Winegrape cultivar and clone selection for warm climates

Post on 02-Jul-2015

199 views 0 download

description

This presentation provides data comparing various selections of common winegrape cultivars grown in the San Joaquin Valley, California

transcript

Selecting Wine Grape Clones to

Improve Yield and Quality

Matthew Fidelibus

Department of Viticulture and Enology

University of California, Davis

Species, cultivars, and clones

• California’s wine industry based on a single species of grape, Vitis vinifera L.

• Most wines made from traditional (old) cultivated varieties of V. vinifera

• Old cultivars have accumulated many ‘clones’ due to mistaken identity, mutation, or both

• Variation among clones may be exploited to improve grapevine yield and quality

What is a grapevine clone?

• A population of vines propagated

asexually (e.g., by cuttings) from a single

mother vine.

• Virtually all propagated grapevines are

technically ‘clones’

• Of particular interest are clones or

‘selections’ having distinctive, beneficial,

characteristics

How to make a mammalian clone

How to make a grapevine clone

How can clonal selection

research benefit growers?• Nurseries offer many different clones of a

given cultivar

• These may differ dramatically with respect to

yield, yield components, fruit composition,

and susceptibility to pests and diseases

• The performance of a given clone can

depend on the climatic region where it is

grown

Materials and methods

• Chardonnay, Merlot, and Zinfandel/Primitivo vines planted in 1997

• Bilateral cordons, two-wire trellis, spur pruned

• Vine x row spacing = 7.5’ x 10’

• Ten single-vine replicates

• Randomized complete block design

• Within a year, all clones harvested on the same day

Chardonnay characteristics

• Most widely cultivated wine grape in CA

• > 70 different registered clones in CA

• Clone 4, industry standard

• High yields, good fruit composition

• 4 has large, heavy clusters—susceptible

to sour rot

Chardonnay clones

Clone Source

4 Martini 5V21, Olmo #66

6 Martini 3V4, Olmo #68

15 Prosser, WA, LR2V6

18 Rauscedo 8, Italy

20 Cornegliano 7, Italy

37 France, 95

Chardonnay yield components

Clone Clusters / vine Cluster wt.

(kg.)

Yield / vine

4 78 d 0.29 a 21.9 a

6 107 a 0.22 c 22.0 a

15 107 a 0.20 d 19.9 b

18 93 c 0.26 b 22.6 a

20 98 bc 0.25 b 22.1 a

37 105 ab 0.24 bc 23.2 a

Chardonnay berries

Clone Berries / cluster Berry wt

(g)

4 192 a 1.5 b

6 147 cd 1.5 b

15 138 d 1.4 c

18 172 b 1.5 b

20 153 c 1.6 a

37 158 c 1.5 b

Chardonnay fruit composition

Clone Brix pH TA

(g/100 ml)

4 23.7 a 3.60 c 0.584 a

6 22.9 b 3.70 a 0.555 b

15 22.8 b 3.69 ab 0.581 a

18 22.7 bc 3.67 b 0.534 c

20 22.4 c 3.68 ab 0.555 b

37 23.0 b 3.68 ab 0.534 c

Chardonnay, sour rot incidence

Clone Sour rot incidence

(%)

4 16 a

6 10 b

15 4 c

18 14 ab

20 13 ab

37 15 a

Chardonnay clones summary

• Clone 4 had good yields, large clusters,

and good fruit composition but was very

susceptible to sour rot

• Clone 15 had 10% lower yields than 4, but

had much less sour rot than 4

Merlot characteristics

• Merlot among the most important red wine

grapes in Calif.

• 20%, by area, and 45%, by yield, grown in

Central Valley

• Clone 3 is standard; consistent set, yield,

fruit composition

• Relative performance compared to other

clones in the valley has not been tested

Merlot clones

Clone Source

1 Inglenook, Calif.

3 Inglenook, Calif.

9 Rauscedo, Italy #3

10 Cornegliano, Italy ISV-V-F2

11 Cornegliano, Italy ISV-V-F5

14 Chamber d’Agriculture de al

Gironde, France

Merlot yield components

Clone Clusters / vine

(no.)

Cluster wt.

(kg)

Yield / vine

(kg)

1 90 b 0.24 19.83 c

3 91 b 0.25 20.75 bc

9 90 b 0.25 21.50 ab

10 103 a 0.24 22.21 a

11 92 b 0.26 21.08 abc

14 85 b 0.23 18.11 d

Merlot berries

Clone Berries / cluster

(no.)

Berry wt

(g)

1 150 1.57 c

3 148 1.66 b

9 149 1.65 b

10 145 1.57 c

11 145 1.73 a

14 146 1.54 c

Merlot fruit composition

Clone Brix pH TA

(g/100 ml)

1 23.6 c 3.91 b 0.377 cd

3 23.4 c 3.90 bc 0.374 d

9 23.7 c 3.90 bc 0.373 d

10 23.65 bc 3.87 c 0.398 a

11 24.0 b 3.94 a 0.391 ab

14 24.4 a 3.94 a 0.385 bc

Merlot clones summary

• Selection 10 performed best; consistently

higher yields of fruit with low pH and high

TA

• Selection 11 was undesirable; the largest

berries, was the most susceptible to rot,

and had high pH

• Selection 3 performed similar to selections

1 and 9 and was not superior to 10

‘Crljenak kastelanski’

• “The red grape of Kastela”

• Zinfandel and Primitivo are probably

selections of the “Red grape”

• Origin of Zinfandel is obscure, 1850s?

• Primitivo means “early” in Italian

• Primitivo has been grown in Italy for about

200 years

Zinfandel characteristics

• Big berries, large clusters, high

fruitfulness, high yields

• Very susceptible to “sour rot” in warm

climates

• Uneven ripening

• Yield declines as the season progresses

• Color can be poor, especially in warm

climates

Zinfandel & Primitivo Clones

Clone Source

Zinfandel 1A Lodi, CA, Handel

Zinfandel 2 Lodi, CA, Handel

Zinfandel 3 Livermore, CA, Ruetz

Primitivo 3 Bari, Italy

Primitivo 5 Calo, Italy

Primitivo 6 Calo, Italy

Zinfandel, cluster characteristicsClone Clusters / vine

(no.)

Cluster wt.

(kg)

Yield / vine

(kg)

1A 73 b 0.30 20.4 c

2 75 b 0.31 21.3 bc

3 75 b 0.35 23.4 b

P3 91 a 0.32 26.0 a

P5 79 b 0.30 22.2 bc

P6 80 b 0.31 22.1 bc

Zinfandel, berry characteristics

Clone Berries /

cluster

Berry wt

(g)

1A 104 2.77 a

2 107 2.75 a

3 126 2.76 a

P3 116 2.64 b

P5 117 2.57 b

P6 110 2.78 a

Zinfandel, fruit composition

Clone Brix pH TA

(g/100 ml)

1A 20.05 c 3.47 b 0.60

2 20.16 c 3.45 b 0.60

3 19.56 d 3.45 b 0.59

P3 21.10 b 3.46 b 0.61

P5 20.82 b 3.48 b 0.62

P6 22.00 a 3.52 a 0.60

Zinfandel, sour rot susceptibility

Clone Sour rot incidence

(%)

1A 50 ab

2 55 a

3 52 ab

P3 40 cd

P5 44 bc

P6 34 d

Zinfandel clones summary

• Few differences between the Zinfandel

selections tested

• Primitivo selections generally were better

• Earlier maturing

• Similar or higher yield

• Similar or less sour rot

Acknowledgements

• Thanks to L. Peter Christensen, Kimberley

Cathline, Jorge Aguilar Osorio, Don

Katayama, & Karin Kawagoe

• Viticulture Consortium & American

Vineyard Foundation

For more details…

• Email mwf@uckac.edu