Date post: | 22-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | millicent-merryl-dalton |
View: | 212 times |
Download: | 0 times |
© T. M. Whitmore
TODAYMaya Corn God
READINGS:Plants and Society (reserve) pp 197-203; 259-260Omnivore’s Dilemma: 15-64; 85-99
Readings for Next week:Nature’s Metropolis pp 205-259On line in Contemporary issues… folder: “Power Steer” (M. Pollan) Amber Waves article on Hispanic workersOmnivore’s Dilemma 65084, 185-238Hungry Planet pp 22-29 (Australia outback); 162-165; 266-275 (USA)
© T. M. Whitmore
Problems & Successes continued
• Impacts on large and small holdersDifficult for poor to afford the “package”Benefits of improved output mostly to
the already relatively better off
• Other criticisms Genetic lossPetroleum dependence (fertilizer)Dependence on irrigationDoes not “solve” the food problem
© T. M. Whitmore
Maize• Maize is a grain bearing grass family plant (like
all other grains) – but unlike any other
• Through selection humans have created a plant that no longer has the ability to disperse seeds and produce offspring without human intervention
© T. M. Whitmore
Controversy in origin of maize
• The Maya considered corn a gift from the gods and cultivating it was a sacred duty
• Botanists, however argue: Battle of Titans:Mangledorf and Beadle1930s through 1970s
© T. M. Whitmore
Paul Mangledorf: Tripsacum school
• He argued that:Domesticated maize was the result of a
hybridization event between an unknown wild maize from S America and a species of gamma grass, Tripsacum.
Teosinte (a wild grass found in C. Mexico) was of hybrid origin, the offspring of a cross between another genus of grasses (Tripsacum) and maize.
Immature ears of Zea diploperennis (a variety of teosinte) whole and sectioned with a few mature fruitcases, one of which is cracked open to expose the grain (photo by Hugh Iltis)
© T. M. Whitmore
Teosinte• The accepted wisdom up to the 1970s was that
the morphological differences between teosinte and maize were simply too great for maize to have been selected from teosinte by ancient peoples over a few thousand years.
• Thus teosinte was placed in the genus Euchlaena in the 19th century rather than in Zea with maize (Z. mays)
© T. M. Whitmore
George Beadle: Teosinte school
• He argued that Some teosintes were of the same species as
maize, while others belonged to a distinct species
A Mexican annual teosinte (Zea mays ssp. parviglumis) was the direct ancestor of maize.
A small number of major mutations could have converted this teosinte into a useful food plant during the early stages of domestication.
© T. M. Whitmore
Battle Decided• Maize is a direct domesticate of a teosinte (Zea
mays ssp. parviglumis), native to the Balsas River Valley area of southern Mexico
• With up to 12% of its genetic material obtained from another teosinte species Zea mays ssp. mexicana through introgression.
© T. M. Whitmore
Teosinte II• The teosintes make up a group of large grasses of
the genus Zea found in Mexico, Guatemala and Nicaragua.
• Virtually all populations of teosinte are either threatened or endangered
• Much scientific interest in conferring beneficial teosinte traits, such as insect resistance, perennialism and flood tolerance, to cultivated maize lines, although this is very difficult due to linked deleterious teosinte traits.
Teosinte and "reconstructed" primitive maize. (photo by John Doebley)
Photos courtesy of the Doebley Lab, Department of Genetics University of Wisconsin-Madison
Ears of Zea mays ssp. parviglumis (maize’s teosinte ancester) and maize (photo by Hugh Iltis)
Wild form of Zea mays ssp. mexicana plants growing in a field in Michoacan, Mexico (photo by John Doebley)
Teosinte ear (Zea mays ssp mexicana) on the left, maize ear on the right, and ear of their F1 hybrid in the center
(photo by John Doebley)
© T. M. Whitmore
Maize Domestication• Maize development is thought to have
started from 7,500 to 12,000 years ago
• Archaeological remains of the earliest maize cob, found at Guila Naquitz Cave in the Oaxaca Valley of Mexico, date back roughly 6,250 years
• > 200 varieties in the Americas by 1492 (amazing breeding achievement).
© T. M. Whitmore
Maize genetics• A distinguishing feature of this grass is the
separation of the sexes among its flowering structures.
• Unlike other grasses, which produce perfect (bisexual) flowers, maize produces male inflorescences (tassels) which crown the plant at the stem apex, and female inflorescences (ears) which are borne at the apex of condensed lateral branches
© T. M. Whitmore
Maize genetics II• Maize is open pollinated (wind blows copious
pollen from stamen to ovaries) most other grains are not
• Fields of wheat or rice will be more or less homogeneous generation after generation – (when planting saved seed); not so for maize since it can cross breed so easily with other varieties that may be growing nearbyThis may be a plus since the new accidental
crosses may have better yield or other beneficial traits
But also a negative since the new cross may be worse
© T. M. Whitmore
Maize genetics III
• The high productivity of maize is due to its large leaf area and to its C4 photosynthetic pathway
• C4 trait (shared by other tropical species adapted to survive periods of drought stress)Is a more efficient means of exchange of
water vapor for atmospheric CO2
• C4 species can produce more dry matter per unit of water transpired than can plants endowed with the conventional (C3) photosynthetic pathway.
© T. M. Whitmore
Maize genetics IV
• Maize’s cross-pollinating has contributed to its broad morphological variability and geographic adaptability
• Varieties may range from 0.5 - 5 m height• Mature in 60 to 330 days • Produce 1 to 4 ears per plant (depends on
density planted)• 10 to 1,800 kernels per ear (each of which
could make a new plant)
© T. M. Whitmore
Maize genetics V• Yield from 0.5 to 23.5 tons of grain per
hectare• Kernels may be colorless (white) or yellow,
red, blue or variegated with these colors in mottled or striated patterns.
• Produced from 50° latitude N to 40° S, is adapted to desert and high rainfall environments, and to elevations ranging from 0 to 4,000 meters above sea level.
© T. M. Whitmore
Maize genetics VI• There is high genetic biodiversity in the
Mexican maize pool, a factor of great importance for the breeding of current and future maize cultivarsat least 42 landraces in 3 groups
A sample of the diversity represented in the corn crib of one farmer in the highlands of central Mexico.
(photo by Hugh Iltis)
© T. M. Whitmore
Major maize phenotypes (groups of varieties)
• Dent corn Most produced type globally = 73% of
commercial production, Yellow dent = “field corn”
Used as livestock feed and for industrial manufactures (starch, corn sweetening, oil, alcohol)
Some white dents are used for human foods in USA, e.g., breakfast cereals, and grits
Produces higher yields and dominates production in North America
© T. M. Whitmore
Major maize phenotypes II• Flour corn (usually white)
The preferred form for direct human consumption
Soft starch that is easily ground to produce meal that can be consumed directly, or as a flat bread, dumpling or beverage
Currently accounts for 12% of commercial production
• Popcorn - the original domesticated type• Flint corn –produced in areas where cold tolerance
is required (e.g., Italy for polenta) and is often preferred for hand grinding
• Sweet corn – AKA corn on the cob
Minnesota State University, Mankato
White flint on left, modern hybrid dent in middle, and Yellow Northern Flint
© T. M. Whitmore
Hybrid corn: World’s 1st Biotechnology
• Windborne pollen effects fertilization of open-pollinated varieties: there is no control of the male parentage
• Thus the drive to develop inbred lines. These are developed by a combination of inbreeding and selection. Inbreeding to transfer of pollen from an
individual plant to the silks of the same plant.
This process is repeated for several generations until the strain becomes stable, or true breeding.
© T. M. Whitmore
Hybrid corn II • A geneticist, G.H. Shull, in 1906
Noted the reduction in “hybrid vigor” (heterosis) in inbred varieties and
Restoration of vigor upon cross breeding inbred varieties
• Cross-breeding involves the cross breeding of selected parents“Single crosses” are produced by
crossing two inbred lines. “Double crosses” are produced by
crossing two different single crosses.Selection is practiced in each generation
to maintain only the superior types.
© T. M. Whitmore
Hybrid corn III • Aim of modern hybrids is to produce a
plant with reliable characteristics (e,g., yield) and modify the local ecology to fitThis is opposite from traditional breeding
that aimed to breed a local variety to fit well with local environmental conditions
© T. M. Whitmore
The shift to hybrids• By 1930s seeds of "double cross" hybrids
could be produced at a price US farmers could afford.
• Farmers could take advantage of the benefits of hybrid corn varieties that resulted in an increase in vigor, yield, and uniformity
• But until the 1940s most farmers still were growing open-pollinated (OP) varieties
• But by 1956, all of the Corn Belt and 90 per cent of the U.S. corn land was in hybrids.
© T. M. Whitmore
The shift to hybrids II• The shift from OPs to hybrids occurred
because hybrids were higher yielding (more corn on fewer
acres)Stood up better (i.e., resisted lodging)Were more tolerant to stresses (drought,
diseases, insects)Had greater uniformity – they were
better suited for mechanical corn pickingThe grain quality was better
• But, saved seeds from these hybrids do not necessarily breed true in farmers’ fields
© T. M. Whitmore
The shift to hybrids III• The introduction of hybrids also allowed, for
the first time, a cost effective protection of intellectual property in corn breeding
First public institutions (ag schools such as NCSU) but later private firms did the costly work to produce these hybrid seeds
• Farmers buying the seed could not maintain or recreate the hybrid themselves and thus needed to buy seed each year if they wanted to maintain the yield advantage the corn hybrids provided.
© T. M. Whitmore
Consequences of the shift to hybrids
• Hybrid corn was and is a huge scientific and commercial success.
• There were, however, unforeseen consequences of this technology. Existing (and genetically diverse) open-
pollinated varieties throughout the Corn Belt quickly disappeared and consequently uniformity in the cornfields greatly increased.
This increased the potential for genetic vulnerability e.g., Southern Corn Leaf Blight, a fungal disease, in 1970
© T. M. Whitmore
The shift to hybrids II• Unforeseen consequences of this
technology… Farmers were “tied” to the seed
companies – costs went up but production went up faster!
• Current opposition to genetic engineering (the new hybrid technology) Potential risks of introducing genetically
engineered varieties to the environmentGreed of companies, etc
• There was a lot less opposition and little if any discussion about the potential risks for traditional hybrids
© T. M. Whitmore
New Maize hybrids• Newest push is for open pollinated maize
varieties with commercial hybrid-like good qualities
• Apomixis (recent patents of a kind of cloning): to produce corn, wheat, and other cereal grains able to reproduce by themselves (saved seed) without losing hybrid vigor, desirable agronomic traits, or useful disease- or insect-resistance.
© T. M. Whitmore
Maize Ecology• Grows in more eco-zones than any other major
crop• Needs sufficient water especially during a 1-
month period of tasseling If too dry => significantly lower yieldsAlso need rain in later period when grain is
fillingThus drought is a problem: not total annual rain
but need sufficient in these key growth periods• Traditional farmers plant multiple varieties with
different maturities (with different dates of tasseling) so if rains are inconsistent they get better yields – less risk than monocrop
© T. M. Whitmore
Maize Production• Produces more food per hectare and per
labor than any other grain2x the yield of wheat; 7 m calories/ha (~
rice); wheat 4m calories/ha; more efficient than most grains in
converting sunlight due to C4 pathwaymuch of the plant can be used: eg stalks
for fuel and fodder
• A greater weight of maize is produced each year than any other grain
© T. M. Whitmore
Maize Production II• In 2000, all maize in world = 140 m ha; 96 m
in 3rd world (thus 2/3 of all maize land is in developing world)But only 46% of total production is in 3rd
world since hybrid (yellow field) maize in 1st world is more productive
• Worldwide production was over 600 million metric tons in 2003World average yield = 4,255 kg per hectareAverage yield in the USA was 8,600 kg per
hectaresub-Saharan Africa average yield = 1,316
kg per hectare
© T. M. Whitmore
Maize Production IV•World maize production
USA 43%China 18%European Union 7%Brazil 6%Mexico 3% (only!)
•Maize consumption (by people directly)Note Sub-Saharan Africa!
© T. M. Whitmore
US Maize Uses• The “Corn Belt”• In North America, fields are often planted
in a two-crop rotation with a nitrogen-fixing crop, often soybeans
• USA production uses56% animal feed18% export (much for animal feed) 13% ethanol (alcohol for fuel)5% High Fructose Corn Syrup8% all other industrial and food usesonly 4% of corn grown in 1st world goes
to human food directly
© T. M. Whitmore
Maize Uses II• “Invisible” food uses
Production of corn sweeteners: corn syrup keeps foods moist and prevents them
from quickly spoiling. Less expensive than table sugar in
United States due to subsidizing corn syrup production while taxing sugar imports
High fructose corn syrup (HFCS) is a modified form of corn syrup that has an increased level of fructose. Most all soft drinks sold in USA
© T. M. Whitmore
Maize Uses III• Production of ethanol in USA
Ethanol, a type of alcohol, is mostly used as an additive in gasoline to increase the octane rating
• Increasingly as major fuel source: Argued to be “greener”E85 (85% ethanol/15% gasoline)flexible fuel vehiclesTax breaks
• Ethanol is a significant market for U.S. corn, consuming more than 1.2 billion bushels in 2004
© T. M. Whitmore
Maize as food• Tasty and edible in many stages of
development: immature as corn on the cob mature as dried and ground as grain
• NutritionProcess of soaking maize in water with lime
(from wood ash) to soften for grinding (using a metate y mano) - changes chemical composition (nixtamalization)
Makes some amino acids (needed to make protein) more available (especially lysine)
Increases availability of B vitamins especially niacin (cultures that rely on corn without this process suffer from nutrition deficiencies)