© 2009 IBM Corporation Hetero-Labeled LDA: A partially supervised topic model with heterogeneous...

© 2009 IBM Corporation

Hetero-Labeled LDA: A partially supervised topic model with heterogeneous

label information

Dongyeop Kang1, Youngja Park2, Suresh Chari2 1. IT Convergence Laboratory, KAIST Institute,Korea 2. IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, NY, USA


Topic Discovery - Supervised

Topic classification–Learn decision boundaries of classes by learning from data with labels– Accurate topic classification for general domains

Very hard to build a model for business applications due to data bottleneck


Topic Discovery – Unsupervised

Probabilistic topic modeling–Learn topic distribution for each class by learning from data

without label information, and choose topic of new data from most similar topic distribution

–e.g., Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA)

Not sufficiently accurate or interpretable


Topic Discovery – Semi-supervised

Supervised topic modeling methods–Supervised LDA [Blei&McAuliffe,2007], Labeled LDA [Ramage,2009]:

document labels provided

Semi-supervised topic modeling methods–Seeded LDA [Jagarlamudi,2012], zLDA [Andrzejewski,2009]: word

labels/constraints provided

Limitations1. Only one kind of domain knowledge is supported2. The labels should cover the entire topic space, |L| = |T|3. All documents should be labeled in training data, |Dunlabeled| = Ф


Partially Semi-supervised Topic Modeling with Heterogeneous Labels

Generation of labeled training samples is much more challenging for real-world applications

In most large companies, data are generated and managed independently by many different divisions

Different types of domain knowledge are available in different divisions

Can we discover accurate and meaningful topics with small amount of various types of domain knowledge?


Hetero-Lableled LDA: Main Contributions

Heterogeneity–Domain knowledge (labels) come in different forms – e.g., document labels, topic-indicative features, a partial taxonomy

Partialness–Small amount of labels are given –We address two kinds of partialness

• Partially labeled documents: |L| << |T| • Partially labeled corpus: |Dlabeled| << |Dunlabeled|

Three levels of domain information–Group Information: –Label Information: –Topic Distribution:


ChallengesDocument labels (Ld)

Feature labels (Lw) {trade, billion, dollar, export, bank, finance}

{grain, wheat, corn, oil, oildseed, sugar, tonn}{game, team, player, hit, dont, run, pitch}

{god, christian, jesus, bible, church, christ}?????

?????


Hetero-Labeled LDA: Heterogeneity

wzθα φ

β

KK

DΛd

γ

Document Labels

Λw

K

δ

Word Labels

Wd


Hetero-Labeled LDA: Partialness

wzθα φ

β

Wd

Λwδ

Λdγ

Kd << K

Kw << K

Kd ∩ Kw Ф

KK

Kw

D


Hetero-Labeled LDA: Heterogeneity+Partialness

ΛdΨ

Kd

wzθα φ

β

KK

Λw

Kw

δ

Hybrid Constraint Wd

D

γ


Hetero-Labeled LDA: Generative Process


Hetero-Labeled LDA: Generative Process


Experiments

Datasets:

Algorithms:–Baseline: LDA, LLDA, zLDA–Proposed: HLLDA (L=T), HLLDA (L<T)

Evaluation metric:– Prediction Accuracy: the higher the better– Clustering F-measure: the higher the better– Variational Information: the lower the better

Data set N V T

Reuters 21,073 32,848 20

News20 19,997 82,780 20

Delicious.5K 5,000 890,429 20


Experiment: Questions

Q1. How does mixture of heterogeneous label information improve performance of classification and clustering?


Multi-class Prediction Accuracy

Clustering F-Measure



Q2. How does HLLDA improve performance of partially labeled documents?

– Partially labeled corpus: |Dlabeled| << |Dunlabeled|– Partially labeled document: |L| << |T|

For a document, the provided label set covers a subset of all the topics the document belongs to. Our goal is to predict the full set of topics for each document.


Partially Labeled Documents: |L| << |T|


Partially Labeled Corpus: |Dlabeled| << |Dunlabeled|



Q3. How good are the generated topics interpretable?– Comparison between LLDA and HLLDA– User study for topic quality


News-20: LLDA (10) vs HLLDA (10)

<LLDA(10) with 10 Document labels>

<LLDA(10) with another 10 Document labels>

<HLLDA(10) with 10 Document labels >


Delicious.5k: LLDA (10) vs HLLDA (10)

<LLDA(10) with another 10 Document labels>

<LLDA(10) with 10 Document labels>

<HLLDA(10) with 10 Document labels >


User Study for Topic Quality

Number of topically irrelevant (Red) and relevant (Blue) words. The more blue (red) words are, the higher (lower) the topic quality is


Conclusions

Proposed a novel algorithm for partially semi-supervised topic modeling

–Incorporates multiple heterogeneous domain knowledge which can be easily obtained in real life

–Supports two types of partialness : |L| << |T| and |Dlabeled| << |Dunlabeled|–A unified graphical model

Experimental results confirm that learning from multiple domain information is beneficial (mutually reinforcing)

HLLDA outperforms existing semi-supervised methods in terms of classification and clustering task

© 2009 IBM Corporation25

THANK YOU

contact: [email protected]

Date post:	26-Dec-2015
Category:	Documents
Upload:	rosa-hawkins
View:	214 times
Download:	1 times