+ All Categories
Home > Documents > + H Xç ? 6 ' ª 7 H Ø [ E · 2018-03-19 · goals, collect and analyze students’ conversations,...

+ H Xç ? 6 ' ª 7 H Ø [ E · 2018-03-19 · goals, collect and analyze students’ conversations,...

Date post: 16-Apr-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 1 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
12
146 29 3 Renovating Assessment for the Future: Toward Forward-looking Approach to Designing Lessons SHIROUZU Hajime Abstract Recent-day society requires of every learner the competency to learn and to empower his or her own competency in a sustainable way. International projects such as the ATC21S project are under- way that name these important yet still unclearly-defined competencies as “21st century skills”, and consider assessments and teaching for them. These projects aim at going beyond the international comparison of benchmark test results. Instead, every country, state, or school strives to set their own learning goals, to share big data not only of achievements but also of learning processes, and to re- flect on the results of their action research. From those trials, we can learn how to set assessable goals, collect and analyze students’ conversations, writing and actions in situations with full use of ICT, and redesign future goals and classes. This report illustrates this direction as a “forward-looking approach” to instructional design cou- pled with “concurrent, embedded, transformative assessment.” The report bases its theoretical view of assessment in the “assessment triangle” which has “cognition,” “observation” and “interpretation” as its three corners. According to this view of the assessment triangle, even though we would like to know students’ cognition, we cannot assess it directly and thus approach it through some form of observation, which waits for our interpretation to make sense of what is going on in the students’ cognitive processes. By applying this view both to content learning and learning of the 21st century skills, this report demonstrates the necessity of 1) an iterative process of refinement of assessment using active learning and ICT and 2) expanding the capacity of all the stakeholders concerned.
Transcript
Page 1: + H Xç ? 6 ' ª 7 H Ø [ E · 2018-03-19 · goals, collect and analyze students’ conversations, writing and actions in situations with full use of ICT, ... we cannot assess it

1

146 29 3

Renovating Assessment for the Future: Toward Forward-looking Approach to Designing Lessons

SHIROUZU Hajime

Abstract

Recent-day society requires of every learner the competency to learn and to empower his or her

own competency in a sustainable way. International projects such as the ATC21S project are under-

way that name these important yet still unclearly-defined competencies as “21st century skills”, and

consider assessments and teaching for them. These projects aim at going beyond the international

comparison of benchmark test results. Instead, every country, state, or school strives to set their own

learning goals, to share big data not only of achievements but also of learning processes, and to re-

flect on the results of their action research. From those trials, we can learn how to set assessable

goals, collect and analyze students’ conversations, writing and actions in situations with full use of

ICT, and redesign future goals and classes.

This report illustrates this direction as a “forward-looking approach” to instructional design cou-

pled with “concurrent, embedded, transformative assessment.” The report bases its theoretical view

of assessment in the “assessment triangle” which has “cognition,” “observation” and “interpretation”

as its three corners. According to this view of the assessment triangle, even though we would like to

know students’ cognition, we cannot assess it directly and thus approach it through some form of

observation, which waits for our interpretation to make sense of what is going on in the students’

cognitive processes. By applying this view both to content learning and learning of the 21st century

skills, this report demonstrates the necessity of 1) an iterative process of refinement of assessment

using active learning and ICT and 2) expanding the capacity of all the stakeholders concerned.

Page 2: + H Xç ? 6 ' ª 7 H Ø [ E · 2018-03-19 · goals, collect and analyze students’ conversations, writing and actions in situations with full use of ICT, ... we cannot assess it

2

, 2016

Page 3: + H Xç ? 6 ' ª 7 H Ø [ E · 2018-03-19 · goals, collect and analyze students’ conversations, writing and actions in situations with full use of ICT, ... we cannot assess it

3

21 Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills: ATC21S

Griffin, McGaw & Care, 2012

21

3 2

Additive change cf.

Assimilative change

Systemic change 19

21

Scardamalia et al., 2012, pp.238-239

Scardamalia 2012

Backward model

Forward model

21

Page 4: + H Xç ? 6 ' ª 7 H Ø [ E · 2018-03-19 · goals, collect and analyze students’ conversations, writing and actions in situations with full use of ICT, ... we cannot assess it

4

Scardamalia & Bereiter, 2006 , 1979

2013

1

2

1 , 2013 2 , 2013

2013

GERM Sahlberg, 2011

Page 5: + H Xç ? 6 ' ª 7 H Ø [ E · 2018-03-19 · goals, collect and analyze students’ conversations, writing and actions in situations with full use of ICT, ... we cannot assess it

5

; ;

concurrent,

embedded, transformative assessment

100

3

ICT

ICR

Page 6: + H Xç ? 6 ' ª 7 H Ø [ E · 2018-03-19 · goals, collect and analyze students’ conversations, writing and actions in situations with full use of ICT, ... we cannot assess it

6

4

CoREF

http://coref.u-tokyo.ac.jp/

ICT

3

4 ICTShirouzu , 2017

Page 7: + H Xç ? 6 ' ª 7 H Ø [ E · 2018-03-19 · goals, collect and analyze students’ conversations, writing and actions in situations with full use of ICT, ... we cannot assess it

7

2000 National Research Council Pellegrino et al.,

2001 “Knowing What

Students Know”

5 Cognition Observation

Interpretation

assessment triangle

5. Pellegrino ������, 2001, p.44

Page 8: + H Xç ? 6 ' ª 7 H Ø [ E · 2018-03-19 · goals, collect and analyze students’ conversations, writing and actions in situations with full use of ICT, ... we cannot assess it

8

Pellegrino et al., 2001, p.48

Pellegrino et al., 2001, p.28 2

< <

A

1588

B

1590

1600

1500

Pellegrino et al., 2001, p. 28)

A

B

B

Page 9: + H Xç ? 6 ' ª 7 H Ø [ E · 2018-03-19 · goals, collect and analyze students’ conversations, writing and actions in situations with full use of ICT, ... we cannot assess it

9

1

A 1588

1

B

B 1600

1600

1500

1 A B

21

21 21

10 2 Griffin,

McGaw & Care, 2012

ICT

Page 10: + H Xç ? 6 ' ª 7 H Ø [ E · 2018-03-19 · goals, collect and analyze students’ conversations, writing and actions in situations with full use of ICT, ... we cannot assess it

10

ICT

21

21

21 ;

;

21

21

PDCA

21

Page 11: + H Xç ? 6 ' ª 7 H Ø [ E · 2018-03-19 · goals, collect and analyze students’ conversations, writing and actions in situations with full use of ICT, ... we cannot assess it

11

21

6

ICT ICT

21

6. 21

Page 12: + H Xç ? 6 ' ª 7 H Ø [ E · 2018-03-19 · goals, collect and analyze students’ conversations, writing and actions in situations with full use of ICT, ... we cannot assess it

12

(2016).

2016 12 21

Griffin, P., McGaw, B. & Care, E. (2012). Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills. New York: Springer-Verlag. (

( ) , P. , B. , E. ( ) (2014). 21

: : ).

(2013). * 24 , 12-13.

(1979)

Pellegrino. J. W., Chudowsky, N., & Glaser, R. (2001). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational

assessment, Washington DC: National Academic Press.

Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). “Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology.” In K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cam-

bridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences. NY: Cambridge University Press, 97-118. (2009).

. : , 80-96.

Scardamalia, M., Bransford, J., Kozma, R., & Quellmalz, E. (2012). “New assessments and environments for knowledge build-

ing.” In P. Griffin, B. McGaw, & E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills. NY: Springer-Verlag,

231-300. ( (2014). 21 -

. : , 77-157.)

Shirouzu, H., Saito, M., Iikuo, S., & Nakayama, T. (2017). “Iterative assessment cycle powered by teachers and AI.” Talk pre-

sented at KBSI 2017.


Recommended