6

WEAK FROM START.Wheat Sags Under the Influ-

ence of Great Selling'

Pressure.

Villard Says the Dakota Crop

Has Not Begun toMove Yet.

Wall Street Nobly ResistsHammering Operations

of Bears.

Heavy Drives at Values to

Uncover Some LargeOrders.

Chicago. Jan. 16.—The wheat market wasagain weak, not immediately at the opening,but within a minute or so thereafter. As

soon as the trading was fairlyunder way theselling pressure once more began tohave itsnatural effect, and the most prominent oper-ator on the decline and in favor of it wasPardridge. St. Louis also piled the wires•Willibear dispatches and selling orders, andeven some of those who have been firm

adherents of the short crop theory were to-day expressing themselves as doubtful of thereliabilityof the government estimates, uponWhich they had been previously relying to

prove the scarcity upon which they formerly

based their purchases of wheat. Therewere still many left, however, who pinnedtheir faith to the government .fig-

ures on the ground that however much they

had teen criticized in former years, they hadalways been found in the end substantiallycorrect, and that the last crop would proveno exception to the record already earned bythe agricultural bureau. The story of the25,000.000 bu crop of the state of Washingtonwas once more brought into prominence bya dispatch wired from New York giving auaccount ol an interview withHenry Villard,

of the Northern Pacific. The railroad man.according to the dispatch, repeated the stoiyof acres of ground in the vicinityof the rail-way stations in Washington piled forty feethigh with bags of wheat. Mr. Villardwasalso reported as saying that theDakota crop had scarcely commencedto move yet. The price of Maywheat was started at IWVsC. or thesame price as it closed yesterday afternoon,but soon weakened and declined tic. Aftera short period ofhesitation «s to its furthercourse ii de< lined to 95c, withvery triflingreactions on the line, here was a recov-ery totvtuc from the report that the Westing-house financial troubles had culminated intheir failure. There was another break to

95c and ibis was followed by a reaction to

95*C, Cables were easier, silver was lower,the cold wave promised for to-day's weatherin the winter wheat region was delayed enroute and ihe confidence of the bents had evi-dently-increased inan equal ratiowith tin waning courage of the bulls. The recovery fromthe low point was occasioned by the re-ported inking for export to Bordeaux of50,000 bushels. A line of steamers tradingfrom Newport News was also reported asbeing under contract for the carrying of150.000 barrels of Hour to London, Liverpooland Glasgow. The corn market was weakand uinde a further decline of Vac. Tradingwas fairlyactive, but was local in character,and most of it was confined to scalpingagainst privileges. Oats developed additionalweakness on the Strength of heavy receipts,lightshipments and the slump in tne oiliermarkets. The trade was fairly active. Hutch-inson led the buying aud Tuttle the selling,which was mostly scattered. There was alair amount of activity in theprovision circle;and at the start the compar-atively moderate receipts of hogs, togetherwith an improvement of from 5c to iOc inthe price us reported from the stockyardsearly in the day, was the cause of a slightimprovement in prices at the commencementof trading. There was a later dispatch not-ing the loss of the early advance in the priceofhogs, and the provision market followedsuit. The packers were the sellers, and thehard spot which the early firmness ofthehog market produced; but at the declinewhich followed. Armour was credited withgivingsome support to prices bybuyingribsthrough Kolossou.

The leadiug fututes ranged as follows:• Open- High- Low- cios-

Articles. ing. est. est. ing.

No. 2 Wheat:January 89% 89% 88% 89%May 96 90% 95 95%July 91 91% 90t& 91

No. 2 Corn:.January ,48% 48% 48% 48February 49 49 48% 48%May 51% 517* 51% 51Vi

No. 2 Oats:January 42% 42% 42 42%May 45% 45% 44% 44%June 44% 44% 43% 44%

Mess Pork:January 10 40 10 40 10 30 10 30February 10 45 . 10 45 10 35 10 35May... 1100 1100 10 82% 10 87%

Lard:January 5 82% 5 82% 580 580February 5 87% 5 87% 5 82% 5 82%May 630 630 6 22% 625

Bhort Ribs:January 500 500 500 500February.....; 5 02% 5 02%May 550 550 5 42% 542

Cash quota were as follows: Floursteady and unchanged. Wheat— No. 2spring,89%c; No. 3 spring. 85@x8c; No. 2, red, 91%®92c. Corn—No. 2, 47ftc Oats—No. 2, 42%©42%c. Rye—No. 2, 70ft@71c. Barley—No. 2,nominal. Flaxseed— No.1. $1.19%. TimothySeed— Prime,$1.26@1.27. Pork—Mess, per bid..$10.2c@10.30. Lard— Per 100 lbs. $5.80. ShortRibs—bides, loose, $4.80@5. Dry Salted Shoul-ders—Boxed, $4.20@4.25. Short Clear Sides-Boxed, $5.2C@5.30. Whisky— Distillers' fin-ished goods, per gal, $1.14. Sugarsunchanged. Oats— 2 white, 45ftc; No. 3white, 42%@43c. Bar.'ey—No. 3, f.o.b., 67®70c:No. 4,i.o. b..63c. Receipts— Flour, 10.---000 bbls; wheat, 23,000 bu; com, 59.000 bu;oats, 128,000 bu; rye 10-000 bu;barley, 43,000bu. Shipments— Flour, 13,000 bUs; wheat.29,000 bu; corn, lOCOOO bu:oats. 128,000 bu:rye, 8,000 bu; barley, 18,000 bu. On the prod-duce exchange to-day the butter market wasdull and unchanged. Eggs firm at 21®23c.

R. M. NEWPORT & SON,INVESTMENT BANKERS,

Loan money on Improved property In St.I'aul and Minneapolis

At G Per Cent "Ou or Before.*'New Pioneer Press Building,St. Paul.

Ban kofMinneapolis Build'g,Minneapolis

Duluth Wheat.Duluth, Jan. 16.—Wheat was dull, and

declined lc in sympathy with weakness inother markets. Receipts were IS cars. Clos-ing quotations: January, 90ftc; May, 97ftc;No. 1hard. 90c; No.1northern, 86c; No.2northern, 82c.

Milwaukee Produce.Milwaukee, Jan. 16.—Flour quiet. Wheat

lower; No. 2 spring, on track, cash, 87@89c;May, 8!%c; No. 1 northern, 92c. Cornfirm: No. 3, on track, 48ft@49c. Oats dull:No. 2 white, on track, 45@15%c. Barley firm:No. 2, Instore, 67%c. Rye quieter; No.1, inttore. 7'2%(&73c.Provisious easier. Pork— May,$10.65. Lard—May, $6.25. Receipts— Flour,2,600 bbls; wheat, 16,600 bu ;barley, 44.300 bu.Shipments— Flour. 300 bbls; wheat, 500 bu;barley. 5,000 bu.

Kew York Produce.New York,Jan. 16.— Receipts. 21,-

--216 pkgs; exports, 6,873 bbls, 17,971 sacks.Heavy, moderately active; sales, 19,200 bbls.

heat—Receipts. 31.200 bu: exports, 47,315bu; sales, 2,360,000 futures, 108,000 spot; spot

market lower, unsettled, closing firmer, mod-erately active; No. 2 red, $1.04% elevator,$l.l'G%l<£l.oi;% afloat, $1.05%@1.07% f.o. b.;No. 3 red. 99ftc(&$l; ungraded red, 99%c@$1,067*; No. 1Northern, $1.10%; No. 1 hard,$1.14%; options sold down %@%c and

Closed weak, especially on late months,which were affected by crop news, but thegeneral situation is upset by fear ofthe effects of silver legislation; No. 2red. Jamary, 51.04-%<%1.05, closing at$1.05; February, $1.C5%@1.05%. clos-ing at $1.05%: March, $1.05@1.05%, closingat $1.05%; May, $1.03 3-16®1.04ft, closingat $1.03%; June, closing at $1.01%; July,07%(&98ftc. closing at 977*0:August, 95%@90%c, closing at 95% c; December, 97ft@98%c, closing at 97ftc. Rye steady, quiet;Western, 76@80c. Barley firm, fairly active.Barley malt easy, quiet. Corn—Receipts,27,9p50du; exports, 2,429 bu; sales, 1,200,000bu futures, 84,000 bu spot; spot marketlower, moderately active, closing steady; No.. 2, si.i&sy%c elevator; 00%®60%c afloat; un-graded mixed, 50®(ilc; steamer mixed, 59®B0%c; No.3, 58%@59c; options declined %®%c and were freely offered, especially May,closing steady; January, 59-\b.@s9%c, closingat 59%c: Felruary, 'sß%, closing at 58%c;May, 68%p@58%c. closing atsS%c.

LiverpoolMarket.Liverpool, Jan. 16 —Wheat quiet; holders

pffer moderately; California No. 1, 7s 9d@rs 9ftd per cental. The receipts of wheat for:"lie past three days were 75,000 centals, in-cluding16,000 American. Corn easy, demand

fair; mixed Western, ss6ftd per cental. Thereceipts of American corn for the past threedays were 44,700 centals. Americanfinest white and colored, 5s 6d per cwt. :-r:' v

FITZGERALD & SMITH,COMMISSION -:- MERCHANTS.• . (lain, Provisions, StocK»» •

Coffee and CottonBought, sold and carried on margins for fut-

tura delivery.

324 Jackson St., GiltillanBlock.Direct private ire to Chicago and New

York. -Members Chicago Board of Trade.Write us and we willmail you our Daily Mar-ket Letter.

WALL, STREKT RESISTS

The Ponderous Hammering ofthe Bears.

New York,Jan. 16.—1he stock market to-day was still less active, but on the whole,displayed a greater resistance to the ham-mering operations of the bears than yester-day, and, While most stocks are lower to-night, the losses are in most cases formsig-nilicant fractious, while a few material ad-vances were scored. The outlook for theday's operations seems to indicate that thesilver scare will not be of longduration.There was iv the afternoon a perceptibleeasing up in the foreign exchange markets,and the fears that gold would have tobe exported in the near future were allayedfor the present, the foreign buying of theforenoon also helping to bring about thisstate of feeling. he heavy drives of valueswere made with the special object cf uncov-ering some large orders which were believedtoexist, but the selling met a demand inthose stocks which completely foiled the at-tempt. Inthe early trading, after a generallyweak opening, New England and Chicago(Jus became strong features, and the strengthivthese properties with the marked demandfor foreign houses helped to rally tho listsharply before the close of the first hour.The foreigners, however, became dissatisfiedand the hammering operations were renewedwith vigor, and prices yielded all alougthe line. Missouri Pacific, the. Villards,Sugar Refineries and Lackawanna showingmost weakness. There was another drive atthe list in the afternoon, which forced pricesOff ttillfarther, aud at the lowest points de-clines from last night extending to 2 percentwere shown. The geueral list, however,was only slightly changed, and, with theeasier condition of foreign exchange, andme most pronounced ease in the money mar-ket, the shorts went in to cover in tlie lasthour with the result ofnearly wipingout thelosses. The industrials were prominent ivthe late rise, lead iv particular. The marketclosed active and strong at slightly underfirst prices. The finalchanges are generallyfor small losses, but the only marked de-clines were Wheeling & Lake Erie, 2: Sugar,

1%. and Union Pacific. 1 per cent, while leadis up 1%. and New England 2. The dealingsin railroad bonds were . still moderatebut the heaviness in stocks were communi-cated to this branch of the market, to-day.and most of the changes of note are in thedirection oflower figures. The transactionsreached for the day $1,906,000, out of whichAtchison incomes furnished $334,000: North-ern Pacific ss, $147,000, and Texas Pacific in-comes, $136,000. There were tew markedchanges, but Montana Central firsts lost 2at1.12. Government bonds have been dull andsteady. State bonds have been dull andwithout feature. Petroleum opened weakunder the pressure of a number of sellingorders from the West. In the afternoon aslight rally occurred, but later the marketsagged offand closed, steady. Pennsylvaniaoil,spot, opening, 74%c; highest, 74%c;low-er^. 7-lftc; closing. 74ftc: February option,opening, 72%c; highest, 72%c; lowest, 72%c;closing. 73%c. Lima oil, sales none. Totalsales, 82,000 bbls.

New York Money.

New York.Jan. 16.—Money on call easy,ranging from 2% to 3% per cent; last loan, 3.Prime mercantile paper, 6%. Sterling ex-change $4.84% forsixty-day bills and $4.87%for demand.

-Chicago Money.

CnicAGO. Jan. Money continued fairlyeasy at 6®7ier cent for both call and timeloans. Bank clearings, $13,336,000. NewYork exchange was easy at 15c discount.Sterling exchange firmat $4.84 for bills and$1.87 for sight drafts.

Merchants' National Bank !ST. PAUL, MINN.

Capital, - - $1,000,000Surplus &Undivided Profits, 600, 000

W. R.MERRIAM.President.C. H.BIGELOW, Vice PresidentF.A. SEYMOUR, Cashier.CEO. C. POWER, Asst. Cashier. -';;--<

DIRECTORS.W. S. Culbertson, D.R.Noyes,L.D.Hodge, E.N. Saunders,B. Beaupre, John L.Merriam,J. W. Bishop, A.B. Stickney,F.A. Sevmoun A.H. Wilder,E.F.Drake, W. R. Merriam,M.Auerbach, C. H. Bigelow.

STOCKS— CLOSING PKICES.New Yokk. Jan. 16.— .

Adams press.. 140 Ontario & West... 16ftAlton ATerre H. 29. Oregon Imp 24*4

dopfd ....120 Oregon Nay ..80Am. Express. ....ll2 North American.. 157&8., C. R. A N.... 22 Pacific Wail 33%Canad'n Pacific. 14% P.. D. AE....T... 16%Can. Southern... 50 Pittsburg...... 150Central Pacific... 30 Pullman P. Car.. 190Ches. &Ohio 18% Reading......;... 32%

do Ist pfd 47 Rock Island 69%do 2d pfd 31 Bt.L.&S.F.lst pfd. 68

Chi.&Alton 127 St. Pau1.... ....:. 54%C. B. &Q........ 91 do pfd ....UIODel. &Hudson... St. P., M. &M....104D., C. A W.......137% St. P. A Omaha.. 24 .D. &R.G........ 19% dopfd ......... 80East Tennessee.. 7% Term. C. &1 37%

do Istpfd 64 Texas Pacific. ... 15%do 2d pfd 17% Toi. &O. C. pfd.. 82

Erie :19% I'nion Pacific ... 45%do pfd 511,*! U. S. Express' .. 68

Fort Wayne .... .149 Wab., St. L.A P.. 10%Hocking Valley.. 27% do pfd. ....... 19%Houston & Tex.. 2 Wells-Fargo Ex..138Illinois Central. .lo2 Western Union ;..75%Kansas &Texas.: 12% Am. Cotton 0i1... 21Lake Erie A W...14% Colorado C0a1.... 36%

do pfd 55% Homestake..:.,.. 8%Lake Shore 107% IronSilver 120Louisville &N... 77% Ontario..... 42Louis. AN.A.... 23 O.uicksilver. 6%Memphis &C... 40 do pfd 38Michigan Cen.... 91 5utr0....... 8M.,L.S. A W.... 90 Bulwer. 15

do pfd 109-& R. &W.P. Ter... 18Mpls. &St. Louis. 6 Atchi50n......... 30%

do pfd liftU. P..D. &G....". 22%Mo.Pacific 65% D. &R. G. pfd... 62%Mobile &0hi0... 28 S. Pacific ... 23Nash. A Chat... 93 C. A. E. 11l...... 47N. J. Central.... 114 St. P. AD .'24%Nor.A vV.pfd... 56 Wis. Central..... 20%N. Pacific 27 Chicago Ga5..... 43%

dopfd 69% Lead Trust..:.... 20%Northwestern... lo6% Sugar Trust 78%

do pfd 135 C, a,C. &st. L.. 63N. Y. Central.... 102% Oregon S. L 19N.V.,C. A St. L.12% Great Nthn. pfd.. 75

do pfd.......... 62 R. G. Western. ... 27%Ohio & Miss 18% do pfd ........ 62%

dopfd 85 . '

BONDS— PRICES.

U. S. 4s reg 120 M.K.&T.«.55... 40do 4s coup 120 Mut.Union 65....101 :. do4ftsreg 103 . N. J. int.ctfs.... lo9ftdo c0up....103 N.Pacific 15t5.... 114%

Pacific 66 of *95 .110 do 205.... 112%La. stamped .91 N.W.consols.... 140 •

Term.new set. 6s.lolft do deb. 55.....106%do do ss. 99 St. L.AI.M.G.5s. 92do do 3st 69% St. L.&S.F. G.M.108

Can. South'n2ds. 97% St. Paul consols..l23ftCen. Pac. 15t5.... 107% St.P.. C.AP.lsts.ll3 -\u25a0•

D &R.O.Ists....116 T.P. L.G. T.R.. 88%.dodo 4s ..... 81% T. P. R. G.T. R.. 34

Erie 2ds 98V? Union Pac. Ists. 108%M. K.AT.G.65.. 76% West Shore .. 101ft

BANK OF MINNESOTAST. PAUL, MINN.

CAPITAL,- - $600,000

Profits and Surplus, $200,000WiR. DAWSON, President.HOBT. A.SMITH,VicePre*'UJM. DAWSON JR., Cashier.KOJBT. L.lUIL.LKK,A«*>t Cashier.

DIRECTORS :

Wm. Dawson, P.Siems,P. S.Harris, E.Mannheimer,Thomas Grace, Lewis Baker,Dennis Ryan, E. W. PeeLR. A.Smith. Arnold Kalman,Mark Costello. P. J. Bowlin,D.Schutte. C. W. Copley,A.B. Stickney, A.Oppenheim,

Wm. Dawson Jr.

GERMANIA BANK.--(STATE bank.)

PAID UP CAPITAL, - -$400,000

Surplus and undivided profits, 855,000.11. li.Strait, William Bickel,'

President. Cashier.

LOCALMARKETS.

St. Paul.Wheat weakened a little, while \corn and

oats remained unchanged. Barley and ryewere quiet. Hay steady and very quiet at

quotations. Flaxseed dropped to 81.10©'1.12. The call: .

Wheat-No. 1hard, 90@01c: No. 1north-ern, 89c; No. 2 northern, 86®87c.

- . .•\u25a0 :Corn— 3, 46@48c. : '' -:

Oats—No. 2 mixed,40c ;No.2 white,42% c;No. 3. 41V&C. . \u25a0

Barley—No.2, 63c;No. 3, ps3©6oc.Rye-No. 2, 6C®6lc.Ground Feed— No. 1, $20@20.50.Cornmeal— Unbolted, 819.50/

'Bran— Sl4.ps«ffils.Hay—No. 1 upland prairie, 87; No. 1. $3;

timothy, $8@8.50.Flaxseed— sl.l2©l.l4.

-Potatoes— Straight. 75@80c; mixed, 65@70c.Dressed Hogs— |3.£n@4 asked.

St. Paul Produce.Butter—Creamery

'Ist. 23(3253: creamer

2d. 2C@22e; dairy Ist. 18@20c;-

dairy 2d, 14©16c; packing stock, 7@l2c. '\u25a0.'\u25a0\u25a0••:•- .

Cheese— Full cream, 10@llc asked;skimmed. iifissc.

Eggs— Fresh, $C@6.30; ice house, $5.40. \u25a0

Maple Sugar— B@loc. \u25a0-'\u25a0'-.Maple Syrup—Per gallon, 51.15@1.25.Honey— Slow at quotations: fine white new

clover,18@20c; buckwheat, 10@llc.Malt—Per bushel, 75@80c.Oranges— s3.sC@4." , -Lemons— Faucy, s3@4.Nuts—Pecans, Texas polished, medium to

large, B@loc per lb;almonds, Tarragonas,17c: California soft-shelled, 18c; filberts,Sicily.12c; walnuts, new California, 12@15c:cocoanuts, $6 per 100: hickory nuts, $1.50 perbushel shellbarks, $1.75@1.85 per bushel ;Brazils, 10@12c: peanuts. Virginia hand-picked, SV'2c; roasted. 10%c.

Dates— Persians, 7@Bc; in mats, 5%c; figs,new, 12@15c. : . .

Cider— Michigan, 16-gal kegs, $4.50per keg; choice refined, 16-gal kegs, $5;choice refined. 32-gal bbls, $B<§i> per bbl.

Poultry—Dressed— Turkeys. ll@12c; chick-ens, B<§l9c:ducks and geese, 9@loc.

Veal-$4p@5.50.Rabbits— 60c.Jack Rabbits— s3.Sweet Potatoes-Illinois, $5.Apples—Fancy, $6@6.p50; standards, $5®

5.50; choice. 91.75@4. -\u25a0..-. -' 'Onions— New, 99c@$l per bu.

- .-_Carrots

—lC'@soc per bu.

Celery—2sc. "•"-Cabbage— s7©lo per ton.Pears-$3@3.50. \u25a0 -...-.Cranberries— Bell and bugle, $10@12; bell

and cherry, $B©9 per bbl; Cape Cod, $10@12per bbl. . :"_']';y:y,

MINNEAPOLIS MARKETS.

Chamber of Commerce.Wheat was lower again, In sympathy with

easy cables, lower corn, oats and provisionmarkets at other places. The amount of bus-iness transacted was fair.as there were manylines that needed some adjustment to bringihemjnto harmony with the lower condi-tions that trading Mas scaled down to. Thecountry movement of wheat was 'not large,but there continues to arrive here a quantityquite above the amount that many hadlooked for ivJanuary. That had adepiessingeffect on values, and the claim by millersthat spot wheat had been worked up toohigh for the sale offlour did not encouragethe purchase of futures, except at a decline.Clearances to-day at New Yorkincluded 27,---315 bu wheat and 24,844 pks flour. There wasa small show ofstrength in futures just afterthe opening, but it had no solidity and themarket average wellbelow Thursday's pricesall day. The few fluctuations were spiritlessto the* end. Total receipts at the four prin-cipal spring wheat points since Aug.1, thebeginning of the crop year foot up, Minneap-olis, 30,742,451 bu; Duluth, 10,804,187 bu; Chi-cago, 10,145,404 bu; Milwaukee, 4,317,372 ou,making a total of 56,009, 414 bu, against 64.---056.126 bu during the same time last year and40,072,946 bu in 1889. The total receipts ofwheat at the four, principal winterwheat points, Toiedo, St. Louis, De-troit and Kansas City fromJuly 1to date are20,482 887 bu, against 23.287,772 bu in 1890 and25,046,745 bnin1889. Local flour shipmentssince Jan. 1amount ti242,202 bbls. against347,673 bbls during the same time in 1890 and142,690 bbls in1889. The receipts at the fourprincipalspring wheat points were: Minne-apolis, 169,330 bu; Duluth, 7,320 bu; Chicago,23,012 bu; Milwaukee, 12,650 bu; total. 212.312bu, against 170,026 bu last year. Cars in-spected out since last report. were 4 No.1hard ;No.1northern, 73 cars; No. 2 northern.15 ears; No. 3northern, 12 cars; rejected, 7cars; no grade. 6cars. Combined receipts atMinneapolis and Duluth for,24 hours, 305cars, against 207 cars a year ago. Flour ship-ments were 19,352 bbls.

CASH WHEAT.The demand forcars of wheat on track and

to be delivered was enough to take all the :good wheat to go to mills. Prices wereagain closer to the price of futures, whichcut offdemand from elevator companies tosome extent. They bought the day before ata spread of3c, while the dealers paid within2%c of May. A year ago the difference wasfrom l@2%c. Arrivals are as free yet as- could be ex-pected and the large movemeut Iis caused; tosome extent, by the favorable cash prices ascompared with the differencc^between themand Maynow and a month ago when some-of it was Lought. Wheat closed: No. 1hard,Jauuary, 90%c; on track, 91c. No. 1 north-ern,. January, 88%c; February, 89c; May,92V2C ;on track, 89c: No. 2 northern, Janu-ary, 76c; on track, 86®87c.

FLOUIt ANDCOARSE GRAINS.Flour—The added dailyoutput of the mills

grindingto-day will probably aggregate 17,---600 bbls. Shipments, 19,352 bbls. Quoted at84.p55@4.90 for first patents ;84.30@4.50 forsec-ond patents; 83.60@4.10 for fancy and exportbakers; $1.89@2.10 forlow grades inbags, in-cluding red dog. Although the local millsdid notpush production for the last weak,and are not pushing itnow, the demand .forHour is not more than equal to the output,even after counting in such movement as goesto the fillingof oldbusiness. The wheat mar-ket has been soft this week, and the possibil-ityof a decline in flour has been a "wetblanket" to the market, or to the demand forpatent flour. Probably the dailysales thisweek have not averaged more tnan 10.000

bbls, with aproduction onlya littleless thanhalf that. The surplus is all of the uppergraoe, or nearly so. Prices are steady, buteasy. ._'_-'

Bran and Shorts— Shipments, 781 tons.Quoted at $15.25@15.50 for bran. $15.25@15.50forshorts, and $15.75@10.25 for middlings.

Corn— Receipts, 6.710 bu; shipments, none.Quoted at 46@48c on track.

Receipts. 3,690 bu: shipments, 5,400bu. Quoted at 40@43c by sample.

Rye—Receipts, none; shipments, none;quoted at 50©61cforsample cars on track.

Barley—Receipts. 1,200 bu; shipmeuts, 1,200bu;quoted at 55@60c for good to fine sam-ples ofNo. 3.

Flax—Receipts, 1,000; shipments, none.Flax sales are based on 8c off from the Chi-cago quotations.

Feed— Millers held at $20@20.r50, withcornmeal at $19@20.

Hay—Receipts, 82 tons: shipments, none;choice wildquoted at 56.50@7, and good tim-othy at $8.25; fair wild, 85.50@6.p50. The haymarket was dull, and some parties havingmuch to sell were about discouraged with itbefore the close. -\u25a0'

'

ST. PAUL UNION STOCK YARDSSOUTH ST. PAUL.

The Yards and Packing Houses Open forBusiness.

Read/- Cash Market for Hogs.

Chicago.Chicago, Jan. Cattle— Receipts, 11,000;

shipments, 3,000; market strong; steers,prime, $5®510: export steers, $5.t5®5.35;common to choice steers, $3.25®4.75; stock-ers, $2©3.25. Hogs— Receipts, 30.000; ship-ments, 8,000: market a shade lower; roughand common, $3.35@3.50; prime mixed andpackers, $3. 65@3.75: light,$3.70@3. 75. SheepReceipts, 5,000;. shipments. 3,000; marketslow, lower; natives, $4@1.75; Westerns,$4.90@5.05; Texans, $4.40@4,75; lambs, $5@6.

Kansas City.Kansas City. Mo., Jan. 16. -Cattle—

ceipts, 3.850: shipments. 1,480. The marketwas steady to strong; steers, $3. 1.90; cows,$1.75@3.50; stockers and feeders, 82.25@3.50.Hogs— Receipts, 12,500; shipments. 3,280.The market was 5c higher; bulk, $3.30@3.50;

:all grades, 83@3.60. >heep— Receipts, 1,180;shipments, 460 head. The market was steadyand unchanged.

Dry Goods.. New York,Jan. 16. There was no changeinthe dry goods ;market. Demand was of amoderate conservative character, but agentskeep wellahead onorders. Prices are steady,and few changes are looked for.\u25a0 There wasno new feature to the market. ;

HELENA,MONTANA,

AS A PLACE TO INVEST MONEY.. The enormous amount of funds Invested bythe citizens of Helena in miningenterprises,induced by

" the abnormally large profits,arising therefrom, \u25a0 leaves open \u25a0 for Eastern =capital exceptional opportunities, in realestate and building investments, which,while absolutely safe, yieldincomes rangingfrom fifteen to fiftyper cent annually. RealEstate is constantly on the advance in valueas the result of an output of wealth un-equaled in the history of the world.

Eastern incomes based upon 5 aud 6 percent investments may be largely augmentedwithout risk,.by shilling the principal to alocality offering wider opportunities. -/ y-

/. visit to He'ena willdemonstrate the-truth of this statement and convert themost incredulous." .;""."'.

For fullInformation, addressL.iG» PHELPS, Secy Citizens Committee,

Helena, Montana.

NOTICEOf Expiration of Period ofr Redemption ;

From Tax Safe.State op Minnesota. County of Ramsey, )

.'\u25a0• -; - Office of County AuDiTon, v

St. Paul. Jan. 13lh, 1891.-\u25a0\u25a0' Public notice is hereby given,' as :requiredby chapter 194, General Laws of 18S5, thateach . piece or parcel of :the \u25a0 real propertyhereinafter described was sold at the tax saleMay 7,1888. pursuant to the real estate taxjudgment entered in the District Court intheCounty of Ramsey on the 14th day of April,I^BB.in proceedings to enforce the paymentof taxes remaining delinquent upou real es-tate on the first Monday of January, 1888.for the taxes of 1886, and the penalties 1 andcosts accrued thereon; and that the period ofredemption ot said real property from saidsale will expire May 7,1891, under the pro-visions of the General Tax Laws of.1878,and the amendments thereto :and the amountextended opposite each ;description is theamount which will be required to redeemsuch description from-said sale on.May 7,1891, including twenty-five (25) cents forpublishing this notice. The real propertyabove referred to is described as follows :

FIRST WARD, CITY OF ST. PAUL.

. _< a Amount.. :S o :requiredNames of Owners or .to : £to redeem

Whom Assessed. Subdivis- : :—

ion of Section, Lot or ' : .t) QBlock. : ,:• -

S. I:I' 3 f--..-./.. i .;. to .

Ashton and Sherburne's Ad--dition to St. Paul—

-«..a,„

J. Ashton .;'..... .H&12 17 849.17do .".- ...-13 17 28.10

C. Wool w0rth........... 14&15 19 77.2H

SECOND WARD, CITY OF ST. PAUL.

t. W Amount*So required

Names of Owners or to : &toredeemWhom Assessed. Subdivis- : .:

——-iou of Section, Lot or : : O QBlock.

- . : c a: : 8

'?I. ED .St. Paul Proper— „ m

- _,J. W.Bass, Esft of... ... 3 3 863.59A.R. Capehart, S 5-6 of. ... 14 4 304.2 1

do Viof N Vi' -

01,OQ

of .... 15&16 4 317.88do Commencing

79 ft W from theSW corner of Fifthand Jackson streets;thence S parallel withJackson street 50 ft:thence W\u25a0

- parallelwith Fifth street 31

\u25a0': ft: thence N parallelwith Jackson street50 ft: thence E 31 ftto beginning, beingpart of (less W'7 ft '\u25a0:• -? \u25a0"- '„to city)....::. .-.: 2 17 201.32

Robert and Randall's Ad-dition to St. Paul—

M.1).Miller,E of Randall's1ine0f..... :5 2 287.97

Ellen Fahev, WVi of .... 4 3 44.'28A. Peterson, E35 ft0f...... 5 15 122.37C. Woolworth... ... ...... 4 20 153.45

do-

9,20 566.74Fletcher's Subdivision of• Brewster's Addition to St.

Paul—- .„„.

TimW00d5.... .....2 7 19.74

THIRD WARD, CITY OF ST. PAUL.

•E* W AmountS o required

Names of Owners or to : £- toredeem. Whom Assessed— Subdi- : .vision of Section, Lot or '- : O £810-jk. : : .S. \u25a0 a"

I\u25a0 Pro••m •.. . ut

Rice &Irvine's Addition to•:.-;\u25a0\u25a0 St. Paul—

'

A.R.Capehart ............. 8 23 $114.18R. A.Smith 9 45 49.85Butman's Addition to St. •

."t;Paul— -'.-'\u25a0-J. G. Freeman, southwest-

erly 50 feet (except Dris-_

/£•, coll's land) of ......'.v.... .. 1 215.42• Given under my hand and official seal this13th day ofJanuary, 1891.» [Seal.] .' \u25a0•.-; ..M.F.KAIN,

County Auditor 0f Ramsey County.

State op Minnesota, County of Ramsey, JOfficeop County Auditor. >-.•

;,:.'•• St. Paul, Jan. 13, 1891. ),Public notice is hereby given, as requiredby Chapter 191, General Laws of .1885, thateach piece or parcel, of the real propertyhereinafter described was sold at the tax sale ;May 8,1888, pursuant to the real estate tax ;

judgment entered inthe District Court in theCounty of Ramsey, on the 14th day of April,

1888. in proceedings to enforce the paymentof taxes remaining •delinquent upon realestate on the firstMonday of January, 188S,for the taxes of 1886 and the penalties .andcosts accrued thereou, and that the period ofredemption of said real property fromsaidsale willexpire May 8,1891, under the pro-visions of the General Tax Laws of 1878,and the amendments thereto, and the amountextended opposite each description .is theamount which will be required to redeemsuch description from said sale on May 8,18iH, including twenty-five (25) cents forpublishing this notice. .' The real propertyabove referred tois described as follows:

FOUR WARD, CITY OF ST, PAUL.•• f g AmountSo required

Names of Owners or to \ %to redeemWhom Assessed, Subdivis- • . — —lon of Section, Lot or • : .O oBlock. : : g. a

:'• B ?I I IB I

Dayton and Irvine's Ad-dition to St. Paul-

Susan Roche. ...........:... 5 73 $101.89Elfelt, Bernheimer and Ar-

nold's Addition to St. .. . ..Paul— , „

John Ca5pair. .........:.... 10 10 20.59H. M.Ranney's Subdivision

of Block11,Stinson's Di-vision of NW Vt of Sec-tion 30, Town 29, Range23

Anthony80ck....... .. 1' 2 49.67Subdivision of Block 13 of

Sliuson's Division ofNW Vi of Section 36,Town 29, Range 23—

Rachel Zah0nyi.......'...... 23 1 77.15Robertson and Van Etten's

Addition to St. Paul—W.D.Cornish 3 4 22.47Jay F.Lyon 8 4 19.74Nininger's Addition to St.

Paul—Wm. Koenig 8 6 73.55D.McDonnell.... ..' ...23 9 32.40Mackubin and Marshall's

Addition to St. Paul—"

Chas. N. Woodward ...... 19 20 72.42M. McNamee ........10 25 69.40Leeches Addition to St. r ;y'\u25a0 y--

Paul—H.Greve •....:..:.......".. 6 8 242.85Selbv. McClung and Van

Meter's Addition to St.Paul-£#rrrMfMMHßHlßWwilkl iliill

L.J.Ramoher... .:..26 1 148.76E. J. 5herbr00k...... ........ 27 1 114.83S. B. Mahan, W% 0f..:....32 1 26.98

do .:..i.......... 33 1 77.09do .:.... ...r.....34 1 102.61

Whitacre, Brisbine and Mul- \len's Subdivision of Lots1and 2,Leeches Out Lots

-S. D.Lord, Not Pleasant ay- '. enue ................ 13&14 .. 30.82M.L. Johns, less street...... 15 .. 10.22

do do ....16 '.. 34.35E.F.Drake. ...56 .. 22.67J. D.McKenty ........... .58 .. 48.85. do ........59 .. 48.87Ewing and Chute's Subdi-

visionof E %ofSW ik and. W.% of SE % of Lot 4,

Leeches Out Lots—P. J. Sraitz ................. 2 -.. 47.12

do less street ......15 .. 193.22Winslow's Addition to St.

Paul—E. Haegerty et al,E%0f.... 1 6 47.56MaryHaggerty, W % 0f..... 1 6 42.68E Haegertyetal'.:' ....22 6 148.72Wm.Manning...:.:......... 1 7 : 913.92Hush Murnane, E% of ...12 18 25.20E. Whaleu, W% of......... 4 21 46.33

do E%0f.....:..., 5 21 57.71Whitacre, Turner and Lep-

per'B Subdivision of Block1,Willis' Additiou to :St.

;Paul—W.K.Gaston ................ 8 .. 17.12:do .. ... :.....:.... 9 .. 14.37Kinnev,Bond and Trader's

Addition to St. Paul— .Ga5t0n:.......... .... 1 10 11.52

do ............... 7 10 11.52Thos. Daly's Subdivision of

Block 2, Stinson, Brown'. and Ramsey's Addition to

St. Paul-Frank E. Buchmeier 8 2 34.98-Saow& Doran ........ ....14' 2-33.42;: do ......13 2 : 33.42-

;do .15 2 .- ; 27.95do ....'..........18 2 .27.95do ;.... ........19 2 27.95

C. E. Matleson'. ..;::... ..... 31 2\u25a0 -v34.80A.Vance Brown's Subdivis-

ion of:,Block 4, Stinson,'

":::Brown and Ramsey's .Ad- •

dition to St. Paul—-

S.E.Dawson ........ ......10 4 11.52do ...29 4 11.52do .......'. :..:.. 31 4: 11.52do 32 4 11.52

'H.Greve.:.. :.-.•....;.....;.. 42 4: ;11.56E.Daw50n.;...... :...:...44 4 11.52

:-, do ..........;.... 45 41 11.58

FOU.ITH WARD, CITY OF ST. PAUL(Continued.)

:\u25a0 77 \u25a0' • 7- f W Amount2 5* required:

Names of Owners or to: *- to redeem,:Whom iAssessed. VSubdi- '\u25a0 :v "

.." —'\u25a0\u25a0-\u25a0 vision of Section, .Lot or '• . :: C 2

Block. . : 2. g'\u25a0 \u25a0 P a':\u25a0;>- \... \u25a0 \u25a0 \u25a0 : 1 3 :• ••...«\u25a0•'.

A.jVance Brown's Subdi-vision of£% of Block 13 ' - -

-."•...a.of '. Stinson. Brown and -/.--.I{Ramsey's Addition to St. .*»Piiul— ..'

' „K.Greve.Nof Fort street of 6 13 8 .Br>H.0G0rmau.... ...... ...24 13 27.9u

.Sloan's Subdivision of S %;\u25a0 of Block 15, Stinson,

"

Brown and Ramsey's Ad-dition to St. Paul— ''-.„'_

n. Greve, less R.R..... ...25 15 7.49Stinson. Brown :and: Ram-

sev's Additiou to Paul—-.Wm. Dawson...... ...17 23 .1.12M.A. Dames, less strip 50 ft

Trto city.....:•.:'.'. '...'.:. 21 28 4.68A>'. F. 8icke1...:..... ...25 28 25.20Ramsey &Dittman.und % of.1,28.. 1.93iij do .p, und%ot,7 28 1.93SH .: do"•-\u25a0•; und%of4 28 1.93

--. - \u25a0'{ do ! und %,».1e55R.R.,0f...............30 28 .1.26;Bauk of Miunesota et al,

'\u0084- ! und%of. .... ....35 23 1.93". \ do und %of .40 28 1.93::L ido und%of. ...47 28 -2.021 j do und % 0f.......... .49 28 1.93

r; . do und less R.R.0f.05 28 1.93do und % 0f..........50 28 2.07do und%of .52 23 1.93- ;do und%of 56 28 2.0/

Ramsey ADitlman.und 28 1.93Bank of Minnesota et al, I< 09 76-"- :. und Vi,less Ry, of J*:"\u25a0' ..:.."\u25a0

—.do und%ofw%ofs 29 1.61do uud%of... 8 29 1.93do uud %of 13 29 1.93. do und %of ...... .16 29 1.93

S.E.Dawson.... ......17 29 3.30Woodland Park—H.N.Jackson 8 2 39.33S.J.Lee. e% ....18 2 ,87.67-E. H. Biggs, n%of 1. 2and 3 12 135./ 8Kuhn's subdivision of block

5. Rondo's Addition to St.Paul—

M. Kuhn ..3 5 44.3/do :.......... 4 5 55.31

Smith'e Rearrangement andSubdivision of block 14,

,; and n Va of block 23. andsubdivision ofs Vaofblock21, and part of block 20and all of block 30. of .La-

_WfMfond's Addition to ;St.

Paul—Wm. Dawson 19 20 6.05

Irvine's Additiou to St.Paul-

Amanda Tumbnll, NofCar- - -rollstreetof 8 2 10.34

FIFTH WARD, CITY OF ST. PAUL.

ir M AmountSo required: £toredeem

Names of Owners or to \u25a0'•' •Whom Assessod— Subdi- *. : Sovisiou ofSection, Lot or

"; £; a

Block. • : p a'*...'! «d .Patterson's Addition to St.

Paul- .J. Towlerton. N 50 ft of E

50 ft of .....5 4 850.46Lyman Dayton's Addition .

to St. Paul—M.I.Etting. NEly 320 ft of 41 452.18De Bow, Smith. Risque and

Williams' Addition to St.Paul—

K.Davies... , ...11 9 14.2jGivenunder my hand and official seal this

231day ofJanuary, 18 Jl.LSeal.] M.F.KAIN,

County Auditor ofRamsey County.

State of Minnesota. County op Ramsey, IOfficeop County Auditor, V

I St Paul, Minn., Jan. 13th, 1891. )'JPublic notice is hereby given, as required

byChapter 194, General Laws of 1885. thateach piece orparcel of the real property here-inafter described was sold at the tax saleMay 9, 1883. pursuant to the real estate taxjudgment entered iv the District Court in the.Cou9tv of Ramsey ou the 14th day of April,IBSB. "inproceedings to enforce the paymentof taxes remaining delinquent upon real es-tate on the first Monday ofJanuary, 1888,for.the taxes ofISB6 ond the penalties and costsaccrued thereon, and that the period of re-demption of said real property from saidsale willexpire May 9, 1891, under the -pro-visions of the General Tax Laws of 1878 andthe amendments thereto; and the amountextended opposite each description Is theamount which will be required to redeemsuch description from said sale on May 9,1891, including twenty-five (25) cents forpublishing this notice. The real propertyabove referred to is described as follows:

SIXTH WARD, CITY OF ST. PAUL:1'

iy.:'. _ • t-1 tt Amount''. '; 2- o required

;. -7 g-to redeemNames of Owners or to: .

Whom Assessed, Subdi-' : O Q'vision of Section, Lot or: :\u25a0 ... £. aBlock. •.-. '. \u25a0

''\u25a0 -. p 5• • p-tI. re

West St.Paul Proper— .;\u25a0

S.D. Lord, mid 4-10 of 3 8209.47do 20 f of S 15 :

ftofmid % 0f... 8 20 1.70do mid 4-10 of W.

%of ........... 8 20 1.97do 10 ft of N %

pffywr of %of 8 20 3.90W.Smith... :-.......: 6 32 7.25

do ....... 7 32 11.68do 8 32 13.90

W. L.Woodbury 3100 44.74Woodbury &Case's Addition

to St Paul—H.Jagoe ..:..... 1 5 60.98Olivier's Addition toWest St.mmmpm^. PaulM.D. Wilkins 1 2 32,30-

do 2 2 29.42Henrietta Owens 1 11

- 49 24. 'do 2 11 94.31

do ............ 3 11 42.017 do ............ 4 11 42.03

Banning & Olivier's Addi-"

tion to West St. Paul-John W.Roche..... 33 83.16S.D.Lord;.'.. .. 2 60 8.40Philip Nugent, und %0f....12 97 2.72

do und % of 5,6 and 7 98 14.02

Hitchcock's Addition toWest St. Paul—

Mead& Rei11y........ ....... 1 1 82.67do 2 1 3.18do '.. 3 1 3.18d0..... 4 1 3.18do 5 1 3-18d0.... 6 1 3.18do .....8 1 3.18d0.........:............ 9 1 3.71d0............ ...10 1 3.71do 11 1 3.71do. 12 1 3.71d0........ : 2 2 3.18d0....... 3 2 3.18'•'•-•• d0............ ... 4 2 3.18d0.................. ...27 2 3.18do.. 28 2 3.18do:.. .....29 2 3.18d0.......... 30 2 2.40d0..... ...31 2 2.40d0........ 32 2 2.40do ........ ..' 2 4 2.40• d0........ ....:.. ..... 3 4 2.40do 4 4 2.40

-\u25a0\u25a0\u25a0 do ..................... 5 4 2.67do 15 4 3.71

•do 16 4 3.17d0....... .......17 4 2.67do :....... ......18 4 2.10d0... ........19 4 2.14

\u25a0v- -do 10 6 5.80--do ..........U 6 5.80

-«J \u25a0 ido... .............12 6 5.8):c; d0........ 13 6 5.80:' d0..... 14 6 5.807°•'; [d0.... ...15 6 5.80"'*,?.\u25a0'•} do .-.'. ..........16 6 5.80'">T

-do .....17 6 5.28"

1d0............. 18 6 5.28Hitchcock's :\u25a0: Addition toy.. West St. Paul-Mead*Reilly. ....... ......19 6 5.28

do \u25a0.- 20 6 5.28Tl do ...............21 6 5.28V\v 'do .22 6 5.28W.A. Leonard 11 7 8.41Mead&Reilly ........... 15 7 8.41>- do Id 7 .7.10

do .....:. 2 \u25a0 8* 2.67

do ................23 8 2.67Philip Reilly ......... 1 9 5.80A.B.Wilgus ....14 9 7.11

:-:Mdo- ;....... 9 10 3.71Mead&Reilly 27 10 5.80Betsy Luudergren 2 11 5.80Mead &Reilly,N% of Odeil

'

,"'creek....!...... ........... .. ... .13.63PhilipReillyetal... 5 12 8.41Irvine's Addition to West

SHB^pß^rp St. Paul—i«Bo"Hp^9BVD.D.Merri11.......... 5 191 7.10':•• do ................. 6191 7.10S.D. L0rd............. ......23 201 .22.63Jackson and Bidwell's •Ad-

dition to West St. Paul—W.H.Sanborn 7 3 7.241 : do ....;...... 8 3 ,7.24

do ....... 9 3 7.24-frr* do ...;..... .....10 3 8.35J.D0herty........... 14 7.24:•. do ..............;... 2 4 6.13F. Amb's Addition to West•'-•\u25a0:"\u25a0 \u25a0 St Paul— ''....

: U.L. Lamprey .1 9 26.47:-:-7. do ....;.... 2 9 . 22.58-r do 3 9 22.58

do ......:......... 7 9 34.20do .............. 8 9

-22.58

/ do ............... 9 .9 22.60Brooklynd

—"-

S.D. L0rd.......... ....10 20 22.51do ....... ...... ......11 .20 , 35.03

Stuart's Rearrangement -.ofBlock 68, Brown & Jack-

'

;son's Addition to West St.Paul-

Christ Ka5tner....„.........21 ... . 21.47

iiSIXTH WARD, CITY OF ST. PAUL\u25a0:\u25a0•-.\u25a0.:: (Continued.)-;•'." t* W Amount.I '

2- o required :. g. to redeemNames of-Owners or to :..,.. .. ''

•:*AVhom Assessed, Subdi vis- • : O J:ion .of Section, Lot or : : 2. B

Block. : . p 5&f_mgsm : : 3 :

Bell's Addition to West St.'Paul—

T.A. Caulfield. S. 50 ft of-

-and ................... 6&7 17 884.08; Prospect Plateau—.AY.A.Somers et al. That part"

ofLot 1 bounded: as fol-lows: Sly byDunedin Ter--race. Wby alley in rear oflot 2, blk

"5, Niy by a line

parallel with and 50 ft dis-'\u25a0\u25a0 tant from S line of said lot1. Elyby Elyline of saidlot 1, part of 1 5 13.53

Bell's Second Addition toWest St.Paul—

P. Rothausen 1 3 42.59do 2 3 '42.59do ..... 3 3 42.59do ..... .... 4 3 42.84

Bazille and Robert's Addi-tion to West St. Paul—

E. P. Sanborn 4 23 41.995.D.L0rd..... 6 23 1.88Sarah AAileox .. 26 3.13-

do ....: 27 26.B. Miller. SBoft of ..." 1 24 89.17Marshall's Addition to AA'est

Paul—P. Lacroix, AY %of 14 7 40.A.M. Regner 15 7 118.92P. Godbout.AVsoftof.....s&« 12 80.53C.J. Berryhill •• 16 15 248.25Robertson's Addition toHBSggiAVest St. Paul-Dawson etal., und 1-6 of.... ,4168 13.61AY. H. 5anb0rn.............. 2 179 52.81J. L.Holman ..:.... 179 235.63Michael Griffin.... 10 180 154.55D.D. Merrill. AY 20 ft of AY 13.63Sweeney's Addition to West . .

Paul-Sarah Wilcox 6 5 14.52

do ................ 8 5 14.52S.D.Lord. 10 5 14.52Dawson's Additiou to St.

Paul-P. R.McDonnell 1 8 47.57J.C.Clifford 1 9 31.91J. Kenning ....:.. .. .. 1 15 16.24Cox's First Addition to St.

Paul-Anna Setzer .T.... 1 ... .4.21

do 2 ... * 4.21do 3 ... 4.21do 4 ... 47.09do 5 ... 4.21

The West St Paul Real Es-tate and ImprovementSyndicate Addition No. 2to St Paul—

The West St. Paul R. E. I 2 17 501aud Imp. Syndicate fdo ...... ......... 3 17 5.01do 4 17 5.01do 5 17 5.01do 6 17 5.01do 7 17 5.01do 8 17 5.01do 9 17 5.01do 10 17 5.01do 11 17 5.01do 12 17 5.01do 13 17 5.01

do . 14 17 5.01do .15 17 5.01

,^ do 16 17 5.01do ...: 17 17 5.01do 18 17 5.01

W.H.Sanborn. 7 26 23.84West St. Paul R. E. audi.. 07

- =d

Imp.Syndicate fll"7 5

-54

do ...12 27 4.76do 13 27 4.76

The West St. Paul Real Es-tate and ImprovementSyndicate Additiou No. 6to St. Paul—

The West St. Paul R.E. 1 k„„ .ai

and Imp.Syndicate f° bJ *' A

do 20 69 4.40do 18 70 3.50

SEVENTH WARD, CITY OF ST. PAUL.' '; m 1-3 « Amount

S 2 g requiredNames of Owners or to

—§ ?! to deem

Whom Asssessed. Sub- eg-""division ofsection, Lot '

— '© £

: Block. : V : a 2'. . . g Sogiyfl fillKm.PppfW m-.:,..: :• <« m .

Miscellaneous—Mager Comencing

at a point on line, be-tween :section 11 and14 where county road; intersects said line,thence E 100 ft,thenceS 50 ft, thence W 150ft, thence N 50 ft, to-beginning..... ...14 28 23 812.46

H. L.Williams— AY 844.5ft of 696.4 ft S of N623.6 ft of NAY% ofNAY% .....32 29 23 407.95

Hewitt's Out Lots; Firstdivision,Addition to St. \u25a0\u25a0'••...

-'-Paul—;- . Lot. Block.S. G. Cook 136 .. 23.38

do 137 .. 23.33do 138 .. 23.38do 139 .. 23.38do Less Merrill & .

Hill's part 140 .. 136.07do 141 .. 23.38do 142 .. 23.38

H.C. Hemeuway 143 .. 23.38do 144 .. 23.38

AVann's Addition to St.Paul—

H.H. Schroeder „ 9 3 4.19do 10 3 4.19

Warm &Prendergast, und :Ai 0f......... 11 4 4.19

John AVann,.uud %of ... 29 4 2.38Rosedale Park Addition to

St Paul-John Ireland. 3 2 26.61Catholic Industrial School. 28 4 15.58Anna E. Ramsey's Addi-

'\u25a0\u25a0"••\u25a0:-. tion to St. Paul—C. B. AYright 18 20 7.81Long's Addition to St.PaulE. C. Long 1 1 11.62Hager's Subdivision of Lots

1, 2, 3,4, 5, 6. 7, 14, 15,16. 17 and 18 'of AValcott's.Addition to CottageHomes

—\u25a0

J.AV.McClungetal 11 3 7.92do 12 3 7.41do 13 3 9.76do ...23 3 7.92do . 24 3 7.93do ...34 4 10.79do 10 13 10.79

Woodland Park Addition toSt Paul-

Thomas W. Wallace ...17 2 4.19John J, Dewey 12 5 22.86College Park Addition to St.

Paul-Anna St. C. Haynes 17 1 28.94

Given under my hand and official seal this13th day ofJanuary, 1891.

[Seal.] M.F. KAIN,County Auditor of Ramsey County.

State op Minnesota, County op Ramsey, )Office op County Auditor, >

St.Paul, Jan. 13, 1891.)Public notice is hereby given as required

byChapter 194, General" Laws of 1885. thateach piece or parcel of the real propertyhereinafter described was sold at the tax saleMay 10, 1883, pursuant to the real estate taxjudgment entered in the district court in thecounty of Ramsey, on the 14th day of April.

.I*BB,in proceedings to enforce the paymentof taxes remaining delinquint upon real es-tate ou the first Monday of January, 1888.for the taxes of 1886. and the penalties andcosts accrued thereon ;and that 'the periodof redemption of said rear property fromsaid sale will expire May 10, 1891, un-der the provisions of the General Tax Lawsof1878. and the amendments thereto, andthe amount extended opposite each descrip-tions is the amount which willbe required toredeem such description from said sale onMay 10, 1891. Including twenty-five (25)cents forpublishing this notice. The realproperty above referred to is described asfollows: .

NEW TERRITORY "A," CITY OF ST.PAUL

t"1 g AmountS o required

£ toredeemNames ofOwners or toWhom

';

—Assessed. Subdivision of • : O oSection, Lot orBlock. : : 2. §

SI pp* ST... p-i-^B9EHL*fitifl^9'Lßp<LiM

Suburban Hills— .,T. Brink.. ......30 17 8182.16Asch's Subdivision of Block. 92, Lyman Dayton's Addi-. tiou to St. Paul—J.E. Egleston ..... .. .. .22 92 47.01H. AY. Grube's Subdivision

of Block 97, Lym.m Day-ton's Addition to StPaul—

Meyer.... ............ 25 97 71.00Chas. Friend's Subdivision

of Block 108. Lyman Day-ton's Addition to St Paul

Hannah M.Regan......... .5 108 37.70Mary Regan ............. ..16108 12.84;Adam Gotzian's Rearrange-

ment of Sigel's Additionto St. Paul—

L.5.Ke11er............ 2 2 17.84J. W. Bass'.

-Subdivision .of

Lots 14 and 15, and Partof 13 S. of R. R.,of Coll-ing's Addition of Out LotatoSt PauI—MSBBJESH

H.Caldwell ........12 2 8.54Ferry's Addition to St.Paul—R.A.5mith.:............. 13 9 23.63Hill's Addition to St Paul—Wm.F.Pieper ..... .:.......17 2 29.83Chas. '\u25a0.Weide's Subdivision: ofLots. 14 to 24 of Block•': 2, Nelson's Addition to

St. Paul—C. A.B. Welde 1 .. 10.08

r Williams' Rearrangement.:of Block 3, Nelson's Addi-

\u25a0 tion to St. Paul—C.AA. C1ark............... ..6 -. 8.01

NEW TERRITORY "A,'.' CITY OF ST.Paul— (Continued.)

N pf « Amount2- c required":. %to redeem

Names of Owners or to j ,Whom Assessed. Subdivis- • :

'a Qion of Section, Lot or :• : 2.

-Block. : : p m. ,• .-I:

-- ',-Chas. Weide's Rearrange-

ment of Block 0. Nelson'sAddition to St. Paul—

Chas. AVeide 5 .. £6.15do ..... ..:'.' 17 0.15do 27 .. 6.15

Lockwood's Addition to St.

Jas. Ackers ..a?............. 20 4 7.58Jas. Ackers 26 4 /.58Eastville Heights Addition

to St. Paul-Pioneer R. E. and Bldg. . "

Society 8 4 5.97StAubiu&Dion 9 9 7.31Oakville Park Addition to

St. Paul-Stone and Marrett 12 13 39.90

do 13 13 5.97do ".'". .'......17 13 5.97do IS 13 5.97do 11 19 7.03do .....14 19 7.03

Arlington Hills Addition to•

St. Paul—R.A.Smith 16 5 7.48C. Schurmeier 11 12 . 9.59

do 12 12 9.59do ....13 12 9.59do ..;....... 14 12 9.59do 15 12 0.59do ..... 16 12 9.59

E.P. Swanson 20 14 .23.16A. Erickson 21 14 49.75James Middleton 1..24- 15 9.87Chas AVeide's Subdivison of

Blocks 25 and 26 of Ar-lington Hills Addition toSt. Paul- .

C. A. B. AVeide 6 25 6.94First Nor. M.E. Church ... 11 25 6.71

do ...12 25 6.70C. A. B.AVeide 17 2a 6.70

do . 5 26 6.70Jos. R. Weide's Subdivision

of Block 27 of AilingtonHills Additon to St. Paul—

J. R. AVeide.... 11 .".' 31.12Chas. AA'eide's Subdivision

of E % of Block 31, Ar-lingtonHills Addition toSt Paul—

C. A. B. Weide 9 .. 598John lverson 11 .. 9.&9Chas. Weide's Subdivision

ofßiock34 of ArlingtonHills Addition to st.Paul—

Borgen A AVarner. N 25 ftof 14&15 34 32.18

Chas. AVeide's Subdivisionof Block 37 of ArlingtonHills Addition to St Paul-

Louisa Weide 3 37 5.89do 4 37 5.89do 7 37 5.89do 8 37 5.89do 12 37 11.21

Chas Johnson 10 37 11.21Schurmeier's Subdivision of

Blocks 38 and 33, Arling-ton Hills Addition to St.Paul-

Wilhelm Olson, (except partof Blomquisi) 13 39 2.14

do 14 39 16.52Chas. AVeide's Subdivision

of Block 40 of ArlingtonHills Addition to St. Paul—

C. A.B. Weide ".. 6 40 5.89Chas. Weide's Subdivision

of Block -16 of ArlingtonHills Addition to St.Paul—

E. 11. Nelson... 14 46 23.90Chas. AA'eide's Subdivision

of Block 45 of ArlingtonHills Addition to St.Paul—

C. A. B. AVeide ...21 -45 4.56do ...22 45 4.03

ArlingtonHills Addition toSt Paul—

V.D.AValsh. ...11 55 17.84J. P. Gribben's Rearrange-

ment "A"—

J. P. Gribbeu 10 1 40.05do 11 1 21.76

Beaupre and Kelly's Addi-tion to St. Paul—

Hattie L.Noyes, mid % of.. 418 19.23J. F. Tostevin's Subdivision

of Part of Lot 23. Hoyt'sAddition of OutLots-

James O'Brien 3 1 14.79J.J.Walsh 4 1 7.22

do 7 1 7.22do 8 1 7.22do 15 1 8.54

Edmund Rice's Third Addi-tion to St. Paul—

AA'm. Raleigh 10 6 33.80Lytou's Addition to St.

Paul—Lewis 11 1 24.34do 12 1 24.34do 8 2 23.28do 9 2 22.02

Lewis' Addition to St. Paul—

V.De Marre 5 5 46.09Lewis' Second Addition to

St. Paul—AVm. Peterson 13 8 20.44i- do ' ....'. .... .....14 '8 87.86T. 8yr0n......;:..v......... 13 13 18.70

do ..:......:.....:. 14 13 18.70Olaf Pearson 6 14 29.84

Lake Como Villas-Mary AA.Curry, except R. R.12 ... 144.00Mary A.Curry, except R.R..35 .. 173.30Hagerman's Subdivision of

Lot60,Lake Como Villas—Mary Regan 1 .. 10.78

do 2 .. 7.47Edwin Dean's Subdivision

of Part of Smith A Lott'sOut Lots—

J. R.Fleckenstein 1- 3 12.53do 2 3 11.21do 3 3 11.21

Holcombe's Addition to St.Paul-

Kate J. Roselle, N %ofN %of 1&2 13 156.28

Nininger& Donnelly's Ad-dition to Holcombe's Ad-dition to St. Paul-

Kate Donnelly,und %of .. 10 4 8.54Sanborn's Addition to St

Paul—Gebhardt Bohn 22.27Chas. Nocken 12.71Summit Park Addition to St.

Paul—Jno. E.Munson 15 16 31.59Mary J. Baxter 22 16 19.46C. Hackett 21 35 14.07A.Vance Brown's Subdivis-

ion of Block 32 ofStin-son, Brown A Ramsey'sAddition to St. Paul-

Mary J. e1ch....: 5 32 28.73Cottage Lots Addition to St.

Paul—W. L.Miutzer 17 2 7.32

do 18 2 7.32do 19 2 7.32do 20 2 7.32do ... 21 2 7.32do 22 2- 7.32do 23 2 7.32do 24 2 7.32

Asylum Addition No. 2 toSt. Paul—

W.C.Wilson 1 2 $9.89Geo. Culver.. « 3 8.54W. C.AA'ilson 16 3 8.54

do 6 '4 8.54do ...23 4 8.54

Clarke's Addition to St.Paul—

B. Danah.... 19 7 823.42F.B.Clarke 36 7 11.73

do 37 7 12.53Rearrangement of Block 12

of Clarice's Addition to StPaul—

F. B.Clarke 12 12 88.54Como Park Addition to St.

Paul—J.P. Gribben 33 3 84.57

do A 4.67Milton Addition to St.

Paul-James A.Mead... .11 1 811.36

do . 12 1 11.36do 13 1 11.36

NEW TERRITORY "A," CITY OF ST,PAUL.

Miscellaneous Descriptions—

% H M Amountra 2 5 required

Names of owners or to §• g £to redeemwhom assessed. Subdi- 3 g. *vision ofsection, lotor :

—; CO

\u25a0 block. : y.".! '2- a111 » Tr.... <1 .. . . It. •

J.C.Johnson. Commenc-at SAY corner of Den-uessy's land: thenceN'ly 3

' feet; thence*Ely470 feet, to begin-ning; thence Ely 40feet; thence VV'ly toN'ly line of Hennes-sey's land: thence N'ly4 feet: thence Sly tobeginning ...30 29 22 $26.03

Kate Donnellv. NAY %.of W% of SE % of SAY% ... -..:........ .35 29 23 796.15

Rogers AStone. E 1.2 ofE%ofSE %of SAY %..35 29 23 429.88

NEW TERRITORY "B," CITY OF ST.PAUL.

Lower St. Paul.f g Amount

«-\u25ba o required

Names ofowners or to whom .' fft0t t0redeemAssessed. Subdivision of '\u25a0 '•

y~77Section, Lot or Block. : ; £ »

'. '. p" Tl. . *i .H. Greve .'. 4 $"2.90

do ..V.'v.V.'.*!!'.'.'!.'!.'.!'!! 5 45.53W. L.Mintzer 12 42.89

do ...... ........ .. 13 42.89do

'14 44.96

do .. 15 44.96Crulckshank's Garden Lots—A.Esklund .'. 2: 2 110.76JohnAVhaley .9 4 19.60

Given under myhand aud official seal this13th day of January, 1891.

[SeaJ.] M.F.KAIN.County Auditor of Ramsey County.

State op Minnesota County of Ramsbt. VOrrif of County Auditor, *

St. Paul, Jan. 13th, 1891. jl.Public notice is hereby given, as required

byChapter 194, General Laws of 1385, that,each piece or parcel of the real property,hereinafter described was sold at ihe tax-sale. May11, I*BB.pursuant to the real es-jtate tax Judgment entered in the DistrictCourt in the County of Ramsey, on the 141MJday of April,183-, in proceedings to enforce:the payment of taxes remaining delinquentupon real estate on the first Monday of Jan-uary. 1888. for the taxes of 18H6. and thepenalties and costs accrued thereon, and'that the period of redemption of said realproDertv from sain sale willexpire May11,1891, under the provisions of the GeneralTux Laws of 1378, and the amendments,thereto, and the amount extended oppositeeach description Is the amount which willberequired to redeem such description fromsaid sale onMay 11,1891, including twenty-live (25) cents for publishing this notice.The real property above referred to is de*scribed as follows:

TOWN OF M'LEAN.on -3 a Amount2 2 2 required

Names of Owners or to § £ n to redeemWhom Assessed. Sub- £ '£.

' —division of Section, Lot .' -•

: IIor block. ~ afi

*III.Dayton. AY%ofSW \

" 'i

M.I.Davtou. W % <>f SAY-

14 . 128 22 815.20do E % of SAY n

_'••I14 T 128 22 45.19

do Commenc-ing17.50 chains S ofNAY corner of E % ofNE Vi of Section 3,thence S 31 deg 15mm. AY 1.696 feet,thence S 58 deg 45mm. E 3.0 feet, thenceN 31 deg 15 miv, E2.99 chains, thence S47 deg 15 mm, E 2.80 ,chains, thence N 31deg 15 mm, .18.56chains to bediming ... 3 28 22 15.83

W. I.Dayton, W '2 of SE% less railroad 3 28 22 75.18

Montville— Lot. Block.M.I.Dayton 8 .. 2.35

do 12 .. 15.10do 13 .. 2.40do 14 .. 1.61do 15 .. 1.49do That part inE

%of Si; % (%)of 32 . .87do 33 .. 2.20do 35 .. 8.20do

*That part in . r

E%ofSE 14 (2-5) of.... 39 .'. 1.16do That part in y

E %of SE %(1 5)of. ...52 . 1.02do 56 .. 2.13do 57 .. 9.5^do That part in

E%ofSE Vi (5-6) 61 .. 2.68do That Dart in

E%of SB Vi (1-35) 62 . .68TOWN OF NEW CANADA.

'£ »-5 50 Amountra

°§ required

Names of Owners or to 5- g <n to redeemAVhom Assessed. Sub- 3 g. ? -rdivision ot Section, Lot. s : ° QorBlock. : ? : 2 §

: tt ••... «> ..C. Demers. AY i-jof AY %

of S AY 14 except partof 2acres to Grace, %acre to Demurs, !acreto city, and pari in-cluded in plat of St.John's City... 5 29 22 810.43

C. Demers. E 18 acres ofS h 14, except part in-cluded in plat of St.John's City and exceptlAS acres to city 6 29 22 13.90

C. Schurmeier. S AY % ofSAVAi

' 26 29 22 52.23St. John's City- Lot. Block.

MaryL.Olivier 11 ... 1.07\u25a0

'do 12 ... 1.07

C.Demers 15 ... 13.04:

S. Nadeau 10 ... 1.00do 18 ... 1.07

C.Demers 19 ... 3.93Dawson's Suburban AcreLotsAVm. Dawsou 7 37 2.13

do 8 37 2.04Morton's Addition—

W. S. Morton. Ex. R. 1t... .13 1 2.14do do ....14 I 2.88do do ...27 1 2.94do do ....28 1 2.94do do ... 9 4 2.34do do .....'il 4 2.B'A

TOWN OF WHITE BEAR. 1% H a Amount

'8 % g required~

a « toredeemNames of Owners, or to 3 » ? \u25a0

bom Assessed, Sub- : -• : O Odivision of Section... : ? . S. 3

::i 5 ?. a. . \u25a0

11. M. Ramicy. 30 acreson AY side of railroadOf SW %of NAY %. ...12 30 22 $133.20

D. D.Merrill,lot 5 10 30 22 26.44A. K. Barnum, E 120 ft

of lot 1 20 30 22 1.54Leo Align.AY As of SAV%.2O 30 22, 213.60

VILLAGE OF WHITE BEAR.f M Amount°

o requiredName of Owners, or to '\u25a0 £• to redeem

AVhom Assessed, Subdi- : ;vision of Section, Lot or '• : O 0Block. : : 2-3. \u25a0 : .i ?. . m • .

Ramaley's Park—Chas.Miette 15 10 83.21

Given under my hand and official seal this13th day of January, 1891.

[Seal.l M.F.KAIN.County Auditor of Ramsey County.

State of Minnesota, Countt ofRamsbt, 1Office of County Auuitob, >

St. Paul, Jan. 13, 1891. 1Public notice Is hereby given, as required

byChapter 194. General Laws of 1885, thateach piece or parcel of the

-real property

hereinafter described was sold at the laxsale May 12, 1888, pursuant to the real es-tate tax judgment entered in the DistrictCourt in the County of Ramsey on the 14tliday ofApril,1888, in proceedings to enforcethe payment of taxes remaining delinquentupon real estate on the first Monday of Jan-uary, 1888, for the taxes of 18S6 and thepenalties and costs accrued thereon, andthat the period of redemption of said realproperty from said sale will expire May 12,1891, under the provisions of the GeneralTux Laws of 1878, and the amendmentsthereto, and the amount extended oppositeeach description is the amount which willbe required to redeem such description fromsaid sale 011 May 12, 1891. including twentyfive (25) cents for publishing this notice.The real property above referred to is de-scribed as follows:

TOWN OF RESERVE.f w Amount2 o required

Names of Owners or to '\u25a0 _\u25a0 to redeemWhom Assessed. Subdi- '\u25a0 • ' .visiom of Section, Lot or '\u25a0 : O OBlock. : : £ S

; fi ?Palisade Addition to St.

'

Paul—F. A.Seymour 28 6 $1.30Geo. F.Benson 14 7 .92

WN CF ROSE.r- a Amount2 o . required

Name of Owners, or to :-. {$. to redeemAVhom ,Assessed, Subdi- :.vision of Section, Lot or :: D O

DBlock. :: S. S5" ff5 :m

A.K.Barnum's Garden Lots—A.K. Barnum 1 .. $1.00

do 2 .. 1.54do 3 .. 1.58do ... 6 .. 1.78do 8 .. 10.25do 9 .. 5.37do 10 .. 3.44do 11 .. 5.86do 12 .. 4.91do 13 .. 2.99do 14 . 3.44do 15 .. 5.8«do 16 .. 6.34do 17 .. 8.20do 18 . 5.37do 19 .. 5.86do 20 .. .82

St. Anthony Park North—F.D.Hager 19 27 1.82

do 23 3t> 1.82do 30 40 1.82do 6 43 1.83

TOWN OF MOUA'DS VIEW.«> -3 a Amountra 2 § required

\u25a0Names of Owners or to -•3 w to redeem

Whom Assessed. Sub- si:division of Section, Lot :

—: o £?

or Block. :f : 2. §. \u25a0 V M::: 3 :

N. Stewart, SAA'% 1 30 23 883.72B. C. Fridley. X 0f.... 630 23 137.32C. D.Giltillan, lot 2, ex-

cept Bucher's 10 acres. 14 30 23 26.62do Commenc-

ing at NAAT corner oflot 2, thence S 26chains, thence E 4chains, thence N 24chains" to lake, thenceAY along lake to begin-ning 14 30 23 5.81

A.K.Barnum, undivided -\u25a0•

%of N 12 ofNE Vi 15 30 23 23.19James Clear et al., undi-

vided AS of S % ofSE %..;./.. 23 30 23 25.04

do undivided%0f10t4.... .. 23 30 23 14.35

do undivided%Oflots 23 30 23 9.86• Brouillette Park— Lot. Block.

M.A.Broudish 1 2 1.60do 2 2 1.14

O.E.Lee etal 4 2 1.14Givenunder my hand and official seal this

13th day of January, 1891.[Seal.] M.F.KAIN,

County Auditor ofRamsey Couuty.3satsjan 17-24-31

THE SAINT- PAUL DAILY GLOBE: SATURDAY MORNING, JANUARY IT, 1891.