Post on 14-Aug-2020
transcript
1
JHEPCoordination Action in support of the implementation
of a Joint Programming Initiative (JPI)
on Cultural Heritage and Global Change :
a new challenge for Europe
JHEP Mid-Term Assessment MeetingBrussels, 16 May 2013
WP3
Implementation of Joint
Programming Initiative
Cristina Sabbioni
JPICH Coordination
2JHEP Mid-Term Assessment MeetingBrussels, 16 May 2013
WP3 : OBJECTIVES (1)
- Implement the Strategic Research Agenda in the most
efficient and effective way through the definition of an
Action Programme.
- Create the networking between research actors and
institutions as a basis for the implementation of the SRA
- Define innovative methods of public / private research
partnerships.
- Decide on joint activities and actions, which follow the
principle of variable geometry
3JHEP Mid-Term Assessment MeetingBrussels, 16 May 2013
WP3 : OBJECTIVES (2)
- Analyze rules and procedures (administrative,
economic, etc..) for the realization of common calls, peer
review procedures for selection.
- Negotiate and securing the commitment and amount of
funding of the organizations participating in JP CH and
the structures necessary for implementation.
- Pool and coordinate national efforts making best use of
existing programmes, activities and instruments
4JHEP Mid-Term Assessment MeetingBrussels, 16 May 2013
WP3 : TASKS AND LEADERS
WP3 LEADER P1 MIBAC, Italy
Task 3.1. Develop the Action Programme
Task Leader P3 – RCE, Netherlands
Task 3.2. Maximizing benefit from existing European
initiatives for harmonization of activities within JPICH
Task Leader P4 – RPF, Cyprus
Task 3.3. Implementation of the Action Programme
Task Leader P1 – MIBAC, Italy
5
WP3 : Task 3.1. Develop the Action Programme
Launch of the first pilot call : launched on 10th January 2013
Second call will be launched March 2014: within the ERA NET
PLUS project HERITAGE PLUS
Definition of the Action Programme :
- based upon the SRA (WP2)
- Identify the actions for joint research to be implemented in the
next 3-5 years
P3 RCE leads the Task 3.1
All other beneficiaries and Associated Participants
JHEP Mid-Term Assessment MeetingBrussels, 16 May 2013
6JHEP Mid-Term Assessment MeetingBrussels, 16 May 2013
JPICH/JHEP PILOT CALL (I):
LAUNCH
- Definition of the MoU : 15 November
- Signature of the MoU : by 13 Countries (i.e. Belgium,
Cyprus, Denmark, France, Ireland, Italy, Lithuania,
Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Slovenia, Spain, United
Kingdom) for a total budget of 3.3 MlEuro
- Definition of the Guidelines for Applicants: by Dec. 2012
- Launch of the call on 10th of January
- Publication of the call on JPICH web site, HERITAGE
PORTAL and Participating Programme Owners web sites
7JHEP Mid-Term Assessment MeetingBrussels, 16 May 2013
JPICH/JHEP PILOT CALL:
RESEARCH TOPICS
1. Methods, tools and modelling for understanding damage and
decay mechanisms on tangible heritage (including buildings,
sites and landscapes).
2. Materials, technologies and procedures for the conservation
of tangible cultural heritage.
3. Use and re-use of buildings and landscapes, including the
relationship between changes of use and public policy,
including costs and added value.
4. Increasing understanding of cultural values, valuation,
interpretation, ethics and identity.
8JHEP Mid-Term Assessment MeetingBrussels, 16 May 2013
JPICH/JHEP PILOT CALL:
ROADMAP
Deadline for proposal submission 5th April 2013
National eligibility evaluation by 10 May 2013
International peer review evaluation by 20 June 2013
Scientific Committees’ meeting 4-5 July 2013
Signatories Consensus Meeting 15-20 July 2013
Communication to applicants evaluation by 30 July 2013
National funding bodies to complete administrative
procedures related to successful proposals 1 Aug. - 30 Oct.
Start projects 1 November
9JHEP Mid-Term Assessment MeetingBrussels, 16 May 2013
JPICH/JHEP PILOT CALL:
Submitted proposals and evaluation
Proposal submitted 89
Proposal not eligible following national
eligibility evaluation all national check arrived : cross
check under definition
International peer review evaluation:
• Each JPICH Country indicated a minimum of 6 experts
and a maximum of 12 (from its own Country or outside), of
which at least 1 expert per topic
• The JPICH List of Peer Expert Reviewers was set up:
113 Experts Top 1 : 29 Top 2: 27
Top 3 : 29 Top 4: 48
10JHEP Mid-Term Assessment MeetingBrussels, 16 May 2013
JPICH/JHEP PILOT CALL:
Peer review evaluation process
Each proposal is assessed by two evaluators (for proposal with
total budget < 150 Keuro) or three evaluators (for proposal with
total budget > 150 Keuro), chosen by the List of Experts. Based
on these evaluations, a preliminary ranking list is prepared.
The JPI/JHEP Scientific Committee will review the ranking list
based on the evaluations and recommend to the Signatories of
the MoU, a list of proposals to be funded.
The Signatories of the MoU will take the final decision on the
proposals to be funded on a consensus basis, based on the
recommendations of the Scientific Committees. They will discuss
and approve the recommended projects according to the
ranking list and the available budget.
11JHEP Mid-Term Assessment MeetingBrussels, 16 May 2013
JPICH/JHEP SECOND CALL (I):
PREPARATION
- Expression of interest: 15 December by 14 Countries
including 16 Program owners, i.e. Italy, Belgium,
Cyprus, Denmark, France, Israel, Norway, Poland,
Portugal, Slovenia, Spain, Lithuania, The Netherlands,
United Kingdom
- Budget: 5.3 MlEuro
- Call Process: Two step procedure
- Funding schema: Virtual common pot
National funding decisions according
to ranking list
12JHEP Mid-Term Assessment MeetingBrussels, 16 May 2013
JPICH/JHEP SECOND CALL (II):ERA NET PLUS PROPOSAL
SEVEN FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME
COOPERATION PROGRAMME: ENVIRONMENT
Challenge 6.5. Mobilising environment knowledge for policy,
industry and society
The HERITAGE PLUS Proposal was submitted by 28
February 2013 as an Era Net Plus Project in support to
the JPICH-JHEP Second Call
Requested EC contribution 2.7 Ml Euro
Proposal accepted : tomorrow negotiation will start……
13JHEP Mid-Term Assessment MeetingBrussels, 16 May 2013
Opening the Call March 2014
Deadline for Pre-Proposals May 2014
Evaluation and selection of Pre-Proposals August 2014
Invitation for Full Proposals September 2014
Deadline for Full Proposals November 2014
Final selection list and funding decisions March 2015
JPICH/JHEP SECOND CALL (III):
PROVISIONAL TIME SCHEDULE
14JHEP Mid-Term Assessment MeetingBrussels, 16 May 2013
EARLY COMMITMENT BY JPICH PARTICIPANTS
TRUST AMONG MS AND AC
PRIORITIZATION OF RESEARCH TOPICS
SRA IMPLEMENTATION
VISIBILITY TOWARDS STAKEHOLDERS
ADDED VALUE OF THE CALLS
15JHEP Mid-Term Assessment MeetingBrussels, 16 May 2013
ACTION PROGRAMME
• The AP is the first step in implementing the SRA
• AP will be a document which, starting from the SRA,
gives tools ansd topics for implementation
• Tools will be enabling activities, such as joint calls,
networking, knowledge sharing, mobility of researchers,
infrastructure etc.
• Topics will be derived mainly from the SRA. In addition
input from MS which topics in their own country are most
apt for collaboration because of content and urgency will
be considered.
16JHEP Mid-Term Assessment MeetingBrussels, 16 May 2013
ACTION PROGRAMME
The following steps were followed for the AP preparation:
Questionnaire to harvest information from JPI Partners
and members of Advisory Board and Scientific Committee
This questionnaire was distributed after consultation of
various partners
The results and other information were merged in a
matrix, which can be a basic format
Also, results of a workshop were harvested
17JHEP Mid-Term Assessment MeetingBrussels, 16 May 2013
ACTION PROGRAMME
The next step will be a draft version of the AP:
This will consist of a written texst (an explanation of why
and how) and lists of enablers and topics
JPI Participants should use their National Consultation
Panels; NL will lead by example
Advisory Board and Scientific Committee will also be
consulted again.
Following the SRA adoption in March 2013:
AP draft will be ready for JHEP-JPI meeting October 2013
AP (Deliverable 3.1) ready by December 2013
18JHEP Mid-Term Assessment MeetingBrussels, 16 May 2013
3.2. MAXIMIZING BENEFIT FROM EXISTING EUROPEAN
INITIATIVES FOR HARMONIZATION OF ACTIVITIES WITHIN JPICH
Deliverable structure
Introduction and executive summary
Survey of EU programmes relevant to JHEP/JPICH
Summary description of past and ongoing projects that
are pertinent to the JHEP/JPICH remit
Summary of the features of the relevant projects to be
considered to maximize benefits
Conclusions
19
The ERA and its components
• ERA: research and development activities, programmes and policies in
Europe involving a transnational perspective
– Research
– Framework (infrastructures, etc)
– Standardization
• EU programmes contributing to the ERA
– Seventh Framework Programme
– Art 185 Initiatives (EUREKA/EUROSTARS)
– COST
– Structural Funds (also known as Cohesion Policy or Regional Policy) -
Culture and tourism topic
– Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme (CIP)
• Industry
– CEN
– European Construction Technology Platform (born within FP7)
3.2. EXISTING EUROPEAN INITIATIVES
20JHEP Mid-Term Assessment MeetingBrussels, 16 May 2013
EU programmes contributing to the ERA
• Seventh Framework Programme Framework Programme FP7: PEOPLE, IDEAS (ERC
grants), CAPACITIES (i.e. Research Infrastructures “CHARISMA” & “ARIADNE”),
COOPERATION (Environment & ICT), ACTIONS (E-infrasctructures “DC-NET”)
• Art 185 Initiatives
EUREKA/EUROSTARS
• COST
Until now COST has funded 3 COST Networks concerning coordination of research activities
in the area of cultural heritage. There is also 1 running COST Action in the same area that will
be completed in 2016.
• Structural Funds (also known as Cohesion Policy or Regional Policy)
Culture and tourism topic (Pertinent but not relevant)
• Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme (CIP)
CIP has projects concerning the documentation of historic buildings in the framework of the
provision of content to Europeana (“CARARE”, “3D-ICONS”). No information about
conservation/protection
3.2. EXISTING EUROPEAN INITIATIVES
21JHEP Mid-Term Assessment MeetingBrussels, 16 May 2013
Industry– CEN (European Committee for Standardization)
CEN is an international non-profit association grouping 33 national Standards committees
Among others, it has Technical Committee 346 dealing with Conservation of CulturalHeritage
A substantial number of standards considered as drafts or final versions
– European Construction Technology Platform (born within FP7)
An ETP is an industry-led stakeholder forum charged with defining research priorities in abroad range of technological areas
ECTP addresses Construction
It has FACH, a focus area addressing CH
FACH contributes to CEN/TC 346
Conservation of CH acknowledged as a cohesion factor, but focus on EEB
3.2. EXISTING EUROPEAN INITIATIVES
22JHEP Mid-Term Assessment MeetingBrussels, 16 May 2013
ERA-NET
• The ERA-NET scheme supports coordination between
national research programmes
– NET- HERITAGE
• ERA-NET PLUS supports joint calls for proposals among
national and regional programmes.
– HERA
3.2. EXISTING EUROPEAN INITIATIVES
23JHEP Mid-Term Assessment MeetingBrussels, 16 May 2013
WP3 : DELIVERABLES
D3.1. Action Programme: Definition and development of the Action Programme [month 22]
D3.2. Report on benefit maximizing of ongoing activities [month 18]
D3.3. Report on analysis procedure for call launch: Analysis and definition of Call documents (MoU of JPICH participating States, Call text, Guide for Applicants) and report on the execution of each joint call [month 24]
24JHEP Mid-Term Assessment MeetingBrussels, 16 May 2013
WP3 : DELIVERABLES
D3.4. Report on activities procedure for funding: Analysis of different types of rules and laws in the countries funding the joint calls (financial procedure adopted) [month 24]
D3.5. Report on procedure for project evaluation: Definition of criteria for evaluation (Selection Guidance Notes) [month 24]
D3.6. Report on testing launched calls: Report on activities for call launching (pilot and second calls) and recommendations for future work. Follow up of the call results. [month 36]
25JHEP Mid-Term Assessment MeetingBrussels, 16 May 2013
WP3 : MILESTONES AND EXPECTED RESULTS
26JHEP Mid-Term Assessment MeetingBrussels, 16 May 2013
WP3 : TIMESCALE
27JHEP Mid-Term Assessment MeetingBrussels, 16 May 2013