Zimbardi et al 2014 - Authentic Large-scale Undergraduate Research Experiences: an Australian T&L...

Post on 12-Apr-2017

82 views 0 download

transcript

CUR  Conference,  Washington  DC,  June-­‐July  2014  

Authen'c  Large-­‐Scale  Undergraduate  Research  Experiences  Engaged  adop'on  through  an  Australian  na'onal  leadership  project    

Kirsten  Zimbardia,  Susan  Rowlandb,  Gwen  Lawrieb,  Jack  Wangb,    Paula  MyaIc,  Peter  Worthyb    

aSchool  of  Biomedical  Science;  bSchool  of  Chemistry  and  Molecular  Biosciences,  dTeaching  and  EducaNonal  Development  InsNtute    The  University  of  Queensland,  Australia  Contact:  k.zimbardi@uq.edu.au  

Undergraduate  Research  Experiences  for  ALL  Undergraduate  research  experiences  (UREs):    •  engage  students1  •  improve  academic  achievement1  •  provide  a  large  range  of  benefits2  Embedding  UREs  into  the  curriculum  maintains  many  of  these  benefits.3  Engaging  large  cohorts  of  students  (several  hundred)  in  UREs  that  are  sustainable  requires  careful  design.4  

Checklist  for  ALURE  Adopters  

Suppor'ng  new  ALURE  adopters  Crucial  elements  •  Academic  ownership  and  fit  for  context  

•  ‘Plug-­‐and-­‐play’  pracNcals  don’t  work  •  IniNal  face  to  face  meeNng  

•  Key  concerns  •  Unexpected  consideraNons  (checklist)  •  RelaNonship  building  

•  Ongoing  mentoring  and  troubleshooNng    •  Scholarly  evaluaNon  for  sustainability  

•  Support  in  gaining  ethical  approval  

ALURE  models:  Up-­‐scaling  

References  1.  Kuh,  G.,  (2008)  High  impact  educaNonal  pracNces:  what  they  are,  who  has  access  to  them,  and  why  they  maIer.    2.  Hunter,  A.-­‐B.,  Laursen,  S.L.  and  Seymour  E.,  (2006)  Science  EducaNon  91:  36-­‐74.  3.  LopaIo  D.  (2009)  Science  in  SoluNon.  4.  Zimbardi,  K.  and  MyaI,  P.,  (2014)  Studies  in  Higher  EducaNon  39  (2):  233-­‐250.  5.  Lawrie  et  al.  (2009)  Uniserve  Proceedings  173-­‐179.  6.  Rowland  et  al.  (2012)  Biochemistry  and  Molecular  Biology  EducaNon  40  (1):  46-­‐62.  7.  Wang  et  al.  (2012)  Biochemistry  and  Molecular  Biology  EducaNon  40  (1):  37-­‐45.  8.  Bugarcic  A.,  et  al.  (2012)  Biochemistry  and  Molecular  Biology  EducaNon  40(3):  174-­‐180.  9.  Zimbardi  K.,  et  al.  (2013)  Advances  in  Physiology  EducaNon  37  (4):  303-­‐315.  This  work  is  supported  by  a  2  year  Australian  Office  of  Teaching  &  Learning  Leadership  Grant.    

ALURE  examples  in  Australia  Exis%ng:  chemistry5,  biochemistry6,  microbiology7,  molecular  biology8,  physiology9  New  adopters:  nanoscience,  geneNcs,  microbiology,  biomedical  science,  chemistry,  invertebrate  biology  Addi%onal  6  Australian  universi%es  developing  local  ‘communi%es  of  prac%ce’  

Our  naNonal  leadership  project  supports  the  development,  implementaNon  and  evaluaNon  of  AuthenNc,  Large-­‐scale  Undergraduate  Research  Experiences  (ALUREs),  and  aims  to:  •  Document  exisNng  ALUREs  and  keys  to  their  success  •  IdenNfy  and  support  academic  champions  in  

developing  new  ALUREs  •  Produce  a  pracNcal  framework  that  guides  new  

ALURE  adopters    

ALURE  through  evolu'on  

AuthenNcity  

Less  student  autonomy  &  responsibility  

More  student  autonomy  &  responsibility  

“Cookbook”  

Guided  inquiry  

Open  inquiry  

Research  projects  

Ownership  

Textbooks   Using  primary  literature  

Building  on  primary  literature  

Unknown  outcomes  

Known  outcomes  

Why  would  my  colleagues  be  interested  in  implemenNng  this  ALURE?  What  outcomes  will  other  teaching/research  staff  get  out  of  being  involved?  What  challenges  are  they  likely  to  encounter?  

Why  am  I  implemenNng  the  ALURE?  What  outcomes  will  I  get  out  of  this?  What  challenges  am  I  likely  to  encounter?  

What  other  stakeholders  may  have  interest  in  the  ALURE?  What  challenges  are  associated  with  their  needs?  

What  outcomes  will  students  get  out  of  being  involved?  What  challenges  are  they  likely  to  encounter?  

Implementer  

Students   Colleagues  

Other  Stakeholders  

Process    and  

LogisNcs  

MoNvaNon  and  Value  

EvaluaNon  

Support  for  Students