+ All Categories
Home > Documents > © Dr Karam 2011-2012 Leadership Charlotte M. Karam, PhD Assistant Professor of Organizational...

© Dr Karam 2011-2012 Leadership Charlotte M. Karam, PhD Assistant Professor of Organizational...

Date post: 15-Dec-2015
Category:
Upload: dennis-armstrong
View: 215 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
66
© Dr Karam 2011-2012 © Dr Karam 2011-2012 © Dr Karam 2011-2012 Leadership Charlotte M. Karam, PhD Assistant Professor of Organizational Behaviour Organizational Psychologist [email protected] OSB 349 Ext 3764
Transcript
Page 1: © Dr Karam 2011-2012 Leadership Charlotte M. Karam, PhD Assistant Professor of Organizational Behaviour Organizational Psychologist ck16@aub.edu.lb OSB.

© Dr Karam 2011-2012 © Dr Karam 2011-2012 © Dr Karam 2011-2012

Leadership

Charlotte M. Karam, PhD

Assistant Professor of Organizational Behaviour

Organizational Psychologist

[email protected]

OSB 349

Ext 3764

Page 2: © Dr Karam 2011-2012 Leadership Charlotte M. Karam, PhD Assistant Professor of Organizational Behaviour Organizational Psychologist ck16@aub.edu.lb OSB.

© Dr Karam 2011-2012 © Dr Karam 2011-2012

Introduction

The leader within (Intra-personal)

The art of leadership (Inter-personal)

M O

D U

L E

C

O V

E R

A G

E:

Page 3: © Dr Karam 2011-2012 Leadership Charlotte M. Karam, PhD Assistant Professor of Organizational Behaviour Organizational Psychologist ck16@aub.edu.lb OSB.

© Dr Karam 2011-2012 © Dr Karam 2011-2012

1. To introduce the participants to more recent conceptualizations of leadership that involves both soft and hard skills.

2. To introduce the participants to leadership development trends that emphasize a combination of both intra-personal and inter-personal elements.

3. To begin to foster and understanding of the importance of Emotional Intelligence for better leadership on the intra-personal, inter-personal, and team levels

4. To introduce examples of techniques for effective delegation and empowerment

M O

D U

L E

O

B J

E C

T I

V E

S:

Page 4: © Dr Karam 2011-2012 Leadership Charlotte M. Karam, PhD Assistant Professor of Organizational Behaviour Organizational Psychologist ck16@aub.edu.lb OSB.

1. Who am I

2. Informal Contract

3. Leadership

W E

L C

O M

EI N T R O D U C T I O N

Page 5: © Dr Karam 2011-2012 Leadership Charlotte M. Karam, PhD Assistant Professor of Organizational Behaviour Organizational Psychologist ck16@aub.edu.lb OSB.

© Dr Karam 2011-2012

Overview of Leadership Module

This workshop introduces the concept of Leadership as rooted within Emotional Intelligence. The focus will be on the importance of the “intra” and “inter” personal skills in effectively leading others and organizations. The workshop relies on the principles of personality, organizational and applied social psychology as the basis for fostering better self-awareness, self-exploration, and interpersonal processes with the strategic aim of developing leadership skills.

I.The leader within (Intra-personal)

II.The art of leadership (Inter-personal)

Page 6: © Dr Karam 2011-2012 Leadership Charlotte M. Karam, PhD Assistant Professor of Organizational Behaviour Organizational Psychologist ck16@aub.edu.lb OSB.

© Dr Karam 2011-2012 © Dr Karam 2011-2012

In a word…. how do you Lead your practice??

6

Page 7: © Dr Karam 2011-2012 Leadership Charlotte M. Karam, PhD Assistant Professor of Organizational Behaviour Organizational Psychologist ck16@aub.edu.lb OSB.

© Dr Karam 2011-2012 © Dr Karam 2011-2012

7

Leadership Defined

Page 8: © Dr Karam 2011-2012 Leadership Charlotte M. Karam, PhD Assistant Professor of Organizational Behaviour Organizational Psychologist ck16@aub.edu.lb OSB.

© Dr Karam 2011-2012 © Dr Karam 2011-2012

8

Definition of Leadership

An influence relationship among leaders and followers who intend real changes and outcomes that reflect their shared purposes.

Page 9: © Dr Karam 2011-2012 Leadership Charlotte M. Karam, PhD Assistant Professor of Organizational Behaviour Organizational Psychologist ck16@aub.edu.lb OSB.

© Dr Karam 2011-2012

Paradigm Shift

There has been a Paradigm Shift in the way we think about Leadership

A shift in the shared mindset about leadership that represents a fundamental way of thinking about, perceiving, and understanding the exchange between Leaders and Members

9

Page 10: © Dr Karam 2011-2012 Leadership Charlotte M. Karam, PhD Assistant Professor of Organizational Behaviour Organizational Psychologist ck16@aub.edu.lb OSB.

© Dr Karam 2011-2012 © Dr Karam 2011-2012

The New Reality for Leadership

CLASSIC Paradigm

Stability

Control

Competition

Uniformity

Self-centered

Hero

NEW Paradigm

Change/crisis mgt.

Empowerment

Collaboration

Diversity

Higher ethical purpose

Humble

Stability Something else widely documented …

Page 11: © Dr Karam 2011-2012 Leadership Charlotte M. Karam, PhD Assistant Professor of Organizational Behaviour Organizational Psychologist ck16@aub.edu.lb OSB.

© Dr Karam 2011-2012

11

Reasons for Leader Derailment

1. Acting with an insensitive, abrasive, intimidating, bullying style2. Being cold, aloof, arrogant3. Betraying personal trust4. Being overly ambitious and self-centered

5. Having specific performance problems in practice6. Overmanaging, being unable to delegate or build a team7. Being unable to select good subordinates

The leader within

(Intra-personal)

The art of leadership

(Inter-personal)

Page 12: © Dr Karam 2011-2012 Leadership Charlotte M. Karam, PhD Assistant Professor of Organizational Behaviour Organizational Psychologist ck16@aub.edu.lb OSB.

Self-exploration:

A better understanding of the self and the impact our behaviors has on others

P A

R T

O

N E

T H E L E A D E R W I T H I N

( I N T R A – P E R S O N A L )

Page 13: © Dr Karam 2011-2012 Leadership Charlotte M. Karam, PhD Assistant Professor of Organizational Behaviour Organizational Psychologist ck16@aub.edu.lb OSB.

© Dr Karam 2011-2012 13

HARD PROFILE SOFT PROFILE

WORK

- Accounting- Investing- Hiring

- Networking- Getting along with others- Having appropriate manners

LIFE

- Financial Provider- Budgeting- Having a job

- Fun-time- Caring/nurturing- Ability to take the time to relax

The Whole You

Page 14: © Dr Karam 2011-2012 Leadership Charlotte M. Karam, PhD Assistant Professor of Organizational Behaviour Organizational Psychologist ck16@aub.edu.lb OSB.

© Dr Karam 2011-2012

Leaders are those who naturally inspire confidence, loyalty, and hard work from others (Christie, 2008)

One of the most reliable indicators & predictors of true leadership is an individual’s ability to find meaning in negative events and learn from even the most trying circumstances (Bennis & Thomas, 2002)

Outstanding leaders go out of their way to boost peoples self-esteem (Walton)

14

Page 15: © Dr Karam 2011-2012 Leadership Charlotte M. Karam, PhD Assistant Professor of Organizational Behaviour Organizational Psychologist ck16@aub.edu.lb OSB.

Thematic Apperception Test

15

Page 16: © Dr Karam 2011-2012 Leadership Charlotte M. Karam, PhD Assistant Professor of Organizational Behaviour Organizational Psychologist ck16@aub.edu.lb OSB.

© Dr Karam 2011-2012

These pictures are ambiguous

The thematic apperception test (TAT) is a projective personality test

Designed at Harvard in the 1930s (Morgan & Murray)

31 pictures10 are gender-specific 21 others can be used with all adults & children

16

Page 17: © Dr Karam 2011-2012 Leadership Charlotte M. Karam, PhD Assistant Professor of Organizational Behaviour Organizational Psychologist ck16@aub.edu.lb OSB.

© Dr Karam 2011-2012

The need for achievementThe need for achievementa strong orientation toward accomplishment and an obsession with

success and goal attainment the extent to which an individual has a strong need to perform

challenging tasks well and to meet personal standards of excellence

The need for affiliation The need for affiliation reflects a strong desire to be liked by other people the extent to which an individual is concerned about establishing and

maintaining good interpersonal relations, being liked, and getting along

The need for powerThe need for power is a desire to influence or control other people the extent to which an individual desires to control or influence others

17

Page 18: © Dr Karam 2011-2012 Leadership Charlotte M. Karam, PhD Assistant Professor of Organizational Behaviour Organizational Psychologist ck16@aub.edu.lb OSB.

© Dr Karam 2011-2012

A Word of Caution

Soft Skills Leadership Development is a strategic choice that we can make

Page 19: © Dr Karam 2011-2012 Leadership Charlotte M. Karam, PhD Assistant Professor of Organizational Behaviour Organizational Psychologist ck16@aub.edu.lb OSB.

© Dr Karam 2011-2012

The Power of Self-Awareness (Burckle & Boyatzis, 1999)

• With self-awareness, person has 50-50 chance (49%) of demonstrating self-management; without it, person has virtually no chance (4%).

• With self-awareness, person has 38% chance of having social awareness; without it, person has 83% chance of lacking social awareness.

19

Why leave YOU unexamined?

Page 20: © Dr Karam 2011-2012 Leadership Charlotte M. Karam, PhD Assistant Professor of Organizational Behaviour Organizational Psychologist ck16@aub.edu.lb OSB.

© Dr Karam 2011-2012

The enigma of self-awareness

Self-awareness and self-acceptance are prerequisites for psychological health, personal growth, and the ability to know and accept others

Individuals who are more self-aware report less stress, perform better in managerial and leadership roles and are more productive at work

The knowledge we process about ourselves (self-concept) is central to improving management skills

Page 21: © Dr Karam 2011-2012 Leadership Charlotte M. Karam, PhD Assistant Professor of Organizational Behaviour Organizational Psychologist ck16@aub.edu.lb OSB.

© Dr Karam 2011-2012

We often evade or resist personal growth and new self-knowledge so we can protect our self-esteem or self-respect

We tend to be afraid of any knowledge that would cause us to despise ourselves or to make us feel inferior, weak, worthless, evil, shameful. We protect ourselves and or the ideal image of ourselves by repression and

similar defenses, which are essentially techniques by which we avoid conscious of unpleasantness or dangerous truths (Maslow, 1962).

But beginning the process of self exploration, if done well, can lead to great success!

Page 22: © Dr Karam 2011-2012 Leadership Charlotte M. Karam, PhD Assistant Professor of Organizational Behaviour Organizational Psychologist ck16@aub.edu.lb OSB.

© Dr Karam 2011-2012 22

Exploring the Intra-PersonalThere various means and techniques for exploration.

• Personal SWOT analysis• Strategic Self-SWOT analysis

Strengths Weaknesses

Threat Opportunity

Page 23: © Dr Karam 2011-2012 Leadership Charlotte M. Karam, PhD Assistant Professor of Organizational Behaviour Organizational Psychologist ck16@aub.edu.lb OSB.

© Dr Karam 2011-2012 23

Exploring the Intra-PersonalThere various means and techniques for exploration

• Personality Assessments• Big Five or Five Factor Model• Myers-Briggs Type Indicator

• Soft Skills Assessments• Emotional Intelligence• Personal Ethical Decision Making• Preferences for Power Usage• 12 executive skills

Strengths

Threat Opportunity

Page 24: © Dr Karam 2011-2012 Leadership Charlotte M. Karam, PhD Assistant Professor of Organizational Behaviour Organizational Psychologist ck16@aub.edu.lb OSB.

© Dr Karam 2011-2012

Emotional Intelligence

Reading:

What Makes a Good Leader (Goleman)

24

Page 25: © Dr Karam 2011-2012 Leadership Charlotte M. Karam, PhD Assistant Professor of Organizational Behaviour Organizational Psychologist ck16@aub.edu.lb OSB.

© Dr Karam 2011-2012 © Dr Karam 2011-2012

IQ vs. EQ

Page 26: © Dr Karam 2011-2012 Leadership Charlotte M. Karam, PhD Assistant Professor of Organizational Behaviour Organizational Psychologist ck16@aub.edu.lb OSB.

© Dr Karam 2011-2012 © Dr Karam 2011-2012

Definition of Intelligence

• The ability to learn or understand or to deal with new or trying situations: the skilled use of reason

• The cognitive abilities of an individual to learn from experience, to reason well, and to cope effectively with the demands of daily living.

• "Intelligence, as a hypothetical construct, is the aggregate or global capacity of the individual to act purposefully, to think rationally, and to deal effectively with his environment” - Wechsler

Page 27: © Dr Karam 2011-2012 Leadership Charlotte M. Karam, PhD Assistant Professor of Organizational Behaviour Organizational Psychologist ck16@aub.edu.lb OSB.

© Dr Karam 2011-2012 © Dr Karam 2011-2012

One General Intelligence??

Charles Spearman

• schoolchildren's grades across seemingly unrelated subjects were positively correlated

• doing well in one area predicted that you will do well in another

• these correlations reflected the influence of a dominant factor – the g factor.

• "general" intelligence

Howard Gardner

•disagreed with Spearman’s g

•proposed the concept of multiple intelligences

•studied savants

•identified many

Page 28: © Dr Karam 2011-2012 Leadership Charlotte M. Karam, PhD Assistant Professor of Organizational Behaviour Organizational Psychologist ck16@aub.edu.lb OSB.

© Dr Karam 2011-2012

First called social intelligence.

The ability to perceive, express, understand, and regulate emotions.

Many studies show EQ to be a greater predictor for future success than IQ

Emotional Intelligence

Page 29: © Dr Karam 2011-2012 Leadership Charlotte M. Karam, PhD Assistant Professor of Organizational Behaviour Organizational Psychologist ck16@aub.edu.lb OSB.

© Dr Karam 2011-2012

70% of the reasons for losing clients/customers are EI-related:Poor service.Poorly handled complaints.Unpleasant interactions.Didn’t go the extra mile.No follow-up.Lack of human connection.

Source: Research by Forum Corporation on Manufacturing and Service Companies, 1989-1995, cited in Orioli (2000)

Why EI: A wake up call

Page 30: © Dr Karam 2011-2012 Leadership Charlotte M. Karam, PhD Assistant Professor of Organizational Behaviour Organizational Psychologist ck16@aub.edu.lb OSB.

© Dr Karam 2011-2012

A person’s ability to read other’s emotions accurately, to respond to them appropriately, to motivate oneself, to be aware of one’s own emotions, and to control one’s own emotional responses.

It is a critical part of social intelligence - self-awareness - good emotional management - delay gratification in pursuit of long-term rewards - empathy, ability to read other people’s emotions

30

Emotional Intelligence

Page 31: © Dr Karam 2011-2012 Leadership Charlotte M. Karam, PhD Assistant Professor of Organizational Behaviour Organizational Psychologist ck16@aub.edu.lb OSB.

© Dr Karam 2011-2012

Impulse controlA fundamental psychological skill

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6EjJsPylEOY

Does it predict anything?

The marshmallow experiment4-year-oldsOffered 1 marshmallow immediately, or 2 if they could wait in a room by themselvesThose who waited:

Covered their eyes, sang to themselves, played games with their hands and feet, tried to go to sleep

31

Emotional Intelligence

Page 32: © Dr Karam 2011-2012 Leadership Charlotte M. Karam, PhD Assistant Professor of Organizational Behaviour Organizational Psychologist ck16@aub.edu.lb OSB.

© Dr Karam 2011-2012

Those who resisted temptation 12-14 years later:More socially competent, personally effective, and self-assertiveLess likely to freeze under stress and pursued challenges even in the face of difficulties

As high school graduates:Better able to put their ideas into words, to use and respond to reason, and to

concentrate1/3 of children who grabbed the marshmallow had SAT average of 524 (verbal) and 528

(quantitative)1/3 of children who waited had average SAT scores of 610 (verbal) and 652 (quantitative)

The essence of emotional self-regulationGoal-directed self-imposed delay of gratificationThe ability to deny impulse in the service of a goal

32

Emotional Intelligence

Page 33: © Dr Karam 2011-2012 Leadership Charlotte M. Karam, PhD Assistant Professor of Organizational Behaviour Organizational Psychologist ck16@aub.edu.lb OSB.

© Dr Karam 2011-2012 © Dr Karam 2011-2012

Five Components of EQ

• Self-Awareness• Managing Emotions• Motivating Oneself• Empathy• Social Skills

Page 34: © Dr Karam 2011-2012 Leadership Charlotte M. Karam, PhD Assistant Professor of Organizational Behaviour Organizational Psychologist ck16@aub.edu.lb OSB.

© Dr Karam 2011-2012

Allows effective communication with others.

Enables management of emotions such as mood, anxiety, fear and anger.

Increases motivation at all levels.

Creates leadership and the ability to gain consensus in diverse settings.

Builds rapport and trust.

Creates a balance of emotion and rational.

Page 35: © Dr Karam 2011-2012 Leadership Charlotte M. Karam, PhD Assistant Professor of Organizational Behaviour Organizational Psychologist ck16@aub.edu.lb OSB.

© Dr Karam 2011-2012

“Your foremost job as a leader… is to take charge of your own energy and then

help orchestrate the energy of those around you.”

Sources: The Effective Leader, cited in Orioli (2000); Goleman, Boyatzis, & McKee (2002, p. 5)

Druker on EI and Leadership

Page 36: © Dr Karam 2011-2012 Leadership Charlotte M. Karam, PhD Assistant Professor of Organizational Behaviour Organizational Psychologist ck16@aub.edu.lb OSB.

Leadership Behaviors: Art of Interactions

The art of Empowerment & Delegation

P A

R T

T W

OT H E A R T O F L E A D E R S H I P

( I N T E R – P E R S O N A L )

Page 37: © Dr Karam 2011-2012 Leadership Charlotte M. Karam, PhD Assistant Professor of Organizational Behaviour Organizational Psychologist ck16@aub.edu.lb OSB.

© Dr Karam 2011-2012 © Dr Karam 2011-2012

Leadership: Traits to Behaviors

Do we think of EI as a great leadership trait? Do all great leaders posses EI?

Are traits alone the key to understanding leader effectiveness.

•We note that not all great leaders possess all of the same traits•Some individuals who possess EI (and other “great traits”) are not effective in their leadership roles

This lack of a consistent relationship between specific leader traits and leader effectiveness led shift in focus from traits to behavior

BEHAVIOR: BEHAVIOR: What great leadersWhat great leaders

actually doactually do

Page 38: © Dr Karam 2011-2012 Leadership Charlotte M. Karam, PhD Assistant Professor of Organizational Behaviour Organizational Psychologist ck16@aub.edu.lb OSB.

© Dr Karam 2011-2012 © Dr Karam 2011-2012

Approaches to Understanding Leadership

Trait approach is a perspective that attempts to determine the personal characteristics that great leaders share

Behavioral approach is a perspective that attempts to identify what good leaders do – that is what behaviors they exhibit

Leadership Behaviors: Art of Interactions

Page 39: © Dr Karam 2011-2012 Leadership Charlotte M. Karam, PhD Assistant Professor of Organizational Behaviour Organizational Psychologist ck16@aub.edu.lb OSB.

© Dr Karam 2011-2012

Leader Behaviors

Attempts to identify what good leaders dodo

In the behavioral approach, personal characteristics are considered less important than the actual behaviors leaders exhibit.

Three general categories of leadership behavior have received particular attention:• behaviors related to task performancebehaviors related to task performance

• behaviors related to group maintenancebehaviors related to group maintenance

• employee participation in decision making and follow throughemployee participation in decision making and follow through(i.e., empowerment and delegation)(i.e., empowerment and delegation)

Page 40: © Dr Karam 2011-2012 Leadership Charlotte M. Karam, PhD Assistant Professor of Organizational Behaviour Organizational Psychologist ck16@aub.edu.lb OSB.

© Dr Karam 2011-2012 © Dr Karam 2011-2012

40

Ohio State Studies… others

Consideration: the extent to which a leader is sensitive to subordinates, respects their ideas and feelings, and establishes mutual trust

Initiating Structure: the extent to which a leader is task oriented and directs subordinates’ work activities toward goal achievement

Page 41: © Dr Karam 2011-2012 Leadership Charlotte M. Karam, PhD Assistant Professor of Organizational Behaviour Organizational Psychologist ck16@aub.edu.lb OSB.

© Dr Karam 2011-2012

Ohio State Studies- Leader Behaviors

Task performance/ Initiating Structure Task performance/ Initiating Structure

• Actions taken to ensure that the work group or organization reaches its goals• It is Job-oriented

• It is related to making sure that work gets done, and the organization is effective and efficient.

EX: Assigning tasks, making schedules, encouraging adherence to rules

This dimension is sometimes referred to as:• concern for production• directive leadership

Page 42: © Dr Karam 2011-2012 Leadership Charlotte M. Karam, PhD Assistant Professor of Organizational Behaviour Organizational Psychologist ck16@aub.edu.lb OSB.

© Dr Karam 2011-2012

Ohio State Studies- Leader Behaviors

Group maintenance/ Consideration Group maintenance/ Consideration

Actions taken to ensure the satisfaction of group members, develop and maintain harmonious work relationships, and preserve the social stability of the group

This type of behavior is employee-centered

Leaders here tend to show their subordinates that they trust, respect, and care about them

This dimension is sometimes referred to as:• concern for people• supportive leadership

Page 43: © Dr Karam 2011-2012 Leadership Charlotte M. Karam, PhD Assistant Professor of Organizational Behaviour Organizational Psychologist ck16@aub.edu.lb OSB.

© Dr Karam 2011-2012

Think of a mentor or someone who inspired you?

What did he/she do?What did he/she do that was different?

Page 44: © Dr Karam 2011-2012 Leadership Charlotte M. Karam, PhD Assistant Professor of Organizational Behaviour Organizational Psychologist ck16@aub.edu.lb OSB.

© Dr Karam 2011-2012 © Dr Karam 2011-2012

Those that Inspire

Transformational leaders

Research suggests that these individuals because they are:

1) charismatic

2) intellectually stimulating

3) engaging in developmental considerations

Do you inspire?

Page 45: © Dr Karam 2011-2012 Leadership Charlotte M. Karam, PhD Assistant Professor of Organizational Behaviour Organizational Psychologist ck16@aub.edu.lb OSB.

© Dr Karam 2011-2012 © Dr Karam 2011-2012

A Word on Charisma

Charisma has to do with the ability to clearly communicate his or her vision of how good things could be by:

•Being passionate and clearly communicating excitement to subordinates

•Openly sharing information with employees so that everyone is aware and informed

•Empowering workers to help with solutions to problems

•Engaging in the development of employees by working hard to help them build skills.

Page 46: © Dr Karam 2011-2012 Leadership Charlotte M. Karam, PhD Assistant Professor of Organizational Behaviour Organizational Psychologist ck16@aub.edu.lb OSB.

© Dr Karam 2011-2012 © Dr Karam 2011-2012

Empowerment

Page 47: © Dr Karam 2011-2012 Leadership Charlotte M. Karam, PhD Assistant Professor of Organizational Behaviour Organizational Psychologist ck16@aub.edu.lb OSB.

© Dr Karam 2011-2012

Empowerment

• Appropriate employee empowerment is essential to team and/or organizational success

• Everyone claims to empower employees, but this is easier said than done

Page 48: © Dr Karam 2011-2012 Leadership Charlotte M. Karam, PhD Assistant Professor of Organizational Behaviour Organizational Psychologist ck16@aub.edu.lb OSB.

© Dr Karam 2011-2012

• It is a management approach designed to give frontline employees the authority they need to do what needs to be done without having to check with management.

• Providing freedom for people to do successfully what they want to do rather than getting them to do what you want them to do

• When empowerment is accompanied by accountability and appropriate guidance, it can lead to increased employee and customer satisfaction.

Empowerment

Page 49: © Dr Karam 2011-2012 Leadership Charlotte M. Karam, PhD Assistant Professor of Organizational Behaviour Organizational Psychologist ck16@aub.edu.lb OSB.

© Dr Karam 2011-2012

Empowerment Dilemma

• Empowered employees are more productive, more innovative, more satisfied, and created better quality products

• This entails giving up control and letting others make decisions, set goals, accomplish results and receive rewards… other people will probably get credit for success!

• This is problematic for people with high need for power and control!

Page 50: © Dr Karam 2011-2012 Leadership Charlotte M. Karam, PhD Assistant Professor of Organizational Behaviour Organizational Psychologist ck16@aub.edu.lb OSB.

© Dr Karam 2011-2012

Empower or Sacrifice?

• Empowering other is neither easy nor natural, we are not born knowing how to do it

• However, it need not to require a great amount of self sacrifice• No need to sacrifice rewards, recognition, or effectiveness. In fact you can

multiply your own effectiveness if you empower skillfully

• Despite the fact that the concept of empowerment is very popular, its actual practice is all too rare in modern management

Page 51: © Dr Karam 2011-2012 Leadership Charlotte M. Karam, PhD Assistant Professor of Organizational Behaviour Organizational Psychologist ck16@aub.edu.lb OSB.

© Dr Karam 2011-2012

What are some of the common myths about empowerment?

•Everybody’s doing it.

•It’s easy.

•Every manager wants empowered employees.

•Every employee wants to be empowered.

•All the manager needs to do is leave the empowered employees alone.

Page 52: © Dr Karam 2011-2012 Leadership Charlotte M. Karam, PhD Assistant Professor of Organizational Behaviour Organizational Psychologist ck16@aub.edu.lb OSB.

© Dr Karam 2011-2012 © Dr Karam 2011-2012

What are some guidelines for effective employee empowerment?

Select the right managers.

Provide training & guidance.

Hold everyone accountable.

Build trust.

Focus on relationships.

Stress organizational values.

Transform mistakes into opportunities.

Reward and recognize.

Share authority instead of giving it up.

Encourage dissent.

Give it time.

Share information.

Realize that empowerment has its limitations.

Watch for mixed messages.

Involve employees in decision-making.

Be prepared for increased variation.

Page 53: © Dr Karam 2011-2012 Leadership Charlotte M. Karam, PhD Assistant Professor of Organizational Behaviour Organizational Psychologist ck16@aub.edu.lb OSB.

© Dr Karam 2011-2012 © Dr Karam 2011-2012

Chose the right managers.

Why?Not every manager is capable of being a coach instead of a boss.

Controlling micromanagers will always slip back into their old ways.

Pick the wrong managers and everyone will see that you are only giving lip service to the idea.

How?Select leaders who are already empowering their colleagues routinely.

Give them a fair chance to change, but make it clear that their odds of success are not good.

Call attention to leaders who are doing it right, and encourage young leaders to select them as mentors.

Page 54: © Dr Karam 2011-2012 Leadership Charlotte M. Karam, PhD Assistant Professor of Organizational Behaviour Organizational Psychologist ck16@aub.edu.lb OSB.

© Dr Karam 2011-2012 © Dr Karam 2011-2012

Select the right employees.

Why?Not every employee wants to be empowered.Only a minority of employees want to work this hard.Announce that everyone is empowered and watch the work come to a grinding halt.Only volunteers are eligible.

How?Identify those people already taking the initiative.Explain the risks and benefits of empowerment, and then wait for those who want to stretch to step forward.Share information openly, and then identify those with good instincts, confidence and the willingness to take risks.

Page 55: © Dr Karam 2011-2012 Leadership Charlotte M. Karam, PhD Assistant Professor of Organizational Behaviour Organizational Psychologist ck16@aub.edu.lb OSB.

© Dr Karam 2011-2012 © Dr Karam 2011-2012

Provide adequate training.Why?

The inclination to take the initiative is natural, but effective techniques are acquired through learning and polished through experience.

Those permitted to flail about aimlessly will quickly grow discouraged and withdraw.

Training increases confidence and encourages risk-taking.

How?Identify the most common challenges they will face.

Demonstrate attitudes and behaviors most likely to be successful.

Point out that nothing works every time.

Celebrate every incremental improvement; perfection is in short supply.

Enlist them as trainers ASAP.

Page 56: © Dr Karam 2011-2012 Leadership Charlotte M. Karam, PhD Assistant Professor of Organizational Behaviour Organizational Psychologist ck16@aub.edu.lb OSB.

© Dr Karam 2011-2012 © Dr Karam 2011-2012

Share information.

Why?Information really is power.

Everyone overestimates how much leaders know.

Sharing your information encourages others to share too; their information may be the key.

Data encourages analysis and discourages impulsive action.

How?Begin by asking what information is needed.

Encourage everyone to contribute to the information pool.

Except for personal stuff, avoid secrets.

Demonstrate openness.

Invite questions and challenges.

Change your position readily when new information demands reconsideration.

Page 57: © Dr Karam 2011-2012 Leadership Charlotte M. Karam, PhD Assistant Professor of Organizational Behaviour Organizational Psychologist ck16@aub.edu.lb OSB.

© Dr Karam 2011-2012 © Dr Karam 2011-2012

Hold everyone accountable.

Why?Authority without accountability becomes self-centeredness.

Every little bit of power is seductive.

Unrestrained freedom is the seed from which tyrants grow.

Individual freedom introduces increased variation into key organizational processes.

How?Find out what happened.

Ask why it happened?

Inquire whether, on looking back, a better option might have been employed.

Let the emotion of the moment pass.

View mistakes as opportunities to grow.

Let the empowered associate come to that conclusion on her own.

Page 58: © Dr Karam 2011-2012 Leadership Charlotte M. Karam, PhD Assistant Professor of Organizational Behaviour Organizational Psychologist ck16@aub.edu.lb OSB.

© Dr Karam 2011-2012 © Dr Karam 2011-2012

Celebrate Empowerment

Page 59: © Dr Karam 2011-2012 Leadership Charlotte M. Karam, PhD Assistant Professor of Organizational Behaviour Organizational Psychologist ck16@aub.edu.lb OSB.

© Dr Karam 2011-2012 © Dr Karam 2011-2012

Delegation

Page 60: © Dr Karam 2011-2012 Leadership Charlotte M. Karam, PhD Assistant Professor of Organizational Behaviour Organizational Psychologist ck16@aub.edu.lb OSB.

© Dr Karam 2011-2012

Delegation:

“The act of delegating, or investing with authority to act for another”

OR….

“The distribution of responsibility and authority to others while holding them accountable for their performance.”

Page 61: © Dr Karam 2011-2012 Leadership Charlotte M. Karam, PhD Assistant Professor of Organizational Behaviour Organizational Psychologist ck16@aub.edu.lb OSB.

© Dr Karam 2011-2012

Empowered Delegation

• Delegating and empowerment and two sides of the same coin.• Delegation refers to the assignment of a task• Empowerment may involve non-work activities, emotions and relationships

• Delegation is the assignment of new or additional responsibilities to a subordinate.

• It applies in all hierarchical levels

• “I not only use all the brains I have, but all I can borrow” – Woodrow Wilson

Page 62: © Dr Karam 2011-2012 Leadership Charlotte M. Karam, PhD Assistant Professor of Organizational Behaviour Organizational Psychologist ck16@aub.edu.lb OSB.

© Dr Karam 2011-2012 © Dr Karam 2011-2012

Why Delegate?

•To use skills and resources already within the group

•To keep from burning out a few leaders

•To develop new leaders and build new skills within the group

•To get things done

•To prevent the group from getting too dependent on one or two members

•To become more powerful as a group

•To allow everyone to feel a part of the effort and the success

•Group members feel more committed if they have a role and feel needed

Page 63: © Dr Karam 2011-2012 Leadership Charlotte M. Karam, PhD Assistant Professor of Organizational Behaviour Organizational Psychologist ck16@aub.edu.lb OSB.

© Dr Karam 2011-2012

Why Not?

…its too hard!

…it takes too much time!

…high risk/lack of trust, nobody can do it as good as I can

…nobody else has any time either……

… I want to be in the limelight

Page 64: © Dr Karam 2011-2012 Leadership Charlotte M. Karam, PhD Assistant Professor of Organizational Behaviour Organizational Psychologist ck16@aub.edu.lb OSB.

© Dr Karam 2011-2012

Steps in Delegation

I –Introduce the task

D-Demonstrate clearly what needs to be done

E-Ensure understanding

A-Allocate authority, information and resources

L-Let go

S-Support and monitor

Page 65: © Dr Karam 2011-2012 Leadership Charlotte M. Karam, PhD Assistant Professor of Organizational Behaviour Organizational Psychologist ck16@aub.edu.lb OSB.

© Dr Karam 2011-2012

Consequences of Poor Delegating

Information and decision-making not shared by the group

Leaders become tired out

When leaders leave groups, no one has experience to carry on

Group morale becomes low and people become frustrated and feel powerless

The skills and knowledge of the group/organization are concentrated in a few people

New members don’t find any ways to contribute to the work of the group.

Page 66: © Dr Karam 2011-2012 Leadership Charlotte M. Karam, PhD Assistant Professor of Organizational Behaviour Organizational Psychologist ck16@aub.edu.lb OSB.

© Dr Karam 2011-2012

THANK YOU


Recommended