+ All Categories
Home > Documents > If alleged thing converted is not property in the first place, there can be no conversion recovery.

If alleged thing converted is not property in the first place, there can be no conversion recovery.

Date post: 17-Dec-2015
Category:
Upload: arnold-riley
View: 212 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
12
Property Defined Judicial Opinions
Transcript
Page 1: If alleged thing converted is not property in the first place, there can be no conversion recovery.

Property Defined

Judicial Opinions

Page 2: If alleged thing converted is not property in the first place, there can be no conversion recovery.

Context = Did conversion occur?

If alleged thing converted is not property in the first place, there can be no conversion recovery.

Page 3: If alleged thing converted is not property in the first place, there can be no conversion recovery.

Kremen v. Cohen

Gary Kremen

Page 5: If alleged thing converted is not property in the first place, there can be no conversion recovery.

Kremen v. Cohen

Stephen Cohen’s Business Card

Page 6: If alleged thing converted is not property in the first place, there can be no conversion recovery.

Kremen v. Cohen

In 2010, sex.com was sold for how much?

A. $20 millionB. $13 millionC. $10 millionD. $5 million

Page 7: If alleged thing converted is not property in the first place, there can be no conversion recovery.

Kremen v. Cohen

Which of the following domain names is the most expensive domain name ever sold ($35 million)?

A. VacationRentals.comB. Porn. comC. Beer.comD. Casino.com

Page 8: If alleged thing converted is not property in the first place, there can be no conversion recovery.

Kremen v. Cohen

What property theory is behind the decision?

A. OccupationB. Natural RightsC. LaborD. Social Utility

Page 9: If alleged thing converted is not property in the first place, there can be no conversion recovery.

Human Body and Its Parts

§ 2-316

Page 10: If alleged thing converted is not property in the first place, there can be no conversion recovery.

Moore v. Regents

Hairy Cell LeukemiaElectron Micrograph

Page 11: If alleged thing converted is not property in the first place, there can be no conversion recovery.

Moore v. Regents

Dr. David W. Goldedied 8/8/2004

Page 12: If alleged thing converted is not property in the first place, there can be no conversion recovery.

Moore v. Regents

Do you think Moore should have recovered for conversion?A. No, the majority opinion got it

right.B. Yes, the dissenting opinion got it

right.C. Regardless, there should be

legislation addressing these issues.

D. This is too complex for me to make a quick decision – I need to think some more.


Recommended