Date post: | 27-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | archibald-mitchell |
View: | 219 times |
Download: | 0 times |
What is theory? Explains why a behaviour or phenomenon
occurs
Why use it? Effective methods for accomplishing behaviour
change Identify key factors + processes to target for change Measurable constructs allow for assessment of
change▪ Basis for detecting success/failure of an intervention
Key Premises
The environment in which one lives can restrict the range of behaviours that are possible
Multiple levels influence our behaviour (ex. physical environment, community, society, government)
Synergistic relationship between the environment and the individual
INDIVIDUAL ENVIRONMEN
TVs.
Predicting movement▪ Moving backwards?▪ Skipping stages
Arbitrary durations 6 months
Complexity of the behaviour Can be in different stages for various PA behaviours
Stage-targeted interventions may not produce longer-term behaviour change
2 Phases
1) Motivation Phase – getting ready to be active
2) Action Phase – engaging and maintaining PA
Self Efficacy
Risk Perceptio
ns
Outcome Expectanci
esGoals Planning
Recovery
Maintenance Initiative
MOTIVATION PHASE
ACTION PHASE
How do we get people into the action phase?How do we get them to maintain this behaviour?
Planning
Recovery
Maintenance Initiative
ACTION PHASE
Self Efficacy
Risk Perceptio
ns
Outcome Expectanci
esGoals Planning
Recovery
Maintenance Initiative
MOTIVATION PHASE
ACTION PHASE
Self Efficacy
Risk Perceptio
ns
Outcome Expectanci
esGoals Planning
Recovery
Maintenance Initiative
MOTIVATION PHASE
ACTION PHASE
Self Efficacy
Risk Perceptio
ns
Outcome Expectanci
esGoals Planning
Recovery
Maintenance Initiative
MOTIVATION PHASE
ACTION PHASE
• Any effort by a human being to alter its own response
• Making sure actions are in line with the goals/intentions
Examined the role of self-monitoring in effective weight control
56 participants – weight loss program
Participants provided with self-monitoring booklet record all food consumption and calories eaten
throughout the week
Members stratified in terms of frequency of self-monitoring
Measured weight change
Self Efficacy
Risk Perceptio
ns
Outcome Expectanci
esGoals Planning
Recovery
Maintenance Initiative
MOTIVATION PHASE
ACTION PHASE
* *
0
200
400
600
800
1000
Week 2 Week 9
Ph
ysic
al acti
vit
y (
METS
m
in/w
k)
Gain
Loss
Mixed
* *
*p<.05
Self Efficacy
Risk Perceptio
ns
Outcome Expectanci
esGoals Planning
Recovery
Maintenance Initiative
MOTIVATION PHASE
ACTION PHASE
All participants (older adults 65yrs+)fill out a lifestyle assessment questionnaire
Intervention Group
Control Group
•15 min face- to-face counseling/feedback regarding activity + nutrition goal setting, monitoring, adjusting goals, sub goals• Counselors help participants create reasonable + obtainable goal
•Standard care • No feedback or counseling regarding goals
Measure Activity and
Diet
Self Efficacy
Risk Perceptio
ns
Outcome Expectanci
esGoals Planning
Recovery
Maintenance Initiative
MOTIVATION PHASE
ACTION PHASE
75 sedentary women (mean age = 48yrs) Randomly Assigned: 1) Action Plans 2) No Action Plans Measure PA at 8 week follow-up
Control Group (no action plans)
Experimental Group(action plans)
Given calendars
Asked to list possible activities they could do to become active
Given calendars
Asked to plan out and record WHEN, WHERE, and WHAT type of PA they planned to do in the next 8 weeks
All participants asked to record on calendars any PA they performed for 8 weeks
211 Patients with CHD Randomly assigned to one of 3 conditions
Measured PA levels at ▪ baseline ▪ 2 months following discharge
Standard Care (Control)
Action Planning Combined Planning
No action or coping plans
3 action plans 3 action plans +3 coping plans
Determination
Motivation
TYPES OF MOTIVATION
Amotivation Extrinsic Intrinsic
• No motivation or complete lack of interest
• Motivation that comes from external sources (4 types)
•Doing something for your own interest or enjoyment
AmotivationIntrinsic
Motivation
Low Self-Determination High Self-Determination
Extrinsic Motivation
External Regulation
Engage in Behaviour for reward
orpunishment
AmotivationIntrinsic
Motivation
Low Self-Determination High Self-Determination
Extrinsic Motivation
External Regulation
Introjected Regulation
BehaviourImposed by self-
imposed pressure
AmotivationIntrinsic
Motivation
Low Self-Determination High Self-Determination
Extrinsic Motivation
External Regulation
Introjected Regulation
Identified Regulation
Engage in behaviourto achieve an outcome
AmotivationIntrinsic
Motivation
Low Self-Determination High Self-Determination
Extrinsic Motivation
External Regulation
Introjected Regulation
IntegratedRegulation
Identified Regulation
Engage in behaviourto confirmsense of
self
AmotivationIntrinsic
Motivation
Low Self-Determination High Self-Determination
Extrinsic Motivation
External Regulation
Introjected Regulation
IntegratedRegulation
Identified Regulation
Autonomy Competence Relatedness
Psychological Needs: Autonomy (self-determination) Competence (experience mastery) Relatedness (social interaction)
PERCEIVED BEHAVIOURAL CONTROL
SELF-EFFICACY
Testing a self-determination theory intervention for motivating tobacco cessation: supporting autonomy and competence in a clinical trial.
N = 1006 Adult Smokers
Intensive Interventi
onCondition
Community Care
Condition
• Public health booklet• List of cessation programs• Encouragement to enroll and speak with MD
• Same community care condition PLUS:• Meet with counselor 4x over 6months• Opportunity to speak with MD
(visits acknowledged patients’ perspectives, supported their initiatives, offered choice about treatment, provided relevant info, minimized pressure and control)