+ All Categories
Home > Documents > < 4Å M{ sÞ5 o rí 4 ,< ûlibrary.jsce.or.jp/jsce/open/00044/2010/29-0101.pdf · − v − v K -&...

< 4Å M{ sÞ5 o rí 4 ,< ûlibrary.jsce.or.jp/jsce/open/00044/2010/29-0101.pdf · − v − v K -&...

Date post: 19-May-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 1 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
12
Ý₀¿úT‥÷SƅK[Ɓ˘ * ! ’65/*-84 !5+3=919 6. *8+59768:+:165 %4786<-4-5: +.:-8 )7-515/ 6. #;2;,01=+4+ ’15- ȽƓ ȩǡ ** "= $!*)&) (+9+:6901 D Abstract Fukuchiyama Line, which locates in suburban of Osaka Megalopolis, has performed a part of Japanese trunk railway network. Because it was chosen as a national railway policy that new line constructions take priority over any line improvements, no major improvements have been made on the line after its open in 1904. Steam locomotives with higher power could make trains reach their destinations in shorter time before World War >, while trainsets with better performance could not make any remarkable improvements in train service level, especially in necessary time, for tens of years after the war. Improvements of double-tracking and electrification in 1980s increased both regional trains and inter-city trains in number and in their average speed. The relative rise of service level of regional train was larger than the others because of slow operation. A comparative study with other nearby lines, using long-term-analysis of change of average speed and number of trains, has been made in this study and assignments in regional service on trunk railways has been revealed. ⁿŽàIñ¦FÜÛ D“R⅜qʧɭqȫ«Ǒƒgj|§lE ƇqffioɤM¥¤§˸ʪ«UlEƟ Q¥ˎʪl]jȝ]d˸ʪrnUE₉Urʪ l]jȝ]jM§F]Q]Eʪrƥƭl¡ 1 hqʪ˸«ɤ_§ƠƛkL§d~E˘ɨoȔ˾ ƶRɔUEɚoƇqƐʪ«NjN˸ʪkrƵˇ ˻ʓqƇÓ«ž_§L{ƒE⁴⁹Ól]jq ʷⁿr¥¤d¡qon¥\§«ƫnQgdF DȉɽʍkrEƇoàʰ]nR¥¡E¥U ʪkLƒEƇlQ¥ŻǬvqƐ ʪq×Ǭ«NjgjM§ʅɻŻʪ«ȑˬl_§F {dEÔʄ⁴⁹Q¥ŻǬvqƐʪ«NjgjS d˸ʪl]jrEʅɻŻʪqÕo¡ÔQ¥ŻǬo ʻ§ŻȉʪE˸Q¥₎²_§Ǜäʪ¡L§d~EY ¤¥˸ʪ«ȯˬl]dF Dȑl]jrEǞqȫ«Ǒƒ§ll¡ oEb¤o/gjƫ¥¤dʜ 90 Ǝo“d§ⁿq₇ ₍ohMjEɚo½÷‡Ðoɹɳ]jȑ]Eȯ ȑ«^j˸ʪɚȂqnm«ʴƼ]nR¥E“R ⅜qƐʪǦýqȫRNJOjSd˦ohMjʴ _§Yl«ɳɮl_§F DȉɽʍqȑʢȒrEoȫɮnǞohMj q˗eWknUEƐʪ«NjNʪq¦ʾɮn ˦«¡ʀ]jM§lʴO¥¤§FƎElUo⁴Ǭ oPMjø÷ˆ™´÷»¬±R˃]UEY¤oR Lj]j£Ud~orEǣ⁴⁹k¡Ƈn|q”÷ ª‰ȲɍRȴ~¥¤§/NongjSjM§F]Q]E ƹl]jrƱ‘]¡ƲkSjM§“WkrnUEǸ Úqǖʈo]jqȲɍ²Rüɏ_§/NnÈƻ RêǸmq/NnɜȻ®kɭɢ]EÒƨEmq/Nn ǞʔRȂQohMjEȫQ¥uYlRkS§ qkrnMQlʴO¥¤§F ⁿQ=flH;>O˝íë¬wFƒí Dowd/NoE“R⅜q˸ʪrq₉Ur ʪl]jȝ]jM§FïOsEǰȉȀqk L§ǫȥ ȤɂohMj¡E 1872(Ǵȹ 5)Ǝoʪ l]jȝ]dRE 1876(Ǵȹ 9)Ǝqǫȥ ƃqˎʪ ₍«ɯƒoE1881(Ǵȹ 14)Ǝ{koˎʪ₍Rˇ“¤j M§F{dEȏɄȉʪéohMj¡Er 1889(Ǵ ȹ 22)ƎkL§REˎʪ₍qÊrE1913(ȩ 2)ƎkL § "! F DʪrEˎʪoȯwjȅLJ˯RnUjɇ }d~EǃgƒdzU˸ʪʧ«ǎ_§orȂnƠƻ kLgdl˗O§F“R⅜qʧrEȩǸÚo§ {korÄːnșRƠ襤EPP}pƕɷƑ * keywords: Ǧý, ʅɻŻʪ, ȅȑ, óƶ ** ȩŸ ( Ƅ) ɣȝǢǓ ƄƇƄʆ J5748530 ƕȏƇ©⁷ 3 °ɳ 11 【土木史研究 論文集 Vol . 29 2010年】 −101−
Transcript
Page 1: < 4Å M{ sÞ5 o rí 4 ,< ûlibrary.jsce.or.jp/jsce/open/00044/2010/29-0101.pdf · − v − v K -& v K ª)S&÷ p ì UM>E' %\E& { { ªF8j÷ p ìM>E Q )& «dgE ÷ ¢ 3 +

*

**

AbstractFukuchiyama Line, which locates in suburban of Osaka Megalopolis, has performed a part of Japanese

trunk railway network. Because it was chosen as a national railway policy that new line constructions take priority over any line improvements, no major improvements have been made on the line after its open in 1904. Steam locomotives with higher power could make trains reach their destinations in shorter time before World War , while trainsets with better performance could not make any remarkable improvements in train service level, especially in necessary time, for tens of years after the war. Improvements of double-tracking and electrification in 1980s increased both regional trains and inter-city trains in number and in their average speed. The relative rise of service level of regional train was larger than the others because of slow operation.

A comparative study with other nearby lines, using long-term-analysis of change of average speed and number of trains, has been made in this study and assignments in regional service on trunk railways has been revealed.

1

90

− 1872( 5)1876( 9) −

1881( 14)1889(

22) 1913( 2)

* keywords: , , , ** ( )

574−8530 3 1−1

【土木史研究 論文集 Vol .29 2010年】

−101−

Page 2: < 4Å M{ sÞ5 o rí 4 ,< ûlibrary.jsce.or.jp/jsce/open/00044/2010/29-0101.pdf · − v − v K -& v K ª)S&÷ p ì UM>E' %\E& { { ªF8j÷ p ìM>E Q )& «dgE ÷ ¢ 3 +

1906( 39)

1909( 42) −1918( 7)

1922( 11)

1

10

11

12

13

14 15 16

17

17

18)

19)

( −−

) 1981 (− − )

−102−

Page 3: < 4Å M{ sÞ5 o rí 4 ,< ûlibrary.jsce.or.jp/jsce/open/00044/2010/29-0101.pdf · − v − v K -& v K ª)S&÷ p ì UM>E' %\E& { { ªF8j÷ p ìM>E Q )& «dgE ÷ ¢ 3 +

( − ) ( − )

( ) ( )

20)

(1994 )

−( , )− 1904( 37)

−( , )

(1892) ( − − − −− ) 1893( 26) 7

− −1896( 29)−

1897( 30) 1899( 32)

−− − − ( )

− −) 1893( 26) 7

(1922)

) )21)−35)

− ()

70 19801907( 40)

1934( 9)

播但線

米原

姫路

豊岡

名古屋方面

鳥取方面

京都

神戸大阪

和田山福知山

綾部

舞鶴

奈良

大津福

知山線

山陰本線

岡山方面

和歌山方面

名古屋方面

福井方面敦賀

−103−

Page 4: < 4Å M{ sÞ5 o rí 4 ,< ûlibrary.jsce.or.jp/jsce/open/00044/2010/29-0101.pdf · − v − v K -& v K ª)S&÷ p ì UM>E' %\E& { { ªF8j÷ p ìM>E Q )& «dgE ÷ ¢ 3 +

70

−−

1903( 36)

341 348

1912

1912

1935 1935

28)29)

30)31) 32) 33)

1908 1940

1912

() 1974 1975

1980

1903

(1) , , 1998, 32 4 (1899)

36 1 (1904), 39 4 (1906)40 3 (1907), 9 (1912)

, 4 3 (1915), 10 8 (1921)12 7 (1923), 16( 2) 1 (1927)

(2) , , 1978,

14 4 (1925),

5 10 (1930), 9 12 (1934)(3) , , 1999

, 4 5 (1929)6 6 (1931), 10 10 (1935)

, 7 5 (1932)(4) , , 1977

, 25 10 (1950), 36 10 (1961)

(5) 4, JTB , 2000,

40 11 (1965), 45 8 (1970)(6) 2, JTB , 2000

, 43 10 (1968)(7)JR ( 14 4 ),

, (8) ,

(http://w3land.mlit.go.jp/WebGIS/index.html)( ),1974 ( )

CKK-74-8_C1A C10, CKK-74-14_C14A C26( ), 1975 ( )

CKK-75-8_C4 C25A(9) , 28) 34)

−104−

Page 5: < 4Å M{ sÞ5 o rí 4 ,< ûlibrary.jsce.or.jp/jsce/open/00044/2010/29-0101.pdf · − v − v K -& v K ª)S&÷ p ì UM>E' %\E& { { ªF8j÷ p ìM>E Q )& «dgE ÷ ¢ 3 +

70−

( )( )

1973(48) 1980( 55)

41978( 53) 1986

( 61) 26 −1986( 61) −

()

CTC()

1991( 3)

P ATS

(2005 )− (SL:

DL: )

(EC)

1910500 1920 8709600 1920

1980 60 3

1980

(DD51 DL 103 EC)

−(1994 )

1974(75) | |

−105−

Page 6: < 4Å M{ sÞ5 o rí 4 ,< ûlibrary.jsce.or.jp/jsce/open/00044/2010/29-0101.pdf · − v − v K -& v K ª)S&÷ p ì UM>E' %\E& { { ªF8j÷ p ìM>E Q )& «dgE ÷ ¢ 3 +

( ) 673.8km−

− 1895( 28) 11

1897− ( , )

1899( 32)

1899( 32)( )

1904( 37) − −

1910( 43) −80

−26

( , )−

1989( )

1996( 8 )

2009 −37)−40)

−1893( 26) 6

1895

1906( 39)

90−

1900 90−

10 1912 10

−1912( ) 5

1934( 9))

1

1950( 25)1961( 36)

−106−

Page 7: < 4Å M{ sÞ5 o rí 4 ,< ûlibrary.jsce.or.jp/jsce/open/00044/2010/29-0101.pdf · − v − v K -& v K ª)S&÷ p ì UM>E' %\E& { { ªF8j÷ p ìM>E Q )& «dgE ÷ ¢ 3 +

1980( 55)1985( 60)

1991( 3)

2001( 13)

JR

−10

() (

)

−10 ( )−11

1912 107 − (

) 11 1910 −

198019 15

11985

37 1991

100

22 12001 JR

42 2

19501970 10 ( −

) 1986

−10 () −12

1986 −1986

19121934

10 15km/h

−107−

Page 8: < 4Å M{ sÞ5 o rí 4 ,< ûlibrary.jsce.or.jp/jsce/open/00044/2010/29-0101.pdf · − v − v K -& v K ª)S&÷ p ì UM>E' %\E& { { ªF8j÷ p ìM>E Q )& «dgE ÷ ¢ 3 +

−13

1912 1923− 25

− 8 − 1− 16 −

−1923

1934 −41 − 9− 8 − 14 −

−1980

50

1980−

10km/h

300m60km/h 41

( ) 41

300m 75km/h 42

−14

1980 1985 −23 −

14 − 9 −12 −

/ [ ] km/h

−−

1912 705 15:05 16:07 16:54 17:45 19:29 4:241923 353 15:12 16:06 16:53 17:43 19:11 3:591934 417 15:10 15:55 16:34 17:14 18:28 3:18

1980

1980 737 15:01 15:54 16:35 17:13 18:36 3:351985 741 15:20 15:59 16:31 17:21 18:32 3:121991 2751M 15:17 15:41 15:54 16:31 17:30 2:13

−108−

Page 9: < 4Å M{ sÞ5 o rí 4 ,< ûlibrary.jsce.or.jp/jsce/open/00044/2010/29-0101.pdf · − v − v K -& v K ª)S&÷ p ì UM>E' %\E& { { ªF8j÷ p ìM>E Q )& «dgE ÷ ¢ 3 +

12 1985−14

741− − 23

−34

1985 1991 −59 −

15 − 19 − 13− 12

1991 2751M−−

−1.8km

− ( − )1961

− 116.0km 1 5361.6km/h ( −

1961 48.9km/h)( − ) 1.7 2001

114.2km 134 72.9km/h

1.4

( − )( − )

− −1912

19912001

2001−15

−16 −17− −

−( − ) − −

1912 1923

1923 19341923 − 20

151929 − ( ,

) 27)

−43)

19601991

( − )1991 −

( − ) − 1934

1980

1991− 1998

199140 1985

−1985

30

( )

−109−

Page 10: < 4Å M{ sÞ5 o rí 4 ,< ûlibrary.jsce.or.jp/jsce/open/00044/2010/29-0101.pdf · − v − v K -& v K ª)S&÷ p ì UM>E' %\E& { { ªF8j÷ p ìM>E Q )& «dgE ÷ ¢ 3 +

6 24 303630

−18 −19− −−

( − ) 1934 1985 50

1991

( − ) 2001

49.4km/h 59.4km/h41.6km/h 33.8km/h

2001 () −

−( − )

1934 1985 50

1930 501960

1980

( ) / [ ] ( ) / [ ]

−110−

Page 11: < 4Å M{ sÞ5 o rí 4 ,< ûlibrary.jsce.or.jp/jsce/open/00044/2010/29-0101.pdf · − v − v K -& v K ª)S&÷ p ì UM>E' %\E& { { ªF8j÷ p ìM>E Q )& «dgE ÷ ¢ 3 +

( ) km/h ( ) km/h

−111−

Page 12: < 4Å M{ sÞ5 o rí 4 ,< ûlibrary.jsce.or.jp/jsce/open/00044/2010/29-0101.pdf · − v − v K -& v K ª)S&÷ p ì UM>E' %\E& { { ªF8j÷ p ìM>E Q )& «dgE ÷ ¢ 3 +

20054 25

: ( ) , , 1967:

, No.482/ -2, pp.47-56, 1994

: , pp.77-87, p.113-124, , , 1991

: , , 1986

: ( ) , ,1968: ,

, 2008: ,pp.6-7, ,1992

: , p.20, , 1999: , 12 , pp.413-420,1992

10 :, , pp.136-142, 1983

11 : ,

, pp.115-124, 198412 :

, , pp.99-106, 1984

13 : , 13 , pp.205-220, 1993

14 : ,

12 , pp.65-80, 199215 :

, 13 , pp.221-232, 1993

16 : ,

14 , pp.159-172, 199417 :

, , 199818 :

, 13

, pp.233-248, 199319 :

,11, pp.57-64, 1993

20 :2

, , pp.245-254, 1989

21 : , No.35, pp.6-14, ,1997

22 : - - , pp.66-72, , 2003

23 : , , 2008

24 : , 197225) : CTC

, pp.158-173, , 198626 : ,

p.65-66, , 199427) JR II , pp.124-128, JTB

, 199828)

, 29) ,

30),

31),

32),

33) ,

34) ,

35) ( ): ,

1986 6 , pp.30-31, 36 :

,JTB , 200737 :

- JR - , 2006 11 , p.3, 2006 (http://www.city.nantan.kyoto.

jp/kouhou/kouhounantan/pdf/2006_ 11/03.pdf) (2009/9/23 )38 :

, , No.526, p.1, 2007 (http://www.city.kameoka.

kyoto.jp/kouhou/0702 /01-1.html) (2009/9/23 )39 :

, 2003 (http://www.pref.kyoto.jp/koho/kaiken/kaiken 2003/030402/030402komoku1.html) (2009/9/23 )

40 :, , 1998

41) : , , 1982

42) : JR , 2003

43) : JR( 14 4 )

−112−


Recommended