1

1

1.1

1950-70

1995

1.2

16 8,100 16 8,100

1995 10 1995 11

2.6 30 10

2

KESH

KESH

2006 12

10 ABB SAE Sadelmi S.p.A.( )

1N/A

F/S)

F/S

1993 Lahmeyer International ( )

1995 2007

EBRD 1

2

2.1

2.2

2010 4 2011 2

2010 6 22 30 2010 10 4 8

2.3

3. B

3.1 a

3.1.1

1990 93 GDP

93 IMF ESAF

1993-96

1 EBRDP4 1 EBRD

3

PIP

2007 5

2009 2 9 2009 11

3.1.2

1995

1992 1,600 US 25

93 500 US

5 2001 13 16

3,400GWh 5,200GWh2

10 1%

Dam Safety Project3

3.1.3

1992 ODA

2 20093 2013

4

3.2 c

3.2.1

1

1

EBRD

4 EBRD

1

1EBRD

2

3 2JICA

4EBRD

1 2 3 4

1EBRD

2

3 2JICA

4EBRD

1 2 3 4

4 500MW 125MW×4250MW 50MW×5

265MW×1

5

EBRD

223M/232 / M/M

5

JICA

2

×4

×5

2

--

×2-- ×4- ×2- 220kV 18--------- 220kV ×4

- 110kV ×1

- ×5----

JICA

5

6

1 6

3.2.2

3.2.2.1

1995 11 1999 9 3 11 47

1995 11 2007 10 7 12 144

306

1. 1997 8

9 10 9

2. EBRD

1997 4 2000 5 38

EBRD

6 3

7 2007 2 108 1990

97 122,000

9 1 8

7

3.

2000 8

2002 9

30

2003 1

4.

EBRD

3.2.2.2

43 8,700 ( 16 8,100

) 64 7,000 16 8,100

147 3.2.2.1

EBRD

3

Mediocredito Centrale: MCC ODA

3

1.

8

1 68 105 172 76 45 1212 644 35 679 1,029 454 1,4833 909 37 946 1,014* 1 797 1,8114 136 12 148 412 65 4772.1 19 21 39 25 2 272 777 85 862 629 204 8333 692 13 705 1,012* 2 209 1,2214 589 7 596 432 65 4973. 192 16 207 0 0 0

80 0 80 0 0 04. 0 33 33 0 0 0

4,024 364 4,387 4,629 1,841 6,470(1,681) 0 (1,681) (1,681) 0 (1,681)

JICA* 1* 2 MCC 8,4002 6,100

3.3 a

3.3.1

3.3.1.1

4 2003

4 1

2003 06 125MW

4

417GWh

1,378GWh 1981-91

1,795GWh 2007

9

10 2007-08

4 11

12 5

4

5 m /

10 4 2009 1,557.4GWh 2003P6 1

11

12 2007 8 12 4

10

2000 1,300 13

6 2008-09 52-44

2007 4,832 4

2007 2005-09

6 /

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009329 172 4,832 44 52

0 0 0 0 0329 172 4,832 44 52

2

7

2003 5 1

2003 07

50MW

7

178GWh

878GWh 1981-91

1,056GWh 2007

13

2 220kV 3

11

09 14

2005-06 7

215 8 2007 2008

8

7

8 m /

14 1,085.3GWh15 2005 6 2

1 206 3 2005-06

2004

12

2000 610 16

9 2008-09 73-44

2005-09

2005 06 283 559

2 06 3

9 /

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009283 559 81 73 44

0 0 0 0 0283 559 81 73 44

3.3.1.2

1 FIRR

25

13.89 16.00

4.40 /KWh 7.0-7.5 /KWh 2007-09

16

4 5

13

2 EIRR

25 21.92

29.00

3.3.2

(1)

50

(2)

3.4

3.4.1

3.4.1.1

14

10 5 2009

1995

1.5

1997

3.4.1.2

1,557MW

500MW+250MW 750MW

10 GWh

JICA Energy Regulatory Entities

3.4.1.2

17

2009

11

09 10 10 4

17 JICA

15

2009 2010 12

11 GWh

1 2010 62 90 2004

12

1 2010 62 90 2004

16

3.4.1.3

13 2000 GDP 2000

GDP

13 GDP

3.4.2

3.4.2.118

18 KESHEIA

6 7

17

3.4.2.2

3.5 a

3.5.1

KESH 19

2003 KESH

KESH 2006

OST

DSO KESH

DSO IFC 2009

KESH 9,500 2010 6

1,250

KESH

62 55

52 68

3

19 KESH METE KESHKESH General Director

18

3.5.2

KESH

200420 9 8

200921

3

OJT

3.5.3

14 2007 2

10

KESH KESH

14

2007 2008 2009 2007 2008 2009136,549 139,529 148,137 165,760 147,075 135,15328,800 28,604 28,420 14,093 25,822 40,529165,349 168,133 176,557 179,853 172,897 175,682

3.5.4

20 Alstom21 AEM Milano

19

3 24

PC

EBRD

1

EBRD

22

EBRD

8 9 23

22 KESH

23 P9 2007

20

4.

4.1

B

4.2

4.3

EBRD KESH

EBRD

21

1)- EBRD2)-3)- JICA4)- EBRD

--

×2-- ×4- ×2- 220kV 18----

1)- EBRD2)-3)- JICA4)- EBRD

----- 220kV ×4

- 110kV ×1

- ×5--

22

--

- EBRD

- 223M/

M/M232 /

1995 11 1999 947

1995 11 2007 10144

4,024364

4,3871,681

1ECU 1221US 91

1995 11

4,6291,8416,4701,681

1 141.971US =106.44

2003 1 2007 10

Third Party Comments for the Ex-post Evaluation on “Drin River Hydropower Stations Rehabilitations Project”

Dr. Eng. Edmond M. HIDO, Albania-EU Energy Efficiency Centre

The Ex-post Evaluation on “Drin River Hydropower Stations Rehabilitations Project” prepared by Mr. Kenichi Inazawa of Office Mikage, LLC describes very clearly, professionally and in details the project outlines and objectives, its relevance to the Albania’s power sector development plan, the effectiveness and impact of the project, the planned and achieved outputs of JICA’s Loan Portion, as well as its overall results.

The indispensability of this important document is connected to the problems and sharp challenges which Albania’s power Sector has encounter during the last 15-20 years.Until 2002, Albania appeared as country with low energy consumption per capita and with high energy intensity as a consequence of outdated technologies especially in power generation sector. The problems of supplies with energy resources have had an impact on the slow developments of the economic activity, as well as in modest levels of living comfort.

The Albanian Governments have established a series of important objectives, realisation of which shall make possible that the power sector be transformed into a supporting sector for a steady development of the entire Albanian economy. The financial and technical support of WB, EBRD, Japanese, Swiss and Italian governments loan have been very crucial for fulfilling such objectives.

In this context, the “Drin River Hydropower Stations Rehabilitations Project” has contributed to improvement of power commodities supply for a better fulfilment of different consumers needs. The Evaluation Report has clearly documented also the contribution of this project towards extending the lifespan of both hydropower stations operation as well as towards improvements of the work safety.

The Evaluation Report, due to the project’s great effectiveness and impact, shows that the projects has contributed to guarantee a safer supply with energy for supporting a sustainable economic development of Albania with minimum impact on the environment.