trout stream itself contained numerous larvae of A. dilutus, but no lar vae of slossonae were present.
Large lake species include A. erraticus,
erullus, saccus, and submacula, which are
almost entirely restricted to Lake Erie in their distribution.46 The presence of these
species in collections that were made in the 1930's and deposited in the Entomology
Collection at the Ohio State University, Columbus, provided the impetus for the
investigation into the current status of these
Athripsodes populations. Marshall52 re
ported the results of the extensive light trap collections from Lake Erie near Put
in-Bay, Ohio, in 1937. Of the nine species of Athripsodes collected, the following were listed as common: angustus, cancel
latus, erullus, resurgens, saccus, and tarsi
punctatus. Specimens of A. erraticus that were also collected from Put-in-Bay and are currently in the Ohio State University collections indicate that it was also quite common in Lake Erie during the 1930s.
In a more recent study, Horwath 53 re
ported the results of extensive black light ing from the same location as Marshall's earlier work. Only four of the original nine species were present: A. angustus, cancellatus, resurgens, and tarsipunctatus. The total numbers collected and the num ber of collections in which each species appeared were also reduced. Marshall de scribed the abundance of shoreline habi tats. These included sandy beaches, shal low bays of mud and vegetation, shores
with rubble, and other habitats with large rocks and boulders. The rubble areas with
accompanying wave action resembled habi tats in stream riffles. The similar substrate
types and the diversity of habitats present in this area today indicate that the poten tial for use by several species of Athrip sodes is still present. Undoubtedly, these
were the habitats used by the past Lake Erie species. The entire area was ex
amined intensely in 1972 and the only spe cies present were those found in Horwath s 1964 study.
The changes in the Lake Erie mayfly fauna,54 the aquatic flowering plants,55 and
water chemistry conditions 56_58 have been well documented. The changes in the caddis fly fauna may also be seen because it seems that the extirpation of four of the common Athripsodes species, erullus, err?ti
cas, saccus, and submacula, from Lake Erie is now complete. The more tolerant
species of Athripsodes remain, but in
greatly reduced numbers. Larvae and cases of A. resurgens were
first reported from freshwater sponges,
probably Spongilla fragilis Leidy, by Krec ker59 in Put-in-Bay, Lake Erie. Krecker described the larval case as being made of a parchment-like material in the form of a cone approximately 12 mm in length. Al
though he identified these specimens as be
longing to the family Rhyacophilidae, from the description of the case they were un
doubtedly Athripsodes, most likely A. re
surgens.
With the exception of a single record of a freshwater sponge's encrusting the case of a limnephilid caddis fly,60 this associa tion of caddis ?ies and freshwater sponges
-Vol. 47, No. 1, January 1975 13
Resh and Unzicker
is unique to certain species of the genus
Athripsodes. Several investigators have al
luded to the fact that the Spongillidae are
extremely intolerant to organic pollution.1'61 Mason et al.,62 however, reported the abun
dance of the chironomid Xenochironomus xenolabiis in the Ohio River. The larval
stage of this midge has also been reported to be dependent on freshwater sponge.45? 63,64 Thg condition of the Ohio River is not the pristine situation that has been de scribed as a typical habitat for the distri
bution of freshwater sponges. As in the case of Athripsodes, this suggests that with in the Spongillidae, a wide range of water
quality tolerances is also present. Brown,65 while studying the biology of sponge flies in the family Sisyridae, found the same
sponge, S. fragilis, in both a cool, clean lake and a warm, polluted pond. Sponges in the lake yielded only larvae of the genus
Climacia, and sponges in the pond yielded only larvae of the genus Sisyra.
Because of the dependence on freshwater
sponge, the distribution of the obligate sponge-feeding Athripsodes (angustus, alces, and resurgens) reflects the micro habitat distribution of the sponge. Jewell61 reported ranges of physical and chemical
parameters that seem to affect distribution of freshwater sponges within certain habi tats. The sponge usually associated with
A. angustus is S. lacustris, although another
sponge-feeding larva was reported as Ath
ripsodes sp. by Lehmkuhl66 from the
sponge, Meyenia mulleri. Fortunately, these specimens were deposited in the col lection of the Royal Ontario Museum,
Toronto, which enabled the identity of this
species to be confirmed at A. angustus. The early collections and detailed field
notes of R. E. Richardson16 at the Illinois Natural History Survey also provided ad ditional data for developing water quality criteria for Athripsodes caddis flies. From
1924-27, Richardson made extensive col lections with detailed locality descriptions along the length of the Rock River, from northern Illinois to the point at which it
eventually empties into the Mississippi River at Rock Island. Additional collec tions were made by H. H. Ross 46 from sev
eral locations along the Rock River during the late 1930's and the early 1940's. From examinations of the collections and locality designations of both early collectors, the localities at which A. menteius were col lected in earlier studies could be deter
mined. This species was the dominant
leptocerid caddis fly in the collections of
Richardson, although he referred to it as
Leptocerus dilutus in his notes. In 1971 and 1972, the Rock River was examined at four sites where A. menteius was abundant in both series of earlier collections. Neither immature nor adult specimens of this spe cies was found, although large numbers of
A. transversas, especially rare in Richard son's collections, were collected. In ex
tensive sampling of both larval and adult
populations, this was the only species of
Athripsodes present. In his analysis of Illinois streams, Smith67 reported that the
Rock River contains areas of urbanization and industrialization that contribute to the deterioration of water quality.
A decline in the population of A. men teius may also have occurred in two north ern rivers, the St. Lawrence and the Ni
agara. In reporting on the abundant caddis fly fauna of the St. Lawrence River, Corbet et al.50 noted the similarity of that fauna to the caddis flies reported in the
Niagara River by Munroe,51 which was
based on collections made in the 1940's.
Only three species reported from the ear
lier Niagara River study were not collected in the St. Lawrence River investigations.
One species was A. menteius. Two other
species were also in the family Lepto ceridae.
In reexamining museum collections, there are situations in which a locally dis
tributed species remains unchanged. In
the Apple River in northwestern Illinois, A. flavus was collected by Ross in the late
1930's. It was collected again in 1972, and a relatively similar population abundance
was reported. It must be noted, however, that the Apple River is one of the cleanest and most unchanged streams in Illinois.67
Unfortunately, there is a paucity of data
dealing with laboratory studies on the ef fect of environmental stress on caddis flies,
14 Journal WPCF
Water Quality Monitoring
particularly Athripsodes. Field studies by Roback,27 in which water quality toler ances were analyzed by the frequency of occurrence of different caddis fly genera under a specific range of water chemistry conditions, indicate a wide range of toler ances affecting the distribution of species of this genus, however. Representatives of
Athripsodes were found in rivers and streams with wide ranges of each of the
following parameters: methyl orange alka
linity, 20 to 200 mg/1; chloride, 3 to 11
mg/1; carbon dioxide, 5 to 10 mg/1; do, 1 to 11 mg/1; iron, 0.01 to 1.0 mg/1; total
hardness, 10 to 500 mg/1; ammonia, 0.00 to 1.0 mg/1 as N; nitrate, 0.03 to 0.7 mg/1 as N; pH, 3.0 to 9.0; phosphate, 0.005 to 0.5 mg/1; sulfate, 10 to 90 mg/1; turbidity, 10 to 1,000 units; and biochemical oxygen demand, 0.5 to 1.0 mg/1. The mode within these ranges is usually indicative of a clean
water fauna, however. For instance, Ath
ripsodes spp. were collected in habitats
ranging in do concentrations from 1 to 11
mg/1, but the mode was 9 mg/1. Similar
findings by Scott68 for A. harrisonii indi cate a wide range of tolerances, with this
species occurring in habitats in which the
pH ranges from 2.8 in acid swamps to 9.2 in alkaline lakes. Even with this range of tolerance of A. harrisonii to pH, however, Scott still considers the subfamily Lepto cerinae, to which Athripsodes belongs, to be the group of trichopterans most sensi tive to mild organic or inorganic pollution.
From a consideration of the results of the above field studies and the change in the fauna of the Rock River and Lake
Erie, it seems that within the genus Ath
ripsodes there is a wide variety of water
quality tolerances. The species A. errati
cus, erullus, menteius, and saccus are less
tolerant of pollution than are A. ancylus, cancellatus, tarsipunctatus, or transversas.
The distributions of the sponge feeding species A. alces, angustus, and resurgens are intimately linked to the water quality tolerances necessary for the survival of the
sponge.
Through associations of immature and adult stages and the development of spe cies-level identification keys, the museum
specimens that have been collected in con
junction with extensive water chemistry analysis, such as those studies reported by Roback27 and several recent investiga tors,69'
70 will be extremely useful in de
veloping annotations on biological indicator
organisms. The technique, used by Ro
back,27 of illustrating the frequency at which different genera appeared within a
particular range of water chemistry and
physical parameters will be a convenient form for data storage. This will particu
larly be the case when it is known how these specific abiotic parameters affect, and thus can be assigned to, organisms that have been identified at the species level. When data on an individual species are available over a wide range of conditions, a matrix
type of data arrangement that uses a multi variate analysis, such as canonical correla
tions, will be valuable in using information about water chemistry and biological agents in order to develop a predictive
model. A systems analysis approach that
employs biological, as well as physical and
chemical, data will be extremely useful in
examining the possible impacts of proposed actions on aquatic environments.
The macroinvertebrate benthic collec itons currently being made in the prepara tion of environmental impact statements are also potentially valuable to the devel
opment of workable annotations regarding water quality tolerances at the species
level. The most obvious aspect of the im
portance of the specimens used in prepar
ing these statements is that, in most studies
involving macroinvertebrates, water chem
istry parameters are measured, along with the benthos, at designated stations. De tailed substrate, vegetation, and geological information is also often combined in stud ies of potential sites of power plants, dams, or other major civil works activities. Be cause of the tremendous number of sam
ples taken in conjunction with environ
mental impact statements, the occurrence
of and frequencies at which species appear in certain chemical and physical ranges
might provide a great deal of useful in
formation in preparing annotations of wa
ter quality tolerances at the species level.
-Vol. 47, No. 1, January 1975 15
Resh and Unzicker
Unfortunately, these collected specimens, often referred to as voucher specimens, are
rarely deposited in either museum or major
university collections and are not available
for general use. Many consulting firms
have justified their practice of not main
taining specimens, because they feel either that the clients may prefer to keep all or
representative specimens themselves or that after the project has been completed, neither the client nor the consulting firms has any further use for the specimens. Even if collections are kept by the consult
ing firms, the chances are great that, with out the trained personnel necessary to
maintain them, the specimens will become desiccated or unusable in some other way and therefore be useless to future re
searchers.
The advantages of depositing collections at museums or major universities far out
weigh any of the possible disadvantages. The specimens would be available for fu ture studies of an area, and they may be
extremely valuable in assessing changes, such as is the case with the Lake Erie and
Rock River collections that were deposited at Ohio State University and the Illinois
Natural History Survey. When specimens are deposited at a museum that has trained curatorial personnel, their value as voucher
specimens may be more adequately in sured. A third advantage is that the taxo nomic expertise that most universities pos sess would be available to assist in the
major identification problems of the con
sulting firms. Therefore, a long-term co
operative effort of this nature might benefit both the impact statement specialists and the academic taxonomists.
It is not unfeasible to expect consulting firms to pay a fee for curatorial or taxo nomic assistance. In the long run, the overhead for voucher specimens mainte nance and the difficulty involved in locat
ing taxonomists and specialists would be reduced. These advantages would more than compensate for curatorial and taxo nomic assistance fees. For the taxonomists, not only would a cooperative effort with
consulting firms increase the size of the col
lections, but it would also result in speci
mens with more valuable information, thus
making each collection a component in the
development of a potential biological in
dicator organism.
In essence, the authors are suggesting greater cooperation between the consulting industry and academic personnel from
which both sides would benefit. The in formation compiled by the consulting firm
will greatly aid both the taxonomist and
ecologist in developing water quality cri teria that may serve to enhance the true
concept of an indicator organism, that is, an understanding of water quality toler ances at the species level.
There is a critical need for increased
support of investigations to develop iden tification keys and resolve basic life his
tory problems of aquatic macroinverte brates. It is also important that ecological agencies support the programs of taxono
mists by collecting data and producing publications. As is illustrated in Table I,
biologists are engaging in fruitless exer cise if they intend to make any decisions about indicator organisms by operating at the generic level of macroinvertebrate identifications.
The time and effort spent on identifying specimens' genus and in developing end less and often meaningless faunal lists for environmental impact statements should be shifted to associating immature and adult
aquatic insects and to developing identi fication keys. If this were done, the spe cies lists prepared in the future would not
merely be taxonomic exercises but valuable tools in the biological assessment of water
quality.
Acknowledgments
Credits. The authors would like to thank Warren U. Brigham, Philip W. Smith, Milton W. Sanderson, and Glenn B. Wig gins for reviewing the manuscript. Charles
Triplehorn and Wilson Britt provided speci mens from Put-in-Bay, Lake Erie, Ohio, for this study.
Authors. Vincent H. Resh, formerly with the Water Resources Laboratory, Univer
sity of Louisville, Ky., is assistant professor of biology, Department of Biology, Ball
16 Journal WPCF
Water Quality Monitoring
State University, Muncie, Ind. John D.
Unzicker is assistant taxonomist, Section of Faunistic Surveys and Insect Identification, Illinois Natural History Survey, Urbana, 111.
References
1. Environmental Protection Agency, "Biological Field and Laboratory Methods for Measur
ing the Quality of Surface Waters and
Effluents." EPA, Nati. Res. Center, Cin
cinnati, Ohio, EPA-670/4-73-001 (1973). 2. Wilhm, J. L., and Dorris, T. C, "Biological
Parameters for Water Quality Criteria."
Bioscience, 18, 477 (1968). 3. Cairns, J., Jr., et al., "The Sequential Com
parison Index: A Simplified Method for Non-Biologists to Estimate Relative Dif
ferences in Biological Diversity in Stream
Pollution Studies." Jour. Water Poll. Con
trol Fed., 40, 1607 (1968). 4. Goodnight, C. J., "The Use of Aquatic Macro
invertebrates as Indicators of Pollution." Trans. Amer. Micro. Soc, 92, 1 (1973).
5. Hurlburt, S. H., "The Nonconcept of Species Diversity: A Critique and Alternative Pa rameters." Ecology, 52, 577 (1971).
6. Pielou, E. C, "The Measurement of Diversity in Different Types of Biological Collec tions." Jour. Theoret. Biol., 13, 131
(1966). 7. Gaufin, R. F., and Tarzwell, C. M., "Aquatic
Invertebrates as Indicators of Stream Pol
lution." Pub. Health Repts., 67, 57
(1952). 8. Gaufin, A. R., "Environmental Requirements
of Plecoptera." In "Biological Problems in
Water Pollution. Third Seminar, 1962." C. M. Tarzwell [Ed.], U. S. Dept. of
Health, Educ, and Welfare, Robert A. Taft
Sanitary Engineering Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, 105 (1962).
9. Patrick, R., "Diatoms as Indicators of Changes in Environmental Conditions." In "Bio
logical Problems in Water Pollution. Third
Seminar, 1962." C. M. Tarzwell [Ed.], U. S. Dept. of Health, Educ, and Welfare, Robert A. Taft Sanitary Engineering Cen
ter, Cincinnati, Ohio, 71 (1957). 10. Bartsch, A. F., and Ingram, W. M., "Biologi
cal Analysis of Water Pollution in North
America." Verh. Internati. Verein. Limnol.,
16,786 (1966). 11. Thomas, W. A., et al, "Biological Indicators
of Environmental Quality?A Bibliography of Abstracts." Ann Arbor Science Pub
lishers Inc., Ann Arbor, Mich. ( 1973 ). 12. Sladecek, V., "System of Water Quality from
the Biological Point of View." Ergenbisse der Limnologie, 7, 1 (1973).
13. Beck, W. M., Jr., "Suggested Methods for Re
porting Biotic Data." Sew. ir Ind. Wastes, 27, 1193 (1955).
14. Patrick, R., "A Proposed Biological Measure
of Stream Conditions, Based on a Survey of the Conestoga Basin, Lancaster County,
Pennsylvania." Proc. Acad. Nat. Sei. Phila
delphia, 101, 277 (1949). 15. Goodnight, C. J., and Whitley, L. S., "Oli
gochaetes as Indicators of Pollution." Proc.
15th Ind. Waste Conf., Purdue Univ. Eng.
Bull, 106, 139 (1960). 16. Richardson, R. E., "The Bottom Fauna of the
Middle Illinois River, 1913-1925." Bull
III Nat. Hist. Surv., 17, 387 (1928). 17. Brundin, L., "Chironomiden und Andere Bo
dentiere der S?dschwedischen Urgebirgs seen." Institute of Freshwater Res., Drott
ringholm Report. No. 30 (1949). 18. Thienemann, A., "Chironomus." Die Bin
negngewasser, Stuttgart ( 1954 ). 19. Paine, G. H., Jr., and Gaufin, A. R., "Aquatic
D?ptera as Indicators of Pollution in a Mid western Stream." Ohio Jour. Sei., 56, 291
(1956). 20. Brinkhurst, R. O., "The Biology of the Tubi
ficidae in Relation to Pollution." In "Bio
logical Problems in Water Pollution. Third
Seminar, 1962." C. M. Tarzwell [Ed.], U. S. Dept. of Health, Educ, and Welfare, Robert A. Taft Sanitary Engineering Cen
ter, Cincinnati, Ohio, 57 (1965). 21. Curry, L. L., "A Survey of Environmental Re
quirements of the Midge (Diptera: Tendi
pedidae)." In "Biological Problems of Wa ter Pollution. Third Seminar, 1962." C.
M. Tarzwell [Ed.], U. S. Dept. of Health,
Educ, and Welfare, Robert A. Taft Sani
tary Engineering Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, 127 (1965).
22. Brinkhurst, R. O., and Jamieson, B. G. M., "Aquatic Oligochaeta of the World." Univ. of Toronto Press, Toronto, Ontario, Can.
(1971). 23. Eliassen, R., "Stream Pollution." Sei. Amer.,
186, 17 (1952). 24. Wiggins, G. B., "The Critical Problem of Sys
tematics in Stream Ecology." In "Orga nism-Substrate Relationships in Streams." K. W. Cummins et al. [Eds.], Pymatuning Symposia in Ecology, Spec. Publ. No. 4,
Pymatuning Lab. of Ecol., Univ. of Pitts
burgh, Pa. (1966). 25. Young, F. N., "Effects of Pollution in Natural
Associations of Water Beetles." Proc. 15th
Ind. Waste Conf., Purdue Univ. Eng. Bull, 160, 373 (1960).
26. Leonard, J, W., "Environmental Requirements of Ephemeroptera." In "Biological Prob
lems in Water Pollution. Third Seminar, 1962." C. M. Tarzwell [Ed.], U. S. Dept. of Health, Educ, and Welfare, Robert A.
Taft Sanitary Engineering Center, Cincin
nati, Ohio, 110 (1965). 27. Roback, S. S., "Environmental Requirements
of Trichoptera." In "Biological Problems
-Vol. 47, No. 1, January 1975 17
Resh and Unzicker
in Water Pollution. Third Seminar, 1962."
C. M. Tarzwell [Ed.], U. S. Dept. of Health,
Educ, and Welfare, Robert A. Taft Sani
tary Engineering Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, 118 (1965).
28. Sinclair, R. M., "Water Quality Requirements for Elmid Beetles with Larval and Adult Keys to Eastern Genera." Tenn. Stream
Poll. Control Board, Dept. Public Health, Nashville (1964).
29. Nebeker, A. V., and Lemke, A. E., "Prelimi
nary Studies on the Tolerance of Aquatic Insects to Heated Waters." Jour. Kans.
Entomol. Soc, 41, 413 (1968). 30. Wojtalik, T. A., and Waters, T. F., "Some
Effects of Heated Water on the Drift of
Two Species of Stream Invertebrates."
Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc, 99, 782 (1970). 31. Gaufin, R. F., and Hern, S., "Laboratory
Studies on Tolerance of Aquatic Insects to
Heated Waters." Jour. Kans. Entomol.
Soc, 44, 240 (1971). 32. Nebeker, A. V., "Effects of Water Tempera
ture on Nymphal Feeding Rate, Emergence and Longevity of the Stonefly Pteronarcys dorsata." Jour. Kans. Entomol. Soc, 44, 21
(1971). 33. Bell, H. L., and Nebeker, A. V., "Preliminary
Studies on the Tolerance of Aquatic In sects to Low pH." Jour. Kans. Entomol.
Soc, 42, 230 (1969). 34. Bell, H. L., "Effects of Low pH on the Sur
vival and Emergence of Aquatic Insects." Water Res. (G. B.), 5, 313 (1971).
35. Gaufin, R. F., and Gaufin, A. R., "The Effects of Low Oxygen Concentration on Stone flies." Proc Utah Acad. Sei., Arts, and
Letters, 38, 57 (1961). 36. Knight, A. W., and Gaufin, A. R., "Relative
Importance of Varying Oxygen Concentra
tion, Temperature, and Water Flow on the
Mechanical Activity and Survival of the
Plecoptera Nymph Pteronarcys californica
Newport." Proc Utah Acad. Sei., Arts, and
Letters, 41, 14 (1964). 37. Knight, A. W., and Gaufin, A. R., "Oxygen
Consumption of Several Species of Stone
flies (Plecoptera)." Jour. Insect Physiol., 12, 247 (1966).
38. Olson, T. A., and Rueger, M. E., "Relation
ship of Oxygen Requirements to Index
Organism Classification of Immature Aqua tic Insects." Jour. Water Poll. Control
Fed., 40, 188 (1968). 39. Rueger, M. E., et al., "Oxygen Requirements
of Benthic Insects as Determined by Mano metric and Polarographic Techniques."
Water Res. (G. B.), 3, 99 (1969).
40. Nebeker, A. V., "Effects of Low Oxygen Con centrations on Survival and Emergence of
Aquatic Invertebrates." Jour. Amer. Fish
Soc, 101,675 (1972).
41. Gaufin, A. R., "Water Quality Requirements of Aquatic Insects." Environmental Pro
tection Agency, Office of Research Devel
opment, EPA-660/3-73-004, 89 (1973). 42. Burton, D. T., et al, "Mortality Curves of
Bluegills (Lepomis macrochirus Rafinesque)
Simultaneously Exposed to Temperature and Zinc Stress." Trans. Amer. Fish Soc,
101,435 (1972). 43. Starrett, W. C, "A Survey of the Mussels
(Unionacea) of the Illinois River: A Pol
luted Stream." Bull III. Nat. Hist. Surv.,
30,267 (1972). 44. Larimore, R. W., and Smith, P. W., "The
Fishes of Champaign County, Illinois, as
Affected by 60 Years of Stream Changes." Bull. 111. Nat. Hist. Surv., 28, 299 (1963).
45. Resh, V. H., "Biology and Immature Stages of
Caddisflies of the Genus Athripsodes in Eastern North America." Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Louisville, Ky. (1973).
46. Ross, H. H., "The Caddis Flies, or Trichop tera, of Illinois." Bull. III. Nat. Hist. Surv.,
23, 1 (1944). 47. Milne, M. J., "The 'Metamorphotype Method*
in Trichoptera." Jour. New York Entomol
Soc, 46, 435 (1938). 48. Wiggins, G. B., "The Unusual Pupal Mandi
bles in the Caddisfly Family Phryganeidae (Trichoptera)." Can. Entomol, 92, 449
(1960). 49. Resh, V. H., "A Technique for Rearing Cad
disflies (Trichoptera)." Can. Entomol,
104, 1959 (1972). 50. Corbet, P. S., et al, "The Trichoptera of St.
Helen's Island, Montreal. I. The Species Present and Their Relative Abundance at
Light." Can. Entomol, 98, 1284 (1966). 51. Munroe, E. G., "Pest Trichoptera at Fort
Erie, Ontario." Can. Entomol, 83, 69
(1951). 52. Marshall, A. C, "A Qualitative and Quantita
tive Study of the Trichoptera of Western
Lake Erie (as Indicated by Trap Ma
terial)." Ann. Entomol. Soc. Amer., 32, 665 (1939).
53. Horwath, A. B., "Insects of Gibraltar Island
in Relation to Their Habitats." M.S. thesis, Ohio State Univ., Columbus (1964).
54. Britt, N. W., "Stratification of Western Lake
Erie in Summer of 1953. Effects on the
Hexaginea (Ephemeroptera) Population."
Ecology, 36,239 (1955). 55. Stuckey, R. L., "Changes of Vascular Aquatic
Flowering Plants During 70 Years in Put
in-Bay Harbor, Lake Erie, Ohio." Ohio
Jour. Sei., 71, 321 (1971). 56. Beeton, A. M., "Environmental Changes in
Lake Erie." Trans. Amer. Fish Soc, 90, 153 (1961).
57. Verduin, J., "Changes in Western Lake Erie
During the Period 1948-1962." Verh. In
ternad. Verein. Limnol 15, 639 (1964).
18 Journal WPCF
Water Quality Monitoring
58. Britt, N. W., et al, "Record Low Dissolved
Oxygen in the Island Area of Lake Erie."
Ohio Jour. Sei., 68, 175 (1967). 59. Krecker, F. H., "Caddis-worms as Agents in
Distribution of Fresh Water Sponges." Ohio Jour. Sei., 20, 355 (1920).
60. Clady, M. D., "The Use of Freshwater Sponge in Case Construction of Limnephilus Spe cies." Proc. Entomol Soc. Wash., 71, 98
(1969). 61. Jewell, M. E., "An Ecological Study of the
Freshwater Sponges of Northern Wiscon
sin." Ecol Monogr., 51, 461 (1935).
62. Mason, W. T., Jr., et al, "Macroinvertebrate
Collections and Water Quality Monitoring in the Ohio River Basin 1963-67." Coop.
Rept., Ohio Basin Region and Analytical
Quality Control Office, Environmental Pro tection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio (1971).
63. Roback, S. S., "The Genus Xenochironomus
Kieffer, Taxonomy and Immature Stages/' Trans. Amer. Entomol Soc, 88, 235
(1963). 64. Roback, S. S., "Insects Associated with the
Sponge Spongilla fragilis in the Savannah River." Notulae Nat., No. 412, 1 (1968).
65. Brown, H. P., "The Life History of Climacia areolaris (Hagen), a Neuropterous 'Para site* of Fresh Water Sponges." Amer.
Midi Nat., 47, 130 (1952). 66. Lehmkuhl, D. M., "A North American Tri
choptera Larva Which Feeds an Freshwater
Sponges (Trichoptera; Leptoceridae; Pori
fera; Spongillidae )." Amer. Midi Nat., 84, 278 (1970).
67. Smith, P. W., "Illinois Streams: A Classifica tion Based on Their Fishes and an Analysis of Factors Responsible for Disappearance of Native Species/' III Nat. Hist. Surv. Bull Notes, No. 76, 1 (1971).
68. Scott, K. M. F., "Some Notes on the Tri
choptera of Standing Waters in Africa, Mainlv South of the Zambezi." Hydrobiol, 35, 177 (1970).
69. Hilsenhoff, W. L., et al, "Aquatic Insects of the Pine-Popple River, Wisconsin." Wis.
Dept. Nat. Res. Tech. Bull, No. 54, 1
(1972). 70. Krumholz, L. A., and Neff, S. E., "A Pre
liminary Ecological Study of Areas to be
Impounded in the Salt River Basin of Ken
tucky." Water Res. Institute, Res. Rept., No. 43, Univ. of Kentucky (1972).
-Vol. 47, No. 1, January 1975 19