Post on 22-Dec-2015
transcript
Whack a Mole and Other Approaches to Health Care Cost
Containment
Merton D. Finkler, Ph.D
Lawrence University
The Agenda
A Brief History of Health Care Cost Containment Efforts
Strategies That Don’t Work Three Potentially Successful Strategies Guidelines for Selecting the Right Cost
Containment Strategy
Whack a Mole Game
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
Hospitals Physicians Drugs Insurance NursingHomes
Points to Remember
Component-based cost containment is temporary.
The burden of health care cost falls mostly on labor.
Value-based purchasing requires leaping many barriers.
All sustainable strategies involve sacrifice. Each organization needs to find the tradeoff
that best matches its mission.
0.0%
2.0%
4.0%
6.0%
8.0%
10.0%
12.0%
14.0%
16.0%
18.0%
Total Health Care Expense Growth
Cost Containment 1980 to the Present
Health care expenditures increased at double digit rates in the early and late eighties
Health care expenditures are again approaching double digit rates
Insurance premiums have featured double-digit growth for the past two years.
Each health care service component has had its turn at leading the rise in costs
Hospital Expenditure Growth
0.0%
2.0%
4.0%
6.0%
8.0%
10.0%
12.0%
14.0%
16.0%
18.0%
Hospital Cost
14% or greater expenditure growth in 1980-82 DRGs led to stabilized expenditure growth. Movement to outpatient services, ambulatory surgery, and
clinics since the mid 1980s Early 1980s, 80% of all surgeries was inpatient hospital event
and 20% outpatient or ambulatory surgery center Now close to reversed Hospital costs share declined from 42% of total to 32%. Yet spending on hospital services accounted for over 50% of
health care expenditure growth in 2001. Hospitals continue to build.
Physician and Clinical Services Expenditures Growth
0.0%
2.0%
4.0%
6.0%
8.0%
10.0%
12.0%
14.0%
16.0%
18.0%
20.0%
Physician and Clinical Services Expenditure Growth
Double – digit $ growth throughout the 1980s 1984 Medicare fee freeze – defeated by volume
increases (especially for diagnostic services) 1992 – RBRVS – fee schedule and volume
performance standards have helped to keep category in line with overall medical expenditures
Physician and clinical service costs share has risen from 19% to 23%, mostly in the 1980s
Technology has moved out of the hospital.
Insurance and Administrative Cost Inflation
-20.0%
-10.0%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
Insurance and Administrative Cost
The insurance and administrative portion (load factor) of the premium has been most volatile cost component.
Insurance pricing cycle features market share chasing followed by bouts of profit margin expansion and reserve replenishment
Average growth above 20% for 1988-1990 led to movement for major health care policy reform
It failed but managed care (pricing) boomed.
Pharmaceutical Cost Inflation
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
Pharmaceutical Cost
Double-digit growth since 1980 except for 1992-94 The most rapidly rising component of expenditures
since 1995. Some argue increased Rx has been the key ingredient
in keeping total expenditures down. Mix of rising usage, new products & rising prices Public policy response varies; some states act as large
purchaser and/or price fixer (Maine). Three tiered programs drive private purchasing. Expenditure share has risen from 5% to 9.7%
Back to the Future
Who Bears the Burden?
Two Central Facts– Employer arranged health care plans are a cost of labor– Management is more responsive to changes in the cost of
labor than laborers are to changes in pay
Consequence: Labor bears most of the burden even if employers pay the bill
– (80% - median estimate among economists)
Common Perception: businesses or consumers bear the burden
Labor Supply
Labor Demand
Total Compensation
Number of Laborers
After HC$ Increase
Wage or Salary
Incidence of Health Plan $ Increase
-4.0
-3.0
-2.0
-1.0
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
1980
19
81
1982
19
83
1984
19
85
1986
19
87
1988
19
89
1990
19
91
1992
1993
19
94
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
Total real compensation Real wages and salaries Real Benefits
Real Wages Were Flat until 1996
Real Wages and Sales did not grow between 1980 and 1995
Total real compensation grew by 0.5% per year Real wages grew by 0.0% per year Real benefits grew by 1.6% per year For 2000, TC 1%;Ben 2.2%;Wages 0.5% Conclusion: Increases in productivity (1.5%)
consumed by health insurance and pension Conclusion: Laborers bear the burden of
health insurance cost even if employer pays
The Whack a Mole Response to Rising Health Care Costs
Short-sighted benefit redesign:– Target the fastest growing component (e.g., ER
use, RX use)
Cost Accountant’s Revenge– If policy slows the fastest growing component, a
new fastest grower emerges
Only attempts to address total expenditures have the potential for sustainable success
Capital Expenditures Control
Duplication of services and reduction of excess capacity have often led to calls for controlled entry – Certificate of Need (CON) laws
Common practice –1970s & 80s, the results: barriers to new entrants and no changes in expenditure growth
Solutions are dictated by political power, not market success
CON insulates existing providers from attempts to increase quality or reduce cost
Which Costs Should Be Contained?
Those paid by third parties Total payments to the industry (including out-
of-pocket) Those related to diseases and their burdens Politicians, employers, and individuals have
different answers
Managed Care in the 1990s
1990s version featured insurance companies trading patient volume for provider network discounts or capitated payment
Most insurers focused on discounts and major utilization trends – “the low hanging fruit”
Employers selected 1 plan (an insurance carrier HMO) to reduce administrative cost
HMO plans offered comprehensive benefits
Managed Care and its Backlash
Comprehensive benefits with employer-chosen restricted access infuriated virtually everyone.
Low unemployment rates and income tax exemption encouraged expanded benefits and networks ; thus, less management & higher $
Further reductions in hospital length of stay not cost-effective but contentious
3 Potentially Sustainable Strategies
Make health care a consumer responsibility– Encourage patients to be efficient consumers
Cap payments to the health care sector– Nationalize insurance or employ global budgets
Encourage primary and secondary prevention– Disease management for chronic disease– Changes in life style for the rest of us
Ideally, seek to add value
Consumer Responsibility to the Rescue
A response to OPM (Other People’s Money) Increased cost sharing – it’s your money, you decide
how to spend it Benefit Shift: from comprehensive coverage with
restricted choice to partial subsidy for broad choice Medical Savings Accounts feature the extreme version
– only catastrophic insurance Many new (untested) options exist Consumer income and preferences drive choices
The Costs of Shifting the Burden
Some employers abandon health care Risk segmentation increases Reduced incentives to join comprehensive
benefit plans (HMOs) Incentives to postpone treatment and ignore
prevention are increased “Out of the managed care frying pan into the
cost sharing fire”
The Ultimate: Cheap Insurance
Single Payer Rises Again
Expenditures can be contained by politically set budgets or global caps
Canada and UK have successfully controlled the health care line item
Priorities in these systems set politically or by providers
The Costs of Single Payer
Individual preferences play limited role Burdens of illness not addressed, only gov’t budgets Technology limited: both that which adds value and
that which does not– Fewer MRIs means more surgery– Fewer new drugs means more intensive medicine
If enrollees can choose a capped plan (or not), individual preferences can served
Gov’t. systems run out of money before fiscal year ends
The Budget Cake is Only So Big
Chronic Disease Burdens are Huge
The burden of illness far exceeds documented paid claims
– Total burden approximates $10k per year per worker with only 47% from group health $ (Goetzel)
Chronic disease burdens cost > $1 trillion per year– CDC/RWJ report estimates that 125 million American suffer
from a chronic condition (Anderson)– Average annual medical cost of $6,032 for those with vs.
$1,105 for those without a chronic disease (Anderson)– Chronic disease a/c 67.5% of medical $ for working age adults – Ave. work impairment is ranges from 2.3 to 10.9 days per 30
day work period (Kessler)
Top 10 Diseases by Employer Expense
Chronic Disease Management
Use evidence-based medicine Well conceived disease management
programs yield $5 - $10 of benefit per $ spent Successful programs integrate care,
emphasize communication, and reduce barriers to compliance
Success requires compliance with evidence-based guidelines
Primary Prevention
The prevalence of chronic disease and the impact of risk increases with age
Pick prevention programs that match risks Wellness programs – Goetzel AJHP – medical
costs dropped for 28 /32 corporate programs reviewed
Reduced Risk Means Reduced Cost
Some Costs of Prevention
Payment comes before savings and, thus, may not make sense with annual enrollment switching
Each program has a different payback period Each population faces a different set of risks Compliance (medical community and
patient/consumers) does not happen without education and compatible incentives
Pay Me Now or Pay Me Later
Seek to Add Value
Determine services that add the most improvement in health status or consumer satisfaction per $ spent
Employ evidence-based medicine – that based on the most valid and reliable scientific information available
Reward evidence-based “best” practice Recognize there may not be one “best” way.
Value-Based Purchasing: No Mean Feat
No common definition of value or quality; hence hard to implement
Multiple reporting requirements and data validity mean extra expense to implement
Public sector purchasers face legislative and administrative restrictions on options
Purchasers must have market power Providers resist quality performance
comparisons
Join a Purchasing Coalition
Increased bargaining power if in same market Shared benefits and administrative
responsibility is essential for success Mixed results since each pool represents an
unique mix of risks, benefits, and incentives California HIPC aggressively negotiated prices
with plans; most others had very limited effect
Central Florida Health Care Coalition
1 million covered lives – 1/3 of the market Started in mid 1980s, spent millions Focus: good quality is cost-effective Identify evidence-based best practices
– Over-use, under-use, and inappropriate use– MBGH estimates at $1,350 per employee per year +
$350 indirect costs for poor quality care– Estimate: 30% of direct hc $ related to poor quality
Pay for Performance
Central Florida Coalition spent $1 million – 5 year implementation plan
Measure and communicate best practices– Establish platinum, gold, and silver payment
50% based on clinical quality 25% based on cost 25% based on patient satisfaction
– Silver level: pay 65% of Medicare Also reward platinum consumers
– Make consumers aware of cost– Reward compliance and risk reduction
Trade-offs to be faced–all options
Increased life expectancy means increased cost but increased healthy years
– Success in acute care increases life expectancy.– Chronic disease increases with age, and, thus, life
expectancy.
Demographic factors suggest that health burdens will rise dramatically in the future; thus need to determine
– Which services to provide– Who will pay the bill
Health care resources are scarce; thus, priority setting, not new entitlements, is needed
Fundamental Choice for Purchasers
Patients / customers must choose either broad choice or increased integration– A broad network of providers
with high cost or external rationing fragmented care
– A narrow network of integrated providers with lower costs and internal rationing more care coordination
IBM helps its enrollees evaluate tradeoffs in terms of their own preferences
The Big Tradeoff
Fundamental Choice for Medical Community
Physicians must choose between– Independent practice with
Oversight from third parties Some ability to bill for extra services Limited financial risk Continuous need to market services
– Group practice with Assumption of financial risk Some clinical independence Group practice decision-making and oversight Opportunity for cost-effective integrated programs
Guidelines for Purchaser Choice of a Cost Containment Strategy
Focus on the total burden of illness, not component cost control
Develop and nurture long term partnerships among patients, providers, and payers. (Structure the system for all to win)
Identify health risk factors and choose health programs and benefit designs to reduce them
Guidelines continued
Invest in the information (including evidence-based guidelines) and communication infrastructure for prevention
Provide incentives for enrollees, providers, and payers to reward performance consistent with reduced risks and illness burdens
Success requires strong leaders who seek value from health services & human capital.
Editorial views
“…So far, health care has no Toyota…” –Molly Coye
JD Kleine – Oxymoron: The Myth of a U.S. Health Care System
“Knowing is not enough; we must apply. Willing is not enough; we must do” - Goethe
American Values
“You can always count on Americans to do the right thing - after they’ve tried everything else.” – W. Churchill
“When faced with second-best trade-off between cost-conscious choice and no choice at all, however, Americans may grumble but select the former.” – J. Robinson
One Solution: Value + Choice
Find value and support it. Fixed contribution by employers to a flexible
spending account (Enthoven) Provide two options for coverage
– A focused narrow network that encourages prevention and chronic disease management
– Broad choice with consumers determining how to spend their money