111

*

** ***14)15)16)

< >

. . . 1. 2. / . 1. 2. 3. .

.

?

.

, .

* 2016

, 33 (2016.4.2.)

, . ** ***

http://dx.doi.org/10.17313/jkorle.2016..38.111

112 38

.

?

.

.

?

?

, ,

,

.

.

(2005)

,

,

.

, ,

,

113

,

.

(2010)

. /

, , ,

/ , , ,

, , , , , ,

.

(2011)

.

, ,

,

,

.

(2001)

,

-

, .

.

(2008)

114 38

, ,

, (2013)

.

,

, ,

, , ,

, , ,

.

, (2009) (2008) .

(2008)

, - , ,

,

. , (2016)

,

,

.

115

.

. 2015 3 1

2016 2 29 1 , 2

( )

1 .

,

.1)

283 1.3

.

2)

.3)

1) ,

.

.2)

, , ,

.3) ,

.

116 38

, ,

, ,

, .

1.

283

,

.

(%)

1 231 81.6

2 227 80.2

3 208 73.5

4 203 71.7

5 172 60.8

6 129 45.2

7 24 8.5

.

117

1)

81.6%(231)

.

.4)

,

. 13 1

23, 20

.

(authentic)

.5)

4) 2 ,

4 3 , (

)

. 5) 2015 12 3

() 2016 11 4

() 12

118 38

2)

.

, 227 ,

21(9.3%),

6) , ,

. 128(56.4%)

, 72(31.7%)

. 6(2.6%), .

26 283

9.2% 30

(10.6%) .

,

.

3)

208(73.5%)

.

.6) / ,

.

119

.

. ,

.

21

.

4)

203(71.7%)

80 63

, ,

.

.

3 4 2

, 3

.

120 38

5)

60.8%.

65 ,

5 .

56,

1 . 11,

6, 5.

,

.

.

.

,

.

,

51%

.

121

. ,

. 2

.

.

.

.

.

,

.

(FLE)

, FLE

3 (

, 2002).

6) ,

128(45.2%)

. , ,

, 3.0/4.5

122 38

.

7)

24, 22

, 2 .

.

8)

7 28,

/ /

22 . , , , ,

, , ,

. , , , , ,

, , ,

.

2. /

/

, 193, 90

68.2%, 31.8% .

.

123

(%)

120 62.2 29 15 13 6.7 31 16.1 193 100

23 25.6 38 42.2 7) 2 2.2 16 17.8 9 10 2 2.2 90 100%

, 120,

62.2% , ,

, .

/

,

.

16 .

,

7% .

11% ,

7) EPS

124 38

,

.

,

.

,

.

,

,

,

, .

,

2% 27%

.

.

(%) (%)

78 89

79 83

85 48

70 77

51 82

51 31

2 27

125

1 3545 10 15 56

2 3545 10 15 56

3 4555 15 12

4 3545 10 15 7

5 4555 15 34

6 3545 5 10 56

7 4555 15 7

8 3545 10 15 34

. 8)

13

9)

, ,

10) .

8) (2016), ,

23

.

, . 9) ,

.

. 10)

126 38

9 2535 5 10 56

10 4555 15 34

11 4555 15 56

12 55 10 15 7

13 4555 15 7

6 ,

5 ,

.

1 6

2 5

3 1

4 1 2 1

, ,

. , 1

9 , 1 9, 2 8

.11)

11) ,

127

1.

. ,

.

, , (

), , ,

, ,

12),

.

,

.

,

.

( )

.

,

.

.

. 12) , ,

.

128 38

1 87

2 86

3 (, )

76

4 66

5 55

6 42

7 39

8 , 38

, ,

,

.

,

, ,

,

, ,

-

,

. , ,

, , ,

, ,

129

.

2.

,

.

, (: , ,

), , ,

, ( , ), , (

),

13), .

1 92

2 79

3 68

4 ( , ) 63

5 59

6 ( ) 54

7 46

8 (: , , ) 31

, ,

,

13) ,

.

130 38

, , -

- ,

,

,

,

.

,

,

, ,

, () ,

, ,

,

.

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

,

.

131

,

.

. ,

,

.

3.

( ), , ,

, , 6

.

.

.

1 62

2 59

3 56

4 52

5 36

6 ( ) 19

, ,

132 38

, ,

,

,

, ,

,

.

, ,

,

, ,

,

,

,

,

, ,

.

,

.

,

3 ,

() ,

,

.

,

,

133

. ,

,

,

.

,

,

.

,

,

.

.

,

.

,

, .

1 283 ,

, , ,

, .

,

,

.

134 38

, ,

13

. ,

.

,

,

.

,

.

,

.*14)

(2010), ,

21-1, , pp.1-27.

(2014), , ,

56, , pp.687-712.

(2008), ,

* 2016. 11. 15. , 2016. 11. 22. 2016. 12. 4.

, 2016. 12. 6. .

135

4-3, , pp.1-20.

(2001), ,8-1,

, pp.69-91.

(2007), ,34,

, pp.27-47.

(2009), ,

5-1, , pp.23-41.

(2010), ,

6-1, , pp.47-67.

(2016), ,

23 , , pp.5-15.

(2004), ,

29, , pp.87-116.

(2005), - 21 ,

16-3, , pp.131-168.

(2003), ,

21-4, , pp.77-96.

(2015), -

-,26-4, ,

pp.101-132.

(2011), ,45,

, pp.109-132.

(2016), ,

33 , , pp.334-346

(2009),

,20-2, , pp. 85-105.

(2013), ,33,

, pp.139-165.

(2013), ,

136 38

24-4, , pp.193-223.

(2016), ,

107, , pp.459-487.

(2002), ,

9, , pp.209-234.

(2003), -

-,14-1,

, pp.323-341.

(2008), ,19-1,

, pp.1-39.

(2008), ,36, ,

pp.371-394.

(2009), ,

19 , , pp.3-16.

G. & H. Hadley(1996), The culture of learning and the good teacher in Japan:

An analysis of student views, The Language Teacher 20-9, pp.53-55.

J. de Jong & C. Harper(2005), Preparing Mainstream Teachers for

English-Language Learners: Is Being a Good Teacher Good Enough?,

Teacher Education Q\quarterly 32-2, pp.101-124.

J. Rubin(1975), What the "Good Language Learner" Can Teach Us, TESOL

Quarterly 9-1, pp.41-51.

S. Babai & S. Karim(2009), Characteristics of an Effective English Language

Teacher as Perceived by Iranian Teachers and Learners of English,

English Language Teaching 2-4, pp.130-143.

137

.

1 283

. ,

81.6% , , , ,

. ,

,

. 13

, , .

,

.

, ,

.

,

.

[] , , , ,

,

138 38

Abstract

Qualities of Korean language teachers

through an analysis of recruiting processes

Ahn, Jeong-minKim, Jae-wook

This study aims to investigate actual and practical qualities of Korean

language teachers. For this purpose, 283 recruitment notices for Korean

language teachers were analyzed. About 81.6% of recruitment notices

mentioned a teaching career as either mandatory or as a preferred factor.

Moreover, the level of degree came second, possession of a teacher's

certificate occupied third preference, and foreign language ability followed.

The recruiting processes of 13 university-level Korean language institutes

were also investigated and analyzed. For application review process, the

applicants' major as well as their teaching career are considered as the most

important factors. The sincerity and honesty implicit in the preparation of

documents are highly valued. For teaching demonstration, effective grammar

explanation has the first call, and implementation of new teaching methods,

preparation for the teaching demonstration, and interaction with the students

are considered important. For interview, basic attitudes and personalities of

preservice teacher have priority over other qualities. Further, the candidate

who has humble but reasonable confidence is highly valued.

[Key words] Korean language teacher, qualities of Korean language

teacher, Teaching demonstration, Interview, Korean

language teacher development, Teacher training

139

? . , . . . .

kjw@hufs.ac.kr / oxygenajm@gmail.com

[ ]

1. ? ( )

&

( )

2.

? 1 9 . ( : 1

: 9)

( )

( )

( ) ( )

, ( )

( )

140 38

( )

( )

( )

: ( )

2.1 .

, ?

3.

? 1 9 . ( : 1

: 9)

( ) ( )

( )

( )

( )

(, ) ( )

( )

( ) ( )

( )

: ( )

3.1 .

, ?

141

3.2 ?

4. ? 1 7

. ( : 1 : 7)

( ) ( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

: ( )

4.1 .

?

4.2 ?

142 38

[ ]

1. ,

? ( )

12 34

56 7

2. ? ( )

5 510

1015 15

3. ? ( )

25 35 35 45

45 55 55

4. . ( )