+ All Categories
Home > Documents > + Stats Chapter 7: Correlation doesn’t mean causation.

+ Stats Chapter 7: Correlation doesn’t mean causation.

Date post: 14-Dec-2015
Category:
Upload: jesus-dudney
View: 226 times
Download: 5 times
Share this document with a friend
25
+ Stats Chapter 7: Correlation doesn’t mean causation
Transcript
Page 1: + Stats Chapter 7: Correlation doesn’t mean causation.

+

Stats

Chapter 7: Correlation doesn’t mean causation

Page 2: + Stats Chapter 7: Correlation doesn’t mean causation.

+Do Now:

The following graph shows ages of men and woman who are married to each other. Based on the graph, would calculating the correlation coefficient be appropriate? Why? Why not?

Page 3: + Stats Chapter 7: Correlation doesn’t mean causation.

+

Page 4: + Stats Chapter 7: Correlation doesn’t mean causation.

+Pirates are causing global warming?

Page 5: + Stats Chapter 7: Correlation doesn’t mean causation.

+EVIL MAN PIRATE.

Page 6: + Stats Chapter 7: Correlation doesn’t mean causation.

+Cheese is killing people?

Page 7: + Stats Chapter 7: Correlation doesn’t mean causation.

+Margarine killing the love?

Page 8: + Stats Chapter 7: Correlation doesn’t mean causation.

+Political Action Committees are killers?

Page 9: + Stats Chapter 7: Correlation doesn’t mean causation.

+Skiing facilities! NO!!!!

Page 10: + Stats Chapter 7: Correlation doesn’t mean causation.

+Hmmmm….

Do NOT confuse association, correlation and causation.

Page 11: + Stats Chapter 7: Correlation doesn’t mean causation.

+Association

Deliberately vague term to describe the relationship between two variables. This can be used for CATEGORICAL data

Ex: Did you know there’s a strong correlation between playing an instrument and drinking coffee…. NO. It’s an association!

Page 12: + Stats Chapter 7: Correlation doesn’t mean causation.

+Correlation

Precise term describing the strength and direction of the linear relationship between quantitative variables.

Page 13: + Stats Chapter 7: Correlation doesn’t mean causation.

+Causation

Scatterplots and correlation coefficients NEVER prove causation.

This is why it is so hard to prove something causes something else– for example, just because lung cancer and smoking is correlated doesn’t mean that one causes the other and when considering one causing the other you need to consider both. Does smoking cause cancer? OR Does cancer cause smoking?

You need to do further tests to actually figure this out.

Page 14: + Stats Chapter 7: Correlation doesn’t mean causation.

+Example 1

A news reporter claims “There appears to be a strong correlation between whether you own a pet and the condition of a person’s yard.”

Thoughts on this?

Page 15: + Stats Chapter 7: Correlation doesn’t mean causation.

+Example 2:

A researcher studies children in elementary school and finds a strong positive linear association between height and reading scores. Does this mean that taller readers are generally better

readers? What might explain the strong correlation?

Page 16: + Stats Chapter 7: Correlation doesn’t mean causation.

+What is wrong? Example 3

The correlation coefficient between Olympic gold medal times for the 800 m hurdles and year is -0.66 seconds per year.

Page 17: + Stats Chapter 7: Correlation doesn’t mean causation.

+Answer

Correlation Coefficient has NO UNITS.

Page 18: + Stats Chapter 7: Correlation doesn’t mean causation.

+What’s wrong? Example 4

The correlation coefficient between Olympic Gold Medal times for the 100m dash and year is -1.37

Page 19: + Stats Chapter 7: Correlation doesn’t mean causation.

+Answer

Correlation Coefficient of -1.37 is impossible! Correlation coefficient will always be between -1 and 1!

Page 20: + Stats Chapter 7: Correlation doesn’t mean causation.

+What’s Wrong? Example 5

Since the correlation coefficient between Olympic gold medal times for the 800m hurdles and 100m dash is -0.41, the correlation coefficient between times for the 100m dash and the 800m dash hurdles will be 0.41

Page 21: + Stats Chapter 7: Correlation doesn’t mean causation.

+Answer

Correlation does not change if we reverse x and y variables.

Page 22: + Stats Chapter 7: Correlation doesn’t mean causation.

+What’s Wrong?- Example 6

If we were to measure Olympic gold medal times for the 800m hurdles in minutes instead of seconds, the correlation coefficient would be -.66/60 = -0.011

Page 23: + Stats Chapter 7: Correlation doesn’t mean causation.

+Answer

Correlation does not change when we change units!

Page 24: + Stats Chapter 7: Correlation doesn’t mean causation.

+Practice Problems

Try some on your own!

As always call me over if you are confused!

Page 25: + Stats Chapter 7: Correlation doesn’t mean causation.

+Exit Ticket

Explain the error:

Your friend claims that the correlation coefficient between what continent you live on and how many hours you sleep is 0.14.


Recommended