+ All Categories
Home > Documents > In 1796, average life expectancy was 25 years old In 1896 was 45 years old In the beginning of the...

In 1796, average life expectancy was 25 years old In 1896 was 45 years old In the beginning of the...

Date post: 27-Dec-2015
Category:
Upload: marlene-garrett
View: 220 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
36
Transcript

In 1796, average life expectancy was 25 years old

In 1896 was 45 years old

In the beginning of the XXI century is 80 years old

In the future, scientists predict that life expectancy will be 120 years before 2046

Life expectancyLife expectancy

Improvement of sanitary conditions

Advances in medicine

Preventive medicine

Increase of communications

Increase of life expectancy Increase of life expectancy depends fundamentallydepends fundamentally

We have done very little to improve We have done very little to improve quality of lifequality of life … …

We live more but We live more but

not betternot better

But, although we have been able But, although we have been able to extend life expectancyto extend life expectancy

1896: influenza, diarrhoea, pneumonia

2006: cardiovascular disease, cancer, accidents

Nowadays, subtle changes in physical activity patterns over the adult lifespan allow most people not engaged on an exercise program to lose a very large proportion of their physical work capacity before they even notice that something is wrong or find that they have crossed a threshold of disability.

Main causes of deathMain causes of death

v

Approximately 50% of the >65 years old takes an average of 12 medicines daily

The majority suffers: arthritis, loss of memory, cardiovascular disease, cancer…

Aging means illness??Aging means illness??

Morphologic and metabolic Morphologic and metabolic facts related to aging facts related to aging

and loss of vitalityand loss of vitality

Metabolic and Physiological ClocksMetabolic and Physiological Clocks

Dehydration

Decrease of Lean Body

Mass

Increase of Body Fat

Decrease in Bone Density

Decrease in Physical

Work Capacity (VO2max)

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

Water % regarding

bodyweight

Newborn (0) Adult ( 40) Old people (80)

Age

Dehydration ProcessDehydration Process

Muscle Aging Muscle Aging II

Slow progressive decrease in the number of muscle fiber

Faster decrease of Lean Body Mass (dehydration process)

Increase of connective tissue and fat Bottom line:

Loss of muscle mass

Sarcopenia

Loss of Strength

Muscle Aging Muscle Aging IIII

No change in number of blood capillaries (capillaries/fibers)

Decrease in blood flow

Decrease in oxidation capacity (decrease in number of mitochondria)

Decrease in number of motor units

Muscle Mass Decrease with AgeMuscle Mass Decrease with Age

Bone AgingBone Aging

Progressive loss of calcium Osteomalacia (diminution of volume) Osteopenia (diminution of density) Osteoporosis

NARROW RELATION BETWEEN LOSE OF MUSCLE NARROW RELATION BETWEEN LOSE OF MUSCLE MASS AND BONE DENSITYMASS AND BONE DENSITY

Joint and Cartilage AgingJoint and Cartilage Aging

Composition: 2%: condrocites (matrix)20-40%: extracellular matrix (collagen and mucopolisaccharides)60-80%: water

Aging: dehydration and diminution in the level of polysaccharides less elasticity, pain, inflammation and deformity

Progressive loss of flexibility in blood vessels

Decrease in the internal diameter of vessels (less flow)

Lose in contraction capacity of cardiac muscle

Lose of closing capacity in cardiac valves and flow return

Hypertension

Cardiovascular AgingCardiovascular Aging

Aging process reduces levels of testosterone and growth hormone and increases levels of Cortisol

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

TestosteroneLevels

18 20 30 40 50 60 70 80-85

Age

Endocrine AgingEndocrine Aging

Facts involved in speeding upFacts involved in speeding up& slowing down aging& slowing down aging

Who doesn´t want to liveWho doesn´t want to liveHealthy and vital at 75´s as Healthy and vital at 75´s as

was on 45´s ?was on 45´s ?

Scientific EvidenceScientific Evidence

Kitgead: “… 70-year-old men trained with weights since 50’s present same muscle mass than a pattern group of healthy adults of 25-30 years old …”

Fiatarone: “… > 90-year-old men, without previous training, trained with weights and increased their muscle mass and bone density compared with a pattern group of adults of the same age …”

Scientific EvidenceScientific Evidence

In this review, the authors outline the magnitude of the losses in Sarcopenia, their functional consequences, and the efficacy of strength training (ST) as an intervention strategy for delaying, preventing or reversing the effects of sarcopenia. Proposed mechanisms of sarcopenia are outlined and, where information is available, they examine the effects of ST on these potential mechanisms, which include neurogenic factors, anabolic hormones, protein synthesis, gene expression, muscle morphology, and muscle regeneration.

The evidence presented on this review suggests that Strength Training is an effective intervention for improving strength, muscle mass and muscle quality and delaying the onset of physical disability in the elderly. Roth, S.M. et al. Strength training for the prevention and treatment of sarcopenia. J Nutr. Health Aging. 2000;4(3):143-55.

SarcopeniaSarcopenia

Scientific EvidenceScientific Evidence

Methods: Using stable isotope tracer methodologies and mass spectrometric detection, we observed: (a) 76-92-year-old physically frail and 62-74-year-old middle-age adults have lower mixed muscle protein synthetic rates than 20-32-year-old men and women; (b) 2 weeks and 3 months of weightlifting exercise increased the synthetic rate of myosin heavy chain (MHC) and mixed muscle proteins to a similar magnitude in frail, middle-age, and young women and men; (c) Serum myostatin-immunoreactive protein levels were elevated in physically frail women and were inversely correlated with lean mass.

Conslusion: This suggests that the protein synthetic machinery adapts rapidly to increased contractile activity and that the adaptive response(s) are maintained even in frail elders.

Schulte JN & Yarasheski KE. Effects of resistance training on the rate of muscle protein synthesis in frail elderly people. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. 2001 Dec;11 Suppl:S111-8.

SarcopeniaSarcopenia

Scientific EvidenceScientific Evidence

OsteoporosisOsteoporosisPURPOSE: To determine the effects of 6 months of whole-body resistive training (RT) on total and regional bone mineral density (BMD) and bone mineral content (BMC) by age and gender in young and older men and women.

METHODS: Younger men (n=10) and women (n=7) aged 20-29 years (25+/-1 years) and older men (n=10) and women (n=10) aged 65-74 years (69+/-1 years) participated in 6 months of progressive whole-body RT. Upper- and lower-body strength was assessed by the one repetition maximum (1RM) test, and total body fat, lean tissue mass, femoral neck BMD, Ward's triangle BMD, greater trochanter BMD, total-body BMD, and L2-L4 spine BMD were determined by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry before and after 6 months of RT.

CONCLUSION: A 6-month RT program increases muscle mass and improves BMD of the femoral region in young and healthy older men and women as a group, with a trend for this to be greater in young subjects.

Ryan A.S. et al. Regional Bone Mineral Density after resistive training in the young and older men and women. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2004 Feb;14(1):16-23.

Scientific EvidenceScientific Evidence

OsteoporosisOsteoporosisPURPOSE: This investigation examined the effect of 6 months of high- or low-intensity resistance exercise (REX) on bone mineral density (BMD) and biochemical markers of bone turnover in adults aged 60-83 yr.

METHODS: Sixty-two men and women (68.4 +/- 6 yr) were stratified for strength and randomly assigned to a control (N = 16), low-intensity (N = 24), or high-intensity (N = 22) group. Subjects participated in 6 months of progressive REX training. Subjects trained at either 50% of their one repetition maximum (1-RM) for 13 repetitions (LEX) or 80% of 1-RM for 8 repetitions (HEX) 3 times x wk(-1) for 24 wk. One set each of 12 exercises was performed. 1-RM was measured for eight exercises. BMD was measured for total body, femoral neck, and lumbar spine by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA).

CONCLUSION: These data indicate high-intensity REX training was successful for improving BMD of the femoral neck in healthy elderly subjects. Also, these data suggest REX increased bone turnover, which over time may lead to further changes in BMD.

Benton M.J. & White A. Osteoporosis: recommendations for resistance exercise and supplementation with calcium and vitamin D to promote bone health. J Community Health Nurs. 2006. 23(4):201-11.

Scientific EvidenceScientific Evidence

FlexibilityFlexibilityPURPOSE: to investigate the effects of aerobic training, strength training and their combination on joint range of motion of inactive older individuals.

METHODS: Thirty-two inactive older men (65 - 78 yr) were assigned to one of four groups (n = 8 per group): control (C), strength training (ST), cardiovascular training (CT), and combination of strength and aerobic training (SA). Subjects in the S, A, and SA trained three times a week for 16 weeks. ST included 10 resistance exercises for the major muscle groups at an intensity of 55 - 80% of 1-RM and CT included walking/jogging at 50 - 80 % of maximal heart rate. Body weight and height, physical activity level and maximal oxygen uptake (VO(2)max) were measured before the training period. Isokinetic (60 and 180 deg x sec(-1)) and concentric strength (1-RM in bench and leg press) were assessed prior to and at the end of the training period. Hip flexion, extension, abduction, and adduction, shoulder extension, flexion, and adduction, knee flexion, elbow flexion and sit-and-reach score were determined before and at 8 and 16 weeks of training.

CONCLUSION: Results indicate that resistance training may be able to increase range of motion of a number of joints of inactive older individuals (increased sit-and-reach performance, elbow flexion, knee flexion, shoulder flexion and extension and hip flexion and extension both mid- and post-training) possibly due to an improvement in muscle strength.

Fatouros I.G. et al. The effects of strength training, cardiovascular training and their combination on flexibility of inactive older adults. Int J Sports Med. 2002 Feb;23(2):112-9.

Obesity

Stress Sedentary

The main problems:The main problems:

Over weight: not only Over weight: not only the weighting the weighting

machinemachine TOFIS: “Thin outside, fat inside”

Scientific research from Imperial College of London 2006 shows that people who would be considered slim can have large quantities of fat within them.

% Body fat X BMI Conclusions:

Sumo fighters can show lower levels of cholesterol than a thin person. Bodybuilders has percentage of fat infinitely lower than average population

Tofis can have an unhealthy, even dangerous build-up of fat around their organs,

Low calorie diets without physical activity could be damaging for health

Rejuvenation: the squaring of the circleRejuvenation: the squaring of the circle    

Nutrition

Genetic Heritage

Exercise

Life Style

RejuvenationThrough BB

Lifestyle

Close relationship between lifestyle Close relationship between lifestyle and hormonal secretionand hormonal secretion

Pituitary Pituitary GlandGland

GonadasGonadas AdrenalsAdrenals

AndrogensAndrogens CortisolCortisol

Anabolic Anabolic EffectsEffects

Catabolic Catabolic EffectsEffects

Decalogue of Decalogue of ImmortalityImmortality

1. Sleep 7 to 8 hours a night2. Always eat balanced and rich in proteins

breakfast 3. Increase into 5 the number of meals per day4. Control calorie and fat intake (high unsaturated

fatty acids)5. Take care of the teeth and chew correctly6. Drink high amount of water7. Control body weight8. Exercise regularly with weights9. Consume little or no alcohol 10. Don’t smoke

Anti-Aging Anti-Aging NutritionNutrition

Essential part of Anti-aging Medicine

Natural alternative and complement of therapeutic drugs

Improve life quality

Prevent and reduce muscular, joint and bone injuries

NutritioNutritionn

Diet:Caloric IntakeRational distribution of caloric intakeFood QualityProtein Minimum

Supplements: Natural substances that help to complete diet

and to improve results

CALORIC INTAKE:CALORIC INTAKE: (calories/Kg. Body weight / day)

35-40 calories / Kg. / day for 20-55 years old

Since 55 years old:35 cal/kg – 1% per year

Fats 0,8g/Kg (aprox. 15 to 20% of daily caloric intake)Fats 0,8g/Kg (aprox. 15 to 20% of daily caloric intake)

Proteins 1,5g/Kg (aprox. 20% of daily caloric intake)Proteins 1,5g/Kg (aprox. 20% of daily caloric intake)

Carbohidrates 5 to 6g/kg (aprox. 60% of daily caloric intake)Carbohidrates 5 to 6g/kg (aprox. 60% of daily caloric intake)

Master Men Bodybuilding Master Men Bodybuilding (40-49 years / up to (40-49 years / up to 9090 Kg) Kg)

Master Men Bodybuilding Master Men Bodybuilding (40-49 years / over (40-49 years / over 9090 Kg) Kg)

Master Men Bodybuilding Master Men Bodybuilding (50-59 years)(50-59 years)

Master Men Bodybuilding Master Men Bodybuilding (over (over 6060 years) years)


Recommended