-----------------------------------
lnternor.onol Atomic Energy Agency STR-205 Department of SafeguardsIf '"~ . ~ \ ' '~ /J
~~
KUFSAS
A COMPUTER CODE FOR MATERIAL BALANCE EVALUATION
M. Yous if
Data Evaluation Section Division of Data Evaluation
Department of Safeguards
October 1985
Disclaimer
This report is the result of work performed at the IAEA, however, it does not
establish IAEA policy.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
1. Introduction 1
2. Data Files 1-2
3. Computation of Variances 2-4
3.1 Notation 2
3.2 Random Vari ance of KUF 2
3.3 Systematic Variance of KUF 2-3
3.4 Random Variance of D 3
3.5 Systematic Variance of D 3-4
4. Accountancy Verification Goal 4
5. Facility Measurement System 4-5
6. KUF Statements 5
7. Stratification 5
8. FIG. 1: Flow Diagram 6
9. Annex 1 7-8
10. Annex 2 9-18
KYousif/vpc/Ext. 6309
Doc. /1 2990H
1. Introduction
KUFSAS code is designed to give the inspector in a very simple concise manner a report at the end of each material balance, reflecting the results of his conclusions. These results are based on SMO 6.12 and SMO 6.13 of the Safeguards manual. The results would assist the inspector to complete the inspection report as well as the 90(a) and 90(b) statements. The code has been developed for reprocessing plants, but could be adapted for other bulk handling facilities as well.
This report will attempt to give a summary of the statistical evaluation methods used. The evaluation methods are based on STM Part F, SMO 6.12 and SMO 6.13.
Fig. 1 illustrates the various steps involved in the evaluation.
Annex 1 is a user guide. (At present assistance of EDE is needed till a more easy to use guide is developed for a wider use).
A sample of the programme output is given as Annex 2.
2. Data Files:
2.1 Operator declared data:
The operator data for the material balance (MB) are retrieved by a natural programme (CREATE) from ADABAS Files 102 and 105.
2.2 !nspector verified data:
These are retrieved by a Natural programme (LAB) from ADABAS File 136.
2.3 ERROR files:
At present three files are created as follows:
Operator's error file giving errors from design information supplied by the facility operator; Operator's error file from performance values supplied by File 148 Inspectors error file.
All these files contain the following:
Random and sytematic relative standard deviations for bulk, sampling and analytical errors and instrument index attached to each. The stratum identification and MB component should also be indicated.
In future these files should be easily created from File 148.
- 2
2.4 Other data:
Inventory in the material balance (KG) Throughput in the material balance (KG) Expected Accuracy (os), relative standard deviation. Significant quantity (SQ)
These are needed to compute the AVG.
3. Computation of Variances
3.1 Notation:
XK Element weight in stratum K (Operator)
YK " " .. (Inspector)" "
.. ..MK Number of batches in
.. ..NK items per batch in stratum K
RK " " samples per batch (Operator)
..CK " analysis per sample (Operator)
UK " " batches measured by inspector
.. ..W items per batch for bulk measurement (Inspector)K
V " " samples per batch for element determination (Inspector)K
A " " analysis per sampled item (Inspector)K
R R , R are operator's relative random (R) and systematic (S)V' s A
SV' SS' SA } variances for bulk, sampling and analytical respectively.
IR , IR ,IR are inspector's relative random (R) and systematic (S)V SA}
IS , ISS' IS variances for bulk, sampling and analytical respectivelyv A
3.2 Random variance of MUF (RVMUF):
RVMUF (1)
3.3 Systematic variance of MUF(SVMUF):
MB IXK (SIGN)
MS IXK (SIGN)
- 3
Where MB, MS, HA are total weights due to Bulk, Sampling and analytical respectively. SIGN = sign of the material balance component (- 1 or + 1).
Variance due to bulk = VB = MB 2 • Sv Variance due to sampling = VS MS2. Ss Variance due to analysis = VA = HA2 • SA
K
SVMUF L (VB + VS + VA) (2 )
1
From (1) and (2) total variance of HUf' (VHUF) is:
VHUF RVHUF + SVHUF
3.4 Random variance of D (RVD):
RVD (3 )
where VO K variance due to operator for stratum K
VIK variance due to inspector for stratum K
3,5 Systematic variance of D(SVD)
Similar to 3.3 above the systematic variance of D due to inspector (ISVD) is given by
IVB + IVS + IVA for stratum K
- 4
and for operator
OSVDK + VB + VS + VA for stratum K
SVD K L (ISVD
K +
1
OSVDK
) (4 )
From (3) and (4) Total Variance of D (VD) is:
VD RVD + SVD ( 5 )
3.6 Variance of (HUF-D)
V(MUF-D) VHUF + VD - 2 COV(MUl', D) ( 6 )
4. Accountancy Verification Goal (AVG):
The expected accountancy capability (E) is given by
E 0.01 (for reprocessing plants)
where
A
Os
inventory or throughput (the larger
expected accuracy for HUF
is used)
Here two cases are considered:
AVG E
E + SQ/IO
if
if
E ~
E <
SQ
SQ
5. Statements on Facility Measurements System:
Here 0MUF computed from performance estimates is compared with the international standards of accountancy (as) and with the design information estimate of the measurement uncertainly of HUF (oD1) as follows:
- 5 -
If the facility measurement inconsistent with the standard.
~ Os the facility measurement
If the facility measurement
system is international
system is acceptable.
system is not consistent with the design information
the facility measurement system is consistent with the design information.
6. KUF statements:
These are computed in accordance with SMO 6.13 (Annex 2).
7. Stratification
So far there is no agreed standardized stratification within the Safeguards department, therefore the present version of the code is flexible enough to stratify in accorance with the information supplied by the inspector. However, for reprocessing plant the stratification is fixed in accordance with KKP and material description code (MOC).
References
1. IAEA Safeguards Technical Manual - Part F. 2. SMO 6.12, SMO 6.13 of the Safeguards Manual
- 6
102 105ADABAS FILES 148
~------
1---,--1j
-. CRRATE
<.
OPERATOR'SERROR DECLARED DATATABLES
1 1 j
.><. HUFSAS
"J_ OUTPUT
- MBT, HUE", HUF- 0, 0 - MUF STATEMENTS
- °HUF' aD' °HUF_D STATEMENT ON FACILITY MEASUREMENT SYSTEM
136
LAB
INSPECTOR'S VERIFIED DATA
1 REPORT TO INSPECTOR
- 7 t t T t + • + t t t t t t .. t t t t t T tit .. t t + t t t t tt t t .. t • t • t t t t t t T i • t t t T t t t t t ..
OI\IE :fl')1014
MUF E VI\L1 11\ T fntJ I\N~Jr x 1
.FIG. 1 It LUSTRATES unw f\lF EVI\I.UI\TION STFPe; I\Rr' CI\RRIf-D.
'.THE ,OLLOWHJC, IS 1\ e;UMMI\RY or IH[ STf=PS:
1\: niE FOLLOWING Nl\fllRI\L PI,ORI\MME- (CI,[I\TE) RE fRIEVE<; OPERl\fOR DATA ,R[IM I\IJI\BI\S FfLES 10) P. 105 "OR n u MI\TERIAL BI\LI\NCE PERIOD I\ND WRI IFe; 1\ WORK F [LE FOR REC;INNING. INPUI,OIJPIII I\NI1 FN[)It-J(~ INVFNll)RY.
OH: 1\ r F: f'RC)(;RI\MMf=
C;PF [ H'lRI\RY [1l\fl\<;[·1 ([ltJII\INING THIS PROC;RI\M:
PRO.JEC I XDlG L I8RI\RY MUF TYPE LIB MFMElF. R CREI\TE
CRPU IS NATURI\L rROGRI\M ro RETRIEVE INPUl/OUTPUf DI\TI\ rOR P CRU IS NAflJRI\L PROGRI\M TO RETRIEVE HWUf/OUTPUf DATI\ fOR IJ
\EPE Te; NATURAL PROGRI\M TO RFTRIEVf BE/PC [)I\TI\ lOR PU IFrFU IS NATURI\I PROGf,I\M TO RETRIFVE Rf/PF 1)l\fl\ fOR U
'ROUIE PRINT CENTRI\I II EXEC XnI\Ae;I\NI\ II STEPLIB DD DC;N~XOFK.rRC10lJCf.L()I\D,DISP~SHR II DOCARD DO I1UMMY II CMPRTOI DO USN-xm=C;.TFSll.LIB(PILU),DISr-SHR II CMWKFOI DD t
XXX YYMMDD YYMMDD <~-------INPUT MBI\ CODE &BE,PE OI\TES XXX YYMMDD YYMMIJD c~"-~-~-'I~WUT MOI\ CODE &ICRS OI\TES I SYSIN DO t
OGON SSG XXXXX <~----~--INPUT rASSWORD EPEU c~---'-=~'INr'UT RELFVI\NT PROGRI\MMF NI\MF,
n: I AB IS 1\ SIMIII\R t·JI\TURI\L PPOC,RAMMF TO f<F IRIf VF INSPH lC1R CORRESPONDHJG I)I\TI\ ,ROM rILE. 13G.
LAG PR()(;[<I\MMF
SPF LIBRI\RY 01\11\5EI CONTI\INING THIS PROGf<I\M:
PROJECT XO[r; LIBRI\RY MUf TYPE LIB MF MO, R I I\P
LI\B IS 1\ Nl\fl/PI\I f'flIH;[<I\MMf= TO RETRTFVF IN<;f'fr:rOR CORRF sr-ouo r N(; UI\ 11\ IIIIJM FILE 13G.
'[<OUTE PRINI CENTRI\I VIr: r;f1Mf'\nrn crNTflE
I<----~~ F,RF .rr DAne; PEe;PEC.SYSIN DO • LOGON RAKAMRA XXX XX IC-~-~-TNrlll rASe;W(lRDI_AB / I
C: MUFSAS CODE READS HIF WORK F ILE:S I\ND OUTPUTe; IHr MATERIAL BALANCE [I\OlE
-OPEIM TORI INC;P[CTor~ OIl ICERFrJCES -VERIFICATION COVERI\GE -ERROR TABI ES -s IGMA MUF. SIGMA \] & S I (,MA MUF-D -STATEMENT ON FACILITY MrASUREMENT sye;TEM -MUF EVALUATION & S[AIEM~NTS -0 STATISTICS EVALUATION
SEE I\TTACHED OUTPUT SAMPlE. ---e:..-"""=-:--==-:- -::-_
MIJrSAS PROGRAMME --~~~~===-=-~~~-~-~~
srF LTBRARY rlA1ASF1 C(JrJ1AINJt~(; 1HIS PROGRAM:
PRO,JEC T XDEG LIBRARY Mur TYPE lIP MEMBER MUre;As
I'ROUTE PRINT ClltJF IISAS EXEC SAS IllIBRARY DO DSN-XOEK.SASLOI\[)LIB.OISP~SHR IIWORKI DO DSN-XOFG.1EST3.LI8(PIL).DIsr-SHR
IWORK2 DO DSt~-XOf_G.TEST3.1 IG(RS),DISP'-SliR IWORK3 Of) DsrJ-XOEG. TFST3.l IB(lAR) ,DISP-SHR IWORK4 DD Dsrl-XOFG.TEsn.\ I8(rILU).OISP~SHR IWORK5 DO OSrJ~XOE(~.T[SI3_lIB(RSU).DISf'~SHR IWORK6 DO DSN-XDEG.ERROR.LI8(ODI).OISP~SHR IWURK7 DO DSN-XDEG.ERROR.LIB(OPE).OISP-SftR IWORK8 DO [)SN~XDEG.ERROR.1 I8( IER) .DISP~SHR IPRINT DO OSN~XOEG. Tf:ST1.LI8(PNCLI),DIsr~SHR ISYSIN 00 DSN-XDEG.nC;T.rLI(MACRO).DIsr~Slm I DO t
ttttt ..... tttT ...... ttttttt ... tttittttt .... ftt .. ttttttttttttttt
=~==== DATA FILFS WORKl TO WORKS -=~-~----==_~--=t It t t .. t t t ... t t t t .... t ... t tt .. t t t .. t t t t t t t t t .... t t t t t t t t t ..... t t t ...
===-~-= MACRO SlATEMEN1S IN =-=~~~=~~-==~-~=--~==--t =-~-=~~ OSN~XDEG.TEST.PLI(MI\CRO)~===---=---~=-===-=t It t t t t t t t t t ti:l- .. t i' t t t t t t tt t I- I- t t • I- t t t t t .. t t ttl- t t t + t I- t f t t
VIC CnMr\l1 rn CfNlnr
MI\TE R 11\1 BAt. I\NCE 11\BL E FOR: I I\E s . MRR r-r R I Of). 9~HJ 1o 1 r0 991) J 1
LIM Df:' c; CRI r r iON NO. Or Elf\ t OIF c; ~JO. elF I fEMs Torl\L ~U(G) OrFRI\TOR
Y,MP MOC
NG HIVFNTORV
X xxxx 35000.000 X xxxx 711 rHl1.1100
x xxxx 5800.000 x xxxx Ig000.000 x xxxx 69·111.4·10 x xxxx 1911. 110 x xxxx )911.11 o
1 o 1 1\ L 1116011.0GO
11c;
1 VVVV 98 196 117329.88')2 nzl. :1:, :1)7.?)rJ~,q
T 0 1 A 11 7(,S7 . j or,
INVENTORV
X xxxx 39999.990 X xxxx 37000.000 x xxxx Ei88.000
T 0 T f\ I. 7 7G87. gcHj
-rMIJF )0665.965 IFICI\Tlm-J COVERAGE [COR rl}~ O.iUS
(OrAL rU(Gl INSPECTOR
36800.000 75600.000
5933.333 19000.000 6800.000 1888.888 2RrW.889
381100.000 38/22.222
69.999
D
ai{t,)
-1800.000 .. 2155.600
-133.333 0.000
1114.440 22.222 2).2)1
1599.990 ·1222.222
61R.OOl
-i1895.819 MUE'·O ~ 2556 j . 784
VIr. COMI'IJTFtl r.FNH1F
UM DE S C RIP 1 lON MDC
NG INVENrORY
xxxx XXXX XXXX xxxx XXXX XXXX xxxx
TS
YYYY ZZZZ
INVENTl1PY
xxxx xxxx xxxx
FPRIJP Tl\FilF rem OPFRl\lOR - LO -
f3lJ\ K Rl\t\llH)M EPPOR REI .')[1
nULK c,YSTEM/\rIr fPROP Rtl .SO
SI\Mf'LING EPFiOP Pfl
RI\t-J[)OM .<;LJ
S/\MPL H-JG SYS TEM/\ TIe fRROP R[L.'~[)
I\NI\I . P At\lLlOM FRRIJH RFlSLJ
I\N/\L . S YS 1 F MA rIC FRPDR Rfl .sn
0.0010 0.0020 0.0050 0.0020 0.0100 0.0010 0.0010 0.0020 0.0050 0.0020 0.0100 0.0010 0.0010 0.0020 0.0050 0.0020 00100 0.0010 0.0010 0.0020 0.0050 0.0020 0.0100 0.0010 0.0010 0.0020 0.0050 0.0030 0.0100 0·0010 0.0010 O. 0020 0.0050 0.0030 0.0100 0.0010 0.0010 0.0020 0.0050 0.0030 0.0100 0.0010
0.0010 0.0020 0.0050 O. OOJ 0 0.0010 0.0010 0.0010 0.0020 0.0050 0.0030 0.0010 0.0010
" 00010 0.0020 0.0050 0.0020 0.0100 0.0020 0.0010 0.0020 0.0050 0.0030 0.0100 0.0020 0.0010 0.0020 O. 0050 0.0030 0.0100 0.0020
..
" "
VIC COMPlIHR CENTRE
- 11 -
['RROR TI\RI F FOR I~JSPFCTOR
ITUM DESCRIPTION MI1C BULK RAN[]OM
FRROR REl .SO BUU( <;YSTFMA I tr: F RPOR RF l . SO
SAMPLING RI\NDOM umOR REL.SO
SAMPLING SYSTFMI\TIC ERROR RF·t.SO
ANAL.RANDOM ERROR REL.SD
ANAL.SYSTEMATIC ERROR REL.SO
J I tJG TtJVE NTDRY
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX xxxx XXXX xxxx
0.001l0 0.0040 o 0040 0.0040 0.0040 o OOIlO 0.00110
0.0020 0.0020 o 0020 0.00)0 0.0020 0.00)0 0.0070
0.0010 0.0010 O.DOH) 0.0010 0.0010 0.0010 0.0010
0.0020 0.0020 0.0010 0.0020 0.0010 0.0020 0.0020
0.0100 0.0100 0.0100 0.0100 0.0100 00100 0.0100
0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020 0.0020
NTC;
YYYY ZlZZ
0.00110 0.00110
o 0020 0.0070
0.0010 0.00')0
0.0010 0.0020
0.0010 0.0010
0.0010 0.0010
TNVENrrlRY
xxxx xxxx xxxx
0.001\0 o 0040 (1 00110
0.0020 0.0020 0.0020
0.0050 0.0050 0.0050
0.0020 0.0020 0.0020
0.0100 0.0100 0.0100
0.0020 0.0020 0.0020
Vir rnMPll-rf:p r.f:NHH=
RI\NDOM EimOR COMPDNFN1C, or Mllf FrHl I'll: - 12 IJM D~sc~irTION
Moe TOrl\1 rU(KG) VI\R.PUI K VI\R.SI\Mr. VI\R.I\NI\. i u r AL
NG lNVE=N10RY
G G
xxxx xxxx
3'].000 74 4c14
0.00172:) 0.005542
o 030625 0.138549
0.122500 0.554197
0.15'1350 0.698288
G xxxx 5.800 0.000034 0.000841 0.00336'1 0.004239 G xxxx 19.000 0.000361 0.009025 0.036100 0.0'15486 G xxxx 6.944 0.000048 0.001206 0.004823 0.006076 G xxxx 1.911 0.000004 0.000091 0.000365 0.000460 G xxxx 2.911 0.000008 0.00D212 0.000847 0.001068
15
8 YYYY 47.330 0.000011 0.000571 0.000023 0.000606 7 z.z zz. 0.327 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000
INVFN [DRY
G xxxx 40.000 0001600 0.040000 0.160000 0.201600 G xxxx rt.OOO 0001369 0.034225 0.136900 0.17249'1 G xxxx 0.688 O.OOODOD 0.000012 0.000047 0.000060
f'I\tJIJOM VI\R I ANCE or MUF = 1.284726
"
VIC COMPUTER CENTRE
K v f\R j t\t.J(f:: HOD
0.000100 0.005608 0.000105 0.0011\44 0000193 0.00001') 0.0000311 0.OOS9r30 0.000000
SAMP. ME ruor:
1 2 3 4 5 6 t 8 '-J
<:;Y:.ffMf\flr
Vf\f11 M.JU'
(J 000100 0.012619 0.000235 0.001444 o 000434 0.000033 0.00007(1 0.0201 G1 0.000001
- 13
[RRnR r,OMPClNEN1S or MIJr FOR r u.
I\Nf\l . Vf\ll1 f\NCt MF Iflno
1 o. dOll i no 2 0.005608 3 0.000105 4 0.000361 5 0.000048 6 0.000001\ 7 (J.000008 8 O. O(J221\ 0 9 0.000000
~YSf~M~ffr v~RjAN(~ ot MIIF = 0.060637
"
so
'"
Vir 1"(Hv1r.l,rn rr"~TtlJ:' L
RAr"llIIM FRROR COMF'OM r"TS rJF [I ro« PUc - 14
M b~~[RIPI JON Moe TOTAl f'IJIKC;) ()J'LR/\ TI)RS J NSf' fCC: Tl mS J() f 1\I
CONT R Tnur TON CONTRJPIITTm"
1[; JNVF NTORY
XXXX XXXX XXXX
3').000000 7il.444ilOO
5.800000
0.15il3''>0 0.698288 0.004239
0.158ililG 0.68G50::; 0.0011119
0.JI7796 1.38il793 0.008358
XXXX 19.000000 0.Oil5486 0.Oil2237 a 081723 XXXX 6 944440 0.006076 0.U05illU 0.0111186 XXXX 1.911110 0.000460 0.000417 0.000878 XXXX 7.911110 0.001068 (].onW)76 00020ilil
s YYYY 7777
47.32988:) 0.377270
0.000606 0.000000
0.OU0229 0.000000
0.0008311 O.OOllOOO
,NVENTORY
XXXX 39.999990 0.201GOO 0.201913 0.409513 XXXX 37.000000 o. I Uil9il 0.205992 0.378il8G XXXX 0.GF\8000 0.000060 O.OOllOOl 0.000060
RANDOM V/\RIMJU. OF D 7.::;96972
"
"
VIC COMPUTER CfNTRE
- 15
SYSTFMnrTC FRROR COMPONENTS OF n FOR PUc
'x Bulk MEfHoD - - - - - - - - -
OPERATORS CONTRIBUT ION
- - - -
INSPECTORS (ON r f< TBUT ION
i Nor x sIIMi'L ING Mf - - - - -
OPFRIITORS rON TRH1UT InN
rHOO - - - - - - -
INSPECHlRS CONTRIRUTION
- . INDFX ilNiIL VTIcAL .. -METHOIY
------------------------------OPERATORS INSPECTORS CONTRIBUTION CONTRIBUTION
o.oOdjoo 0 005608 0.000105 0.001444 0.000193 0.000015 0.000034 0.008960 0.000000
0 lJoobj6 0.005891 o 000138 0.001444 0.000185 0.000011 0.000033 0.008960 0.000000
1 '2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
o.ooolob 0.01'2619 0.000235 0.001144 0.000434 0.000033 0.000016 0.020161 o 000001
o.oooojo 0.005891 0.000138 0.001444 0.000046 0.000014 0.000033 0.002240 0.000000
j 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
0.000105 0.005608 0.000105 0.000361 0.000048 0.000004 0.000008 0.002240 0.000000
5.050015 0.005410 0.007273 0.015199 0.018737 0.019785 0.021444 0.000670 0.000653
$v$TtMiltIC vil~inNct or o ~ 0.jj57ij
VIr: ,oMrllfHl CENTRE
!MARY RESUI TS OF VARIIINCL C; ti .. ttt .... *tiiit ..... t"t11iitt.t
VARIANCE or MllF our ro r~RfOf~MIINCr: VAllIFS:
- 16 -
100M ERROR VARIIINCF .TEMATIC ERROR VARIANCE
AL ERROR VIIRIANCE
Al FRROR STANDARD DEV.
-1.:'a'1126 0.0600J7
1.3447[,3
_15960i9
VARIANCE OF MUF DUE TO DESIGN INFORMIITION:
100M ERROR VARIANCE ,TEMATIC ERROR VARIANCE
AL ERROR VARIANCE
AL ERROR STANDARD DEV.
1.226208 0.05[,727
1.282935
1 _132667
VARIANCE OF 0:
100M ERROR VARIIINCE ,TEMATIC ERROR VARIANCE
ilL ERROR VARIANCE
AL ERROR STANDARD OEV.
2.596972 0.175713
2.7"1768<1
1 . 66~ 138
40
50
" " " " vs
"
" so
"
"
VIC COMPUTFn CENTRE "
- 17
IIIF FVIIIUIITI(l~J ANn CONFIOFNCF lIMiTS (1N MUF:
llJ~ (KG j s fGMA MlJr SIGNrr-TCi\Nf :50.G66 1. HiO 17 821 YF S
OWFR LiMIT\L)~MI,I! -1.96 X SIGMA MUF 1R.393
IPf'FR LIMIT\U)-MIITj1.9G X SHiMA M\JF 77 9'9
;0/\1 /\MCJI,IN T (K(~)- 4.090
I I--f-- - +- ~ -- .. -- ~ -- - 1 - - ,
~ 1·- - - ~
-70 -10 0 + 10 +20 1'<0 KG "
1UF S r II TfMENT:
DENCE LEVEL: 0.95 STICAL SIGNIFICANCE: RI IF MUF IS ent ATER TH/\N ZERO.
IU/\Rns SIGNH ICAt~(E:
RUE. MUF IS GREATFR TH/\N THE GO/\I /\MOUNT
lUF·O EV/\LUATION I\NO ((lNrII][NU LIMITe; ou Mur-f/:
iurI) (KG j .s HiM!\ Mur [) s TGNIF fCII~JT
)';.'167 j.19S 71 :'i91 'YF c;
FR LIMIT(L )-MtJl .96 x S IGM/\ MIII- ?:::l.770
eF·R I IMIf(U)-MLJF j l . 9 6 X .<;JGM/\ MlJr 77. fl04
/\MCJUN r (KG) ~ 4.0CJO
IL
I ..
I - - +- _. - .. + - - ~ - -- I I I I
70 -10 0 110 '/O 1'<0 KCi
JST'!'Cl0R MIIF e;rIlTFMT-Nl:
)F~JCE LEVEL: O.9 r ,
.r le/\l S IGNIF lCANcr: ~IW MIl[' IC, "PF/\If-I! [H/\N If RO.
If\RrlC; S rGI'J i r I ( /\NU : ur Mllr is liPr/\TlP IIIIIN r nr CO/\l /\MOUNT
- 18 TATISIICS EVAlliAfTON,
<'G) S I liMA n S [(~Nlr I(ANI
4.896 i _6 (;:i ? _'+10 Yf S
*t* :ttt*t'ttttttttttt tttt" tt .. 't ttt .. ;::tltTf." "tiTtt t
~A MUF COMPARISON BETWEEN INIERNAIIONAL STANDARDS AND DESIGN INfORMAfiON
\fA MUF 5 i GMiI I NI_ SIGMA 01
1 _160 i . 000 1.1:'3
E FACILITY MEASUREMENT SYSTFM IS ~~OT CONSISTENT WITH IERNATTONAL STANDARDS
E FACILITY MEASUREMENI SYSIEM IS NOT CONc,ISlrNT TH THE DESIGN INfORMAl ION
E fXPLANAIION 10 IHE OUfPUT
E MAIERIAL BALANCE TABLE IS CONSTRUCfE,D USING THE ERATOR DATA AS GIVEN BY THE ACCOUNfING RrrORIS(PIl D IeR) ANLJ BY THE INSPECTOR VERIFIED DAIA FROM FILE lJ6.
RATA: DEFINED ON fHF HASIS ()f KMP I\. MIlC
RIFICA(IOt~ COVERAGE FOR ALL CUMPOt~ENTS O! TUE MATERIAl LANCE = SUM(AMOUNT VU<IFIED) / SUM(AMOUNT DECI_ARED)
t .. 'ttt*i t t t.t .. tttttttt ...... """fttt .... , t t. t ttt;- tiTt .. tti ttt-t
VIC COMPLJIFR CENIRF
