Post on 17-Dec-2015
transcript
www.infrastructureontario.ca 1
New Oakville Hospital
www.infrastructureontario.ca 2
Project Name: New Oakville Hospital
Scope: Project Includes:
New facility: Will accommodate diagnostic and treatment facilities, ambulatory care facilities, rehabilitation and complex continuing care facilities as well as a variety of support departments.Location: Will be located on a 50 acre new hospital greenfield development at Dundas Street and Third Line in Oakville, Ontario. Total Beds: 457 bed facility that will evolve over time to accommodate 704 beds.Parking: There will be surface parking as well as a covered parking structure to accommodate visitor, staff, physician, volunteer, student and supplier/consultant parking.
Building Type: Main Building: 8-10 storey tower, and several 2-4 storey wings, Roof Top Mechanical Penthouse one level below grade.Parking Structure: 2 to 4 story, on grade concrete structure.
Project Type: Greenfield
Sq. Ft. Total Building approximately 1,629,695 Building Gross Floor Area.
Project Overview
www.infrastructureontario.ca 3
RFP Transaction Timeline
• RFP Issued May 31, 2010• RFP Closed February 25, 2011• Credit Spread Lock In received on April 15, 2011.• Evaluation of RFP Submissions March 8 to April 29, 2011• Preferred Proponent Notification June 2, 2011• Commercial Close July 26, 2011• Financial Close July 29, 2011
Approval Obtained:
• IO Board approval May 19, 2011• HHS Board approval June 10, 2011• MOHLTC Funding Approval Letter issued July 15, 2011
www.infrastructureontario.ca 4
• Proposals were submitted in response to the RFP by three pre-qualified proponents. Proposals were received from:
Consortium Development Design Construction FM Operations Financial Advisor
Hospital Infrastructure Partners
Carillion CanadaEllisDon Corp.Fengate Capital
Parkin Architects in Joint Venture with Adamson Ass. Architects
EllisDon Corp.Carillion Canada
Honeywell Ltd. Fengate Capital Management Ltd.
Community Health Consortium
Lend Lease CanadaAccionaAecon
Kasian Architecture
Aecon BuidlingsAccionaLend Lease Canada
Dalkia Canada Investec North America Ltd.
Plenary Health Plenary Group,Innisfree
B+H+STH, Joint Venture Architects
PCL Construction Canada
Johnson Controls
RBC Capital Markets
Proponents
www.infrastructureontario.ca 5
Evaluation Reporting Structure
Project Sponsors
IO Project Manager
Fairness
Monitor
Conflict Review Team
Completeness and Legal Evaluation Team
Design Evaluation
Team Financial
Evaluation Team
Evaluation Coordinators
Evaluation Committee
Infrastructure
Ontario WCH
Project Sponsors
Technical EvaluationTeam
Design Evaluation
Team Financial Evaluation
Team
Infrastructure
Ontario Halton Healthcare
Services (HHS)
Subject Matter Experts
• Design Compliance Consultant
•
•
Facilities Management Advisor
•
Legal Advisors
•
Equipment Specialist
•
Financial Advisors
Transaction Process Advisor
• HHS Designated Advisors• Insurance Advisor
Technical Construction Sub group
Technical Operations
Sub group
• OHC Advisors
www.infrastructureontario.ca 6
• The Evaluation Committee and Evaluation Teams were composed of equal representatives from:
- Infrastructure Ontario (IO)- Halton Healthcare Services (HHS)
• The Evaluation Teams were supported by various technical advisors/subject matter experts:
• The Evaluation process was monitored by a Fairness Advisor
Evaluation Committee Structure
www.infrastructureontario.ca 7
Evaluation Categories Maximum
A. TECHNICAL SUBMISSION 500
1.0 Project Management and Construction Plan 55
2.0 Works Schedule 15
3.0 Equipment Procurement and Coordination Plan 20
4.0 Transition and Commissioning Plan 25
5.0 Operations Plan 150
6.0 Design Submission 235
B. FINANCIAL SUBMISSION 500
1.0 Net Present Value 450
2.0 Quality of Proposed Financing Plan 50
SUSTAINABLE ENERGY INNOVATION (Bonus point) 30
Maximum Points Available 1030
Evaluation Scoring
www.infrastructureontario.ca 8
Design Submission Evaluation Criteria
Includes Evaluation of:
6.1 Project Vision and Guiding Principles and Objectives
6.2 Clinical Functionality, including Infection Prevention and Control
6.3 General Functionality, including Accessibility and Safety/Security
6.4 Design Quality, including Environmental of Wellness
6.5 Sustainability, including Flexibility / Adaptability / Expansion
6.6 Technical Building QualityThe quality of the design was important to HHS and this was demonstrated by the high weighting the Design Submission had on the overall Technical Score. The high weighting and the categories helped focused the team on delivering a high quality yet affordable solution
www.infrastructureontario.ca 9
Proponent Design Submissions
www.infrastructureontario.ca 10
Illustrative Design
The Illustrative Design:
– Represented a compliant design with approved clinical functionality and program layout. The design and layout was endorsed by Clinical and Management User Groups of Halton Healthcare Services (HHS). It was however open to innovation by Proponents.
www.infrastructureontario.ca 11
Innovation in DBFM projects
• Much time is spent discussing risk transfer in generating value for money.
• Less time, but of at least as much importance is the value of design innovation in generating value for money and real savings.
• Under a stipulated sum or Build-Finance project, all proponents are bidding to the same design so bid prices are not likely to vary greatly.
• Under a DBFM, three different designs can generate significantly different construction prices.
• A Proponent who submits an efficient and optimized design can:
-significantly reduce their construction costs since they can efficiently utilize building materials and labour.
- With a smaller BGSF there is less building to maintain and repair from a lifecycle perspective. - Also, a lower construction cost means a lower capital cost and consequently lower financing costs.