I
$L. Tiact No. Timber Sale No. NAME
- ltj .,£;.;oLe~ -s tJ · ADDRESS
Y;if{E rR
Species
or<. mx !8A
CJak I'YIX t6A A-
TOTAL VALUE OF
BID
Min.
Bid
Estimated Per Total Value
Volume unit
-5"8 12 II
Z'ID
soo /00
300 <-11-t37 SDO
COMPARISON OF BIDS
6f<otri;kc:S la~v<FML5
Bid Per Bid Per
Unit Unit
Total "Bid Total bid
500 t.t zf> U-6" 276' l'!iD /90
'38 ~7)
?.8 Z.7 /~ 10
1./0 "37 ~[572() 1>785b
s.L. COMPARISON OF BIDS
JJom~ !ld /)s;lt.dNO J/!qj r{:;t.·L.~-11...1 s -e+m kc.CJ~~ ;./oP.:rot-1 .., v
\
-
Bid Per Bid Per Bid Pe.r Bid Per Bid Per Bid Per Unit Unit - . Unit Unit Unit .Unit
Total Bid Total Bid Total Bid Total "Bid Total bid
"330 "3¥0. ~;I :Z.'/D ~53 '16b ;ED 25"3.02 /?.0 /83 zo_!L lOb /Z_().~ 1'10 /83 2.0/
2/ 21. 2.9 . /0 zg 1~.~ 3/ ·u.oB 1'1 2g lg_5.S"0
II 8./D ;!) 2.8 /0.1-5'
o/'C> ?.4 .91/ "30' "3'3 Z1J.SO 5'09Z.C> 5'/ 97'3 ,liZ. 69100 5"360/ {i'_!L08~
I
I
I
" COMPARISON OF BIDS
c ffl,emll-s As t/t.tft\){j I!I~Ai No~rJ ~b,(. k2W.t.6~~ Tract No. Timber Sale No. NAME
2 -/'{ /JlJ'f6R~OR~ ADDRESS
Min .
Bid Bid Per Bid Per Bid Per Bid Per Bid Per
Estimated Per Total Value Unit Unit Unit Unit Unit
Species Volume Unit Total 'Bid Total bid Total Bid Total Bid Total Bid
o!Z !00 3~5' '33f.5 ~ ~10 ~-s-z.
,6A 'S.t/ ;6"D 118-~ 167 /'36
mx t/ Z7~ ~/. 08 U7 I'ID
As~ ~0 z' 3-t;.og Z.7 :z.g 8A z=:- 5"" 7.6"() g I$'
C>ak 200 2.Z Z./.Z.'S ;g ,, #1X 6"'0 z.tj 26.~2 ~9 18
3'~&;70 'l~z&5 l 'tZ~5.~ tl~ 2.35'.& ' 142,77
j ~-------------------------------------------------------------------------------.,/
Tract No.
6? -;Jt(
. Species
of< mtl Mx
A mx Oak
TOTAL VALUE OF
BID
Timber Sale No. NAME
:(P_t>D~/? ,-c: ADDRESS
·~~:__
Min.
Bid
Estimated Per Total Value
Volume unit
~~~~
'5. 91/ LZ.?
/ 3 2..
J 9Z. 0g
COMPAIUSON OF BIDS
~61-rLa~s f/MK n//s !6+M ~~ilh
Bid Per Bid Per Bid Per
Unit Unit Unit
Total Bid Total bid Total Bid
1-/fi'O I3~D 2.92...
2 7f) '2. 75" Z 92..
2 7-s- zoo 19 Z.
32.)0 2.~ 'a'Z..
'3'1.s-6 Z3 Z.2
~lf.fl) z.o z. z. '1/ 703 13/ 71'17. ~) 28 &,s'J. Jf~
__,
I +f._~
lh:; lV~ woo f) 7kft.t-toJD J% 7i COMPARISON OF BIDS· .
A/loR.:rQJ i.m~ &'!UsR.. '->
Bid Per Bid Pe.r
Unit . Unit Bid Per Bid Per Bid
Total Bid Total Bid Unit Unit U1
2~5' '-??!".7 2--Total Bid Total bid
z..c;;C 335':7 2..-
IK'D Z 31· ~ ~
I45"Z... 30~
lqzz.. Z.2. 0
Zo8 {7! 0
¥gs-o zfi', tf
't'v, 2./. 72
zl j/.3D
33 '19~. 7Q 2.9 29/. z.. 0
'3 1 2.8 3 2- /~
2./ /~ 39 ~s3,cjg 2~6'/5.8 b
,.
I
Tract No.
6-!L(
Species
Oak (Js
A M·~
TOTAL VALUE OF
BID
Timber Sale No. NAME
9o QC>l P1 fJG- ADDRESS
Min.
Bid
Estimated Per Total Value
Volume Un it
1/~0
726"" /(oD
. J~
t//2'}(. ~
COMPARISON OF BIDS
~~e-lf r i.a /(e~ ~7Ui2cv.boo ~+YJI/ ~lit
Bid Per Bid Per Bid Per Bid Per Bid Per
Unit Unit Un it Unit Unit
Total 'Bid Total bid Total Bid Total Bid Total Bid
~7·'" . 2~ zt/ 37.5"0 5l..9b si ~O,Gb 5"~ZO zt/ 37.6{) G"O.'ID zl
1 77?6~0 7 7 8'1(),5(; ~i.'l£>.o
2
Tract No.
O-IL(
Species
Cbk ~A-P:s-m~<_
TOTAL VALUE OF
BID
;~:_~;::~, Mi n.
Bid
Estimated Per Total Value
Volume Unit
/~0 80 /b ~
COMPARISON OF BIDS
h7v~v..hoD JJifJWFt
Bid Per Bid Per Bid Per Bid Per Bid Per
Unit Uni t Unit Unit Un it
Total B id Total bid Total Bid Total Bid Total Bid
23.'/l
1./7. 2~
'17. ~ v ~t;
gotJI/,Bo
3
Tract No.
D,/f
Species
P-:s-()Qk ;12_ )(
TOTAL VALUE OF
BID
Timber Sale No. NAME
r;;t!-LJ t ~ ADDRESS
Min.
Bid
Estimated Per Total Value
Volu me unit
/~0
/00 /~
BS8j.oo
COMPARISON OF BIDS
TR t1 De-/.1 v~t< ~
Bid Per Bid Per Bid Per Bid Per Bid Per
Unit Un it Unit Unit Unit
Total Bid Total bid Total Bid Total Bid Total Bid
'3D '30 z~
9o75.oo
\
Tract No. Timber Sale No.
l();..;tj ~-k.RL-1;$ 6(JRuce-
Species
6a/( Pr A
JIJ1X 5w
lf2f:_ - !tLt..IAJI
TOTAL VALUE OF
BID
Min.
Bid
Estimated Per
Volume Ui1it
Czb' )20
/!0 ~0 o/"0
NAME
ADDRESS
Bid Per
Total Value Unit
COMPARISON OF BIDS
Bid Per Bid Per Bid Per Bid Per
Unit Unit Un it Unit
Total Bid Total bid Total Bid Total Bid Total Bid
" \ "" / - ~·
\ T\ ..- v-J \ \ v I ) \ )/ \ ' ~ \ v
I VI ) \ ~ \
Tract No.
3-1/
Species
L)Qk 1-l-Ps mx
TOTAL VALUE OF
BID
Timber Sale No. NAME
~/J5>6:G ADDRESS
-R-A-15 Min.
Bid
Esti mated Per Total Value
Volume u nit
-s;o 'Z-oo 12-0
.&/5"' 9/ZO.Ot>
COMPARISON OF BIDS
!31-/)1 ~tf(j:;,<jt;
Bid Per Bid Per Bid Per Bid Per Bid Per
Uni t Uni t Unit Unit Un it
Total Bid Total bid Total Bid Total Bid Tota l Bid
z~
z~
s/ 2~
1 76""9~ct.:
Tract No.
6-1(
Species
Oak p:s Pr< 4
!Yix.
TOTAL VALUE OF
BID
Timber Sale No. NAME
~ -
1osG~ ADDRESS
Min.
Bid
Estimated Per Total Value
Volume U~it
700 l./30 130 60 20
COMPARISON OF BIDS
frl-lil iot&~;Jt
Bid Per Bid Per Bid Per Bid Per Bid Per
Unit Unit Un it Unit Unit
Total 'Bid Total bid Total Bid Total B id Total Bid
z'/ "32 38 IS'" /b
' 328?0,00
Tract No.
/9~ /If
\
Species
c5ak P.:s-A J11K
TOTAL VALUE OF
BID
Timber Sale No. NAME
a.;-;/, t/reR_fJIJ) ADDRESS
Min.
Bid Bid Per
Estimated Per Total Value Unit
Volume unit
300 //0 /5"
/{)()
-
COMPARISON OF BIDS
Bid Per Bid Per Bid Per Bid Pe.r
Unit Unit Unit . Unit
Total Bid Total bid Total Bid Total Bid Total Bid
\ \ , r-... -;:-:!- 7 h . ......-.....
\ \ ) ~ 77' / . .,_,.,..,.....
" A ~ /
\\ \ v r v \ D~
' - \.7 /
r( ) -"' 't
Tract No.
780 -!It/
Species
PK p-:s-
TOTAL VALUE OF
BID
Timber Sale No. ~ NAME
B 6R' ADDRESS 0 1.AK6
Min.
Bid
Estimated Per Total Value
Volume Unit
'320
:?0 <JBZI
COMPARISON OF BIDS
:;:;; TTJ kWOoD 6/om&s.t<C,
Bid Per Bid Per Bid Per Bid Per Bid Per
Un it Un it Unit Un it Un it
Total B id Total bid Total Bid Tota l Bid Total Bid
~"1- 2.(. ~/.7~
32.7~ gJ. 79 1~919.'10 13033.90