Date post: | 01-Apr-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | natalie-clink |
View: | 231 times |
Download: | 5 times |
An analysis of web searches in a South African academic Online Public Access Catalogue
Solvej VorsterUniversity of Cape Town
7th June 201211th Southern African Online Information Meeting
Presentation outline
Introduction and Background
Methodology and Interpretation of the results
Discussion and Conclusion
Fact: There is a continued reliance on print
and physical collections at UCT Libraries
Library Circulation statistics and OPAC transactions are not significantly decreasing
Year Number of loans2000 373 7732001 420 6222002 501 3392003 563 1222004 542 1542005 508 2552006 444 7402007 436 3202008 415 9952009 410 6162010 424 7032011 381 815
Circulation of items 2000-2010
Year Opac transactions
2006 1 769 627
2007 1 646 879
2008 1 557 088
2009 1 545 516
2010 1 615 857
2011 1 537 283
Web OPAC transactions 2006-2010
Introduction and Background• Why study OPAC use? Questionable role of the OPAC in terms of
relevance, use and value
• Are there new ways of information seeking and are they changing the way patrons are searching the OPAC?
• How seriously should we consider calls to abandon LCSH cataloguing?
• What about the “classical functions of bibliographic control”?
• Are South African students following the same searching behaviour patterns shown elsewhere?
Methodology
• UCT implemented the Web OPAC in 1999 (Aleph® ILS system from Ex Libris)
• Since 2006 OPAC search records have been stored as Oracle tables
• Transactional Log Analysis (TLA) was rejected as a tool for data analysis in favour of SQL and other reporting tools
• No attempt was made to study or measure search success, nor measure user satisfaction
MethodologyEvents that are registered in the Z69 (Web OPAC events) Oracle table (Ex Libris, 2009): • Search Command - Multi field (find-a)• Search Command - Basic search (find-b)• Search Command - CCL (find-c)• Search Command - Advanced (find-d)• Search Command - Multi base (find-m)• Scan• Refine Search• Cross sets• My Library Card• Help• SDI Profile• Save• Z39 Server Search request• Z39 Server scan request
Search = Keyword searchScan = Alphabetical Browse search
Methodology
Description of the 4 Reports:
1. Types of OPAC searches
2. Browse Searches
3. Keyword Searches
4. Self mediated services in the OPAC (My Library Card) and the Help function
Interpretation of the Results
Searching and Browsing 2006 vs 2011
Keyword Searches
76%
Browse24%
2006
Keyword Searches
86%
Browse14%
2011
Type of browse search
Title Author
ISSN ISBN
Journal title Author & title Corporate authors Keywords from author System number Imprint Words from title Series PublisherCorporate authors Keywords from author Place of publication Keywords from place of publication
Keywords from publisher MeSH subjects, Subject, LC subject , Keywords from subject, Local thesaurus, LC subject subdivision Course code Location Department General keyword
Shelf mark Course code
Keywords from language code
Keywords from year Dewey classification number General keyword
Known ItemsSubjectsQualificationMetadataGeneral Keywords
Type of browse search No. %
Title 745 910 44.3Author 360 174 21.4Subject 248 010 14.7Shelf mark 120 180 7.1Journal title 115 976 6.9Author & title 24 050 1.4LC subject 18 656 1.1Course code 14 834 0.9System number 5 450 0.3ISBN 5 314 0.3
Top ten Web OPAC Browse searches
Interpretation of the Results
Interpretation of the Results
General keyword0%
Qualification metadata8%
Subject Searches16%
Known Item Searches76%
OPAC Browse Searches
Interpretation of the Results
"icts impact" AND "user""information technology impact" AND "libraries""internet" AND "information user""internet" AND "library""is branding evil""issues in Diagnosis""jazz" and "south africa""jim goes to joburg"
Actual Subject Browse searches in the OPAC showing inappropriate keyword and Boolean searching
Interpretation of the Results Type of keyword searchWordsW-titlesW-authorsISSNISBNBarcodeW-seriesW-publishersW-Unif.TitlesW-place of publW-subjectsW-ToCW-sublib.W-yearW-formatW-language codeW-thesesW-notesW-material type
W-collectionW-shelf
General keywordsKnown ItemsSubjectsQualification metadata
Interpretation of the Results
Type of keyword search Total PercentageWords 3 989 423 60.8W-titles 844 494 12.9W-authors 809 381 12.3W-subjects 215 963 3.3ISSN 193 505 2.9W-sublib. 119 463 1.8W-year 80 819 1.2W-format 77 804 1.2W-language code 77 027 1.2ISBN 73 683 1.1
Top ten web OPAC Keyword searches
General Keywords61%
Known Item Searches30%
Qualification Metadata6%
Subject searches3%
OPAC Keyword Searches
Interpretation of the Results
Interpretation of the Results
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
Self Mediated services
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
Help Function My Library card
Discussion and Conclusion
• The study supports the trends in the literature which show decreasing use of subject searching in favour of keywords
• What is the role and importance of subject searching ? For whom?
• OPAC is rigid and unforgiving for untrained searchers
• OPACs still reflect 1.0 design in interface and ability
• Solutions?
Discussion and Conclusion
• User studies
• User instruction
• “Hacker ethics” (Evans, W. 2009)
• Bibliobarbarism? (Berman, S. 2006)