Date post: | 26-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | jasmin-pitts |
View: | 214 times |
Download: | 0 times |
© 2005 Bentz Whaley Flessner
Profile, Identify and TrackMajor and Planned Giving Prospects
in Team Approach
Joshua Birkholz
2© 2005 Bentz Whaley Flessner
Agenda
Overview of principles and applications
Identification and Profiling
Prospect Management and Tracking
3© 2005 Bentz Whaley Flessner
Elements of a major and planned gift development system
1. Base development
2. * Prospect identification
3. * Feeding and maintaining an active prospect pipeline
4. Major and planned gift cultivation
5. Donor relations or stewardship
4© 2005 Bentz Whaley Flessner
But first…Base development
Membership program
Membership is the beginning of prospecting
Teaching donor behaviorGiving consecutively
Increasing in amount
Building awareness at the macro level
Encouraging involvement at the macro level
6© 2005 Bentz Whaley Flessner
Identify and Prioritize
Who are my best prospects for…??
Major giving
High end membership
Volunteering
Planned giving
7© 2005 Bentz Whaley Flessner
Special Initiatives
Knowledge and learning
Sports ProgrammingFinance
Endowment
Arts programming
8© 2005 Bentz Whaley Flessner
How do we get there?
A process of filtering or refinement, based on:
Previous giving behavior
The ability or “capacity” to give at a major level
The likelihood or “propensity” to give to your station
Interests aligning to the mission and impact of your station
9© 2005 Bentz Whaley Flessner
Previous giving behavior
Outright giving vs. cumulative giving
RFM analysis (Recency, Frequency, Monetary value)
How much a person gives both cumulatively and outright
How recently a constituent gives
How frequently they give and for how long
See sample formula used with Team Approach user, UNC-TV
10© 2005 Bentz Whaley Flessner
Capacity to Give
Broadly: zip codes, purchased wealth scores, job titles, surveys
Specifically: Find actual assets and income held by a constituent
Database screening
Peer evaluation
Prospect research
Incorporate ratings into Team Approach
11© 2005 Bentz Whaley Flessner
Propensity to Give
Surveys
Purchasing generic and custom models
Peer evaluation
Data mining for advanced organizations
Incorporate “Likelihoods” or “Propensity Ratings” into Team Approach
12© 2005 Bentz Whaley Flessner
Propensity: Data mining
Using statistics software to model a Team Approach query
Define the behavior to predict and code the pool (major donors, planned giving donors)
Compare to the rich depth of custom fields in Team Approach including demographic, geographic, program interests, event attendance, etc.
Build a likelihood score to import into Team Approach ratings
13© 2005 Bentz Whaley Flessner
Interests
Define and internalize the impact of your organization
Align interest characteristics to these impact areas
Create custom surveys for constituents to self identify an area of interest
Align programming preferences to interests
Use the depth of Team Approach to code constituent interests
14© 2005 Bentz Whaley Flessner
Profiling
Two primary types of profile
Prospect research profile: biographical summary of a person
Market profile: geo-demographic profile of a segment or “market”
Select populationQuery demographic, geographic, program interests,
event attendance, etc.Analyze frequency distribution (counts) by area and
synthesize into a profile
15© 2005 Bentz Whaley Flessner
Questions to address through profiling:What are the characteristics of our major and planned
giving donors?
What distinguishes our lifelong members from our top outright donors?
Our major donors tend to be of a generation that is passing; what is different about the next generation?
Which types of people does this gift officer cultivate most efficiently and effectively?
What distinguishes a top producing portfolio from an underperforming portfolio? Or…How should we construct optimum portfolios?
16© 2005 Bentz Whaley Flessner
Synthesize information
Prioritize according to all the ratings and dimensions (capacity, propensity, giving, interests, “fitting the profile”
Prioritize into pools according to consolidated ratings
19© 2005 Bentz Whaley Flessner
Qualification process
Research qualificationConfirm ability, likelihood, connection,
and interests through one-to-one information gathering and interpretation
Assign to field officer
Field officer qualification, AKA Discovery
Confirm ability, likelihood, connection, and interests through personal meeting
21© 2005 Bentz Whaley Flessner
Feed names into a prospect management and tracking system
Beyond tracking giving and membership
Team Approach enables stations to:
Record history of relationships with constituents
Guide the strategy for major and planned giving cultivation
Manage the prospect cultivation pipeline
23© 2005 Bentz Whaley Flessner
Stages advance a person to solicitation
Research qualification moves a suspect to a “qualified suspect”
Discovery moves a qualified suspect to “prospect”
Cultivation moves a prospect through from awareness, to involvement, and on to ownership
Solicitation moves a prospect to “donor”
Stewardship moves a “donor” back into cultivation
24© 2005 Bentz Whaley Flessner
Key elements to maintain on Team Approach
Assigned solicitor or manager
Stages of cultivation
Record and maintain cultivation strategies (including projections and timelines)
After every meaningful interaction, record a contact report
Schedule each visit or “move”
Track the progress of proposals
25© 2005 Bentz Whaley Flessner
Recommended first steps
Conduct RFM analysis of donors
See that the top names are under management
Make use of ratings on Team Approach
Commit to gathering data as well as gifts (job titles, family information, interests)
Query multi-dimensional data from Team Approach on top major and planned giving donors
What are the basics?Do others share these characteristics?
Synthesize what you learn
26© 2005 Bentz Whaley Flessner
Questions?
Thank You!
Joshua Birkholz
Bentz Whaley Flessner7251 Ohms LaneMinneapolis, Minnesota 55439P. 952-921-0111 F. 952-921-0109
email: [email protected]
website: www.bwf.com