+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Consequentialist - an action is right or wrong based on consequences Deontological (or...

Consequentialist - an action is right or wrong based on consequences Deontological (or...

Date post: 01-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: ariel-logan
View: 213 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
21
Moral Theories influential in history of bioethics Remember: even though they have had influence – many are very flawed.
Transcript
Page 1: Consequentialist - an action is right or wrong based on consequences  Deontological (or nonconsequentialist) - the intrinsic nature of an action itself.

Moral Theoriesinfluential in history of bioethics

Remember: even though they have had influence – many are very

flawed.

Page 2: Consequentialist - an action is right or wrong based on consequences  Deontological (or nonconsequentialist) - the intrinsic nature of an action itself.

What makes something right or wrong?

Consequentialist - an action is right or wrong based on consequences

Deontological (or nonconsequentialist) - the intrinsic nature of an action itself can be right or wrong

Page 3: Consequentialist - an action is right or wrong based on consequences  Deontological (or nonconsequentialist) - the intrinsic nature of an action itself.

Consequentialist theories

UTILITARIANISM: what produces the ‘greatest good’› What makes something a good result?

the greatest good is pleasure or ‘happiness’ = Hedonism

Greatest good is knowledge or perfecting to a certain standard

Page 4: Consequentialist - an action is right or wrong based on consequences  Deontological (or nonconsequentialist) - the intrinsic nature of an action itself.

Utilitiariansism cont….

Act utilitarianism = rightness depends on result of specific action

Rule utilitarianism = the greater good is a result of keeping rules and so one must follow rules for greater good (1000 units of happiness for 10 people is better than 900 units of happiness for the same 10)

(John Stuart Mill (1806-1873)

Page 5: Consequentialist - an action is right or wrong based on consequences  Deontological (or nonconsequentialist) - the intrinsic nature of an action itself.

Utilitiariansism cont…. How has/is utilitarianism applied to bioethics?

This is a frequent rationale for euthanasia› Act utilitarianism would say the person is no

longer suffering› Rule utilitarianism would say that this would

lead people to distrust doctors, motivations and unleash value judgments on the elderly and disabled etc…

N.B. (nota bene = note well): don’t rush to a decision – you have yet to hear all theories!!!)

Page 6: Consequentialist - an action is right or wrong based on consequences  Deontological (or nonconsequentialist) - the intrinsic nature of an action itself.

Deontologicalism

De = of Onto = nature Logic = reason “Reason in the nature” of or “of

nature’s reason”

Page 7: Consequentialist - an action is right or wrong based on consequences  Deontological (or nonconsequentialist) - the intrinsic nature of an action itself.

Kantian EthicsImmanuel Kant: Popular German philosopher - (1724-

1804)

Holds that morality consists in following rules that are universally applicable out of duty.

eg…you lie to someone to borrow money (can you answer that you think it is ok for everyone to lie in order to borrow money – if no, then you should not lie)

“categorical imperative”: Kant’s term for what he calls this universally accepted rule. An imperative is a command and categorical means is it without exception.

Page 8: Consequentialist - an action is right or wrong based on consequences  Deontological (or nonconsequentialist) - the intrinsic nature of an action itself.

Kant continued…

Kant would say if you believe it is morally ok to kill all Ethopians …then that is your categorical imperative.

ABELARD: 13th century – morality is based on one’s intentions -

Page 9: Consequentialist - an action is right or wrong based on consequences  Deontological (or nonconsequentialist) - the intrinsic nature of an action itself.

Abelard (12th century)

Morality is based on your intention – if you mean well

Abelard and Heloise

Page 10: Consequentialist - an action is right or wrong based on consequences  Deontological (or nonconsequentialist) - the intrinsic nature of an action itself.

Virtue Ethics

emphasizes the character of the moral agent, rather than rules or consequences, as the key element of ethical thinking.

Page 11: Consequentialist - an action is right or wrong based on consequences  Deontological (or nonconsequentialist) - the intrinsic nature of an action itself.

Proportionalism

1960’s attempt to find middle ground between utilitarianism and deontologicalism -

says a proportionately greater good outweighs the bad - the lesser of the evils

(this theory has been condemned in Veritatis Splendor because an intrinsically evil act cannot change its nature because of intentions or circumstances)

Page 12: Consequentialist - an action is right or wrong based on consequences  Deontological (or nonconsequentialist) - the intrinsic nature of an action itself.

Natural Law Theory

(by the way – the Catholic Church promotes this theory)

Maintains that right actions are those conforming to moral standards in nature through human reason

For 9 minute video clickhttp://

www.youtube.com/watch?v=WCVQJmKrkxo&NR=1

Page 13: Consequentialist - an action is right or wrong based on consequences  Deontological (or nonconsequentialist) - the intrinsic nature of an action itself.

Moral Relativism

There is no objective good or evil, right or wrong.

Idolatry of tolerance

Page 15: Consequentialist - an action is right or wrong based on consequences  Deontological (or nonconsequentialist) - the intrinsic nature of an action itself.

So…. what IS truth?

Who said “what is truth?” in Scripture?What was the answer?

Before we discuss what the Church teaches, what in all these moral sounds true to you?

Page 16: Consequentialist - an action is right or wrong based on consequences  Deontological (or nonconsequentialist) - the intrinsic nature of an action itself.

What is the Church’s position

Morality of an act depends on

Object + Intention + Circumstances

Page 17: Consequentialist - an action is right or wrong based on consequences  Deontological (or nonconsequentialist) - the intrinsic nature of an action itself.

See CCC 1749……

Morality of an act

circumstances

object

intention

Page 18: Consequentialist - an action is right or wrong based on consequences  Deontological (or nonconsequentialist) - the intrinsic nature of an action itself.

God is judge The moral conscience (CCC – 1776 - …

“Conscience is the aboriginal Vicar of Christ.” John Henry Cardinal Newman, "Letter to the Duke of Norfolk," V, in Certain Difficulties

felt by Anglicans in Catholic Teaching II (London: Longmans Green, 1885), 248.

Page 19: Consequentialist - an action is right or wrong based on consequences  Deontological (or nonconsequentialist) - the intrinsic nature of an action itself.

Conscience cont….

What are the distinctions in the following terms:

Vincible ignorance vs. Invincible ignorance

Erroneous, doubtful and true conscience

Page 20: Consequentialist - an action is right or wrong based on consequences  Deontological (or nonconsequentialist) - the intrinsic nature of an action itself.

Formation of conscience

How is formation of conscience related to bioethics?

Page 21: Consequentialist - an action is right or wrong based on consequences  Deontological (or nonconsequentialist) - the intrinsic nature of an action itself.

Law

An ordinance Of reason For the common good Promulgated by him who has care of

the community


Recommended