+ All Categories
Home > Documents > - Site Summary Revised Format for EM QPRs and MPRs Site Generated Slides May 2011 1.

- Site Summary Revised Format for EM QPRs and MPRs Site Generated Slides May 2011 1.

Date post: 26-Dec-2015
Category:
Upload: moses-ellis
View: 216 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
11
- Site Summary Revised Format for EM QPRs and MPRs Site Generated Slides May 2011 1
Transcript
Page 1: - Site Summary Revised Format for EM QPRs and MPRs Site Generated Slides May 2011 1.

- Site SummaryRevised Format

for EM QPRs and MPRs

Site Generated SlidesMay 2011

1

Page 2: - Site Summary Revised Format for EM QPRs and MPRs Site Generated Slides May 2011 1.

Safety (Strategic Goal 5.1 and 5.2) (One slide per Contractor)

Safety Management Program Status Change

Conduct of Operations Green

Work Planning & Control Yellow

Electrical Safety Red

Fire Protection

Radiological Protection

Nuclear Safety

Lockout/Tagout

Corrective Actions

Quality Assurance

Event Recurrence

Environmental Release

Material Handling/Transportation

Equipment Degradation/Failure

OS/IH

DOE Oversight

Safety Narrative: [Site-submitted narrative explaining any significant safety issues. Narrative should include a high level explanation of the Base vs. ARRA breakdown of safety incidents, Occurrence Reporting and Processing System (ORPS) events, Near Misses, Significant Injuries, Results of recent assessments/site visits, lessons-learned, contract fee actions (e.g. CPOF/fee payment reductions), as well as status on any CAP development/implementation/effectiveness.

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

1.6

2QFY09 3QFY09 4QFY09 1QFY10 2QFY10 3QFY10 4QFY10 1QFY11

TRC EM Target TRC Rate DART EM Target

DART Case Rate Linear (DART Case Rate) Linear (TRC Rate)

Page 3: - Site Summary Revised Format for EM QPRs and MPRs Site Generated Slides May 2011 1.

Contract Status – Non M&O Contract Version (One Slide per Contract)

Contractor Title:Contractor's Name:Contract No.:Contract Type:

Requests for Equitable Adjustment Number Dollar ValuePending Less than 180 Days Pending 180 Days or More

Number Dollar ValuePending Less than 180 Days Pending 180 Days or More

Change Orders

Number Dollar ValuePending Less than 180 Days Pending 180 Days or More

Claims/Disputes

Key Contract Milestones Due Date Actual DateContract Management Plan:

Performance Evaluation Measurement Plan:

Contract Performance Baseline Initial Approval:

Earned Value Management System Certification:

Partnering Agreement in Place:

Contracting Officer: Date of Award: Base Period or Performance: Contract Options: 1:

2:

Contract General Information

Contract Value ($M)

3.3

4.7 4.7

0

1

2

3

4

5

$M

Initial Current Contract Performance Baseline

Page 4: - Site Summary Revised Format for EM QPRs and MPRs Site Generated Slides May 2011 1.

Contract Status –M&O Contract Version (One Slide per Contract)

Contractor Title:Contractor's Name:Contract No.:Contract Type:

Requests for Equitable Adjustment Number Dollar ValuePending Less than 180 Days Pending 180 Days or More

Number Dollar ValuePending Less than 180 Days Pending 180 Days or More

Change Orders

Number Dollar ValuePending Less than 180 Days Pending 180 Days or More

Claims/Disputes

Key Contract Milestones Due Date Actual DateContract Management Plan:

Performance Evaluation Measurement Plan:

Contract Performance Baseline Initial Approval:

Earned Value Management System Certification:

Partnering Agreement in Place:

Contracting Officer: Date of Award: Base Period or Performance: Contract Options: 1:

2:

Contract General Information

Contract Value ($M)

3.3

1 0.75

0

1

2

3

4

$MContract Performance Baseline Total for CAPs

Contract Performance Annual Baseline Total for Ops

Contract Performance Annual Baseline Total for Other EM Work

Page 5: - Site Summary Revised Format for EM QPRs and MPRs Site Generated Slides May 2011 1.

[Project Code and Name] - D4 of 324 Lab. requires additional source term removal due to high dose rate (12k REM).

New/Existing:Existing

Owner: Contractor

Status:Realized

Planned Action: Dedicated team to manage the hot cell removal effort and a subcontract has been awarded to perform the work. Additional subsurface characterization in progress.

Top Three Risks/Issues (One Slide per Site)

[Project Code and Name] - Additional characterization required to enable 610-10/11 Burial Ground remediation.

New/Existing:New

Owner: DOE

Status:Not Realized

Planned Action: Remediation was completed without additional required characterization. Risk no longer active.

[Project Code and Name] - Additional characterization required to enable 610-10/11 Burial Ground remediation.

New/Existing:New

Owner: DOE

Status:Not Realized

Planned Action: Remediation was completed without additional required characterization. Risk no longer active.

Page 6: - Site Summary Revised Format for EM QPRs and MPRs Site Generated Slides May 2011 1.

ARRA Buy Back Status Update (One Slide per Site)

ContractorProject/Activity

Code and NameBuy Back Scope Description and Estimated Cost Compliance

Related

Footprint Reduction

Related

Last Expected Completion Date

of Buy Back Projects (Month-

Year)

SRR SR-0014C.R1.1 – Liquid Waste Recapitalization

Buy Back Scope Initiated-Scope description ($ cost estimate, $ paid to date)-Scope description ($ cost estimate, $ paid to date)Buy Back Scope Not Initiated-Scope description ($ cost estimate)-Scope description ($ cost estimate)

No No September 2011

SRNS SR-0030.R1.2 – P Reactor Decommissioning

Buy Back Scope Initiated-Scope description ($ cost estimate, $ paid to date)-Scope description ($ cost estimate, $ paid to date)Buy Back Scope Not Initiated-Scope description ($ cost estimate)-Scope description ($ cost estimate)

Yes Yes September 2011

SRNS SR-0030.R1.3 – P Ash Basin Remedial Actions

Buy Back Scope Initiated-Scope description ($ cost estimate, $ paid to date)-Scope description ($ cost estimate, $ paid to date)Buy Back Scope Not Initiated-Scope description ($ cost estimate)-Scope description ($ cost estimate)

Yes Yes September 2011

Page 7: - Site Summary Revised Format for EM QPRs and MPRs Site Generated Slides May 2011 1.

Site Accomplishments (One Slide per Site)

• Accomplishment #1

• Accomplishment #2

• Accomplishment #3

• Accomplishment #4

• Accomplishment #5

Page 8: - Site Summary Revised Format for EM QPRs and MPRs Site Generated Slides May 2011 1.

MR/Contingency (One Slide per Large ($100M+) CAP)Management Reserve and Contingency Narrative Place any pertinent narrative in this box. Explain how allocated relates to the plan, totals to date, etc.

Original MR

÷Original

TPC

Remaining MR ÷ Cost

to Go

Original Contingency

÷Original

TPC

Remaining Contingency

÷ Cost to Go

Last Risk Register Update

Last Monte Carlo Run

% % % % M/D/2011 M/D/2011

Management Reserve and Contingency Cumulative Planned and Actual Values Allocated

0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

60,000

70,000

80,000

$1,0

00s

MR (Plan) 6,000 10,000 14,000 18,000 22,000 26,000 30,000 34,000 38,000 42,000 46,000 50,000 54,000 58,000 62,000 66,000 71,000 73,000 74,000 75,000

Contingency (Plan) 2,500 5,750 9,000 12,250 15,500 18,750 22,000 25,250 28,500 31,750 35,000 38,250 41,500 44,750 48,000 51,250 52,000 53,000 54,000 55,000

MR (Allocated) 0 0 3,000 5,500 9,900 10,100 18,900 28,000 29,000 33,500

Contingency (Allocated) 0 500 700 1,100 1,300 8,050 13,800 26,500 27,600 30,100

YR

2009

QTR 1

QTR 2 QTR 3 QTR 4

YR

2010

QTR 1

QTR 2 QTR 3 QTR 4

YR

2011

QTR 1

QTR 2 QTR 3 QTR 4

YR

2012

QTR 1

QTR 2 QTR 3 QTR 4

YR

2013

QTR 1

QTR 2 QTR 3 QTR 4

Page 9: - Site Summary Revised Format for EM QPRs and MPRs Site Generated Slides May 2011 1.

MR/Contingency (All CAPs with TPC less than $100M and All Ops Activities)

ARRA and Base Capital Asset Projects with Total Project Cost less than $100M – Project Level

Project Number and Name MR Remaining MR

Original MR

÷Original

TPC

RemainingMR

÷ Cost to Go

Contingency Remaining Contingency

Original Contingency

÷Original

TPC

Remaining Contingency

÷ Cost to Go

Last Risk Register Update

Last Monte

Carlo Run

Project Number and Name #1 $ $ % % $ $ % % M/D/2011 M/D/2011

Project Number and Name #2 $ $ % % $ $ % % M/D/2011 M/D/2011

Project Number and Name #3 $ $ % % $ $ % % M/D/2011 M/D/2011

Project Number and Name #4 $ $ % % $ $ % % M/D/2011 M/D/2011

All Operations Activities – Contractor Level Separated by ARRA/Base

Project Number and Name MR Remaining MR

Original MR

÷Original

TPC

Remaining MR

÷ Cost to Go

Contingency Remaining Contingency

Original Contingency

÷Original

TPC

Remaining Contingency

÷ Cost to Go

Last Risk Register Update

Last Monte

Carlo Run

Contractor #1 (ARRA Ops Work) $ $ % % $ $ % % M/D/2011 M/D/2011

Contractor #1 (Base Ops Work) $ $ % % N/A N/A N/A N/A M/D/2011 M/D/2011

Contractor #2 (ARRA Ops Work) $ $ % % $ $ % % M/D/2011 M/D/2011

Contractor #2 (Base Ops Work) $ $ % % N/A N/A N/A N/A M/D/2011 M/D/2011

Page 10: - Site Summary Revised Format for EM QPRs and MPRs Site Generated Slides May 2011 1.

10

EM Lessons Learned Executive Summary

Lesson Learned:Lesson Learned:

Project/Activity Name:Project/Activity Name: Lessons Learned Identifier: Lessons Learned Identifier:

Lesson Learned:Lesson Learned:

Project/Activity Name:Project/Activity Name: Lessons Learned Identifier: Lessons Learned Identifier:

Lesson Learned:Lesson Learned:

Project/Activity Name:Project/Activity Name: Lessons Learned Identifier: Lessons Learned Identifier:

Page 11: - Site Summary Revised Format for EM QPRs and MPRs Site Generated Slides May 2011 1.

11

Application of Lessons Learned to Management of Projects/Activities

• Include a summary of how past LLs, AI findings, or ORPs findings were used during project planning, execution, or closeout during the quarter.  This could include discussion during training, review during development of planning documents or when writing work packages, review or incorporation during readiness reviews, discussion during PODs, etc. 


Recommended